Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#112 - nultweezes (04/09/2013) [-]
User avatar #123 to #112 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/09/2013) [-]
What if I told you...that was a newborn dinosaur?
User avatar #132 to #123 - RoyalNightmare (04/09/2013) [-]
What if I told you...that it still would've died millions of years ago, despite how old it is in the picture?
User avatar #133 to #132 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/09/2013) [-]
But...it's a newly drawn picture of a newborn dinosaur.
So, in no way is it old.
User avatar #134 to #133 - RoyalNightmare (04/09/2013) [-]
Okay, so I'm only going to explain this once. There isn't a single dinosaur that wouldn't have been dead for millions of years. As such, any image of a dinosaur is portraying something millions of years old. It could be a picture of a prehistoric egg, for all it matters. The fact is, what's depicted is as old as dirt.

I officially don't like you, because having to explain how a joke works sucks all of the enjoyment out of it. And it's not even my freaking joke.
User avatar #135 to #134 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/09/2013) [-]
Sir, it's a shame that I have to explain to you, that I was only being sarcastic.

It really takes the fun out of sarcasm, when you have to explain the obvious sarcasm.

And sarcasm, my friend...is older than that drawing of a newborn dinosaur
User avatar #137 to #135 - RoyalNightmare (04/09/2013) [-]
First, I'm not a sir, not that it matters. And I'll be honest, though text is horrible at conveying sarcasm, your posts in no way seemed sarcastic. I honestly don't believe that you were being sarcastic, though at the same time, I don't really care.

Though, you attempting to use my own words was a bit more disappointing than anything. Either way, I don't really feel like sticking nultweezes with a hundred more notifications dragging this out, so I'll bid you a good day.
User avatar #138 to #137 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/09/2013) [-]
So...you're basically saying "I thought you were just an idiot, and still do".

Eat **** my friend. Eat **** .
User avatar #141 to #138 - RoyalNightmare (04/09/2013) [-]
The only reason I'm replying, is because I cannot stand miscommunication. At no point did I think you were an idiot. I just thought you were incorrect. Even geniuses are wrong now and then. If you were sincerely being sarcastic, then I will sincerely apologize for my assumption. I have nothing against you, I really don't. But assuming that you're old enough to drive a car, you're more than aware of the types of people that tend to be on the internet. Since I have no interest in flame wars, or pointless arguments, I tend to nip them at the bud.

So, I say this as honestly as possible: I don't think you're an idiot. Your intelligence is fairly apparent. I simply wanted to avoid a drawn out argument.
#144 to #141 - knuckleheaded (04/09/2013) [-]
Sorry, I had to.
Sorry, I had to.
User avatar #143 to #141 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/09/2013) [-]
Fair enough.
 Friends (0)