Truth. . you know in like 20 or 30 years or so theres gonna be a section in history books dedicated to this time period where gays were fighting for their right
Click to expand


you know in like 20 or 30 years or so
theres gonna be a section in history
books dedicated to this time period
where gays were fighting for their
right to marry and suffering from
and the kids learning about it in
class are going to be disgusted by
the mere fact that gays had to even
try to fight for what was rightfully
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 17635
Favorited: 38
Submitted: 04/03/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to celticsyoyo submit to reddit


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #56 - tocoolforyouinajar (04/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
The year is 2540, a student in history class notices something off about his textbook.

“How come these textbooks skip the years 1990 through 1999?”

The teacher puts his air-marker down on the table, lowers his head, and sighs. “Because…” he lifts his head, a single tear rolls down his cheek, “only 90’s kids remember the 90’s”
User avatar #22 - outerspacebar (04/04/2013) [+] (13 replies)
From a fag, thanks for that. I needed to smile.
User avatar #38 - srskate (04/04/2013) [-]
History is kind of like growing up.

You look back and think "was I really that stupid?"
#97 - holyturkey (04/04/2013) [-]
Pfft, kids will never know they will be to busy ripping pages out of the books to roll with.
#16 - anonymous (04/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
ugg, i don't know why we give defectoids rights.... I suppose next we'll allow furries and scats to be allowed to "express themselves" in public
User avatar #20 to #16 - huffe ONLINE (04/04/2013) [-]
it's about time we get some trannies on the senate i think
#43 - anonymous (04/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
no gay rights
only lesbian rights
#58 to #43 - tocoolforyouinajar (04/04/2013) [-]
Yea! And no black rights, only white rights.
Yea! And no black rights, only white rights.
#49 - SlayerOOz (04/04/2013) [-]
gays are the Blacks of the future and society is just like...
gays are the Blacks of the future and society is just like...
User avatar #21 - megaton (04/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
you know whats funny though. if there was an actual way to separate a difference between male gays and female lesbians. then women would probably already have lesbian rights while gay guys still wouldn't. it all falls under that same double standers.
User avatar #74 - ihatem (04/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Or they'd wonder why they were asking the state for the church's consent for legal rights when they could just ask legislation for legal rights of a partnership, and not even mention the word "marriage"?
User avatar #98 to #74 - noblexfenrir (04/04/2013) [-]

The church doesn't own the rights to the word "marriage". Never has.
#68 - anonymous (04/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Ok seriously, I don't give a **** about gay marriage. I'm straight, so it affects me in no way, shape, or form. I do not give a **** if they can marry or not. I don't ******* care... they're not me. I'm not gay. I don't have to worry about whether or not I can marry someone so I do not care.
User avatar #91 to #70 - robinwilliamson (04/04/2013) [-]
That's when you ask to have a threesome
User avatar #66 - infiniteduress (04/04/2013) [-]
Truth sure, funny no
User avatar #53 - douthit (04/04/2013) [-]
And gun owners, and drug users, and immigrants, and taxpayers--who are all discriminated against.
User avatar #115 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)

They're going to look back at the great "gay-war" and wonder why the gays were allowed to live in the first place, and not exterminated like the Nazis.
User avatar #102 - younglegend (04/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Just a mere thought, is it even possible that space travel was created and that we arent the present but the past of some sort and the future people have travelled back in our time just to win lotteries and ****
User avatar #126 to #113 - younglegend (04/04/2013) [-]
great inspiration
User avatar #67 - dashgamer (04/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Marriage is a religious ceremony, which by my logic means that federal and state governments shouldn't be able to pass laws influencing it, but for some mystical magical ******* reason, there are legalities attached to it, as the title and ceremony of marriage are a valid legal means of establishing that two people are co-dependent. So, the only reason gay marriage is an issue that can be in the history books is because of all the financial and legal crap that is attached to it but is ignored in favor of a moral standpoint, like nuptial agreements, custody over adopted children, the mutual ownership of property, **** like that. In my opinion, the "institution" of marriage shouldn't be even remotely related to those things in the first place.
User avatar #101 to #67 - noblexfenrir (04/04/2013) [-]
>Marriage is a religious ceremony.

I agree that the issue is drawn from the legalities attached to marriage, but I still think the situation would be comparable to black only water fountains (As in, it's the same thing and you get the same result, but that is yours because I don't want you touching mine).

The problem is however, that marriage has never been a purely religious ceremony, religion has adopted it but it's never owned it. This is shown even in this society by how two non-religious people can still get married.
#27 - anonymous (04/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Yeah, sure, non-fertile marriage is gonna be perfectly normal everywhere in a few years, nobody will question it. Of course that's right, didn't you ******* read Darwin mate ?
User avatar #33 to #27 - LookinHereWhy (04/04/2013) [-]
They won't reproduce anyways so why not let them get married?
#76 - anonymous (04/04/2013) [-]
it'll also be known as the dusk of the marijuana prohibition. which will be a much more interesting topic.
User avatar #40 - slumberdonkey (04/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I don't know, there are people now who are all for segregation...
#19 - anonymous (04/04/2013) [-]
And then the girls will laugh at the fact that boys and men actually had privileges back then.
User avatar #1 - Nahyon (04/03/2013) [+] (3 replies)
You say it like it is not necessary
#2 to #1 - anonymous (04/03/2013) [-]
it isn't... in theory at least. Too bad the real world is such a weird place to live in
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)