Hulk Talk. Seriously though no homo. Some homo
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #2 - voiceless ONLINE (04/06/2013) [+] (25 replies)
Then what's with the hole attacking black widow & Thor in that airship thingy?
Doesn't seem to be very under control at all.
User avatar #3 to #2 - jacencaedus (04/06/2013) [-]
His whole control over the powers depends on just that, control, to be more specific, control over his anger. If he is caught off guard or get's hurt like he did then, then he is going to lose his ****
User avatar #55 - famousfatwalrus (04/06/2013) [+] (5 replies)
I thought it was pretty obvious.

Who watches The Avengers but not anything else?
#60 to #55 - llamafinger (04/06/2013) [-]
#215 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (04/07/2013) [+] (11 replies)
This image has expired
some people say i look like Edward Norton
im ready for the red thumbs
#220 to #215 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (04/07/2013) [-]
This image has expired
and the governor
#243 - mrsoup (04/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
#236 - awesomeradish (04/07/2013) [+] (5 replies)
If only Ed Norton was cast for The Avengers...
#152 - johnnyspicywiener (04/06/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Comment Picture
#95 - sirbrentcoe (04/06/2013) [+] (6 replies)
it's just a little confusing to me why they keep changing Hulk actors. Why not stick with Ed Norton? dude's a ******* great actor...
User avatar #31 - ablt (04/06/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Then why couldn't he control himself on that flying boat? He should have been lucid.
User avatar #33 to #31 - houmand (04/06/2013) [-]
The thing is: If he becomes the Hulk on his own accord, he controls it. Or rather, he nudges the big guy in the right direction. If he's threatened (knocked down under some pipes by surprise) he instinctually transforms and thus hasn't directed the Hulk side of him at anything, so he's completely out of control.
User avatar #200 - itsnotunusual (04/07/2013) [-]
Let me help:
Its like when you really need a ****
So you need a **** , youre holding it in, cos you dont want to **** yourself, on the helicarrier, or whatever its called, he was distracted, and accidentally **** himself (the metaphor)
With the big worm monster thing he just said **** it and **** himself voluntarily

All arguments solved, peace on earth
#174 - Penn (04/07/2013) [+] (11 replies)
Here's my problem with The Avengers:

The movie Captain America takes place in the 40s where they turn Steve Rogers into a super soldier with their advanced technology. The Incredible Hulk, however, takes place during modern times (proven by the fact that at the end Tony Stark says he's trying to put a team together, so it's obvious that he has already created the iron man technology). But, in The Incredible Hulk, they use the SAME technology on Emil Blonsky to make him a super soldier. That's what I don't understand. How is technology way more advanced but in the 40s Steve Rogers' body literally changed because of what they gave him, but approximately 70 years later that technology went to **** ?
#185 to #174 - abcdxyz (04/07/2013) [-]
The original formula/experiment that made Captain America was lost when the scientist who made it died (admittedly I feel like this is a plot hole, he makes a super secret super weapon and doesn't have the formula stored multiple times over with the government for safe keeping, nor does anyone who worked with him apparently know it) so they have spent the next 70 years trying to figure out what he put in that formula because they have no idea what it is. The Hulk ends up being another failed attempt, just one that results in another "super being" instead of killing the test subject.

This is my understanding and if someone wants to expand/correct me then feel free to go ahead
User avatar #358 - pottslande (04/07/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Really? People nitpicked this scene because he lost control on the ship?

God dammit, he can lose control in a super stressful situation. That's the entire point. That's what they were worried about. If he had control all the time he would have no weakness. It makes SENSE why are you people arguing this?

God dammit
User avatar #227 - Furry (04/07/2013) [+] (7 replies)
User avatar #229 to #227 - megatrollinator (04/07/2013) [-]
He's still capable of losing his temper
#287 - Her (04/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
People seriously thought that he suddenly learned to control it halfway through the movie?
#261 - berkut (04/07/2013) [-]
That's all? I mean, a lot people didn't know that? I knew that already and I haven't even watched the movie.
#378 - FoonyJoonk (04/07/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Did none of you pay attention to the film at all? The ******* Tesseract was influencing them all. That's why Bruce couldn't control it. I'm surprised so many people missed that...
#385 - bazda (04/07/2013) [-]
I was unaware that this was even a topic of debate. How could you NOT know this?   
.gif absolutely related.
I was unaware that this was even a topic of debate. How could you NOT know this?

.gif absolutely related.
#354 - jedisquirrel (04/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Comment Picture
User avatar #265 - maskedguardianmkii (04/07/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Okay... couple questions.
1: If his secret is that he's "always angry", wouldn't that mean he's always the Hulk?
2: If he learned to control his powers so well, long before the Avengers took place, then howcome he still had an outburst that nearly resulted in bringing the airship down, killing everyone on board?
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)