facebook (-1). .. Why is "Timmy Turner" posting this? Because he's okay with fairies
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

facebook (-1)

+1068
Views: 49510
Favorited: 53
Submitted: 04/03/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to tommymemeborn E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(128):

[ 128 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #128 - iwanttousenumbers (04/04/2013) [-]
"2 fat ugly women that are women"
User avatar #124 - kermheat (04/04/2013) [-]
It's a known fact that sex reduces after marriage.

By supporting gay marriage, there is less ******* sex.

Don't support gay marriage!
0
#123 - aceshot has deleted their comment [-]
#117 - gabemczombie (04/04/2013) [-]
This is what i felt the entire post
This is what i felt the entire post
User avatar #112 - sketchysketchist (04/04/2013) [-]
It's okay to be okay with girl on girl porn but against gay marriage.
Two girls sexing it up in porn means you're beating off to women that are just doing it for money.
gay marriage is permanent and it's considered a felony to film and beat off to their sexual experiences.
User avatar #135 to #112 - Crusader (04/05/2013) [-]
No marriage is permanent
The "sanctity of marriage" went out the window once you allowed wide-spread divorce.

Not to mention, I beat it to a lot of amateur porn, which believe it or not, is just some couple filming themselves doing it normally.
User avatar #136 to #135 - sketchysketchist (04/05/2013) [-]
I'm not against gay marriage, but I'm okay with others being against it yet enjoy girl on girl porn. It's not a noteworthy contradiction that should label one a hypocrite.

Meh, amateur is too weak by my standards. They're so quiet and normally just do a few things. I enjoy my porn loud and movement that'll make an epileptic look still.
Comment has been flagged   Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
#110 - chancebell (04/04/2013) [-]
Flagged Comment Picture
This image was flagged 04/05/2013
#114 to #110 - terrorrizor (04/04/2013) [-]
**terrorrizor rolled a random image posted in comment #1347743 at Friendly ** Reported
#108 - xcat (04/04/2013) [-]
yahoo...
User avatar #104 - xzylophone (04/04/2013) [-]
Its fapping time
#103 - pehtran (04/04/2013) [-]
facebook.
#102 - alucord (04/04/2013) [-]
I can fap to whatever the hell I want and support whatever the hell I want!
User avatar #98 - Crusader (04/04/2013) [-]
How are ******** not gay?
#95 - ohemgeezus (04/04/2013) [-]
This post may be the worst I've seen on FJ in my 6 months of being here.


>find debatibal post
>circle the lamest, most unfunny piece of **** comment possible
>????
>front page
#93 - anonymous (04/04/2013) [-]
can I ask for source for the bottom? too lazy to sign in
User avatar #90 - henryfordthegod (04/04/2013) [-]
Well I know the real answer to all this
User avatar #92 to #90 - thegrohltroll (04/04/2013) [-]
Yup, NSFW
#82 - fjponythread (04/04/2013) [-]
All of the comments here
#89 to #82 - dsgbiohazard (04/04/2013) [-]
Anyone who's disgusted by anal is, IMO, retarded.
#131 to #89 - icecreamonnips (04/05/2013) [-]
sorry, i dont want my penis where 						****					 comes out
sorry, i dont want my penis where **** comes out
User avatar #134 to #131 - revorce (04/05/2013) [-]
sorry, i dont want my **** where penis comes out
User avatar #133 to #131 - dsgbiohazard (04/05/2013) [-]
>IMO
>I
>M
>O
User avatar #77 - synapse (04/04/2013) [-]
This post is so ******* stupid it hurts.
How can you be okay with your parent's marriage? Do you jump through space and time to crash the wedding ceremony?
#75 - anonymous (04/04/2013) [-]
parents'*
User avatar #71 - weenieandthebutt (04/04/2013) [-]
I used to be excessively pro about gay marriage but once you're open to both sides of the argument, the point is that it's not necessarily a hate against homosexuals but it's just the fact that 'marriage' is a religious concept (not legal concept) and religion forbids homosexuality. Yes, ******* porn is technically a sin in their book but it at least doesn't interfere with religion or the church. Just as I despise the church interfering with science, it's just as bad as those who do the same with the church.
User avatar #120 to #71 - swittig (04/04/2013) [-]
Marriage predates religions. Try harder.
User avatar #121 to #120 - weenieandthebutt (04/04/2013) [-]
if you read my comment #106, then I made a counter argument that took it into account.
User avatar #81 to #71 - Kellanved (04/04/2013) [-]
So, you're saying there should be marriage for straight couples, and something else for same sex couples? Like a white people bathroom and a colored people bathroom? Sure, sounds like an excellent compromise doesn't it? Except that it is STILL PREJUDICE. You can say 'I <3 gay people' all day and it doesn't change the fact that you are still a bigot if this is the sort of stance you have. It's not about religion, it's about equal rights. Oh, and marriage is a legal concept, just because most people are married by a priest it doesn't change that fact that it is a legal concept. Get off your high horse, you don't have the moral high ground. You're worse than the WBC, at least they're honest about their prejudice and aren't afraid to speak it publicly.
User avatar #87 to #81 - weenieandthebutt (04/04/2013) [-]
Listen here ****** , I don't have a problem with gay people or even homosexual acts per se. It's not a legal concept, it's a religious concept that has nothing to do with the government. The problem with you liberal hippy douches is that you love to live in this idealised utopian where you fail to see both sides of the argument and observe things in a realistic manner. You're just as bad (or as worse) as a ******* feminist.
User avatar #97 to #87 - shinypokemans (04/04/2013) [-]
Marriage is not owned by any religion. The idea of two people spending their entire lives together dates back to the cradles of civilization stage. And if it's not a legal concept, why is it that you need to get a marriage license from the state?

Also, about the feminist thing: You're talking about feminanzis, not feminists. There are plenty of good men and women out there who call themselves feminists and fight for equal rights, not women's superiority. Maybe you should take your own advice and look at both sides of the argument.

User avatar #106 to #97 - weenieandthebutt (04/04/2013) [-]
If what you say is true about the whole notion of marriage, then maybe they deserve the 'marriage' status but they should get married somewhere else other than a church or have a priest conduct it for them. As for feminism, I believe in equal women's rights, especially those abused and oppressed in third world countries but the feminists in western parts really piss me off. I'm not talking about those fat, ******* misandrist one's. I'm talking about those silly student-activist types who btich about sexual objectification in the media, the lack of women in science or issues on slut shaming and how walking around in your underwear sleeping with countless men is empowering.
User avatar #91 to #87 - Kellanved (04/04/2013) [-]
LOL awww he's mad. You're a prejudiced ass hole. That's all you'll ever be, you will never be anything more than that. Idealized utopia? Hah, right. Maybe I just believe in equal rights like I would have if I had been alive during the Civil Rights movement and the Women's Sufferage movement. History has judged people like you and me already my friend. And people like you are remembered as nothing but ignorant bigots while people like me aren't remembered at all. I'll never be someone like Martin Luther King Jr., but god damn it, I'll do my part when the rallies are organized and the voting booths are open. gay marriage is becoming legal in state after state, gay MARRIAGE and there isn't a damn thing people like you can do to stop it. Just like people like you couldn't stop equal rights for people of different races or women. You're powerless.
User avatar #100 to #91 - weenieandthebutt (04/04/2013) [-]
I'm not 'actively' stopping gay marriage or anything. I'm just voicing my personal opinion on this matter. Yes, homosexuals were abused and discriminated in the 70s and 80s, homophobia does exist today in some parts but other than that, they got practically the same rights as everyone by law (even the Civil Union status still suffices) so why are people like you still bitching about it? I believe in equal rights as just as much as the next person but only in the legal sense. With religion, it's not our business or our place to change its doctrines, practises or general beliefs. It's a religion, not a government. I personally find Christianity a whole load of bullcrap but I'm not going to go interfere with the Church's practise. What's wrong with the civil union status? They're still going to be together just like anyone else and exhibit the same legal rights.
User avatar #105 to #100 - Kellanved (04/04/2013) [-]
As 'shinypokemans' said before, religion does not own the concept of marriage and it is sheer arrogance for any religion to say that it does. Civil unions do NOT grant all the rights that LEGAL Marriage does. If you don't know that then you're even more arrogant and ignorant than I thought and you aren't even worth my time to prove wrong, I didn't even need to do it, you showed your own ignorance already. Good bye my bigoted friend. If ignorance is bliss, then I trust that you are very happy indeed.
User avatar #111 to #105 - weenieandthebutt (04/04/2013) [-]
Okay fine, if marriage wasn't founded by religion, then maybe they deserve the 'marital' status but it shoudn't be conducted in a church or by the priest in this case. In what way does the civil union status oppress them if you're so eager to prove me wrong in that department?
User avatar #79 to #71 - xxhunterxx (04/04/2013) [-]
Porn in general is a sin in Christianity.
User avatar #83 to #79 - weenieandthebutt (04/04/2013) [-]
ermmm I did mention it if you actually bothered reading my whole comment. The point is that pornography doesn't interfere with the church's constitution whereas marriage does. I'm trying to be as diplomatic and as realistic as possible about it. Bro, if I established my own religion, I would obviously allow it but I don't make the rules here.
User avatar #85 to #83 - xxhunterxx (04/04/2013) [-]
Weenieism.
User avatar #74 to #71 - weenieandthebutt (04/04/2013) [-]
at least establish the 'civil union' status or 'butt buddies'
[ 128 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)