Upload
Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#79 - anon id: c02be050
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
I could see marriage priveledges get abused very quickly.

Could it possibly happen that 2 friends pretend they are "gay" and get married for lowered taxes, insurance, etc? And considering if one dies, the other friend can get all his ****. Plus you could date any girl you want and not have to worry about being divorced and having all your **** gone.

Anyways, its a more fragile subject in court, as it would bring a lot of new problems they'd have to deal with. Considering anyone can abuse the system.
#138 to #79 - colmcorbec
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
"you could date any girl you want and not have to worry about being divorced"   
   
You mean like every teen on the planet? Wooa, that would be balls :D"   
   
I also heard the economy of canada has collapsed because of all the fraud.   
You know, like in Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, Israel, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and every other country that legalized same sex marriage.
"you could date any girl you want and not have to worry about being divorced"

You mean like every teen on the planet? Wooa, that would be balls :D"

I also heard the economy of canada has collapsed because of all the fraud.
You know, like in Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, Israel, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and every other country that legalized same sex marriage.
User avatar #87 to #79 - coolcalx
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
you're implying that straight people can't do this?
User avatar #83 to #79 - Kingsteveooo
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
Yeah, because marriage is so sacred now with the divorce rate being 50% and all
User avatar #80 to #79 - habanaro
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
Can't men and women already pretend to be married to get benefits? Why is this a sudden new problem with gay marriage?
#82 to #80 - anon id: c02be050
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
because its going against gender roles.

the court: Alright so whos the husband?

the gay couple: we both are.

the court: ****. how do i deal with this?
#86 to #82 - paradoxpoetic
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
How is that a problem? Why do they need to know who the husband is? Does the husband get specific rights?
User avatar #98 to #86 - zonicoi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
Because, As i'm assuming from what i've heard from other people, in like cases with children, the mother almost always gets the children unless the father has some serious **** on her.
or so i'm told.
#100 to #98 - paradoxpoetic
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
The way something like that works, is the primary caregiver keeps sole custody except for extreme cases. Usually this is the mother, because the mother breastfeeds, or stays home to raise the child. In the case of a homosexual partnership, if they were to divorce then the parent that acted as a primary caregiver to the child, the one that stayed home and didn't work in a single-income household, for example, would receive the child.
User avatar #113 to #100 - sweetjessierose
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
Right, because there are no dual-income straight marriages....
#114 to #113 - paradoxpoetic
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
I was answering his question in the context of homosexual relationships. In dual-income straight marriages, the child usually goes with the mother because the mother is usually the primary caregiver, unless the parents agree otherwise or there are extenuating circumstances.
User avatar #101 to #100 - zonicoi
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
See no i just look like an idiot.
god dammit paradox y u so smrt
#104 to #101 - killerostars
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
While what he said is true if the children are old enough, like 13 or so, they can have a huge influence on a court case. Like if they didn't want to go with the mother.
User avatar #106 to #104 - zonicoi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
you're right, but a little over on the age.
atleast in Iowa it's 9.
#102 to #101 - paradoxpoetic
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
Thumbed you up because reasons.
User avatar #84 to #82 - habanaro
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/28/2013) [-]
Except there's places where gay marriage is already legal and there's been all of no news made of problems like this.