Titel. . ibelieveso ems a', III 'Cl we literally may be en the verge elf nuclear war and all we can due is make fun kim jarig m burce: . uia. It's not our fault his cartoonish antics make him seem like a Looney Tunes villain. tumblr
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (371)
[ 371 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
90 comments displayed.
#1 - crazymero
Reply +113
(04/08/2013) [-]
The dog that barks,doesn't bite.
#2 to #1 - kingwaffles
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#165 to #1 - toxicrocker
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#143 to #1 - yomommabinshoppin
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
I don't know about that, I was bitten by a barking dog
#13 to #1 - jinkazama
Reply +2
(04/08/2013) [-]
Usually a dog that bites barks...
#16 to #13 - samoaspider
Reply +9
(04/08/2013) [-]
no, the dog who growls bites. i have the experience
no, the dog who growls bites. i have the experience
#241 to #16 - hydraetis
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Except for true huskies. They just bite.
#6 to #1 - bitchplzzz
Reply +427
(04/08/2013) [-]
yeah but I would be scared of a barking dog with a nuclear missile and unreliable aim.
#7 to #6 - crazymero
Reply +22
(04/08/2013) [-]
don't worry dude,he uses apple maps,it will probably hit the moon.
#10 to #7 - chuckbillrow
Reply +2
(04/08/2013) [-]
assuming his missiles had enough delta V to reach the moon and were powered by apple maps... they would make it a few meters before crashing horribly
#54 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(04/08/2013) [-]
Do you really need to call it delta V? You can't just call it velocity like a normal person?
#59 to #54 - chuckbillrow
Reply +2
(04/08/2013) [-]
people say "this rocket has X delta V" because otherwise we would have to say "this rocket is capable of changing its velocity by X meters per second" and ain't nobody got time for the latter
#62 to #59 - anon
Reply 0
(04/08/2013) [-]
I know, and on paper when we're doing math it makes sense, its just wierd and pretentious to use it colloquially though
#210 to #62 - saladtongsofdeath
Reply +12
(04/09/2013) [-]
says the guy using colloquially
#52 to #6 - theableacher
Reply +2
(04/08/2013) [-]
I live in Denmark. Small Country. Small Chance.
#212 to #6 - scapeartist
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
>He has a single crude missle that might not even hit the U.S.
>America has over 2000 nuclear weapons ready for launch.
>Do you really think Kim Jong Un would even consider attacking the U.S? It would be suicide.
#175 to #6 - anon
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Don't worry.
They may have unreliable aim but they also have **** rockets.
#26 - CollinTB
Reply +171
(04/08/2013) [-]
It's not our fault his cartoonish antics make him seem like a Looney Tunes villain.
It's not our fault his cartoonish antics make him seem like a Looney Tunes villain.
#3 - apatheticalcare **User deleted account**
Reply +132
(04/08/2013) [-]
#322 to #3 - pinstre
Reply +5
(04/09/2013) [-]
*raughing
#8 - frijoles
Reply +95
(04/08/2013) [-]
honestly, I think that is the whole point. There isn't much any of us CAN do. So, while we have the ability to still make jokes, by God we will do that to the best of our ability until he quits threatening or we're nothing but ash.

pic related.
#235 to #8 - anon
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
"we're nothing but ash"? yeah.....that 1950's nuclear tech is very intimidating....
#310 to #8 - lunarflare
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Not to mention their missiles can't actually hit us. They can get a bit of Alaska, but who ever gave a damn about Alaska?
#388 to #8 - anon
Reply 0
(04/11/2013) [-]
Or, when he's nothing but stray atoms. I'm fairly sure they realize that attacking America would be the end of their country, whether it started WIII or not.
#31 to #8 - lellone
Reply +13
(04/08/2013) [-]
"we'll make jokes until we're nothing but ashes"
that sounds pretty poetic
#86 to #31 - aerosol
Reply +9
(04/08/2013) [-]
It's almost profound, even.
#128 to #86 - frijoles
Reply +5
(04/09/2013) [-]
quite nice of both of you fine citizens to say.
#82 - jellytamer
Reply +28
(04/08/2013) [-]
so can someone explain this?
Is the leader(DJ 4DM1N) of this site really the leader of north korea?...
if so...that just raises further questions.
if not, who is he? and how did this rumor start?
#279 to #82 - anon
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Newfag
#87 to #82 - freshswaggason
Reply +1
(04/08/2013) [-]
#101 to #82 - crocodilelord ONLINE
Reply +1
(04/08/2013) [-]
#116 to #82 - Ottovan
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
Oh, man....


That's.... uh.... kinda sad, man.
#209 to #82 - mariasaturnina
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
I really, really want that to be true. I really, really want DJ 4DM1N to be the actual leader of North Korea.

even though I know it's not true
#167 to #82 - stoneddolphin
Reply +2
(04/09/2013) [-]
Your stupidity actually made me laugh.
#99 to #82 - chuclitsaltyballs
Reply +12
(04/08/2013) [-]
thumb for stupidity so bad it made me laugh
#147 to #82 - Crusader
Reply +3
(04/09/2013) [-]
No, it's an old joke.
No one knows who he really is, he has kept his anonymity very well.
There was one picture up that showed that he was a man of possibly arab lineage (slightly tan skin with a lot of hair) in his mid to late 20's.
#352 to #147 - saladtongsofdeath
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
like this?? am i doing it right DJ 4DM1N?
#92 to #82 - maskedguardianmkii
Reply +5
(04/08/2013) [-]
Guys, I'm not entirely sure, but I think he might be serious.
#169 to #92 - stoneddolphin
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Hahahahaha
#90 to #82 - neutralgray
Reply +6
(04/08/2013) [-]
Of course he's Kim Jong-Un. I don't see any way else that would make sense.
#96 to #82 - mrsoup
Reply +6
(04/08/2013) [-]
The dumbassery in this post amazes me.
#138 to #82 - phanact
Reply +7
(04/09/2013) [-]
Yea
He is
He'll nuke you
#94 to #82 - markertemp
Reply +11
(04/08/2013) [-]
For years, DJ 4DM1N was using Kim Jong il as his profile picture, and it became a running gag. When il died, he switched to using un.
#105 to #94 - jellytamer
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
thanks for being the only person to help out with this!
so do we know who DJ 4DM1N really is?
#111 to #105 - neutralgray
Reply +3
(04/09/2013) [-]
No, actually. He's kept his identity secret for years. His name escaped during our lawsuit with The Oatmeal but most don't remember and we supposedly got swiched to a new Ad-min afterwards but due to his character we can assume Ad-min is the same old Ad-min.
#120 to #111 - andriod
Reply +4
(04/09/2013) [-]
You can tell just by personality that he is the same.
He probably did leave for awhile but he restarted his trolling/time wasting activity's 1-2 months ago.

#261 to #111 - beetman
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
There are actually three owners of the sight.
#129 to #111 - kasperscar
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
He uploaded a picture of himself once.
He was handsome.
shortish hair.
and was wearing a sweater
#194 to #129 - mondominiman
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Was this him?
tinyurl.com/cjvldnw
#377 to #194 - kasperscar
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
No.
#325 to #194 - SomebodyGetTheDoor
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
That's the creator of TheOatmeal, Matthew Inman.

>inb4 image caption
#341 to #325 - mondominiman
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Well you said short hair and sweater. That's what I saw.
#385 to #341 - SomebodyGetTheDoor
Reply 0
(04/10/2013) [-]
I said nothing
#386 to #385 - mondominiman
Reply 0
(04/10/2013) [-]
Wasn't you, I didn't see who I responded too. The other guy said short hair and sweater.
#195 to #82 - frysandaburger
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
#107 to #82 - durkadurka
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Well of course. What made you think otherwise?

#192 to #82 - meganinja
Reply +2
(04/09/2013) [-]
Guise. What if Dj 4DM1N ackually is Kim Jong-Un? He could be using the only computer in Best Korea to run the site, and look through all the threads to see debates that expose 1st world nations' military secrets, their weaknesses, etc.
#85 to #82 - nsali
Reply +86
(04/08/2013) [-]
youre a special kind of stupid huh?
#183 - mrstalin
Reply +32
(04/09/2013) [-]
Meanwhile on the news:
"Quebec was hit by a nuclear missile today that was intended for the United States.
The Prime Minister was killed in the blast, the guy firing it was an alcohol."
#218 to #183 - anon
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
GUYZ HE'S SERIOUS
#189 to #183 - sensimilia ONLINE
Reply +2
(04/09/2013) [-]
"an alcohol." good times.
#43 - peggscott
Reply +27
(04/08/2013) [-]
The way I see it, If they were going to do it they would have by now...   
   
MFW they do actually fire...
The way I see it, If they were going to do it they would have by now...

MFW they do actually fire...
#163 to #43 - stoneddolphin
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
US officials say that it might happen this week... Meh
#374 to #163 - peggscott
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
Yeah, But I might also win the lottery this week...

I get what you're saying though
#317 to #43 - girrafalopegis
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#375 to #43 - norwegiandude
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
Thumbed because Misfits
#376 to #375 - peggscott
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
I have a few of them...
I have a few of them...
#378 to #376 - norwegiandude
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
The quality of the series dropped when Sheehan left... Whyyy did he do that?
The quality of the series dropped when Sheehan left... Whyyy did he do that?
#379 to #378 - peggscott
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
It was still a great show though, they done a good job with hid replacement.
It was still a great show though, they done a good job with hid replacement.
#217 - drfreeman
Reply +21
(04/09/2013) [-]
"Nuclear war" If a toddler throws a ball at you, that doesn't mean you're playing baseball.
#227 to #217 - hammarhead
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
I appreciate your degredation of north korea, but china is ally to best korea and they have nukes
#237 to #227 - drfreeman
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
China has a lot to lose if their friends go shooting off nukes. They have already expressed their opposition towards North Korea's threats. We shouldn't declare a state of nuclear war if one angry little man manages to throw together a nuke. If China we're looking to be a part of this, they would be giving North Korea the funds to do it. They still aren't that grave of a threat.
#236 to #227 - luiselvergas
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
why would china would go to war with america?
#238 to #236 - drfreeman
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
They wouldn't. Our debt to them would vanish.
#239 to #238 - hammarhead
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
I know I'ts very unlikely for them to start lobbing nukes, but america certainly doesn't want to start getting on uneven ground with a power like China.
#240 to #239 - drfreeman
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Oh hell no, you have that right. We may be all high and mighty and everything.. but we'd have no chance against China
#264 to #240 - Lulzilla
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Actually we'd take China down pretty easily. They have numbers. That's IT. Their equipment isn't as good as ours and they don't have as much of it. Our Navy is pretty much everywhere. It would be very easy to invade then the fight would be in China instead of over here. The time it would take them to assemble their Navy and come all the way over here it would be obliterated. One Destroyer. Just one and an entire city is leveled. Said Destroyers have the ability to shoot down incoming missiles so it's pretty darn protected. That plus the Marine Corps (Oorah) can invade the beaches easily. Look at the US with Vietnam. We were winning despite the numbers they had. We lost because we left since it was no longer worth fighting for.
#382 to #264 - luiselvergas
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
dude the chinese air force will **** you up they are pretty legit not to mention they have a huge ass army with pretty good equipment in which their ******* soldiers have been training since 15
#383 to #382 - Lulzilla
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
One, You are COMPLETELY wrong. You obviously have no idea about our military's. Sure China has a lot of troops but we have a lot of VERY powerful missiles. Chinese equipment is poorly made since they have to outfit MILLIONS of troops. The standard issue Chinese rifle is prone to jamming and misfiring.
The Chinese Air Force cannot compete with our Air Force. That huge defense budget isn't just spent nothing. Every branch in the US has their own version of an Air Force. The Navy, Army, Marine Corp all have fighter pilots and various other air crafts.
The Chinese minimum Military age is 18. Get your facts right. They're training is nothing compared to ours. Our troops are trained by BATTLE HARDEN Instructors. China's military hasn't had any combat experience so they do not know what it's like. If the Marine Corp the smallest branch in the US Military can withhold a battle with hundreds maybe thousands of Viet-congs then we can handle the Chinese as-well. Like I said in my other comment. All we need is One Destroyer and we can take multiple beaches easily. We have a **** ton of Destroyers all over the world. Imagine a whole Fleet of Destroyers on the coast of China.
#289 to #264 - asschwitz
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Our carriers are like mini-floating bases capable of leveling entire cities, it's ridiculous the amount of firepower you have on there, 1 is a big enough threat itself, imagine a fleet of 3 accompanied with nuclear submarines and destroyers. Plenty of force to take on China, not to mention our troops have combat experience from our affairs in the middle east, Where as China's military doesn't.
#267 to #264 - patriotpenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
nice profile picture btw
#246 to #217 - Lulzilla
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
You're under thinking it. If N.Korea launched missiles at us the missiles would quickly be taken out by our Navy. They can shoot them down when they're still in space. But the fact that N.Korea actually TRIED to attack us like that they'd be invaded. If America went after the Taliban and AQ the way we did imagine how we'd react to having a country attempt to Nuke us. The Taliban destroyed a couple of buildings and ended thousands of lives. A nuclear attack on New York City would end MILLIONS of lives and completely obliterate a huge part of Americas culture and history. Even if it was a failed attempt we'd DESTROY North Korea for it.
#258 to #246 - drfreeman
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Sure we'd destroy them, but that's irrelevant. The threat they pose to us is nothing compared to the threat we pose to them. America will take every chance it can to jerk off democracy into a country in need of "Liberation".. but I was only speaking of nuclear war. If they nuked us.. we wouldn't nuke back, we would go and tear down the government and establish a new one.. because honestly, a good majority of the citizens realize their unjust treatment and have no real hatred for the rest of the world.. it's just forced on them.
#274 to #258 - Lulzilla
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
We wouldn't nuke them seeing as it's against the Geneva convention. We will NEVER nuke anyone unless it is ABSOLUTELY necessary. Also I don't think you understand what the US has been doing these past 10 years. We're not forcing democracy on them. THEY WANTED IT. We took down Saadam because he posed a huge threat towards us. They wanted a new leader. Afghan is already has democracy but the terrorist groups terrorizes the government and people so that having a Democracy is pretty much pointless. They want us to get rid of these groups but they want us to do it in less destructive ways which is VERY hard to do.
#254 to #246 - patriotpenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
they dont even have the teechnology to launch missles
#260 to #254 - Lulzilla
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
They do. They don't have the technology to launch heavy duty missiles like we can. They can always do what we did with Japan and use a Plane. They could just use lighter less destructive missiles but none other the less catastrophic.
#266 to #260 - patriotpenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
even if our army (and souths ) are able to destroy their nukes the worst they can do is bomb souel , that and if a war broke out without nukes there is no doubt that north korea would get the seven shades of **** kicked out of them,their underequiped and poorly trained compaired to america and south korea
#134 - Crusader
Reply +21
(04/09/2013) [-]
Charlie Chaplin mocked Adolf Hitler
#208 to #134 - ivoryhammer
Reply +3
(04/09/2013) [-]
So did Disney, Looney Toons mocked the Japanese
#41 - goochtvi
Reply +20
(04/08/2013) [-]
It'll just be another 7 hour war...