BF 4. internet is source.. I dont want to start a war or anything, but just looking at those couple of minutes of game play all i saw was call of duty.... i really hope DICE gets rid of c OC is Not


Anonymous comments allowed.
#49 - noobian (03/29/2013) [-]
Battlefield thread!
Battlefield thread!
#151 to #49 - yamiyo (03/30/2013) [-]
I know this is now a BF thread, but I just had to.

#214 to #49 - arcticassassin (08/06/2013) [-]
#215 to #214 - arcticassassin (08/06/2013) [-]
My Battlefield folder grows
My Battlefield folder grows
#217 to #215 - arcticassassin (08/06/2013) [-]
I liked Bad Company 2 because of the playstyle, but I liked Battlefield 3 because of the unlocks and scenery.
I liked Bad Company 2 because of the playstyle, but I liked Battlefield 3 because of the unlocks and scenery.
#69 to #67 - somenerd (03/29/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #126 to #69 - jakekel (03/29/2013) [-]
does this GIF really need an overused meme plastered over it.
User avatar #216 to #126 - arcticassassin (08/06/2013) [-]
Exactly how I feel about half the stuff on the internet.
User avatar #111 to #74 - themuffinmonster (03/29/2013) [-]
I hate that you can't do that anymore
#118 to #49 - cpthaze **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #213 to #118 - arcticassassin (08/06/2013) [-]
************ that's my favorite .gif
#115 to #49 - fivewordminimum **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#131 - liquidz (03/29/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#140 to #131 - beefking (03/29/2013) [-]
**beefking rolled a random image posted in comment #90 at News Flash ** BAD EA!!!
#128 - grimmwaters ONLINE (03/29/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#1 - benighted (03/29/2013) [-]
I dont want to start a war or anything, but just looking at those couple of minutes of game play all i  saw was call of duty.... i really hope DICE gets rid of campaign in future titles and stick 100% to multiplayer when it comes to battlefield games and leaves the singleplayer/co-op up to BFBC.
I dont want to start a war or anything, but just looking at those couple of minutes of game play all i saw was call of duty.... i really hope DICE gets rid of campaign in future titles and stick 100% to multiplayer when it comes to battlefield games and leaves the singleplayer/co-op up to BFBC.
#130 to #1 - anon (03/29/2013) [-]
The camping looked good, why remove it? They have already spend their time making it
#133 to #1 - anon (03/29/2013) [-]

#144 to #1 - enoki (03/29/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #166 to #1 - capslockrage (03/30/2013) [-]
Honestly lots of games are trying to copy CoD, and they need to stop it, CoD got it right, and it doesn't mean other games need to try to copy it to become successful, sometimes I get tired of CoD and want something different to play
#11 to #1 - forbesydemon (03/29/2013) [-]
The Bad Company story is the only Battlefield story I've enjoyed. Mutha ******* Haggard.
User avatar #2 to #1 - supermegasherman (03/29/2013) [-]
battlefield has turned into es's call of duty. thats all it really is. i miss battlefield 1942. that **** , was the ****
#4 to #2 - therealmaster ONLINE (03/29/2013) [-]
I still have the Battlefield 1942 World War II anthology. It's 			*******		 awesome.
I still have the Battlefield 1942 World War II anthology. It's ******* awesome.
User avatar #5 to #4 - supermegasherman (03/29/2013) [-]
dude i loved 1942. such a great game
#10 to #5 - nicksawinner (03/29/2013) [-]
*******		 LOVE THAT GAME i was pissed when i figured out my wife threw it out when she was cleaning but ea released it for free for their 10 year anniversary or something
******* LOVE THAT GAME i was pissed when i figured out my wife threw it out when she was cleaning but ea released it for free for their 10 year anniversary or something
User avatar #12 to #10 - supermegasherman (03/29/2013) [-]
Wait its free? Well **** I need to go get that
#209 to #12 - nicksawinner (03/31/2013) [-]
yup its in orgins demos section but its really the full game
User avatar #17 to #4 - pocketstooheavy (03/29/2013) [-]
They really need to stop making all of this modern crap. Get back to the WWII Classics!
User avatar #116 to #17 - burningsmurfs ONLINE (03/29/2013) [-]
I would play the **** out of a WWII multiplayer game these days. I remember thinking back in the 90s though that god damn every shooter is about WWII we need a break. NOW though they could make it sweet and online and no one's doing it yet because they gotta make a call of duty.
#147 to #2 - jdogtwoptzero (03/29/2013) [-]
1942 was awesome, but don't forget BF2142 <-That was some good **** right there. I'd love it if they released a sequel (that doesn't suck).
#136 to #2 - nightstar (03/29/2013) [-]
I love that game.   
I was all about El Alamein.
I love that game.

I was all about El Alamein.
User avatar #146 to #136 - kazorkthedork (03/29/2013) [-]
and Gazala. don't forget Gazala

kursk as well
#190 to #146 - nightstar (03/30/2013) [-]
Kursk? I was never impressed by it.

But I sure did love this bad boy.
User avatar #197 to #190 - kazorkthedork (03/30/2013) [-]
I loved all the russian maps.
I can only remember the name of kursk though... and stalingrad of course
User avatar #114 to #2 - namesboo (03/29/2013) [-]
I liked the remake on PSN I think it was battlefield 1943
User avatar #148 to #2 - danrat (03/29/2013) [-]
is 2042 any good?
User avatar #191 to #148 - supermegasherman (03/30/2013) [-]
it didn't strike me as interesting but i never tried it
#96 to #2 - anon (03/29/2013) [-]
Ah, the old "it was better before"-talk, we've all heard that before, it's tiring
User avatar #192 to #96 - supermegasherman (03/30/2013) [-]
the game was good. thats it
User avatar #60 to #2 - TwistedBamboozler (03/29/2013) [-]
BF2 and 2142 were both incredible as well.
User avatar #50 to #2 - yojo (03/29/2013) [-]
I miss it too man. I wish there was some way i coul- oh wait, it still ******* exists.
User avatar #52 to #50 - supermegasherman (03/29/2013) [-]
they should remake 1942, modern graphics with an improved engine. i'd pay good money
User avatar #61 to #52 - yojo (03/29/2013) [-]
That would be cool. But videogame remakes are a rare thing these days :/
User avatar #46 to #2 - propanex (03/29/2013) [-]
there is still servers up... they sometimes are heavily modded.
User avatar #45 to #2 - andnowducks (03/29/2013) [-]
my battlefield 1942 got removed and just gave me the trial version, making me pay ******* DOUBLE, JUST ******* LIKE THE LOST AND DAMNED I'M LOOKING AT YOU XBOX OVER IN THE ******* CORNER ACTING ALL INNOCENT.
User avatar #7 to #2 - benighted (03/29/2013) [-]
true, and yes 1942 is legendary along with bf2. solid dice titles.
User avatar #8 to #7 - LordOfHate (03/29/2013) [-]
BF1942 was good enough for me to buy it, and I don't have a lot of cash.
User avatar #6 to #2 - supermegasherman (03/29/2013) [-]
User avatar #3 - foffepoffe (03/29/2013) [-]
Imagen Battlefield 2142 with BF3 graphic.
#20 to #3 - cuntdestroyertata (03/29/2013) [-]
battlefield vietnam
#142 to #20 - anon (03/29/2013) [-]
the best battlefield ever.
User avatar #13 to #3 - dafuqisdisshit (03/29/2013) [-]
That would be glorius. I still have my BF 2142 for PC. I wish I had friends to play it with.
User avatar #19 - dunmerforlife (03/29/2013) [-]
bad company 2 had better multiplayer imo, sniping was way better
#24 to #19 - anon (03/29/2013) [-]
I have to agree. I don't know what they did wrong with BF3 but Bad Company 2 was just more fun in the map design.
User avatar #219 to #19 - arcticassassin (08/06/2013) [-]
I loved how much more arcade-shooter BC2 felt. Plus it was a lot easier to die.
User avatar #28 to #19 - fhbsdtmd (03/29/2013) [-]
all they did was add a little more realism, the scope in badcompany 2 barely moved while you aimed, im not gona lie though i miss bc2 but i still think bf3 is a really good game
User avatar #30 to #28 - bokkos (03/29/2013) [-]
"The most realistic games are the most fun"
Said no one ever.
User avatar #34 to #30 - fhbsdtmd (03/29/2013) [-]
so you are saying that COD games are better than bad company/battlefield because its more unrealistic? **** out of my face with that, most people get bad company or battlefield games because of the realism
User avatar #37 to #34 - bokkos (03/29/2013) [-]
No, I'm saying they'll never hold a candle to the likes of Skyrim, Metroid Prime, Half Life, Warcraft III, Painkiller etc. Plus the claim of "realism" is so laughingly false it borders on the offensive. To paraphrase Yahtzee: a realistic war shooter would have it so you get shot, laid up in hospital for 6 months, and sent home, preceded by 8 months of rigorous excersize with people you're explicitly not to have sex with.
User avatar #40 to #37 - fhbsdtmd (03/29/2013) [-]
although you have a point, videogames have to find that border of making a game realistic and fun at the same time. I think the bad company and bf series does just that.
User avatar #41 to #40 - bokkos (03/29/2013) [-]
I agree they have a place in the industry, but would it be so much to ask for a game where you are a ghost and the whole point of the game is to terrify and kill people, while avoiding the Ghostbusters and Priests? My problem is that they're becoming a default position for triple A game developers, when we would have awesomely unique games all the time.
User avatar #38 to #19 - cedrock (03/29/2013) [-]
Huge problems Bad Company 2 has:
- Terrible hit registration, makes people with over 100 ping have a reaaally hard time. (I have pings like that all the time, terrible connection, best I can get in my country)

- Nearly everything falls apart because of the explosions, leaving people without any good cover, AND THERE'S NO PRONE STANCE!

- Choppers are overpowered if driven by a good pilot.

I'm currently downloading BF3 after I bought it for the 10$ deal. So you could say I've never played BF3 to know how you guys feel about it.
#43 to #38 - jahnaids (03/29/2013) [-]
-Most servers in BC2 were all created by DICE itself, so for the most part, crappy connection would be your own fault.
-The ******* point of the Destruction IS to destroy cover. That's what made BC2 so great. It ridiculed Campers, crushing people under destruction would be awesome.
-Choppers can be shot down...
-And proning really doesn't do anything.
It makes it nearly impossible to get hit, or hit someone in prone.


On the other side, BF 3 has WAY to many problems that really prevents it from living up to its predecessor.

-Gunplay is ******** than BC2, all the guns make it feel like your character's arm is completely made of jelly. Making it literally difficult as **** to control, ESPECIALLY on a console.
-Vehicles are all overpowered as hell due to the fact that explosives like Rockets and **** are underpowered.
-Unlocking things is a ******* chore.
-Maps are far too large on the consoles.
-All the guns sound like pop guns, no real power behind them.
-Jets are ******* stupid.
So forth and so forth.

BF3 has a ton of problems.

User avatar #48 to #43 - fistpump (03/29/2013) [-]
I'm sorry to tell you this, man, but you sound like a complete BF3 noob...
-I mean, you learn to control your guns, adding a foregrip and a flash suppressor can make your guns much more accurate, too.
-If you know how to use an RPG, they destroy a tank in two hits. (Hint: Shoot the back.)
-Unlocking things comes as it does in any other FPS. I'm guessing you aren't waiting to unlock a specific gun on a class; I can see that as being a chore, but playing the game to unlock things... Gives it a little more meaning...
-I actually agree, some maps are very large (Alborz Mountains, Gulf of Oman) but there are smaller maps (Any CQ map, most maps are spliced into tiny sections for Rush). It depends on what you prefer.
-I really don't know what you mean with the pop guns thing. Sure, not every gun sounds powerful, but a lot of people use a suppressor, which makes them sound like pea shooters. Without suppressors most sound fairly unique, especially the LMGs.
-Jets are absolutely amazing if used correctly. If I were you, I'd practise with them. No other vehicle can dominate both air and ground so effectively.

What rank are you, anyway? Can't be a colonel yet, surely?
User avatar #73 to #48 - cedrock (03/29/2013) [-]
You must have a ********** .
#79 to #73 - fistpump (03/29/2013) [-]
As much as I love your reference, no, I'm only Colonel Rank 30. I barely even play BF3 anymore. Used to be addicted to it. Those were the ********** times...
User avatar #81 to #79 - cedrock (03/29/2013) [-]
Every time I level up in battlefield 3, I will yell "PROMOOOOTTEEEEEED!!!!"
User avatar #90 to #81 - fistpump (03/29/2013) [-]
User avatar #160 to #48 - meganinja ONLINE (03/30/2013) [-]
the way I feel about jets is you choose either air superiority OR air support for the ground. Heat seeking missiles don't work on ground targets, but are by far the easiest way to take out another jet or chopper. Rocket pods can sometimes get you a nice tank kill or a lucky infantry kill if you know what you're doing when you go in for a run, but are ******* hard as tits to use to shoot down another jet, although they can work on choppers. I wish the main gun worked better against ground targets, or you could have 3 weapon slots, as jets are pretty much only useful for taking out jets.
User avatar #205 to #160 - fistpump (03/30/2013) [-]
Okay, if you are on a PC, ignore the following advice; consoles, however...
If you stick an AGM on a jet, you get a camera placed on the underside of your jet (essentially your target locator) that has a slight zoom on it, allowing you to see players and vehicles from a larger range. If you ever find a target that isn't moving, line up your MG crosshair and fire on that bitch. The bullets hit 10% damage each on the body, 50% to the head. It destroy people. It's a little easier on PC, as you can mark from an infinite range, whereas on consoles it's only up to 250m.
The machine gun is very versatile if you know where to aim with it. Against helicopters, shoot the cockpit (scout) or the area just behind the cockpit (attack) and they go down a charm. 3 seconds of sustained fire anywhere on the body will also disable it.
For actually damaging anything with the AGM, it's pretty useless. Tanks have smoke 95% of the time, but they're also pretty slow, making rocket pods favourable to use against them. I'd suggest, however, for Armoured Kill or End Game maps, that you use the AGM. Firing an AGM at a quadbike or a dirtbike will disable, destroy, and kill anyone on it. They're kills/points galore.
I wouldn't suggest using heatseekers, ever. Jets are a little easier to take out with them, sure, but your secondary should be anti-ground. If you can master the MG and anti-ground, you should have no problem with being the biggest dick in the sky.

Wow. That was one hell of a paragraph... Or several...
User avatar #207 to #205 - meganinja ONLINE (03/30/2013) [-]
I DO use my MG on helicopters. Only thing I can ever manage to hit with it. My TV is really low resolution so I can never tell if i'm hitting a jet or not with it, so it's simpler just to use my heat seekers, shoot one to make them use their flares, then fire a second one, and a third when I get it from reload. Works every time.

Firestorm is my favorite map for flying though, and it's rather large with most of the people concentrated in or around the buildings, so maybe that's why I don't get many infantry kills.
#176 to #48 - jahnaids (03/30/2013) [-]
I'm not saying that learning to use the guns is impossible.
Gunplay just becomes really ****** in comparison to BC2.
And though I can admit that I am bad at BF3 and am rather good at BC2, Battlefield 3 just doesn't feel right. Like I said, rather than the gunplay being impossible to control, it feels like your character is made of jelly. With enough time, I'm sure that learning to use a weapon is apparent. But all the weapons in BF3 have that 'jelly'-like stature. Making it really irritating to play.

-Yes, shooting the back has always been the weak spot. But I'm actually talking about using rockets and grenades on GI as well.
I'm not kidding. I've had grenades blow up in my face that did not kill me.
I've shot people with rockets at a close distance, and they've been left with at least 20% HP.

-Weapons shouldn't take over 6 well played matches to ******* unlock.
Simply said.
Though it was easy to unlock everything in Bad Company 2, BF3 made it a ******* chore. And yes, a game is a game for the fun of it.
But if there's no progression with whatever you're doing. It feels so pointless.
In contrast, if you're playing Counter Strike, a game with no progression, it becomes satisfying nontheless because you potentially can get anything at any point.'
-And Small maps shouldn't ******* be DLC.
That's just dumb.
-Jets are ridiculous. They shouldn't be made especially for a 12 v 12 game. I have no problem with them on PC.

Also, I have no idea, I haven't touched the game in months.
#196 to #43 - fearthejeeper (03/30/2013) [-]
You're a special kind of stupid aren't ya.
In BF3
-The Gunplay is far better than any game I have played, I have shot alot of the guns that are in BF3 and the recoil in game is realistic. I am sorry but guns are not as easy to control as CoD portray's it. The guns are as realisitc as any games get besides BF's brother MoHW
-Again the vehicles are as realistic as ever. Have you tried to kill a tank in real life? Well I haven't but I have seen what it takes to kill an Abrams, and guided missiles are really the only thing that can do it along with mines. An Abrams armor is capable of taking multiple RPG's in the same spot without gibing way, that's why the material its made of is top secret. The only week spot on a tank is the bottom and rear, where the engine is. Again, the game is as realistic as it gets vehicle wise.
-Unlocking is part of every game. Yes it does take some time to get weapons and get all of them along with the attachments but it keeps you playing the game, that's why its like that.
-The maps were meant to be large in the first place. Battlefield is all about vehicles and they had to make maps that can acquire the use of one. On PC the maps are even larger so I am not seeing why you are complaining.
-I have no idea what you are talking about with the guns sounding like pop guns. They do not sound as realistic as some other games, like MoHW, but they get the job done. Every gun just about has a different sound.
-Jets are a major help if the person flying it knows what they are doing. They can dominate the battlefield. They can take out vehicles on the ground as well as taking care of the air. In the right hands, the jet pretty much provides all the support and wins games.

I play BF3 often and love it. The only other BF games I played were BC, BC2 and 1943, all of which I really liked. I hate CoD and will never buy/play another CoD game unless its pre MW2.

Thanks for the rant, I was needing one!
#199 to #196 - jahnaids (03/30/2013) [-]
You're a special kind of stupid aren't ya.
You sound like a crying fanboy for defending this game to this magnitude.

-You also realize that half of your argument is based off of "Realism" in video games.
Truth is, no one ******* cares. A game is meant to be fun, and while it can be realistic, it has to remain in the realm of video games. Battlefield 3 over exaggerates the recoil on weapons. You've obviously never fired a weapon in real life, giving you credibility to make the statement. And though balance is often the best medium to find, sacrificing the 'fun' in a game for 'realism' does not make it good.
-Second, Unlocks are good. They're nice. They give you a sense of progression. But Battlefield takes it in the wrong direction for making it a ******* chore to unlock a certain gun. You don't merit anything against my argument. Therefore my point remains valid.
-Maps aren't meant for a person without a ******* vehicle to run for a solid 10 minutes. Hence why there is the squad spawn system. Map designs are all awful in the game. Though emulating an actual battlefield, there are so little choke points with so much ******** on the sides that no one will ever trek. Take a Map in Bad Company 2, like Port Valdez. There are a ton of choke points worth covering and looking at that can really turn the balance of a game. Battlefield 3 does not offer that. Therefore my point still stands.
-Listen to weapons in real life. Then listen to the sound quality in Bad Company 2. And then listen to the weapons in Battlefield 3. I'm sorry. But everything in Battlefield 3 sounds the same for me. This is coming from a Counter Strike Soundwhore. Your point falls because the audio in Battlefield 3 does not do anything to show
-Yes. Jets are useful. They can be huge impacts in the tide of battle. I simply stated that jets are ******* stupid. Therefore it's an unnecessary point you don't need to touch upon.

Also. I never touched upon CoD. Why are you bringing that up.
#206 to #199 - fearthejeeper (03/30/2013) [-]
ha, you know what, I am a fanboy of Battlefield because they are really the only shooter that I really like besides a few. I brought up CoD because more than half of the people who hate on BF are CoD fans. I realize that this is the internet and nobody believes **** on the internet but I live in Oklahoma and shoot guns every weekend, matter of fact, I am going shooting tomorrow. I have shot a plentiful of combat weapons because I have friends that are class 3 dealers therefore being able to have automatic weapons legally. One of them even has a SAW, RPD, and an M240B, all of which I have shot a couple hundred if not thousands of rounds through. I would name the weapons that I have shot from battlefield but why, not like anybody would believe me. I have shot pretty much every caliber that you can think of. I have even shot a 50 cal 3 times, twice with a mcmillan and once with converted AR stock. I never turn down an offer to shoot something.
I only play games that are realistic and require skill to play. I can't play any of those magic games or fantasy games because they can't keep my attention. Battlefield is as close as it gets for a realistic video game(on a console, don't play PC games) and that's why I play it. I'll have my opinion on why its the best and you'll have yours against it.
#208 to #206 - jahnaids (03/30/2013) [-]

I really don't care.
I like Battlefield.
Especially Battlefield Badcompany 2. I was comparing Battlefield 3 to Bad Company 2.

you really don't have to prove anything.
Or argue, you're kinda bad at that
User avatar #87 to #43 - cedrock (03/29/2013) [-]
As I said, I have never played battlefield 3, but I will do soon.
What I mean by this is that I don't know why people think Bad Company 2 is better then battlefield 3, while to me, in videos, it looks much better.
#103 to #19 - shafmeister (03/29/2013) [-]
So you were one of the 12 snipers on my team of 16. Damn you.
User avatar #200 to #103 - dunmerforlife (03/30/2013) [-]
probably lol. I also loved using the AUG with the assault class
#212 to #200 - shafmeister (04/02/2013) [-]
Yeah the Aug was badass especially with magnum ammo. High rate of fire + decent damage = destruction.
User avatar #51 - gjaa (03/29/2013) [-]
Am I the only one would sacrifice the whole of campaign mode production time/money just so that the multiplayer could be mind-blowing?
User avatar #54 to #51 - pukki (03/29/2013) [-]
I dont understand how multiplayer can be mindblowing. It would still be basic Rush/Conquer/TDM modes.
User avatar #56 to #54 - gjaa (03/29/2013) [-]
If they invested all campaign budget into excellent servers, maps, innovative new modes. They could even throw in a map editor and then have a community map playlist. Also, more players per server is always an improvement.
User avatar #58 to #56 - pukki (03/29/2013) [-]
I still wouldn't go so far and call it mindblowing. All that sounds just neat and nice.
User avatar #59 to #58 - gjaa (03/29/2013) [-]
If done extraordinarily well then it could be. There are plenty of things that I wouldn't be able to think of, but the developers could.
User avatar #98 to #59 - froghole (03/29/2013) [-]
no matter what you do it will not eliminate campers, which is what battlefield has turned into.
User avatar #94 to #56 - hurricanesam (03/29/2013) [-]
User avatar #97 to #94 - gjaa (03/29/2013) [-]
We're talking about Battlefield in this thread, mate.
User avatar #101 to #97 - hurricanesam (03/29/2013) [-]
I know, I play Battlefield often. Im just saying that everything youre coming up with has been done. Halo got really bad because all of the community maps are ******* terrible.
User avatar #77 to #51 - sketchE ONLINE (03/29/2013) [-]
i think they tried that once. it was called mag
User avatar #92 to #77 - gjaa (03/29/2013) [-]
Ok, I looked that up and found this. If this was implemented in Battlefield but on a slightly smaller scale in terms of players per server, it would amazing. Imagine conquest with 10 flags and platoon commanders setting objectives for each platoon and each squad leader micromanaging his men. There would be dogfights going on in the sky, epic tank duels, huge infantry encounters as platoons meet. It would be incredible.
User avatar #93 to #92 - sketchE ONLINE (03/29/2013) [-]
that would actually be interesting i think id enjoy seeing an actual battle simulator
#122 to #93 - mrwoodcock (03/29/2013) [-]
#121 to #92 - mrwoodcock (03/29/2013) [-]
#117 to #92 - gjaa (03/29/2013) [-]
Lol forgot pic
User avatar #108 to #77 - potatot ONLINE (03/29/2013) [-]
Too bad they didn't make it into something bigger and better.
User avatar #95 - ilovedonkeydick (03/29/2013) [-]
Anyone else feel a huge kick in the nuts when 'Battlefield 3 Premium' came out? Here I am, 10000% proud of the series and to be a fan. Happy that this game series is like no other and is amazing. Bam, pay to play ******** . Whenever I got killed that big Premium logo on their player info made me boil with rage. Ever since premium came out I rarely play anymore. Then immediately when they finish hyping their DLC they start hyping BF4 making it look like it's a whole new game. It isn't. I'll regain my love for Battlefield if they don't have some BF4 premium ******** . That and the destructability sucked nuts compared to BC2.

tldr; Fanboy Rages to Modern Changes
User avatar #137 to #95 - Neodude (03/29/2013) [-]
Why were you angered about premium? Did you buy it yourself, because if not I see no reason to be mad, it did not give any real advantage over other players, which makes me question your reasoning for calling it pay-to-win. Also, no **** they are going to start hyping BF4 now that they have officially finished with BF3, it's just plain business sense. Honestly, if you owned a company, what would you do? Would you continue to emphasis a product that you have finished any and all production on, and so will not be adding anything to, or would you start advertising the next big product you plan on releasing to help increase sales on it, knowing that your last product paid for itself, and wanting this new one to do the same.
#175 to #95 - lordaurion (03/30/2013) [-]
Premium adds almost no functionality change to the game. It was just the cheapest way to get all the map packs and you got a few extra cosmetic things with it.
#119 to #95 - mrwoodcock (03/29/2013) [-]
That's why i prefer to stick to arma...
It got everything bf got and more... If you want realism then arma is more realistic than bf.
And the best part of it is that Bohemia supports moding. So everything that is not made by the developers, is made by the community...

P.S. Arma starts to be REALLY fun when you find a good community server
User avatar #104 to #95 - valyn (03/29/2013) [-]
i know that feel. have every battlefield game made, havent touched 3 since that faggot **** dropped
User avatar #107 to #95 - yusay (03/29/2013) [-]
When I preordered BF4 it said I would get some kind of premium just for the Digital deluxe version, which is 20 dollars more. If they really are going to keep it, it better just be 20 bucks.
#145 - deliciousdee ONLINE (03/29/2013) [-]
BF 2143 should come first
#83 - LocoJoe (03/29/2013) [-]
They need to work on it more. Make it a nextgen release. 			*******		 EA turning BF into COD by making them churn out a game every few years.   
I want to do this to the devs for putting in that 			*******		 bloom and blue tint
They need to work on it more. Make it a nextgen release. ******* EA turning BF into COD by making them churn out a game every few years.
I want to do this to the devs for putting in that ******* bloom and blue tint
User avatar #109 to #83 - yusay (03/29/2013) [-]
Considering this year might be their chance with COD fatigue/less hype, they might sell many more copies. Although I've honestly been out of the loop with gaming lately, I've barely heard anything about COD for this year.
User avatar #29 - fhbsdtmd (03/29/2013) [-]
they need to bring battlefield vietnam back with bf4 graphics and **** , that would be badass highspeed **** right there
User avatar #120 - pulluspardus (03/29/2013) [-]
I thought the joke here is how developers are so obsessed with overexaggrated sun rays and bloom , that look like a nuke exploded in the background
#138 to #120 - beefking (03/29/2013) [-]
**beefking rolled a random image posted in comment #1303 at I think i'll live **
User avatar #185 to #138 - arsyro (03/30/2013) [-]
******* just cause 2
#139 to #138 - beefking (03/29/2013) [-]
When people say Battlefield is "realistic"
User avatar #149 to #139 - katypower (03/29/2013) [-]
What's more realistic.
Battlfield... Or CoD?
User avatar #153 to #149 - viscerys ONLINE (03/30/2013) [-]
User avatar #154 to #153 - katypower (03/30/2013) [-]
So basically
''Whats more realistic; BF or CoD''
User avatar #201 to #154 - pulluspardus (03/30/2013) [-]
No Arma III look it up.
User avatar #155 to #154 - viscerys ONLINE (03/30/2013) [-]
In every possible way.
#186 to #149 - beefking (03/30/2013) [-]
**beefking rolled a random image posted in comment #6 at really netflix? ** Got some peaved people thumbing down!
User avatar #100 - dagreatmax (03/29/2013) [-]
I miss the BF2 times, sniping people 200m away when they were a small bump in the map.
#89 - sweateagle (03/29/2013) [-]
I wonder how the jets'll turn out...
I wonder how the jets'll turn out...
#220 to #89 - arcticassassin (08/06/2013) [-]
I don't know they can't get much better than this.
I don't know they can't get much better than this.
#221 to #89 - arcticassassin (08/06/2013) [-]
User avatar #91 to #89 - fuckberries (03/29/2013) [-]
well they still have sanchez.. so probably about 5 wins, maybe 6
User avatar #110 to #91 - mitchellking (03/29/2013) [-]
#31 - mondprinzessin (03/29/2013) [-]
Has it been confirmed yet??
Has it been confirmed yet??
User avatar #32 to #31 - kingrayne (03/29/2013) [-]
...yes? Theres a TV commercial and gameplay already out, of course the mission they chose to show off looks super generic...
User avatar #44 to #32 - turboderp (03/29/2013) [-]
if I made such games, I would show only the poorest scenes before release. This way, people would be amazed and **** their pants after they bought the game, instead of expect a fantastic orgasm at each minute, only to be fooled with a fart in the face.
User avatar #33 to #32 - mondprinzessin (03/29/2013) [-]
cool, thanks for the info bro
#75 to #55 - stoneddolphin (03/29/2013) [-]
Will it be for ps4 or for current consoles? Sorry I can't watch the video (age restriction, and I don't fell like making a new account).
User avatar #78 to #75 - summonsplix (03/29/2013) [-]
confirmed platforms are; PS3 Xbox 360 and PC, as far as i know not a PS4 version
#80 to #78 - stoneddolphin (03/29/2013) [-]
It would have a lot more potential on ps4. But then again it's all about the money and they would make a lot more sales on the ps3 and xbox 360 concerning that there has bee no word on the xbox720 and not everyone is gonna be able to buy the ps4 when it comes out so many people will not switch over.
It would have a lot more potential on ps4. But then again it's all about the money and they would make a lot more sales on the ps3 and xbox 360 concerning that there has bee no word on the xbox720 and not everyone is gonna be able to buy the ps4 when it comes out so many people will not switch over.
User avatar #179 to #80 - capslockrage (03/30/2013) [-]
No, there will be a new xbox coming out, the name just isn't confirmed.
It probably won't even be called the 720.
#198 to #179 - stoneddolphin (03/30/2013) [-]
I know it won't, but because no one knows, I just called it the 720.
User avatar #35 - kinglobster (03/29/2013) [-]
ill play the beta like i did for BF3, then never buy the game. because **** EA and **** Origin.
User avatar #84 - unicornswag (03/29/2013) [-]
I enjoyed battlefield 2 the most
#27 - anon (03/29/2013) [-]
What a shame how EA destroyed one of the few good war games on the market.
To me even Battlefield 3 felt like a **** in my toilet, DICE just ignored what everyone complained about and continued to release more DLC without fixing **** from the core game. Not to mention Battlefield 4 was officially announced before BF3 was even done with DLC.
User avatar #22 - briggsil (03/29/2013) [-]
I'll pass... ArmA 3 is where its at...

In coming ********* detected...
User avatar #36 to #22 - cedrock (03/29/2013) [-]
ArmA 3 is a nice game, don't get me wrong, but it gets boring. The realism tends to get boring after a while. In battlefield, you can do **** like jet swaps (Search "BF3 jet swap" on youtube if you don't know it) and way more other cool stuff that you wouldn't be able to do in ArmA.
#102 to #36 - shafmeister has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #39 to #22 - Omegashenron (03/29/2013) [-]
Arma III is cool but only for pc. SO I can't play it.
#163 - thatoldguy (03/30/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #168 to #163 - vanoreo (03/30/2013) [-]
I actually pulled something like that off once.

I shot a dude out of his cockpit with my jet gunner and just jacked his.
User avatar #171 to #163 - soggytomatoe (03/30/2013) [-]
You asshole. Now who's gonna clean up all this jizz?
User avatar #182 to #163 - arsyro (03/30/2013) [-]
i did this on Damavand Peak once, I sniped a jet pilot out off the cockpit and jacked his plain
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)