Nuclear War. description. North Korea usa nuclear war


Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - crazyolitis (03/30/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #50 to #1 - thice (03/31/2013) [-]
they're not armed, so no harm done.
#10 - unclemagic (03/31/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#5 - whamaclabam (03/31/2013) [-]
"Are you sorry? "
#48 to #5 - anon (03/31/2013) [-]
Are you not entertained


Thanks obama
#2 - eclecticparadigm **User deleted account** (03/30/2013) [-]
North Korea's nuclear test to tempt US, kinda reminds me of some tiny parts of Asia trying to claim Chinese territories.
North Korea's nuclear test to tempt US, kinda reminds me of some tiny parts of Asia trying to claim Chinese territories.
#51 - lamnad (03/31/2013) [-]
this reminds me of what my brother post on face book yesterday
#97 to #51 - anon (03/31/2013) [-]
Which means, South Korea will die from the extreme fallout after creating your beautiful island.
#54 - drewbridge (03/31/2013) [-]
They have technology about equipment to 1955-1965 Russia, except of a lower quality.

They're making tons of threats against the US, but South Korea is the one we should be worried about. NK can't ship troops to the US or even be a big threat, but they can send them down south, and kill everyone there, instead.

If I was a South Korean I'd be pretty uncomfortable. (We'll still rape NK to death if they attack SK, but still, sucks to live underneath the most radical indoctrinated country on the planet_
User avatar #64 to #54 - fantomen (03/31/2013) [-]
I saw a video of them training with a 1928 DP light machine gun the other day.
It fires ammo designed in the 1890s...

But credit to the guy that designed it, they were using a more modern machine gun too, and that didn't work.
User avatar #71 to #54 - nitsuan ONLINE (03/31/2013) [-]
Ya, we know the North can't threaten main land USA, but we are worried about our pacific territories and allies, primarily South Korea.
User avatar #79 to #54 - captchakid ONLINE (03/31/2013) [-]
Read somewhere it was estimated they could hit our bases in South Korea (No **** ), Japan, Guam, and even Hawaii. But no further than that.
#11 - sirham (03/31/2013) [-]
Even though most of North Korea's rocket launchs have been a failure, they still have a ******* of well disciplined soldiers. So a war with North Korea would be very bloodspilling.
User avatar #65 to #11 - Laddie (03/31/2013) [-]
Not as disciplined as you would think.

You need to login to view this link
User avatar #67 to #11 - fantomen (03/31/2013) [-]
They have a lot of fanatic soldiers, but even in peace time they are so ill equipped that they aren't given enough food, so they raid local villages looking for food.

But many of the low ranking soldiers are still so fanatical that they could possibly keep an insurgency going for a few years, even if doing so would be a war crime.
#24 to #11 - anon (03/31/2013) [-]
They may have disciplined soldiers, but there is only so much that can offset the kind of technological advantage that we have over North Korea. We wouldn't use it obviously, but we literally have the capability to turn the entire country to glass without leaving our comfortable living room couch.
User avatar #25 to #24 - Trrave ONLINE (03/31/2013) [-]
Damn it all. I always forget to log in!
User avatar #47 to #25 - vycanismajoris (03/31/2013) [-]
Why do you log out in the first place?
User avatar #101 to #47 - Trrave ONLINE (04/01/2013) [-]
Because I share a computer.
#27 to #11 - anon (03/31/2013) [-]
No. Can't be ****** going into details so i'll write the short version.
Best Korea has only one option when going to war, that is to attack South Korea.
Though Best Koreas armies could ravage the south, they don't have supplies for a full scale strike, longer than a week or two. As soon as they cross the border, they will be ****** from all sides. The Best Korean soldiers entering will be transformed into flaming goo from all the bombs that will hit. Naval and air strikes will follow, and since Best Korea launched a full scale strike on the south, they don't have the forces it takes to defend themself. China and Russia would never support North Korea in a war, because it would cost them more in the long run, plus it would ensure WWIII, which they would wanna avoid aswell. South Korean and American bombs carpetbomb Best Korea, they can't defend themselves due to outdated Sovjiet tech., and China (north border) wont help them. At all.
Best Korea loses.

tl;dr north korea lose
#20 to #11 - snickerstheif (03/31/2013) [-]
>Well disciplined soldiers
#56 to #20 - niggernazi (03/31/2013) [-]
This is kim jong training gorilla warfare. He has over 300 confirmed kills and can kill you in over 700 ways with his bare hands. It is the coat that make him look fat.
User avatar #33 to #20 - unicornswag (03/31/2013) [-]
Looks like a slumber party, and everyone is wearing their pj's and playing war lol
#34 - brutallyhonest (03/31/2013) [-]
One of my brother's teachers referred to this whole thing as a card game. Korea doesn't have a great hand, but they're playing their cards very well. If they bombed us, they'd only take out a small portion of us, but if we bombed them, they'd all be destroyed. The sad thing is, I live in New York.. So if they do decide to bomb us, I'd be one of the small portion that'd die.
#38 to #34 - VeryWittyName (03/31/2013) [-]
Best Korea don't have bombs which can reach as far as new york
User avatar #53 to #38 - therealtjthemedic ONLINE (03/31/2013) [-]
What about planes that have bombs?
#55 to #53 - VeryWittyName (03/31/2013) [-]
How would a Best Korean plane manage to make it into US airspace without being shot down?
User avatar #39 to #38 - brutallyhonest (03/31/2013) [-]
For now, I suppose.
#40 to #39 - VeryWittyName (03/31/2013) [-]
Can't see it happening anytime soon, to be brutally honest.
User avatar #41 to #40 - brutallyhonest (03/31/2013) [-]
Haha, I see what you did there! Using my very witty name as a joke!
#62 to #34 - yodudewtf (03/31/2013) [-]
I feel your pain
#82 to #34 - anon (03/31/2013) [-]
Head for the subways.
User avatar #84 to #34 - houseofbrick (03/31/2013) [-]
Nah, their best ICBMs wouldn't get farther than the West Coast. You're safe.
User avatar #89 to #34 - mattmanhemi (03/31/2013) [-]
i live in new york too, but they will never get a nuke to reach us
User avatar #42 to #34 - sublemon (03/31/2013) [-]
Even if they managed to get warheads over here, don't you think we have precautions set up to defend against whatever ********* weaponry they have to offer so a missile strike cannot happen?
#52 to #42 - anon (03/31/2013) [-]
no, we don't because liberals have fought against missile defense system "Star Wars", etc.... since first conceived in the 1980's by Reagan who proposed that we work on a missile defense system that would essentially make global nuclear war impossible becuase all the ICBMs would be shot down. he wanted to develop the technology and share it wwith the russians. i was in college at Georgia Tech back then, and the liberals were all protesteing against it on our campus....
all that being said N Korea doesnt have the ability to get a nuke to NY city
User avatar #59 to #52 - viscerys ONLINE (03/31/2013) [-]
Why were people protesting against things to keep them safe?
User avatar #69 to #59 - TheUnforgiving (03/31/2013) [-]
People were protesting it because it wouldn't work not because they were "liberals." the thing is the "Star Wars" project was too costly to manufacture, too time consuming,and too difficult to maintain. For people who don't know, the project was to literary strap a giant laser to a Boeing 747, and melt the missile as it was launching. Thing is it took too long for the plane to lift off, then it had to catch up to the missile,and finally point the laser at it, where it would take up to a few minutes to melt the missile most likey not even damaging the damn thing.
User avatar #44 to #42 - brutallyhonest (03/31/2013) [-]
America.. I'd rather not put my hope and trust into them, to be brutally honest. They've ****** us over too much for myself to rely on them to save our lives.
#85 to #34 - CollinTB (03/31/2013) [-]
I wouldn't count on it; if they wanted to bomb the east coast they'd have to either fly across the United States or go around the entire planet. The West coast makes for a much better target, being seriously right there on the other side of the Pacific.
I wouldn't count on it; if they wanted to bomb the east coast they'd have to either fly across the United States or go around the entire planet. The West coast makes for a much better target, being seriously right there on the other side of the Pacific.
User avatar #100 to #85 - slenderwolf (04/01/2013) [-]
Alaska is projected to be just barely in range of their missile sites, that is if they don't **** it up...again.
#86 - yourdadsdad (03/31/2013) [-]
I know I can use this
#19 - DutchBlood (03/31/2013) [-]
America's face when:
America's face when:
#8 - yorkswmr (03/31/2013) [-]
America's face when:
User avatar #30 - mrfourtysevenman (03/31/2013) [-]
#88 - mechbaird (03/31/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #9 - peanutbitter (03/31/2013) [-]
dude.. i see this on here almost every ******* day
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)