Truth. . you know in like 20 or 30 years or so theres gonna be a section in history books dedicated to this time period where gays were fighting for their right


you know in like 20 or 30 years or so
theres gonna be a section in history
books dedicated to this time period
where gays were fighting for their
right to marry and suffering from
and the kids learning about it in
class are going to be disgusted by
the mere fact that gays had to even
try to fight for what was rightfully
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 17637
Favorited: 38
Submitted: 04/03/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to celticsyoyo submit to reddit


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #56 - tocoolforyouinajar (04/04/2013) [-]
The year is 2540, a student in history class notices something off about his textbook.

“How come these textbooks skip the years 1990 through 1999?”

The teacher puts his air-marker down on the table, lowers his head, and sighs. “Because…” he lifts his head, a single tear rolls down his cheek, “only 90’s kids remember the 90’s”
#72 to #56 - shrinemaiden **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #84 to #56 - yunablade (04/04/2013) [-]
"How come we still have textbooks in 2540, what is this, medieval times?"

Would have been a better question.
#97 - holyturkey (04/04/2013) [-]
Pfft, kids will never know they will be to busy ripping pages out of the books to roll with.
User avatar #38 - srskate (04/04/2013) [-]
History is kind of like growing up.

You look back and think "was I really that stupid?"
User avatar #22 - outerspacebar (04/04/2013) [-]
From a fag, thanks for that. I needed to smile.
#92 to #22 - iggyblanco (04/04/2013) [-]
Sorry I just like that GIF. You guys will get your marriage rights, don't worry. It's ridiculous that it's not already legal and I think people more and more are starting to realize that.
Sorry I just like that GIF. You guys will get your marriage rights, don't worry. It's ridiculous that it's not already legal and I think people more and more are starting to realize that.
#24 to #22 - ruinsage (04/04/2013) [-]
This image has expired
why is this getting thumbed down?
User avatar #25 to #24 - acedce (04/04/2013) [-]
I think they misread it
#31 to #22 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
Louis CK - Faggot <--- It explains the difference between faggot and gay
#51 to #22 - rosietheamazon (04/04/2013) [-]
thank you for being a fag.   
keep that 			****		 up
thank you for being a fag.
keep that **** up
User avatar #94 to #22 - nicolascagelover (04/04/2013) [-]
Oh hi, Op
User avatar #21 - megaton (04/04/2013) [-]
you know whats funny though. if there was an actual way to separate a difference between male gays and female lesbians. then women would probably already have lesbian rights while gay guys still wouldn't. it all falls under that same double standers.
User avatar #34 to #21 - srskate (04/04/2013) [-]
its because lesbians are hot.
#76 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
it'll also be known as the dusk of the marijuana prohibition. which will be a much more interesting topic.
#49 - SlayerOOz (04/04/2013) [-]
gays are the Blacks of the future and society is just like...
gays are the Blacks of the future and society is just like...
User avatar #66 - infiniteduress (04/04/2013) [-]
Truth sure, funny no
User avatar #53 - douthit (04/04/2013) [-]
And gun owners, and drug users, and immigrants, and taxpayers--who are all discriminated against.
#68 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
Ok seriously, I don't give a **** about gay marriage. I'm straight, so it affects me in no way, shape, or form. I do not give a **** if they can marry or not. I don't ******* care... they're not me. I'm not gay. I don't have to worry about whether or not I can marry someone so I do not care.
User avatar #70 to #68 - iwanttousenumbers (04/04/2013) [-]
What if a lesbian steals your girlfriend
User avatar #91 to #70 - robinwilliamson (04/04/2013) [-]
That's when you ask to have a threesome
#96 to #91 - fuckincanuck (04/04/2013) [-]
#4 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
im 100% this thing will happen with pedophilia too...
#82 to #4 - Crax (04/04/2013) [-]
Except that a child can't give consent under the law.
User avatar #115 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/04/2013) [-]

They're going to look back at the great "gay-war" and wonder why the gays were allowed to live in the first place, and not exterminated like the Nazis.
#117 to #115 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
"not exterminated like the Jews*"
there you go, fixed it for you.
User avatar #119 to #117 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/04/2013) [-]
Well, nobody looks back and says "I wonder why the Jews weren't exterminated sooner".
#125 to #119 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
those who support the nazi's do. lol
User avatar #55 - GrimTheRealReaper (04/04/2013) [-]
"Equality for all? Then how about equality for bestiality? How about equality for incest? Isn't that counted as love to them? Or does it disgust you? Who are you to rant about equality when you're only wanting gay pride? Equality is an ignorant stand point. THINK before you speak about EQUALITY FOR ALL. And STOP trying to shove it in my face."

A post my brother made about this topic.

I'm homophobic. Yea, I'm the ******* devil or whatever. But the problem is, I don't do **** to anyone. I don't attack the gay people at my school. I dont call them faggots. I don't do anything of the sort. I would just prefer if you kept that **** out of my face, because it happens to disgust me. In fact, I have gotten the **** beat out of me by a group of people for the reason of not believing in gay rights. I got the **** beat out of me. I didnt do **** but think. So when your on the topic of not being attacked because of your beleifs, think of that. I'm not shoving my beleifs down anyones throat, but you sure as hell are down mine.
User avatar #77 to #55 - OddballAnon (04/04/2013) [-]
bestiality is illegal because an animal can not consent incest is illegal because the offspring are at a much higher risk of genetic deformity mental health issues and other health problems due to lack of genetic diversity and it is therefore an undesirable outcome, Homosexuality however has none of these drawbacks if those involved are two consenting adults why not let them be happy together. personally i think displays of affection should be kept behind closed doors no matter the gender of those involved. Equality is only ignorant if those involved are making the rights of one side take priority over the rights of another like those crazy feminists that say that all men are no better than dogs and should be treated as such that is equality gone wrong
#118 to #55 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
Goddamn it's about time someone said it. I was never against gay people, but all this **** about "gay rights" is getting ridiculous. I'm tired of hearing about it.

User avatar #63 to #55 - beerterror (04/04/2013) [-]
Before you got thumbed down to oblivion, have a congratulation on common sense, your brother also. Good to know there are more people here who aren't brainwashed leftists.
User avatar #64 to #63 - GrimTheRealReaper (04/04/2013) [-]
II don't even care. To all you ******* pricks that are too close minded to realize, its not the gays being discriminated anymore, its the ones who are against them. Thumb me down. I don't care in the slightest.
#79 to #64 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
It's two sided discrimination, welcome to the arena right next door to the Democrats and Republicans arena
#43 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
no gay rights
only lesbian rights
#58 to #43 - tocoolforyouinajar (04/04/2013) [-]
Yea! And no black rights, only white rights.
Yea! And no black rights, only white rights.
#59 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
I'm so ******* tired about hearing gay rights and the discrimination of black people. Just shut the **** up already.
User avatar #74 - ihatem (04/04/2013) [-]
Or they'd wonder why they were asking the state for the church's consent for legal rights when they could just ask legislation for legal rights of a partnership, and not even mention the word "marriage"?
User avatar #98 to #74 - noblexfenrir (04/04/2013) [-]

The church doesn't own the rights to the word "marriage". Never has.
User avatar #122 to #98 - ihatem (04/04/2013) [-]
It's so they can't say anything about it, not that they own it.
The big reason is religion, so if it's all put in legal equality and avoiding the church in general, they lose all their ground. The church argues "marriage is between man and woman/ is a religious institution/ for the church to decide" blah blah blah, but homosexuals just need to take a slick legal detour, to get legal rights, keeping it below religious radar.
User avatar #123 to #122 - noblexfenrir (04/04/2013) [-]
But that isn't what many of them want nor would I ever suggest they go for anything less. They are law abiding citizens who are being kept from/told that they aren't allowed to get married simply because the person they want to marry is the same sex.

Yes they can just find a legal detour to get around all this fuss, but the fact is they shouldn't have to. The religious who are against this need to realize they cannot tell people they aren't allowed something everyone else is, simply because they don't like it.

The church needs to be told that it doesn't own marriage, never has, never will. That this is a secular nation and as such religious practices have no place in deciding government/social institutions.

Trust me I get what you're saying but in the end that's the equivalent of wondering why blacks weren't fine with black-only water fountains since they got everything a white water fountain gave but just for them. Separate but equal will never be equal.
#62 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
why do we even tolerate gays. we should kill them all.
#60 - rickmac (04/04/2013) [-]
except for, ya know, the fact that marriage isn't a right
#16 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
ugg, i don't know why we give defectoids rights.... I suppose next we'll allow furries and scats to be allowed to "express themselves" in public
User avatar #17 to #16 - teamrocketninja (04/04/2013) [-]
#18 to #16 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
idk if you noticed all the furry conventions going around.

they already do express themselves in public you silly **** .
User avatar #20 to #16 - huffe (04/04/2013) [-]
it's about time we get some trannies on the senate i think
#27 - anon (04/04/2013) [-]
Yeah, sure, non-fertile marriage is gonna be perfectly normal everywhere in a few years, nobody will question it. Of course that's right, didn't you ******* read Darwin mate ?
User avatar #36 to #27 - srskate (04/04/2013) [-]
except its a mutation affected by multiple factors, mate.
Following your logic, there wouldn't be any gay people to start with.
User avatar #33 to #27 - LookinHereWhy (04/04/2013) [-]
They won't reproduce anyways so why not let them get married?
User avatar #44 to #27 - myrtille (04/04/2013) [-]
Why are there people who think gay marriage will decrease the population?
Those people are already gay. They are already not going to have kids. Jesus.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)