Upload
YouTube Videos Funny Pictures Funny GIFs Funny Text Funny Movies
Login or register
  • Your Posts
  • Login or register
    Login / Create Account
    Create Account
    Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
     
    Click to Create Account
    Login to FJ
    reset password
    Click to Login
    Log in/Sign with Facebook.
    Log in/Sign up with Gmail.
  • Create Channel 4chan animemanga aww politics Tumblr-Content vidyagaems marvel cat WholesomeMemes cute dccomics starwars dank-webms UnlimitFateWorks Daily-Jokes s-c-p OneForAll CartoonGoodness RainbowSixSiege oc-comic-makers DankHistory FJNN videogames polandball warhammer40k Raven Conspiracytime cat-channel wallpapers dungeons-n-drags elderscrolls bendingtime overwatch-time furry tf2 erma zawarldo Earth-chan DokiDokiClub deadpool pokemon Gondola
    Home
    Reset viewedpages
    Sort: ThumbsTrending
      New!adhesive optimal wakeful Cormorantadhesive optimal wakeful Cormorant
      389
      3 hrs ago
      New!JOKEJOKE
      453
      3 hrs ago
      ---- You Tony---- You Tony
      627
      4 hrs ago
      breezy hospitable Elandbreezy hospitable Eland
      749
      6 hrs ago
      New!This is why I have trust issuesThis is why I have trust issues
      258
      3 hrs ago
      Abnanad phoneAbnanad phone
      462
      4 hrs ago
      New!UK Police Say Not ‘Cost Effective’ to InvestigateUK Police Say Not ‘Cost Effective’ to Investigate
      281
      2 hrs ago
      New!Just a Seal catching a ride on top of a rudderJust a Seal catching a ride on top of a rudder
      176
      2 hrs ago
      New!romantic rigid Rookromantic rigid Rook
      102
      1 hr ago
      future lethal complex Quailfuture lethal complex Quail
      368
      4 hrs ago
      New!Travel time in 1914 from LondonTravel time in 1914 from London
      155
      2 hrs ago
      New!organic far-flung redundant Armadilloorganic far-flung redundant Armadillo
      261
      3 hrs ago
      CopperCopper
      348
      4 hrs ago
      posting this while it is still relevantposting this while it is still relevant
      409
      4 hrs ago
      New!Aircraft emergency slide deploying slow moAircraft emergency slide deploying slow mo
      140
      2 hrs ago
      New!disgusting hanging wonderful Whaledisgusting hanging wonderful Whale
      231
      3 hrs ago
      New!Kids crying over nonsenseKids crying over nonsense
      259
      3 hrs ago
      New!frequent halting historical Sandpiperfrequent halting historical Sandpiper
      204
      3 hrs ago
      fresh cloudy rare Cariboufresh cloudy rare Caribou
      482
      6 hrs ago
      New!Puzzle BoxPuzzle Box
      133
      2 hrs ago
      New!yielding permissible Ravenyielding permissible Raven
      188
      3 hrs ago
      Supporters of rival teams come face to face in the streetsSupporters of rival teams come face to face in the streets
      527
      6 hrs ago
      New!Brain reboot successfulBrain reboot successful
      178
      3 hrs ago
      New!far testy devilish ---htingalefar testy devilish ---htingale
      164
      3 hrs ago
      Sweet DreamsSweet Dreams
      202
      4 hrs ago
      The future is nowThe future is now
      672
      7 hrs ago
      New!I like trainsI like trains
      58
      1 hr ago
      New!Who doesn't like sausage?Who doesn't like sausage?
      105
      1 hr ago
      Never saw the whole one beforeNever saw the whole one before
      760
      9 hrs ago
      Rebellious teens of the 21st centuryRebellious teens of the 21st century
      618
      8 hrs ago
    Newest Uploads
      He proteccHe protecc
      0
      39 snds ago
      All-Purpose FlourAll-Purpose Flour
      0
      2 mns ago
      Thanos Quest: Mind GemThanos Quest: Mind Gem
      1
      2 mns ago
      A purchase to be sure, but a disappointing oneA purchase to be sure, but a disappointing one
      6
      12 mns ago
      Stankpost comp 2Stankpost comp 2
      9
      13 mns ago
      Always busyAlways busy
      10
      15 mns ago
      Anon dates a furryAnon dates a furry
      10
      17 mns ago
      A tremendous floofA tremendous floof
      9
      19 mns ago
      Anon plays Truth or DareAnon plays Truth or Dare
      6
      19 mns ago
      What would you do in 30 seconds?What would you do in 30 seconds?
      3
      21 mns ago
    User Rankings Funny Pictures Videos / MP4s HD Gifs/Soundless MP4 Animated GIFs YouTube Videos Text Posts
    About us
    • Advertise on FJ
    • Copyright/DMCA Removal
    • Report Abuse/Harassment
    • Report Spam
    • Contact Us
    • Unsubscribe from newsletter
    Remaining character count: 4000
    Spoiler Image
    Shortcuts: "C" opens comments. "R" refreshes comments.
    Record voice message?
    0:00 Click to start recording.
    Scroll to comment?
    Back to the content 'Against Gay Marriage'
    Refresh
    Options
    asd
    2 new threads. 1 new replies.
    User avatar#170 - solinvictus
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    There is seriously a fundamental misunderstanding about what marriage is. It is not about love, it is not about lust. To put it simply it is about the proliferation of the species.
    Historically, I cannot think of any Western culture who instituted gay marriage. Sure, there were many who have been accepting of homosexuality, such as the ancient Greeks (and not all of them for that fact, such as the Spartans). For many centuries, love was not even a precept of marriage, it was a union between a man and a woman and their families for the purpose of producing heirs. Why do you think married couples get tax incentives? To make it easier on them financially to have and raise children. Of course, now-a-days we prefer to love the person we marry, I would prefer it myself.
    So many people are clamoring for gay marriage, and apparently no one has any idea what marriage is meant for. If we go to change thousands upon thousands of years of cultural and legal precedence on a whim, a political fad that has only risen in popularity in the last couple of years, where will it end? What is even the point of being married if it is no longer about having children? Just to have the state recognize that you are in love? I'm sure I'll get a lot of red thumbs for this, but someone has to stand up and speak the damn truth every once in a while because the truth has clearly not dawned on any of you.
    User avatar#333 to #170 - godofcorndog
    Reply+2
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    People have owned slaves for thousands of years. Why should we free them on a whim and political fad? People just can't face the damn truth every once in a while because the truth has clearly not dawned on any of you.
    #312 to #170 - rodneyabc
    Reply+2
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Nah most of us are just generally clever enough to make the logical leap that gay marriage doesn't hurt anyone so it shouldn't be banned.

    Writing a lot of words and over thinking **** doesn't make you clever. It just shifts you sideways from down syndrome retarded to autistic retarded.
    User avatar#210 to #170 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    You are so foolish it's hilarious. Marriage has absolutely nothing to do with proliferation of the species, especially considering marriage is an entirely human construct that holds no basis on reproduction.
    #335 to #210 - matuemco
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    this
    and btw love how #170 is talking about speaking "damn truth" thinking his opinion is the truth
    #221 to #210 - anon id: 85859339
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    You are such a pretentious douche it's pathetic.
    #250 to #221 - anon id: 47799068
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Why don't you add to the debate rather then being a pretentious douche.
    #255 to #250 - anon id: 85859339
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Because there's no debating with this faggot.
    It's "LOL IM RITE UR WRONG DEAL WITH IT."
    #243 to #221 - gilfhunter
    Reply+2
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Comment Picture
    User avatar#229 to #221 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Yup, doesn't mean I'm wrong though.
    #234 to #229 - anon id: 85859339
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Actually it does, since no one wants to listen to a faggot like you.
    Doesn't matter how "Right" you think you are if everyone thinks you're a huge douche.

    But of course, you're not going to listen and still think you're right, and continue being a douche, and think people actually respect your opinions.

    Go **** yourself. You are the reason people hate atheists.
    User avatar#316 to #234 - hurricanesam
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    I dunno man, youre kind of being a douche right now.
    User avatar#248 to #234 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    You're so angry, should probably get help for that.

    Why would it matter if someone thinks I'm a douche? There are many that don't, I hardly see any reason in trying to get the endearment of someone who ignorantly believes in the opposite of me on this specific issue.

    Because unfortunately, I'm not wrong, and the only way you can honestly say I am is if you support making a specific sect of person a second class citizen for no good reason.

    #254 to #248 - anon id: 85859339
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    You're the kind of faggot that goes on the internet just to try and argue with people and feel smart because you're dumb as **** in real life.

    "LOL IM AN ATHEIST IM RIGHT ALL THE TIME U CAN'T ARGUE WITH ME I HAVE TWO PEOPLE THAT AGREE THAT MAKES ME RIGHT DEAL WITH IT."

    You're pathetic.

    And really? You're gonna try and devalue my argument by saying "LOL U MAD, BRO?"

    Kill yourself.
    #328 to #254 - rodneyabc
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Considering the dude hasn't once mentioned atheism and you just brought it up, im going to go ahead and assume he mentioned it somewhere else and you decided to ******* stalk the guy from another part of the site and hound him about it here.

    You are ******* creepy.
    User avatar#257 to #254 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+3
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Hardly, simply pointing out the fact you're taking this pretty harshly for no reason.

    Strange how I literally haven't said anything like that yet you keep writing it as if I have. Everything I've written is pretty explained and non-pretentious.
    #206 to #170 - mrmamric
    Reply-1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    The message of marriage died back about in the sixties and seventies. That was when free love exploded and people were ******* like rabbits. People nowadays don't realize what life was like before then and our entire culture was changed. Now, since marriage doesn't mean what it used to, people have to abberate what marriage stands for.

    It's really interesting how our society has changed. What's more interesting is how I'm likely going to get red thumbs from this comment even though this is just a lesson on history.
    User avatar#231 to #206 - solinvictus
    Reply-4
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Your absolutely right, and of course those cultures back then are mocked today as being unenlightened and chauvinistic. So people, especially from our generation, are not learning family values, unless their parents teach them, and our schools are hard at work to undermine that.
    As for history, the morons on this site have clearly stated that history means nothing. Its just a bunch of dead guys, what could we possibly learn from them, right?
    #240 to #231 - mrmamric
    Reply-1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    "Exactly. I mean, they're dead. So it's not like they could have taught us anything important anyway, right?"

    ~The average FJ user
    User avatar#212 to #206 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Peoples views and opinions change with time, this isn't inherently a bad thing. Sixties and seventies also were times of heavy discrimination and sexual repression, we evolve and try to better ourselves, this is a case of such an event.
    #216 to #212 - mrmamric
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    I don't really see how the evolution of marriage fits into us evolving into better creatures, but I'm just going to assume you're right.
    User avatar#224 to #216 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    It's not evolution of marriage, marriage can't really evolve since it's a construct purely derived from societies views on the current acceptance. Ancient sumerians had group marriages/gay marriages/man-woman marriages, etc. Ancient greeks and romans really didn't put so much "ceremonial" basis on marriage and instead married for families (to have children and what not) but would commonly take part in homosexual acts in bath houses and such. Native americans viewed groupings of opposite sex and same sex individuals to be equal because they put more importance on the spirit than the body.

    It's more just our societal opinion that's evolving. That's what makes us better creatures.
    User avatar#258 to #224 - solinvictus
    Reply-2
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Your wrong about the Greeks and Romans, they put a GREAT deal of ceremony into marriage, but it was between and man and a woman. Furthermore, what lasting effect have the Sumarians had on Western society, as opposed to the Greeks and Romans. Very little.
    #309 to #258 - theseustheminotaur
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Do you know nothing about the sumerians at all?
    User avatar#267 to #258 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+2
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    During paganistic times and outside of more abrahamic controlled areas? I think not, they purely put emphasis on family, marriages otherwise were not held in very high regard minus possibly royal groupings.

    Oh and you're totally right, the sumerians had no lasting impact whatsoever....minus the heavy contributions to math, architecture, monetary systems, lunar calenders, etc, etc...but I mean who cares about those right?
    #232 to #224 - mrmamric
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    At any rate, why has there been such a sudden boom of gay stuff all over the internet lately? Is there some gay, worldwide vote that I'm missing here or something?
    User avatar#251 to #232 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Well in the US the supreme court is hearing testimony on repealing prop 8 (The law passed in california that banned gay marriage) and the DOMA (Defense of marriage act, that basically calls marriage "between 1 man and 1 woman" and tries to set that as the countries standard which many don't agree with).

    So yeah right now it's a pretty hot topic.
    #263 to #251 - mrmamric
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Oh. So that's why that guy had a Prop 8 bumpersticker on... I thought he was just stuck in the past. XD
    User avatar#268 to #263 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Yeah it's going to be a pretty heated issue for a bit longer, even though nothing will get done anytime soon. They have to go through countless appeals and testimonies and then they still have to account for the time to make an actual decision. It's aggravatingly slow.
    #249 to #232 - theseustheminotaur
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    I think it's because of the supreme court looking at prop 8, possibly overturning it.
    #264 to #249 - mrmamric
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    That explains a lot. Thank you!
    #265 to #264 - theseustheminotaur
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Anytime!
    User avatar#188 to #170 - Dropkicksxxx
    Reply+2
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    So everyone who gets married has children? What does a it honestly hurt anyone, and speaking of children, many straight couples have children and don't even want them but if a gay couple has children they have to try, be it adopted or surrogate they have to spendthat time and money to do so, because they truly want to raise a child. I'm sure the kid sitting in an orphanage doesn't mind having two moms or two dads. And look now they have a heir, and a child who would have grown up without parents otherwise now has a loving family. Your argument is flawed, why should we continue to follow laws made two thousand years ago? Just because we've been conditioned to them? What honestly could follow gay marriage that would be so horrific that we can't allow it?
    User avatar#178 to #170 - richardastley
    Reply+2
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    But that's the problem with your argument. Marriage isn't just about healthy functioning of the species. You know what else would be good for the species? If we just killed all the rich people and had our governments redistribute that wealth. Another thing we could do is end the suffering caused by poverty by killing everyone living in poverty. Or even if we randomly kill a certain percentage of the people on Earth, eventually absolute poverty won't even be an issue.

    Marriage has evolved, at least in most societies, to be a monogamous romantic relationship between two people who love each other. There is even the individual benefits for each couple that come with a partner's ability to make decisions for medical emergencies or to raise children. The purpose of gay marriage legalization is for the right to have a life partner to make those decisions or help raise those children. The purpose of marriage has evolved into more than just human function because it is a human rights issue.
    User avatar#180 to #178 - solinvictus
    Reply-7
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Kill, kill, kill. Is that your answer to everything you ******* retard? As for evolution, lets look at it this way. When species evolve and survive, it is because what they evolved into works and is useful.
    User avatar#182 to #180 - richardastley
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Exactly. Having a romantic life partner, even if you're gay, works and is useful.

    Evolution doesn't always work in the species' favour, but in this case, it does!
    User avatar#185 to #182 - solinvictus
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    How does it work? It serves no purpose for society or for children. If the only reason for gays to get married is so they can deal with medical decisions then make a law that deals with that issue by itself, not fundamentally change the meaning of thousands of years of tradition just for that insignificant little purpose.
    #204 to #185 - anon id: 47799068
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    It has also been hypothesized that gays are a sort of biological population control.
    User avatar#190 to #185 - richardastley
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Many gay couples adopt. That helps children. Generally speaking, orphanages prefer two parents to adopt over a single person because the research suggests that two parents are better than one. The research also suggests that kids raised by gay couples are just as well off as kids raised by heterosexual couples. So there's a huge hole in your argument!
    User avatar#195 to #190 - solinvictus
    Reply-4
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Only a man and a woman can raise a child right. As I said in a comment before, a man cannot be a mother to a child, nor can a woman be a father, and a child needs both in order to understand its gender role in society.
    User avatar#207 to #195 - richardastley
    Reply+2
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    I strongly recommend you look up "Comparing the Impact of Homosexual and Heterosexual Parents on Children" in the Journal of Homosexuality by Allen and Burrell. A TON of evidence is just piled up in that article arguing against your statement "Only a man and a woman can raise a child right." It's a meta-analysis looking into research over the years. The DOI number is 10.1300/J082v32n02_02

    Happy reading.
    User avatar#181 to #180 - solinvictus
    Reply-3
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    accidentally hit enter or something. where was I? Marriage has remained fundamentally the same for so many millenia because it works and doesn't need to be altered.
    #176 to #170 - necroshiz**User deleted account**
    +1
    has deleted their comment [-]
    User avatar#220 to #176 - Dropkicksxxx
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Exactly, this kid is arguing that we should still live by laws created 2000 years ago. If we always did that we would never advance as a race, just kick our legs and flail around in one spot.
    #225 to #220 - necroshiz**User deleted account**
    +1
    has deleted their comment [-]
    User avatar#244 to #225 - Dropkicksxxx
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    A wanna be what? I'm sorry I must have a brain fart brewing haha
    #253 to #244 - necroshiz**User deleted account**
    +2
    has deleted their comment [-]
    User avatar#260 to #253 - Dropkicksxxx
    Reply+2
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Ahh I see good sir, I've been here forever and should have known that, like since it was bright green haha. I didn't make a user name till '10 I believe though. Thanks for clearing that up for me, I must peel myself away from here for work though. G-night
    #271 to #260 - necroshiz**User deleted account**
    +2
    has deleted their comment [-]
    User avatar#184 to #176 - solinvictus
    Reply-3
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Morality is the distinction between right and wrong. What is fundamentally right and what is wrong does not change from one society to the next. Nihilism will get you no where with me.
    #191 to #184 - necroshiz**User deleted account**
    +1
    has deleted their comment [-]
    #174 to #170 - anon id: 47799068
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    I do not want to get married because i want to have children or get tax decreases. I want to spend the rest of my life with some one and truly share it with them. Why would Romans have any relevance at all? That was a long time ago and shouldnt be a basis for marriage in the US.
    User avatar#179 to #174 - solinvictus
    Reply-2
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    You don't need to get married to spend the rest of your life with someone. As for your comment on history, you truly have no idea how much you are affected by it. A great deal of western law is based on ancient laws, many established by the Romans. Our very constitution was inspired by the Roman Republic, Anglo-Saxon law, and Jewish law from the old testament. Historical precedence means a great deal. Take for instance private property, a right that has been established for centuries. Take that right away and one only need look at the old Soviet Union to see the result of it.
    #193 to #179 - anon id: 47799068
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    This is true, we do hold onto some customs and laws from the past, but we are a lot more civilized now. Things shouldn't be kept the same because old values were based on it. Laws and values need to be more flexible (to an extent) to work and mold into an ever growing modern society. If we still kept old traditions and faiths women and blacks could still be treated as second rate citizens or slaves. If our laws and values don't grow with us, our society will never go anywhere.
    #171 to #170 - jamintomusic
    Reply+6
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    so what about infertile people? they shouldn't get married? And its also about the benefits of getting married. such as tax cuts. and welfare when your spouse dies. which gay couples do not receive in many states. like they do in Canada for one.
    User avatar#187 to #171 - solinvictus
    Reply-3
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Marriage is not about the welfare of husband and wife, it is, has always been, and should always remain about the welfare of the children. As for infertile people, they can still raise children in an ideal household, can they not? Now I have nothing against gays in particular, but they cannot act as parents. Children must have a father and mother figure in their lives in order to understand their gender role in society. A man cannot be a mother to a child anymore than a woman can be a father. They are not biologically programmed to do so.
    User avatar#215 to #187 - Dropkicksxxx
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    Dude, your logic is is flawed to the point where I don't even know how to argue, you'll have some rhetorical open ended answer that has no basis other than your own opinion. Do gays not have family to unite? Can they not have a surrogate or a donor to have children? Why can't they raise a child, because you say so? I happen to know a few people raised by same sex couples, you would never be able to tell, they get their gender identity from T.V and from interactions at school. Also, most cultures that do not accept gays do not because of religion. I really don't want a reply unless you have something intelligent, not this crap you learned from watching FOX news for an hour or two. The only thing it would change about marriage is who could do it.
    #194 to #187 - jamintomusic
    Reply+1
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    i only grew up with a working full time mother and i turned out just fine. and no i am not gay.
    User avatar#200 to #194 - solinvictus
    Reply-3
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    I'm certainly not saying a single parent can't raise a child right, but generally speaking, as studies have shown, children do much better in a household with a mother and a father. You can tell me your personal story all you want, but that doesn't change anything.
    User avatar#242 to #200 - cheeselol
    Reply0
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    you're two arguments against it are pretty much 'its tradition' and 'it is bad for children'

    do the ******* math.

    whats no parents

    a single parent

    a single gay parent

    a gay couple?

    as for 'its a tradition. **** off.
    User avatar#261 to #242 - solinvictus
    Reply-3
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    If you would like to lead a traditionless life, that is fine, its your business. But that doesn't give you the right to fundamentally alter mine and a large majority of Americans just because you disagree.
    User avatar#269 to #261 - cheeselol
    Reply+3
    (03/28/2013)[-]
    its fine to be against gay marriage if you have a solid reason.

    its a tradition is not a solid reason, its retarded.

    the KKK dont follow the tradition of lynching black people publicly any more, does that mean they should start against because 'its tradition'?

    again with the post, two people who you will never know getting married will not affect you in the ******* slightest.
    Back to the content 'Against Gay Marriage'

    Top in 24 Hours

    • adhesive optimal wakeful Cormorant
      adhesive optimal wakeful Cormorant

      390
      3h ago
    • JOKE
      JOKE

      453
      3h ago
    • ---- You Tony
      ---- You Tony

      627
      4h ago
    • breezy hospitable Eland
      breezy hospitable Eland

      749
      6h ago
    • This is why I have trust issues
      This is why I have trust issues

      258
      3h ago
    • Abnanad phone
      Abnanad phone

      462
      4h ago
    • UK Police Say Not ‘Cost Effective’ to Investigate
      UK Police Say Not ‘Cost Effective’ to Investigate

      281
      2h ago
    • Just a Seal catching a ride on top of a rudder
      Just a Seal catching a ride on top of a rudder

      176
      2h ago
    • romantic rigid Rook
      romantic rigid Rook

      102
      1h ago
    • future lethal complex Quail
      future lethal complex Quail

      368
      4h ago
    • Travel time in 1914 from London
      Travel time in 1914 from London

      155
      2h ago
    • organic far-flung redundant Armadillo
      organic far-flung redundant Armadillo

      261
      3h ago
    • Copper
      Copper

      349
      4h ago
    • posting this while it is still relevant
      posting this while it is still relevant

      409
      4h ago
    • Aircraft emergency slide deploying slow mo
      Aircraft emergency slide deploying slow mo

      140
      2h ago
    • disgusting hanging wonderful Whale
      disgusting hanging wonderful Whale

      231
      3h ago
    • Kids crying over nonsense
      Kids crying over nonsense

      259
      3h ago
    • frequent halting historical Sandpiper
      frequent halting historical Sandpiper

      204
      3h ago
    • fresh cloudy rare Caribou
      fresh cloudy rare Caribou

      482
      6h ago
    • Puzzle Box
      Puzzle Box

      133
      2h ago
    • yielding permissible Raven
      yielding permissible Raven

      188
      3h ago
    • Supporters of rival teams come face to face in the streets
      Supporters of rival teams come face to face in the streets

      527
      6h ago
    • Brain reboot successful
      Brain reboot successful

      178
      3h ago
    • far testy devilish ---htingale
      far testy devilish ---htingale

      164
      3h ago
    • Sweet Dreams
      Sweet Dreams

      202
      4h ago
    • The future is now
      The future is now

      672
      7h ago
    • I like trains
      I like trains

      58
      1h ago
    • Who doesn't like sausage?
      Who doesn't like sausage?

      105
      1h ago
    • Never saw the whole one before
      Never saw the whole one before

      760
      9h ago
    • Rebellious teens of the 21st century
      Rebellious teens of the 21st century

      618
      8h ago
    • Classic
      Classic

      195
      4h ago
    • 4chan comp. #99
      4chan comp. #99

      56
      1h ago
    • empty great Alligator
      empty great Alligator

      156
      3h ago
    • History is Written by the Victors...
      History is Written by the Victors...

      1142
      11h ago
    • powerful magenta Wombat
      powerful magenta Wombat

      36
      53m ago
    • Man Mauled by Dog
      Man Mauled by Dog

      37
      1h ago
    • The Black People may be DANGEROUS for Japan
      The Black People may be DANGEROUS for Japan

      108
      3h ago
    • Happy parent
      Happy parent

      21
      31m ago
    • Bitch got served
      Bitch got served

      32
      32m ago
    • This ad for a game....
      This ad for a game....

      58
      1h ago
    FunnyJunk, LLC - Copyright - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Community Guidelines - Copyright Removal Request