North Korea. Oh France. Frags: surrenders to North /rfe, '". .. "h, france North Korea War
x
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #4 - Loppytaffy (04/06/2013) [-]
I'm English, I'm genetically predisposed to hate the French, and even I resepect that the French fight their battles through to the end.

Okay, so they might lose; lose Calais or Canada or whatever. But they still fight, and helped American win their independance, whilst Germany helped England to fight America by getting blind drunk.

Italy on the other hand, Italy is Europe's bitch (I say Europe because the Ottoman Empire was not Europe at the time, Turkey has only recently joined). "sorry, yes Austria/Spain/Saxony/Britain/France/Germany/Allies, how far would you like me to bend over for you?"
User avatar #5 to #4 - bokkos (04/06/2013) [-]
Not to mention the French Resistance during WWII were a bunch of badass ************* . Nazi soldiers absolutely everywhere, and they had balls so large they threw them onto train tracks to disrupt Nazi shipments.
User avatar #9 to #5 - smokedmeatlog (04/06/2013) [-]
Didn't they lose their country then?
#22 to #9 - taintedangel (04/06/2013) [-]
France had no choice but to surrender at that point because they haven't fully recovered from WWI and only did it so they wouldn't be massacred by the invading Nazi forces. France still did everything they could to resist their Nazi occupiers.

BTW, you ever heard of a liberator? Nice little gun that can be concealed in your palm that French Resistance fighters would use when they sneak up on Nazi soldiers, kill them silently, and 'liberate' the Nazi's weapons for their use.

Pic is the gun.
User avatar #29 to #22 - admiralen ONLINE (04/06/2013) [-]
the french sounds like cowards
User avatar #33 to #29 - taintedangel (04/06/2013) [-]
Tell that to their battle history. out of 168 battles: they won 109, lost 49, and had a draw 10 times. Get out.
User avatar #35 to #33 - admiralen ONLINE (04/06/2013) [-]
they lost against the germans three times in the span of 50 years, they fight the people they surrendered to constantly and ambush them, theyre pussies
User avatar #48 to #29 - Loppytaffy (04/06/2013) [-]
Yes, not like America who just nuke civilians.
User avatar #52 to #48 - admiralen ONLINE (04/06/2013) [-]
in a war like that one theyre not civilians anymore, the factories and industries in the two towns were supporting the japanese warfunds
User avatar #53 to #52 - Loppytaffy (04/06/2013) [-]
So you're telling me that every tax paying American is a soldier now?
User avatar #54 to #53 - admiralen ONLINE (04/06/2013) [-]
im saying the ones who work on the weapons and vehicles are
User avatar #56 to #54 - Loppytaffy (04/06/2013) [-]
no, every person who pays tax to their country is funding the military, and in effect helping the cause.
User avatar #57 to #56 - admiralen ONLINE (04/06/2013) [-]
indirectly, killing tax payers wont hurt the military as much as killing the ones making their weapons and vehicles
User avatar #46 to #29 - bokkos (04/06/2013) [-]
So that's why they commanded not one, not two, but three Empires over their history, possess an extraordinary track record in every war they've been in, and have given birth to some of the most accomplished generals, leaders, artists and scientists the world has ever known?
Drown yourself in sulfuric acid so we don't have to dispose of your wretched carcass.
User avatar #51 to #46 - admiralen ONLINE (04/06/2013) [-]
and yet they still managed to lose to a nation only 50 years old, infact the reason i think they suck is cause they continuosly fail, they lose constantly they caused wwii and they ****** dubbed csi miami
User avatar #49 to #46 - Loppytaffy (04/06/2013) [-]
Just three?
But, did they never lead the Holy Roman Empire? I know Habsburg had it for the most part but some other countries got to lead, no?
And then there's Napoleon, old Empire of Charlmagne, did they lead Flanders? What about East Roman? Pretty sure they had a generic French Empire, too.
User avatar #55 to #49 - bokkos (04/06/2013) [-]
Three exclusively French empires; They were indeed part of many more
User avatar #50 to #9 - Loppytaffy (04/06/2013) [-]
Look at it this way; Nordics are a group of five badasses and their badass islands that not even Russia ***** with.
Denmark fought the Nazis for a grand total of half and hour, and spent the rest of the war waiting on them, hand and foot.

At least France fought. France fought until the very last. And so did Britain- we pushed them back, but had run out of fire power, so in theory we had won, but had nothing to keep it that way. Which is why America is able to claim that "they won" the war.
User avatar #21 - noodlelover (04/06/2013) [-]
You know france only surrendered in WW2 because if they didnt all of paris would have been destroyed...they werent as lucky as the british who have a huge channel of water dividing them from the rest of europe....
User avatar #24 to #21 - toughactintinactin (04/06/2013) [-]
And they do have an extensive military history beyond that as well.
User avatar #38 to #24 - noodlelover (04/06/2013) [-]
THANK YOU the ungrateful american cunts wont even acknowledge that they wouldnt be here if not for the french
#19 - jarofdirt ONLINE (04/06/2013) [-]
#11 - TheGreatAnon (04/06/2013) [-]
North Korea: Fire Ze Missile!   
America: Really dude...just really?   
NK: All glory to Kim jong un!   
America: ...This little 			****		 serious?   
   
NK: ~Launch Failes, bails out into the ocean~   
.... Our great Kim Jong Un has decided to spare you!   
   
America: Hahahahaha, No. You're Glory, My boot of Freedom.   
~Launches bombers, North Korea now renamed to the Plain of Glass~   
   
America: That's how it's done Bitches, now get me a soda!
North Korea: Fire Ze Missile!
America: Really dude...just really?
NK: All glory to Kim jong un!
America: ...This little **** serious?

NK: ~Launch Failes, bails out into the ocean~
.... Our great Kim Jong Un has decided to spare you!

America: Hahahahaha, No. You're Glory, My boot of Freedom.
~Launches bombers, North Korea now renamed to the Plain of Glass~

America: That's how it's done Bitches, now get me a soda!
#36 to #11 - ybigballz (04/06/2013) [-]
no renamed "somearea" pronounced sumaria
#12 to #11 - garymuthafuknoak (04/06/2013) [-]
'merrica
'merrica
User avatar #14 - reginleif (04/06/2013) [-]
That's pretty much all the help we're going to get from all of Europe.

They'd rather sip tea while complaining about the US to even bother doing **** .

At most we'll get some beta company from the UK just so they can say they ******** helped, and maybe a Prince for good PR.

Getting real tired of your **** Europe.
User avatar #37 - mrgusti (04/06/2013) [-]
the ignorance of Americans never sizes to amaze me, you would still be a British colony if not for the French, also if north Korea attacks you wont just eliminate them or drop a nuclear bomb on them how do you think the Chinese would react to a nuclear assault so close to their soil, also the north Koreans have a very big army and many allies so yeah.
User avatar #47 to #37 - reginleif (04/06/2013) [-]
I don't even feel like formatting my **** to such an ignorant post. Here.

1. France only helped the US to oppose Britain, like it always does. The US was simply another battleground for them.

2.US has given France just as much if not more aid, if you JUST count WW2.

3. No nukes, but we could eliminate the entire Korean peninsula with just conventional weapons.

4. What allies you retard? China is the only thing holding that piece of **** country together....and even they are getting tired of their **** . China will not risk losing international support fighting an offensive war with the US over Korea, if anything they will probably invade first to keep the US out of it's backyard.

In conclusion: You are ******* retard, so yeah.
User avatar #58 to #47 - mrgusti (04/07/2013) [-]
1.it does not matter if they only helped them, with out their aid they would not have won the British
2.that does not Contradict the aid they gave you
3.no they have a larger army all in all, and you had to fight on their soil.
4.they don't have many but they still would get support if Americans would invade their soil from american hating countries organizations
in conclusion: so yeah no need to use profanity because you don't have any manners
User avatar #59 to #58 - reginleif (04/07/2013) [-]
1. It does matter because motivation is a HUGE factor in whether something gets praise of not.
2. If you bitched about you lending me 50$ when I lent you 200$ I say something is paid and reminding someone just reminds them of the debt they owe you.
3. They have a larger army....... with ****** ww2 era equipment. Don't forget that South Korea will be giving men and a base for our troops. They can't win a conventional war.
4. Name the countries (besides china who would never join in anyways) who would assist the Koreans against the US, and are in fact powerful enough to do so.

In conclusion, manners are wasted on the Stupid. Don't say retarded things if you don't like being called retarded. So Yeah.
User avatar #60 to #59 - mrgusti (04/07/2013) [-]
i don't want to argue with a man/woman witch allows him such arrogance and idiocy
User avatar #61 to #60 - reginleif (04/07/2013) [-]
;/ It's not arrogance, but logic which allows me to conclude that a country that cannot even feed it's own people and is isolated by the international community cannot defeat a Military superpower.

It is idiocy to suggest otherwise.

But I'll take that as "conversation over", and leave you to your ramblings. ^^
User avatar #62 to #61 - mrgusti (04/07/2013) [-]
>not arrogance
>military superpower
pick one

they outnumber you 3 to 1 they also have the advantage of homeland, they cannot feed their people implying there is no people starving in america, their government spends billions of dollars in warfare and therefore dose not care about starving people doesn't sound like america at all, and they do not have ww2 era equipment so look up facts before you call me a retard for not knowing facts
User avatar #63 to #62 - reginleif (04/07/2013) [-]
>i don't want to argue with a man/woman witch allows him such arrogance and idiocy
>comes back to argue

>.>

It's not arrogance to acknowledge the fact that the US spends an enormous amount of money on it's military and is ahead of the curve on these technologies. It's fact.

>they outnumber you 3 to 1<

>implying that the side with the most people always wins battles.

Casualty wise America has one of the best ratios ever in military history when it comes to enemy/American dead.

Homeland advantage is mitigated by the fact that the South Koreans ALSO have a homeland advantage, and will be providing us with men/supplies/ and a launchpad.

Just because there are poor in America, doesn't exclude the fact that the poor in Korea are much more numerous and the poverty much more extreme ty. And this is the side you think could win? Idiot.

And while they may not have exactly ww2 era equipment, they are NOWHERE near the level of our aircraft carriers, bombers, and missiles. Don't delude yourself, the only advantage they have is their numbers, and even that can turn against them if their supplies are cut.
#23 - kilik (04/06/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#16 - TheRiot (04/06/2013) [-]
I wish I could give this tem thumbs but you defiantly have mine
User avatar #17 to #16 - defiantly (04/06/2013) [-]
You probably meant to use "definitely".
User avatar #18 to #16 - captainredfish (04/06/2013) [-]
If you out an A, in definitely, then you are definitely an A-hole.
0
#15 - yodaddysofat has deleted their comment [-]
#6 - itsfreecola (04/06/2013) [-]
sad but true
#8 to #6 - kevman (04/06/2013) [-]
Guess he finally grew up
#3 - walkerjam (04/06/2013) [-]
**walkerjam rolled a random image posted in comment #62 at how to draw anime character **
Newly instated president of France, chosen by the North Koreans.
 Friends (0)