Penn Jillette. Luke I am your father. There is no out and than we simile truth. It even! trace of any sink relgion were mined out and nothing were Basset! " It  duct Tape is silver
x

Penn Jillette

Penn Jillette. Luke I am your father. There is no out and than we simile truth. It even! trace of any sink relgion were mined out and nothing were Basset! " It

Luke I am your father

There is no out and than we
simile truth. It even! trace of
any sink relgion were
mined out and nothing were
Basset! " It would never be
that wall
again. There might he some
other nonsense in Its time.
but not that exact nonsense. It
all oi science were lelellele out
tattie still he true and
someone would lino a may to
more it all out attain.
Penn Gillette
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+395
Views: 27650
Favorited: 115
Submitted: 03/20/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to mrgoodlove submit to reddit

Comments(348):

[ 348 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #15 - Wazzy (03/20/2013) [-]
If every single trace of me was wiped out there would never be anything created exactly like me. Does that mean I don't exist?
#208 to #15 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
You arent an omnipotent being
User avatar #23 to #15 - arziben (03/21/2013) [-]
you're a unique living being, of course not
User avatar #17 to #15 - fjsknight (03/20/2013) [-]
Well the possiblility exists that after an immeasurable amount of time that someone just like you will exist. Although the same argument could be made for religion.
User avatar #27 to #15 - kamusioso (03/21/2013) [-]
You don't exist anymore, you existed
And this guy says that the data we obtained about God would be wiped out, not him. As no one has ever seen him (outside of the bible), he would need to send that data again, give us another bible, or appear... IF he didn't, then he doesn't exist.
User avatar #16 to #15 - mrgoodlove (03/20/2013) [-]
Yes
#26 to #15 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
your logic is flawed
User avatar #38 to #15 - notguitaraddict (03/21/2013) [-]
you're a living thing, not a theory
User avatar #47 to #38 - Crusader (03/21/2013) [-]
But a theory can be a thing.
The theory of gravity, for example.
Still a theory, but still an observable thing, we can see the effects.
What he is talking about is if he ceased to exist, his atoms disappeared, people forgot who he was, would he still have existed? Yes, but we could not observe the fact that he did indeed at some point exist.
User avatar #206 to #47 - usernameluisdjlols ONLINE (03/21/2013) [-]
if he's wiped from existence, then he would not exist. i think that's pretty simple. gravity is something you experience, something you feel every day that keeps you to the ground. god is an idea for how the universe started and why some things are, so even if he was wiped from all of everyone's thoughts, there would be people again going "why was everything created?" and the idea of a god would be created again. sure, not the same white haired bearded zeus we think of, but one that would probably fit into modern society, maybe even a tan black haired god or some ****
User avatar #324 to #206 - Crusader (03/21/2013) [-]
Sorry, I shouldn't have said wiped from existence, all evidence of him is wiped out except for mentions in the school yearbook.
User avatar #77 to #47 - neutrality (03/21/2013) [-]
Gravity is not a Theory, it is a law of science meaning; it is proven.
User avatar #248 to #77 - RandomAnonGuy (03/21/2013) [-]
No, gravity is theory that is used to explain the law of universal attraction.
#86 to #15 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
Actually there are several theories out there that say not only is it possible for that to happen but It is plausible. Aside from the usual multi-universe theory. There is also an idea out there that suggests even if the universe is infinite, that due to the repetition of certain patterns in the universe if you go far enough away from here in any direction eventually you will find an exact copy of your self at any age doing anything you have or haven't done simply because there are actually a finite number of ways things can be done. I'm so sorry I can't find the sauce right now but Google should help if anyone is interested in learning more.
#39 to #15 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
Doesn't mean you don't exist, it just means you don't matter.
User avatar #69 - ComicBookGuy (03/21/2013) [-]
While reading the content, I was thinking do I really want to look at the comments? The answer? No.
User avatar #73 to #69 - anonymousattorney (03/21/2013) [-]
....I read that in the Comic Book guy's voice from the Simpsons...
User avatar #71 to #69 - hypex (03/21/2013) [-]
worst. comments. ever.

sorry i just had to
#51 - rhc (03/21/2013) [-]
I hate that atheists on here tend to hold "atheist idols" such as Richard Dawkins, this faggot magician, and that "President of Atheist Society" or whatever the hell his meaningless title is.   
They just take the word of these people as fact, as if what they say about god is any more valid than a non-famous person. If what they're talking about their respective field, that's a different story, and they are probably more qualified (e.g. Dawkins explaining evolution, because he is a evolutionary biologist, or Stephen Hawking explaining the Big Bang, because he is a cosmologist)   
I am an atheist, but people like Richard Dawkins and Penn Jillette are just as stupid and evangelical as their religious counterparts.
I hate that atheists on here tend to hold "atheist idols" such as Richard Dawkins, this faggot magician, and that "President of Atheist Society" or whatever the hell his meaningless title is.
They just take the word of these people as fact, as if what they say about god is any more valid than a non-famous person. If what they're talking about their respective field, that's a different story, and they are probably more qualified (e.g. Dawkins explaining evolution, because he is a evolutionary biologist, or Stephen Hawking explaining the Big Bang, because he is a cosmologist)
I am an atheist, but people like Richard Dawkins and Penn Jillette are just as stupid and evangelical as their religious counterparts.
User avatar #286 to #51 - robinwilliamson (03/21/2013) [-]
Atheists have atheist organization leaders but their title is meaningless? Does that make the pope a meaningless title too?
#301 to #286 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
"Atheists have atheist organization leaders"
Sounds to me that atheism is becoming more and more like a religion to me.
User avatar #70 to #51 - jewsburninindaoven (03/21/2013) [-]
But guys like Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, and Stephen Hawking have PhD's in very difficult fields and are borderline geniuses. They are much more qualified than evangelical Christians.
User avatar #81 to #70 - rhc (03/21/2013) [-]
They are geniuses. But being a genius and having a Ph.D have nothing do with philosophy, however ironic it sounds (Ph.D = doctor of philosophy). Philosophy and religion are relative by nature, because none of it can be proven or disproven, so no person is more qualified than another to argue it.

However, if you want to get into an argument about neuroscience or evolutionary biology or astrophysics, talk to Sam Harris or Richard Dawkins or Stephen Hawking. They probably know what they're talking about.
#90 to #81 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
Philosophical arguments should be and indeed are still bound by the rules of logic and reasoning. You can't just make something up and say that it's philosophy, it still has to make logical sense within the confines of your philosophical model. Reason and logic are also the pillars of science so no, a person that has studied science in-depth will be able to construct far better philosophically 'sound' arguments than the average schmuck.
User avatar #100 to #90 - rhc (03/21/2013) [-]
hm. Good point. So they will be better at arguing, assumedly, than a "regular" person, but regardless, whether their argument is sound is not relevant to the validity of their beliefs over another person who's arrived at their conclusion not by logic.
You can't use logic to disprove existence of a god that doesn't follow logic. There's no point.
#135 to #100 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
If something doesn't seem to make sense then either you have too little information to understand it, in which case you should endeavor to find out more about it, or it is simply nonsense.

The big question of whether there is a God cannot have a logical outcome. What people like Dawkins do (for the most part) is question the application of faith, rather than the faith itself. They target the ideas that affect the real world rather than spiritual, things like "We'll do this or deny that because we think God wants us to." This is where logic and reasoning come in because you can question whether or not all those things that God allegedly wants or doesn't want fit in together.
#75 to #70 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
Stephen Hawking is agnostic
User avatar #160 to #51 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
Silverman, the President of American Atheists. The organization isn't actually pointless. They argue and protest and such for right for atheists, like the removal of mandatory prayer.

Guy's still a huge dick, though.
#6 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
This is a pretty bad argument.
User avatar #7 to #6 - mrgoodlove (03/20/2013) [-]
Why is that?
#46 to #7 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
It assumes there is only one path of technological progression.

They key fact is that in our current state, we're extremely narrow-minded in terms of advancement. We keep to one path and are unable to fathom completely alternate possibilities. If we were to start from scratch with absolutely no bearing from the past, it's quite possible the human race would generate a very different outcome in terms of scientific advancements and very likely never stumble upon some of the current day knowledge we hold axiomatic.
User avatar #65 to #46 - tkparrish (03/21/2013) [-]
Im not sure that this is the point Penn was trying to make. When he referred to science, i think he meant things along the lines of chemistry and biology. Things that would be the same, and be consistently the same even if we wiped out all record of it. Not the technological progression you mentioned
User avatar #322 to #65 - mctoilet **User deleted account** (03/21/2013) [-]
It's still a pretty bad argument.
I myself is an Atheist, but i don't want to disprove God's existence with flawed logic.

If we removed all existence of Bio ,Chemistry and phys knowledge we would still eventually Figure it out someday. But not in the same way, and heck not with the same names! Maybe we would actualy disprove some of our theories by "thinking out of the box" because we have no knowledge of anything before that.

Same goes with Religion. If we removed the existence of all religions we would just make a new one. Possible the same just different name and Image. We would still think killing is a sin in any religion. Like Scientist would figure out that Heating water makes it boil. and it then turns into gas. wich actualy is also a liquid. so why call it gas?
because Scientific religion!
(bad comparison, but i hope you get it)

I don't like Religion because i think its the root of all hate and wars.
But i do understand that if we removed Religion, we would just fight because reasons.
+26
#44 - panacea has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #58 to #44 - jedawg (03/21/2013) [-]
I'm an atheist and I say you don't deserve those red thumbs. I'm sure they'll be redirected towards me now tho
#63 to #58 - illogicalvulcan (03/21/2013) [-]
Nay I say.... Nay... green thumbs for the both of you.
+2
#61 to #58 - panacea has deleted their comment [-]
#64 to #61 - jedawg (03/21/2013) [-]
You have no idea the crappy night I'm having. Of course women problems but you really put a smile on my face stranger so thanks a ton. gif unrelated
You have no idea the crappy night I'm having. Of course women problems but you really put a smile on my face stranger so thanks a ton. gif unrelated
+2
#66 to #64 - panacea has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #67 to #66 - jedawg (03/21/2013) [-]
Nah, Life is good and I feel fortunate to be happy
+2
#68 to #67 - panacea has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #60 - KayRed (03/21/2013) [-]
I ******* hate Penn Jillette. All he is a smug, libertarian asshole, ******** on peoples beliefs, talking about a subjects he knows nothing about. He's no better than the religious.
#42 - drtrousersnake (03/21/2013) [-]
So if Hitler successfully created a world where there was only the "master race" and destroyed all evidence of other races existing, he still wouldn't be able to see why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?
#302 - guitarsimmi (03/21/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#299 - envinite (03/21/2013) [-]
"There is no God, and that's the simple truth."   
   
Behold the master of 			*********		.
"There is no God, and that's the simple truth."

Behold the master of ********* .
#229 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
As a Christian I think it's pretty futile to try to prove or disprove God/religion with science. They're just two totally different things. Many famous religious scientists (like Georges Lemaitre - the man who proposed the Big Bang Theory) would agree.
User avatar #140 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
Christians, take heart in Acts 5:33-41, and in Matthew 5:10. The world will always hate us for our faith, but do not let it discourage you. Yours is the kingdom of the heavens.

(But still take into consideration that you might be a dick. It's always a possibility.)
User avatar #72 - unpreparedninja (03/21/2013) [-]
guys i know this is crazy talk but,

can't we all just believe what we want and respect each others opinions and beliefs?

or is that too much?

yeah you're right, we should desperately try to convert one another in the comment section of funny junk.
#78 to #72 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
^ This post AKA the "I'll be a hippie ******* white-knight and call for peace and love because it's guaranteed to get thumbs from the assholes that don't like religious posts yet continue to look at them."
User avatar #79 to #78 - unpreparedninja (03/21/2013) [-]
i dont care about thumbs really, thumb me down if you want, i was just putting in my two cents.
#82 to #79 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
^ The "No really, I am just a moral, nice guy. Lets all get along. THUMB ME UP!"
User avatar #89 to #82 - vissova (03/21/2013) [-]
A thumb is worthless. A thumb on this website is nothing more than pixels and lights animating on a computer screen and have absolutely no value. Someone could make a comment with a very good point and have a thousand red thumbs and there would be no difference. The fact that you think this guy wants thumbs is retarded.
User avatar #94 to #89 - unpreparedninja (03/21/2013) [-]
i applaud you kind sir. enjoy a green one
#192 to #94 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
^ The "I'm so happy somebody took my side, this might mean I actually get a friend! Better suck ass and bend over for him else he might not LOVE ME!"
#92 to #89 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
^ The "having an existential crises, better cover up my worthlessness by qustioning someones value of something."

Your entire life and everything you feel is the result of electrical impulses in your brain. It all has exactly as much value as you decide to place on it. Thumb-whoring on this site is prolific because some people get kicks from getting green thumbs. To deny such a thing happens is not naive, it's just ******* stupid.
User avatar #96 to #92 - vissova (03/21/2013) [-]
So basically what you're saying is that because a handful of people like getting green thumbs, then EVERYONE likes getting green thumbs.

This guy clearly does not care for them and has told you so.

Additionally, what is this about you saying "my worthlessness"? Are you implying that I am worthless? So you're actually disrespecting me and attempting to start a fight because you think someone wants thumbs? Are you kidding me?
#184 to #96 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
^ The "Got mad at anon and raged." Probable kid having his half-hour of computer time before school.
User avatar #209 to #184 - vissova (03/21/2013) [-]
What the **** did you just ******* say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the **** out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my ******* words. You think you can get away with saying that **** to me over the Internet? Think again, ****** . As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're ******* dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little **** . If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your ******* tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will **** fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're ******* dead, kiddo.
#213 to #209 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
^ The "Shamelessly trying to save face using an ancient copy-pasta"
#257 to #213 - rockyshand (03/21/2013) [-]
what is it with all you white people?
User avatar #83 to #82 - unpreparedninja (03/21/2013) [-]
believe what you want bro
User avatar #153 to #72 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
Respect is a good value, humanistically, but I think it's more important to civilly preach what you believe to be the truth than to abandon any attempt out of etiquette. Debating and arguing will get us nowhere, though.
#328 to #153 - xishnik (03/21/2013) [-]
But that's how scientific progress is made.... without people questioning each others ideas, thoughts, "opinions", we get ourselves nowhere past the stone age. we'd still be living in huts if our psychological initiative for progress didn't exist, our search for truth has lead us where we are. Religion on the other hand, had the opposite effect , it was kind of like making up an exotic and interesting excuse to things we see, based on some ramblings of some dude who used to sacrifice goats.and Christians followed the white rabbit all the way into the pits of retardation because of the exotic component, and their ever furthering attachment to it. It's not like the first religious people where like oh here's a rock, here's a tree.... let's observe these things carefully. It was more like "why do we exist", "what is our purpose", "everything looks so complicated", "what can cause this complication", so they entered exotic thoughts and opinions on the matter, and spread it into our culture like a rootsystem via people who spread "beliefs" otherwise known as exotic ******** explanations to reality, based on the ramblings of some cultures.
User avatar #336 to #328 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
Many religious or superstitious people made great scientific advancements. That's not to say religion didn't cause many complications, though. It did. But that's because the heads of said religions were narrow-minded dickbags.

Also, I never said that questioning things was a bad thing. Christianity advanced out of Catholicism due to questioning, too, and continued from there. What I was saying is that it is better to politely share yours experiences and educate people on your views than to get stuck in a never ending shout-fest, like we see all the time on here.

But then, what's the point in all this knowledge? Where does it get us? I know this is practically heresy nowadays, but is all this knowledge and technology worth it? We're destroying the world we live in, and to what goal? The Native Americans were perfectly in balance with the nature around them, and lived long, healthy lives without the technology we have today.

Hate all you want, but religion or not, I don't think our endless pursuit of knowledge is a good thing.
User avatar #329 to #328 - exotic (03/21/2013) [-]
this 4x ^
#278 to #72 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
hahahahahahahaha how idealistic (and naive) of you
#147 to #72 - xishnik (03/21/2013) [-]
If you believed that killing and murdering was the only way into valhalla, and that sodomizing women was cool... would i respect you? would i appreciate your "opinion" nerp derp herp skerp.
If you believed that killing and murdering was the only way into valhalla, and that sodomizing women was cool... would i respect you? would i appreciate your "opinion" nerp derp herp skerp.
+14
#28 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#88 to #28 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
That .gif...
Why would anyone even...
What.
#212 to #28 - nitrate (03/21/2013) [-]
I love Flea, and I love that movie.   
   
   
   
   
   
Suburbia is the name of the film in case anyone was wondering.
I love Flea, and I love that movie.





Suburbia is the name of the film in case anyone was wondering.
User avatar #178 - Endofzeeworld (03/21/2013) [-]
I am a man of science. I believe in what there is proof of.
Give me proof that god exists, and I will believe he exists.
Give me proof that god doesn't exist, and I will not believe he exists.
The simple truth is actually that nobody knows. Logically, we can't know. So there isn't much point in ******* arguing about it, is there?
#179 to #178 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
If you're a man of science then you ought to have a working understanding of the burden of proof. The claim is that God exists, no that he doesn't.
User avatar #182 to #179 - Endofzeeworld (03/21/2013) [-]
Mr. Jillete's claim certainly seems to be that he doesn't. I quote "God doesn't exist, that's the simple truth"
#188 to #182 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
And to back it up he presents a logical proof which, scientifically, is a form of evidence. It's more a refute of a previously made claim.

"I have a 12 inch cock." Vs "No you don't."
User avatar #191 to #188 - Endofzeeworld (03/21/2013) [-]
No, he comes up with an argument towards the futility of religion, not the non-existence of god. An argument, by the way, which I whole-heartily agree with. You cannot tell me there is no god, and you cannot tell me there is one.
User avatar #218 to #178 - gamezattackzcomics (03/21/2013) [-]
I just wanted to let you know that it's nice to see an atheist who agrees that there is no way of knowing if God does or doesn't exist. And I think that's the point that both sides often don't get. It's called "faith" for a reason, not knowledge. Just a friendly Christian saying thanks for being cool.
#296 to #178 - foulsmell (03/21/2013) [-]
Give me proof that unicorns exist, and I will believe they exist.
Give me proof that unicorns don't exist, and I will not believe they exist.
While we cannot be 100% certain that unicorns exist, we can say comfortably say that there's no good reason to suggest that they do, resulting from a lack of evidence. Living a life on the presumption that unicorns likely don't exist is the only reasonable position.

All religions make remarkably large claims for themselves, with which they present not even scarcely convincing evidence.
User avatar #350 to #296 - Endofzeeworld (03/21/2013) [-]
Living your life on presumptions that are based off no real evidence is a pretty ****** way to live.
User avatar #185 to #178 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
Well, there's certainly no empirical proof, but I see small evidence all the time in my daily life, that God does exist. It just takes a little faith to begin with.
User avatar #228 to #185 - silverzepher (03/21/2013) [-]
faith: firm belief in something for which there is no proof
merrriam webster
User avatar #230 to #228 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
Now faith is the substantiation of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.
Hebrews 11:1
User avatar #234 to #230 - silverzepher (03/21/2013) [-]
exactly, meaning it cannot be measured, name something else that can't be measured.
User avatar #236 to #234 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
I could have made a really immature joke there.

Not sure where you're going with this, though.
User avatar #186 to #185 - Endofzeeworld (03/21/2013) [-]
And I am glad you have faith. I do not. I have seen no evidence of his existence, thus I myself cannot declare his existence or lack thereof.
#190 to #186 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
I don't agree with your views, but it isn't my place to argue against it. I think you should give some churches a visit nonetheless, though. You never know what you might find.   
   
Have a nice day!
I don't agree with your views, but it isn't my place to argue against it. I think you should give some churches a visit nonetheless, though. You never know what you might find.

Have a nice day!
#222 to #190 - brothergrimm (03/21/2013) [-]
mother ******* bionicles
User avatar #194 to #190 - Endofzeeworld (03/21/2013) [-]
You too, my friend!
And I have been to a church, I spent most of my sunday mornings during my childhoods in churches. They were very enjoyable, and I found the strong sense of community very wonderful.
User avatar #196 to #194 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
It really is! I rarely ever feel that sense of family elsewhere.
User avatar #197 to #196 - Endofzeeworld (03/21/2013) [-]
Plus the church I went to was very much in favor of helping the homeless and destitute. That is one of the best things I have ever seen.
User avatar #200 to #197 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
I saw a documentary last night about a man (forgot his name now) that dedicated his life to God by helping the orphans of the city he lived in, and others. I wanted to cry several times.
#202 to #200 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
This conversation is
ULTRAAAAAAA GAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!
User avatar #204 to #202 - draezeth (03/21/2013) [-]
I like to call it "IN TOUCH WITH ITS FEMININE SIDE"!
#210 to #204 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
You can touch my feminine side.
#193 to #190 - HarvietheDinkle (03/21/2013) [-]
NO NO NO THIS ISNT WHAT FUNNYJUNK IS ABOUT

YOU BOTH SHOUDL BE INSULTING EACH OTHER AND RAMBLING INCESSANTLY, NOT BEING CIVIL
User avatar #241 to #190 - silverzepher (03/21/2013) [-]
i have, i get sick, runny nose, and a feeling of someone trying to pawn their hidden guilt and agendas onto me, but i thank you for understanding that there are differences of opinion.
+6
#152 - bangala has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #281 - robinwilliamson (03/21/2013) [-]
I don't think people realize that this argument is very reasonable. Just because it makes a critical claim in the beginning doesn't mean the argument should be dismissed, cause remember, so does the Bible with it's "In the beginning" bullcrap. Let's look at what are facts and are very hard to argue against with evidence.
-The reason Christianity is so popular is because Constantine used it as a unity tool to bring Rome together and the Roman empire's religion then, no matter the religion, would = Europe+Western Civilization belief as a majority. It was necessary then to bring Rome together.
-The holy symbolism of Jesus is pagan, from a very common worship of the Southern Cross/Crux. The Sun would "die" on the constellation to the bottom in the end of winter, then "resurrect three days later" by a degree of two up the cross by December 25th. This is where the Christian cross came from, it was in star form for other religions.
-Humans evolved to make less Type 1 errors, false positives, which is why we're more cautious and have more drills. "It is better to have loved and lost then to have never loved at all." Think of it. As intelligent beings, if there was a rustling in the grass, and we assume there's a predator and we're wrong, we will survive better than saying there it's not a predator and we're wrong, because nature didn't wait for us to work the science.
-Nature works the same way in our universe as a godless universe. Superstitious activity like suspending the Earth would cause global natural effects that all humans would notice and make record of it, but Eastern religions say they didn't experience these things. Also, it's possible that universes can be created from nothing or other universes. If anyone who doesn't believe it would kindly YouTube science videos by Lawrence Krauss and Michio Kaku (both fascinating people), and actually try to understand the science, they'll find it isn't absolutely required to have a god for life as we know it to exist.
#285 to #281 - foulsmell (03/21/2013) [-]
Thank goodness! Someone on FJ who actually knows a little bit of history.

In your opinion, which contributed more to the spread of Christianity: the innate truth of the bible or the Emperor Constantine making Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire?
#305 to #285 - magmon (03/21/2013) [-]
"Yay, smart people!" (Same breath >.>) "Innate truth of the bible".
Did I read this wrong?
#327 to #305 - foulsmell (03/21/2013) [-]
I was parodying the fundamentalist view that the bible is the eternal word of Yahweh.
#332 to #327 - magmon (03/21/2013) [-]
Good man. We need a sarcasm font.
+2
#247 - berrypie **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #258 to #247 - crazylance (03/21/2013) [-]
I seriously wish he had a guitar in his hands.
+1
#259 to #258 - berrypie **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #266 to #259 - crazylance (03/21/2013) [-]
That it will.
#272 to #247 - jimboismynameo (03/21/2013) [-]
i see you are rock n roll   
   
im pretty rock n roll myself
i see you are rock n roll

im pretty rock n roll myself
[ 348 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)