Cities' pure night skyline. .. The mighty city of the Brooklyn Bridge. Very different from New York City I might add.
x

Comments(116):

[ 116 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#39 - colcrockett (04/02/2013) [-]
The mighty city of the Brooklyn Bridge. Very different from New York City I might add.
#1 - anon (04/02/2013) [-]
That's what the world will look like in a Zombie Apocalypse.
#84 to #1 - anon (04/02/2013) [-]
YOU STOLE MY COMMENT ANON **** YOU!!!!!!!
User avatar #99 to #1 - mondominiman (04/02/2013) [-]
I always wonder why there is no power or water in those zombie apocalypse movies. This might be a dumb question but i personally don't know, do they need to constantly check up on those things otherwise they go out or what? I always assumed it would be like a "I am legend" scenario where the people are gone but utilities still function.
#11 to #1 - anon (04/02/2013) [-]
Read World War Z. All the fires and explosives and **** that would go off in the panic initially after it started would create all kinds of clouds and **** , making the sky even darker at night.
#9 - flameroo (04/02/2013) [-]
Would saw.....
#96 - misticalz ONLINE (04/02/2013) [-]
>would saw

#113 - spyrothehedgehog (04/03/2013) [-]
"what city dwellers would saw"
<<---
#111 - mspaintpro (04/03/2013) [-]
10/10 would saw
#71 - crazyeyedbioll ONLINE (04/02/2013) [-]
what city dwellers would saw
#106 - beefkakes (04/02/2013) [-]
Look at that. Thousands of doors...opening all at once.
User avatar #35 - spamalope (04/02/2013) [-]
"would saw"
God damn it.
#13 - danytheop (04/02/2013) [-]
I tawt I taw a Tar! I DID I DID TAW A TAR!
#2 - lrw (04/02/2013) [-]
where's London, i think that would of been cool with the red bus. just wondering really cool though. shame we cant see them because of light pollution :(
User avatar #15 - TRINDADE ONLINE (04/02/2013) [-]
the irony is the few lights we do see are from satellites
User avatar #16 to #15 - sparkyoneonetwo (04/02/2013) [-]
how is that irony??
User avatar #17 to #16 - Zeigh ONLINE (04/02/2013) [-]
He made an effort to turn off all artificial lights in these pictures so that we could see the brilliance of the night sky...which contains artificial light.
User avatar #19 to #17 - sparkyoneonetwo (04/02/2013) [-]
Okay but, I don't see how the only lights we see in the cities are satellites is ironic
User avatar #20 to #19 - Zeigh ONLINE (04/02/2013) [-]
He turned off all the lights so you could see all the pretty man made satellites.
I don't think I can dumb this down any further.
User avatar #21 to #20 - sparkyoneonetwo (04/02/2013) [-]
Still not ironic that in the city you can see the satellites but not the stars.
User avatar #23 to #21 - Zeigh ONLINE (04/02/2013) [-]
God dammit.
Let me try again.
Someone created a picture, he wanted to show what it would look like if cities weren't flooded with light so that people could see the natural light of the stars in space. However it is very unlikely he went through the trouble of finding out which of those points of light are man made satellites, so they're probably still there.
What makes it ironic is the fact that he eliminated artificial light on the ground so we could more easily observe the artificial lights in space.
User avatar #24 to #23 - sparkyoneonetwo (04/02/2013) [-]
what you are saying is sorta ironic but what the other guy said "the irony is the few lights we do see are from satellites" I don't see any irony there what he says has nothing to do with the fact there is most likely still artificial light in them pictures.
#73 to #24 - mattdoggy (04/02/2013) [-]
The use of words expressing something other than their literal intention, now that is irony.
User avatar #25 to #24 - Zeigh ONLINE (04/02/2013) [-]
Are you really this stupid? Please tell me you're trolling me.
He said the exact same thing I just said in fewer words.
User avatar #26 to #25 - sparkyoneonetwo (04/02/2013) [-]
No what he said is totally different. If he means the same thing he worded that in a very very bad way.

The way I see it what he said is the few lights we see in the skies in cities aren't stars but satellites. I don't see how there is any irony in that.

User avatar #27 to #26 - happyfox (04/02/2013) [-]
IT'S LIKE RAAAAAA-AAIIIIIIIIIN, ON YA WEDDING DAY
User avatar #28 to #27 - sparkyoneonetwo (04/02/2013) [-]
that makes me think of a motley crue song
User avatar #29 to #28 - happyfox (04/02/2013) [-]
IT'S A FREEEE RIIIIIIIIIDE, WHEN YA ALREADY PAID
User avatar #30 to #29 - sparkyoneonetwo (04/02/2013) [-]
that's nice
#123 to #30 - TRINDADE ONLINE (04/03/2013) [-]
Jesus Crist
I'm sorry, I'm wrong.The irony I though was in a scene like that:
"We have fewer stars than when I was a kid. At least you never failed me, north star"
"actually grandpa, that's just a satellite"
grandpa fw
My irony senses are bad, you guys didn't needed a load of purple bars to figure that
User avatar #124 to #123 - sparkyoneonetwo (04/03/2013) [-]
It seems Zeigh did.
User avatar #125 to #124 - TRINDADE ONLINE (04/03/2013) [-]
nah, he though the irony was in the fact that the photo contained arificial light(I didn't even though about this)
For me it was thinking we still see some light and it could be worse, but we see none at all
I'm done talking about this
User avatar #126 to #125 - sparkyoneonetwo (04/03/2013) [-]
I know what he thought. Though you never said anyting like what he thought you did.
User avatar #31 to #30 - happyfox (04/02/2013) [-]
IT'S THAT GOOD ADVIIIIIIIIIIICE THAT YA JUST DIDN'T TAAKE
#40 to #31 - wheresthefudge (04/02/2013) [-]
I'll point out that none of the things in that song, nor what you pointed out in this absurdly long chain of comments are ironic.   
   
Now that's irony.
I'll point out that none of the things in that song, nor what you pointed out in this absurdly long chain of comments are ironic.

Now that's irony.
User avatar #41 to #40 - happyfox (04/02/2013) [-]
who would have thought...it figures.
0
#18 to #17 - sparkyoneonetwo has deleted their comment [-]
#72 to #15 - mattdoggy (04/02/2013) [-]
only a few of those lights are actually satellites   
and only 2 or 3 of them could be artificial, everything else just reflects the sun to earth
only a few of those lights are actually satellites
and only 2 or 3 of them could be artificial, everything else just reflects the sun to earth
User avatar #87 - YoDawgIHeardU (04/02/2013) [-]
If you put on night vision goggles you can see the stars like that anywhere
User avatar #58 - Bly (04/02/2013) [-]
i would kill to see a sky like this...
User avatar #67 to #58 - mymiddleleg (04/02/2013) [-]
Go to the countryside
#68 to #67 - candyjust (04/02/2013) [-]
I live in the countryside and i don't see this 			****		.
I live in the countryside and i don't see this **** .
User avatar #115 to #68 - Kabutops (04/03/2013) [-]
maybe if you go to a high enough altitude. i was able to see a very starry night (but probably half the amount stars in the picture) on a mountainside
User avatar #69 to #68 - legodude (04/02/2013) [-]
I know that.
#51 - Ninernsu (04/02/2013) [-]
One day.. when **** hits the fan and their are zombies everywhere...... people who want light pollution to go away will look at the stars and say " **** .."
User avatar #52 - screwyouman (04/02/2013) [-]
I just want to start an operation that involves going to every power plant in the world and turning off the power for an hour, just so people can see the stars for once.
User avatar #53 to #52 - Kittehh (04/02/2013) [-]
Let me know if you ever get that rolling. I'd sign for it.
#105 to #52 - mutants (04/02/2013) [-]
It's called earth hour.
#117 to #52 - anon (04/03/2013) [-]
Not to mention all the people in hospitals and nursing homes who might die just so you can see the stars. oh and all those nice security systems on maximum security prisons. and servers holding info on social security, tax, and credit information. Among other things of course.
#54 to #52 - harleycurnow (04/02/2013) [-]
We should have a day/hour that no-one burns fossil fuels. That would be brilliant and i think it would promote people to be less environmentally friendly.
#101 to #54 - misticalz ONLINE (04/02/2013) [-]
Why would you want them to be less environmentally friendly?
Why would you want them to be less environmentally friendly?
#130 to #101 - harleycurnow (04/03/2013) [-]
more*
User avatar #131 to #130 - misticalz ONLINE (04/03/2013) [-]
C:
#60 to #52 - anon (04/02/2013) [-]
do you know how much money is exchanged in an hour worldwide or even in just the US?
its a nice sentiment but its economically impractical
User avatar #62 to #60 - screwyouman (04/02/2013) [-]
Who says anything about money? Environmentalists can help me out.
#100 to #62 - anon (04/02/2013) [-]
Think he's talking about online banking and **** .
User avatar #37 - xcmxcmx (04/02/2013) [-]
yeah the sky would look nice but it would be a ******* nightmare on the ground
User avatar #45 to #37 - Nutcase (04/02/2013) [-]
U know there this wonderful new invention call the flashlight which can fit easily into ones pocket and light up your path. I personally support getting rid useless light producers like street lights it'll save energy and let u see more of the night sky.
User avatar #47 to #45 - xcmxcmx (04/02/2013) [-]
ok so youre saying that there shouldnt be streetlights, headlights, lit signs, or lights in homes/stores/etc. And we should replace them by carrying flashlights. And im the stupid one?
#63 to #47 - hairibar (04/02/2013) [-]
I know you weren't talking with me, but here's my opinion.

Obviously, we can't just get rid of that lights. But for example, where I live, street lights have opaque things at the upper part, so the sky gets much prittier. (I can tell the difference since they put that things).
Also, some responsability wouldn't be bad at all
User avatar #129 to #47 - Nutcase (04/03/2013) [-]
Yes u are because i didn't say headlights I said street light u ******** and useless light producers ak lights that are not needed. Of which I was only talking about lights outside. I assumed everyone would be smart enough to know, apparently your weren't.
User avatar #133 to #129 - xcmxcmx (04/05/2013) [-]
you are actually too stupid to argue with
0
#97 to #45 - nissn has deleted their comment [-]
#70 - mattdoggy (04/02/2013) [-]
Mfw i live out in the middle of the country and get to see this every night   
i bet half of you haven't even seen the milky way
Mfw i live out in the middle of the country and get to see this every night
i bet half of you haven't even seen the milky way
User avatar #82 to #70 - ronyx (04/02/2013) [-]
**** you ***** , im jealous.
#49 - europeanswallow (04/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#55 to #49 - anon (04/02/2013) [-]
find another god damn reaction picture.
#43 - anon (04/02/2013) [-]
We have no needs for the stars now... we have compasses to tell direction, books to tell stories, and artificial light to brighten the night. We don't live in the stone age anymore.
[ 116 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)