The future is better than you think 1. Not sure if OC. I took it from this video And I screenc
Click to expand

The future is better than you think 1

  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 71539
Favorited: 186
Submitted: 04/02/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to vycanismajoris Subscribe to fucking-science submit to reddit


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#5 - finnini (04/02/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Of course all Africa's economic growth is through wireless, there seem to be so many more wealthy African princes since the internet came into being.
#1 - ninjajunkie (04/02/2013) [+] (2 replies)
#88 - studbeefpile ONLINE (04/03/2013) [+] (4 replies)
"I'm thirty seven, I'm not old"

#139 - omgusogay (04/03/2013) [+] (4 replies)
""not sure if OC""

You're not sure if you created it or not? can't remember if you took the time to research this and put it together from scratch, or if you just found it somewhere else and posted it...? Do you have a Court Appointed Care worker? maybe ask them.....

TLDR: OC means ORIGINAL content. That means it originates from YOU. You are the You need to login to view this link you made it.
...the fact you are the first person to post it somewhere doesn't make it OC.
#155 - Faz (04/03/2013) [+] (4 replies)
I love how its like using the Indians as an example of **** tier people, like "It was only the rich who had these before! But now even the dirty Indians have them too!" It gave me a good giggle.
#125 - flufflepuff (04/03/2013) [+] (3 replies)
don't forget, we can kill more, faster, better!

#179 - toughactintinactin (04/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
The rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer, and the sloths are plotting revolt.
The rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer, and the sloths are plotting revolt.
#149 - slyve (04/03/2013) [-]
This image has expired
3 billion for the entire human genome project. That would be enough to keep Americas military running for 2 days.
#18 - andalitemadness (04/03/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Life expectancy is weird. In the Upper Paleolithic times (50,000-10,000 years ago) it was 33 (including infant mortality for all). Then, in Neolithic times when humans started living closer together it dropped to 20. By Classical Rome it was at 28 and in Medieval Britain it was 30. It's taken up to Early Modern Britain to get back to the level it was in the Upper Paleolithic times, until now when it's at around 68.
#21 to #18 - thefasrdog (04/03/2013) [-]
The **** I put up with.
#146 - seniorawesomesauce (04/03/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Sure, the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting richer, it's just that the rich are getting richer at a expedentially faster rate.
#200 - senorfrog (04/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Genome Soldiers
User avatar #166 - grandmabetty ONLINE (04/03/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Which isn't true if you live in a country that is run by a man called David Cameron
#116 - blockheadboy (04/03/2013) [+] (3 replies)
i dont see the poor getting richer
User avatar #124 to #116 - teutoburg (04/03/2013) [-]
look at it this way, in 1800 only ridiculously rich people could have ice cream, now anyone can get it for a couple of bucks

technology makes everyone's lives better
User avatar #89 - luidias (04/03/2013) [-]
life expectancies were that low because of the high infant mortality rate. discounting all the dead babies and toddlers, life expectancy in humans have always ranged around 50-70 years of age.

anyways, I'll stop taking the fun out of everything now.
User avatar #8 - outerfiend (04/02/2013) [-]
I bet the money i gave to the Nigerian prince that wanted my Credit card helped as well
#250 - niconicodouga (04/03/2013) [-]
"We spent years stealing these things."
#204 - zuripanto (04/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
my friend you've never gone to third world countries, and if you have, you've never lived actual human misery. capitalism depends on rich and poor, depends on social gaps that will never change.

only if we change it
User avatar #206 - pfccross ONLINE (04/03/2013) [-]
the first part about life expectancy is how we explain the problem with the social security system. Back when social security was first put in, people wern't expected to live that long past 65 anyway. now just about everyone in america knows someone thats living well over the retirment age. Social security is draining the nations funds because more and more people are living longer and longer and its "immoral" to raise the retirement age. Now people that are plenty healthy enough to keep working are just sitting back and enjoying life because they are still healthy enough to and old enough not to have to work. Now i dont want to just screw people out of their social security, but something has to be done. eventually we are all going to be spending half our ******* lives in retirement, but there wont be any money left for them to give us. its a system doomed to die and drag alot down with it.

is just how i see things. Everyone is entitled to their own view on things of course.
#82 - thecurlysage (04/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
"not sure if OC" how can you not know if it's OC or not?
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)