Smartest thing peter griffinn ever said. . So you can pay , 445, 883 on a commercial for: starving kids, but you can' t feed them?

Comments(54):

[ 54 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
-40
#2 - wretchedlarva has deleted their comment [+] (8 replies)
User avatar #3 to #2 - awesomanium (03/28/2013) [-]
You mean, that's not the REAL Peter Griffin?
#18 - mrgoodlove (03/29/2013) [+] (1 reply)
This image has expired
User avatar #16 - diablojoe (03/28/2013) [+] (5 replies)
First of all, charitable organizations are given TV advertising spots for free, secondly most of the footage comes from prerecorded stock footage and very little original footage is ever actually used and even if they did use original footage, a small crew and maybe one camera + travel fees+ some second rate editting software, which is all they'd ever actually, use would not cost 6,000,000+ dollars. Shut the **** up, I'm sick of seeing this ******* content get thumbed you mothertossing arsewanker.
#20 - emurater (03/29/2013) [+] (2 replies)
shut up meg.
shut up meg.
#29 - iheartidiots (03/29/2013) [-]
made this a while back; relates
User avatar #25 - thepyras (03/29/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I get the point of twitter accounts for fictional characters, but only if you use it in character. This is something Peter Griffin would never say.
#43 - jandersoninbbb (03/29/2013) [-]
The advertisements are made so that, theoretically, a large group of people that see it will donate more than just one organization.
#23 - anonymous (03/29/2013) [+] (1 reply)
The fact that he put an precise number makes people actually believe that the number is real, have you seen the adverts?
User avatar #39 to #23 - jewsburninindaoven (03/29/2013) [-]
Shut up meg
+1
#46 - potatonuggets **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#56 - darkjoker (03/29/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#53 - strongsauce (03/29/2013) [+] (1 reply)
PLEASE show your parents this website... I know you don't give to charity   
   
www.charitynavigator.org/
PLEASE show your parents this website... I know you don't give to charity

www.charitynavigator.org/
#52 - anonymous (03/29/2013) [-]
its a reminder to people that kids are starving..

imagine a world with no such ads... and imagine the people who actually doesnt care.
People need to be reminded.
#50 - winniedawho (03/29/2013) [-]
Revenue raising dude, revenue raising.

You have to spend to earn MORE, that what revenue raising means.
User avatar #49 - onceman (03/29/2013) [-]
Omg this is so true, cause I'm sure it's just common sense that people with loads of money go to these places with children living in extreme poverty, make commercials showing their concern and asking you to help, and just leave without helping them out in any way.

That's how ******* stupid you, the people who have reposted this, and Seth McFarlen sound.
User avatar #12 - kirluu (03/28/2013) [+] (4 replies)
The point of the commercial is to inform people of the problem, thus increasing the amount of people who will take action and help the fond. This is supposed to make up for the money spent on the commercializing and campaigning.

In other words, this post is retarded.
#10 - anonymous (03/28/2013) [+] (1 reply)
All that has to happen is that the commercial makes more than it costs. Furthermore, don't charities get free spots on certain TV networks to show their commercial. In which case, one commercial could be used for years, with no more cost than what it initially cost.
#8 - anonymous (03/28/2013) [-]
The idea is to get publicity for the issue and hopefully the commercial would make more for the issue than it cost. Just like in regular commercials.
#5 - anonymous (03/28/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Commercials for those charities are given spots on TV networks for free.
#1 - anonymous (03/28/2013) [-]
[citation needed]
[ 54 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)