Fucking Hufflepuff. The kind of a name is Hufflepuff anyway? I'm not really a Harry Potter fan but is there a real reason why its called that?. l ail‘ I' m in H Harry Potter hufflepuff Black Folk
x

Fucking Hufflepuff

 
Fucking Hufflepuff. The kind of a name is Hufflepuff anyway? I'm not really a Harry Potter fan but is there a real reason why its called that?. l ail‘ I' m in H

The **** kind of a name is Hufflepuff anyway? I'm not really a Harry Potter fan but is there a real reason why its called that?

l ail‘
I' m in Hufflepuff?
Them hope you have a , In time walking
home from Platform Nine" and Three
Quarters at the end Ejf' t' yea, bitch.
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1012
Views: 38897
Favorited: 44
Submitted: 04/08/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to veck submit to reddit

Comments(62):

[ 62 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#4 - ctrlaltwank (04/08/2013) [-]
Haggord is disappoint
#11 - DeadGoomba (04/09/2013) [-]
It's because Hufflepuff is the stoner house:

- They’re mostly considered nice and peaceful.
- They live right by the kitchen.
- Their head of house teaches herbology.
- “Badger” is exactly the kind of animal a stoner would come up with.

Hence the name "HUFF le PUFF".
User avatar #48 to #11 - daentraya (04/09/2013) [-]
Also, their common room is hobbit like. It's the most cozy dahm place in all of Hogwarts. You can enter by tickling a pear, tapping barrels, or fail and be droused in vinegar. It's the most secure house of them all. And honeybadgers. Honeybadgers are awesome.
"evil kids in Slytherin, wannabe heroes in Gryffindor, and everyone who does the actual work in Hufflepuff." - HP and the Methods of Rationality.
Too bad i really dislike the combination of black and yellow
#50 to #11 - anon (04/09/2013) [-]
Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le LE LE LE Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le LE LE LE Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le Le le LE LE LE
#19 to #11 - sparkieemae (04/09/2013) [-]
**** ***** I might actually be a ****** Hufflepuff.
#25 to #11 - tacopie (04/09/2013) [-]
Slytherin is the coke head house.

-They are all assholes
-All of them are rich
-The couple times you see their house its remarkably spotless for a bunch of teenagers
#13 - labs (04/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#24 to #13 - hillbillypowpow (04/09/2013) [-]
I don't know, but it's probably a pretty good seeker.
User avatar #41 to #24 - desdemona (04/09/2013) [-]
you had one job
#26 to #13 - theuncreativekid (04/09/2013) [-]
A FELLOW STARKID!?
A FELLOW STARKID!?
User avatar #39 to #26 - crackedupunicorn (04/09/2013) [-]
What a great find!
#14 to #13 - habanaro (04/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#21 - sonicg (04/09/2013) [-]
Never enough Ravenclaw...
#12 - antisocialtwilight (04/09/2013) [-]
Ravenclaw represent.
#16 - rainytrain (04/09/2013) [-]
Hufflepuff Pride, Suckas!!!!!!!!
#15 - happyphoton (04/09/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9n9wswKMec

Hufflepuff house head explains hufflepuff
#49 - usmcoorah (04/09/2013) [-]
Mfw everyone prefers Ravenclaw because its not evil like Slytherin, a bandwagon like Gryffindor, or gay like Hufflepuff.

That kind of makes Gryffindor the new Ravenclaw and Ravenclaw the new Gryffindor.
#54 to #49 - justtocomment (04/09/2013) [-]
I've always preferred Hufflepuff.
Gryfindor and Slytherin are for those naturally gifted and destined for greatness.
Ravenclaw is notorious for the great thinkers.
Hufflepuff - fiercely loyal. Maybe not the most skilled, but damned if they don't try their ******* hardest...
User avatar #55 to #54 - usmcoorah (04/09/2013) [-]
Honestly if Hufflepuff had a different name I feel like I'd prefer it.
#56 to #55 - justtocomment (04/09/2013) [-]
I just never understood why they kept the Slytherin house a thing after the founder turned out to be, you know, a ******* loony?
#18 to #3 - tunasandwhich (04/09/2013) [-]
**tunasandwhich rolled a random image posted in comment #41 at might be on to something ** STRYPER
**tunasandwhich rolled a random image posted in comment #41 at might be on to something ** STRYPER
User avatar #29 - iluvscuba (04/09/2013) [-]
Huffle badger don't give a ****
User avatar #17 - tigersstripes (04/09/2013) [-]
those EYYYYEEEES
#43 to #17 - anon (04/09/2013) [-]
ur a faget
User avatar #63 to #43 - tigersstripes (04/09/2013) [-]
holy **** , a girl on funnyjunk? NAW
#10 - lolerlaura (04/09/2013) [-]
There was a Harry Potter exhibit at my local science center a few years ago. I went there on a date and the first thing they had was a working Sorting hat.

It put me into Hufflepuff :(
#44 to #10 - anon (04/09/2013) [-]
i hope ur date dumped u rite then and there
#42 to #10 - lotengo (04/09/2013) [-]
MFWi take my date to a Harry Potter exhibit
User avatar #35 - thatnerdyguy (04/09/2013) [-]
I don't see anything wrong with Hufflepuff.
I mean, I guess I see all of the non-Ravenclaw houses as being equally inferior.
#46 - greenwithenvy (04/09/2013) [-]
In Harry Potter you have the Time Turner, can literally go back in time, yet they never use them to stop Voldemort/anyone else who is evil? kind of a dick move Albus...
User avatar #47 to #46 - ultimoz (04/09/2013) [-]
I hope you're joking.
User avatar #52 to #47 - acidjunk (04/09/2013) [-]
How does it work? Im curious, since greenwithenvy's thing obviously cant work
User avatar #57 to #52 - ultimoz (04/09/2013) [-]
Basically you can't stop voldemort or anyone else by going back in time because it's kind of a law. If you change something that major it would mess a lot of things up that could potentially make the world worse of than with voldemort.
User avatar #58 to #57 - greenwithenvy (04/09/2013) [-]
I don't mean going back like, from Harry's time all the way to when Voldemort was young, I mean when he was just rising up why not do time-turner stuff. It would make the world a worse place? I doubt it >.>
User avatar #59 to #58 - ultimoz (04/09/2013) [-]
I'm not the best at explaining **** . Have you read the books? If not, don't make statements like that and expect positive feedback. You don't think people would have thought about that before?
User avatar #60 to #59 - greenwithenvy (04/09/2013) [-]
"I don't know the answer, so I'm going to assume you aren't a true fan and haven't read books. Also J.K Rowling is the best writer ever and would NEVER have ANY plot holes AT ALL."
User avatar #62 to #60 - ultimoz (04/09/2013) [-]
Alright let me give it another go. If they used the time turner to kill Voldemort, multiple things would be different. For instance, Harry would probably have never met Ron or Hermione. Hell, he could have been in Ravenclaw.

Also the time turner goes back an hour every turn, so it would take a very long time to go back that far. And once you're there, you can't come back. You'd have to calculate all the hours and everything.

And also, Hermione handed back the time turner she had to the ministry of magic and then the time turner stock was completely destroyed in the fifth(?) book.
User avatar #64 to #62 - greenwithenvy (04/10/2013) [-]
my point isn't to go back from the present time, but when voldemort was JUST starting out killing people, have an Auror go back a few days before with the turner and then just wait out the time. hell it could even spawn it's own book series of Time Turner Aurors in a "minority report" wizard style book.
User avatar #61 to #60 - ultimoz (04/09/2013) [-]
Nice one.
#27 - anon (04/09/2013) [-]
Seriously do you guys have to screencap and make jokes about every ******* scene of these movies?
User avatar #36 to #27 - kakarikocucco (04/09/2013) [-]
because people with senses of humor come here to laugh.
User avatar #53 to #36 - Dropkicksxxx ONLINE (04/09/2013) [-]
betcha these anon fag comments are all the aame 12yo, juat trying to make it look like he got someone to agree. Probably some weird self confidence deal,
#28 to #27 - anon (04/09/2013) [-]
Agreed, Harry Potter sucks they should just let it die already
#30 to #27 - anon (04/09/2013) [-]
Word. I'm so sick of this crap.
User avatar #1 - luckyshotdk (04/08/2013) [-]
the founders name was Hulda Hufflepuff.
User avatar #2 to #1 - veck (04/08/2013) [-]
Thanks bro/brah.
User avatar #22 to #1 - collegedood (04/09/2013) [-]
can't you read the title? her first name was ******* .
#6 to #1 - vaginismus (04/08/2013) [-]
NO it's HELGA, HELGAAA
NO it's HELGA, HELGAAA
User avatar #7 to #1 - Furubatsu (04/08/2013) [-]
In what version? It's always been Helga
#45 - itsfreecola (04/09/2013) [-]
or he could fly home
or he could fly home
User avatar #34 - Yojimbo (04/09/2013) [-]
I always imagined Hufflepuff's as the normal kids. Well, normal by wizard standards. Kids who are just struggling to get by in school. Kids we don't have a brilliant female friend, aren't the teacher's secret favorites, and who don't have mortal enemies. They just want to do their homework in peace, and pass their O.W.L.S. Probably get real sick of Gryffindor and Slytherin's ****
User avatar #33 - demandsgayversion (04/09/2013) [-]
If you're a Hufflepuff, you won't know there's anything wrong with being a Hufflepuff.
[ 62 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)