einstien teaching theoretical physics. einstien teaching theoretical physics. Professer Einstein, the questline can this year' s were are the same Pat, lam year
x
Click to expand

einstien teaching theoretical physics

einstien teaching theoretical physics. einstien teaching theoretical physics. Professer Einstein, the questline can this year' s were are the same Pat, lam year

einstien teaching theoretical physics

Professer Einstein,
the questline can this
year' s were are the
same Pat, lam year' s‘?!
True. but this year 'all)
all the answers
are different.
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1578
Views: 56406
Favorited: 76
Submitted: 03/20/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to boonboon submit to reddit
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#6 - epicburana ONLINE (03/20/2013) [-]
another totally legit quote from him...
User avatar #21 to #6 - amuter ONLINE (03/21/2013) [-]
It doesn't have to be his quote, it's still true!
User avatar #12 to #6 - sirdoofus (03/20/2013) [-]
The thing is
that boy needs therapy.

thebest404pageever.com/swf/Frontier_Psychiatrist.swf
#41 to #6 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
The smartest mother ******* really are crazy mother ******* though. Tesla, for example, was in love with an imaginary laser pigeon.
User avatar #46 to #41 - critality ONLINE (03/21/2013) [-]
Don't forget his doomsday device!
User avatar #39 to #9 - theturtletorres (03/21/2013) [-]
Is there a bigger version of this?
User avatar #16 to #9 - youngchief (03/21/2013) [-]
probably the most clever ERB line yet
#14 to #10 - SunilCCXXXVII **User deleted account** (03/21/2013) [-]
#18 - ryuryu (03/21/2013) [-]
Pic unrelated.
User avatar #27 to #18 - darksideofthebeast (03/21/2013) [-]
It's not an anomaly if everyone knew it already


;_;
#26 - darksideofthebeast (03/21/2013) [-]
I honestly
Don't know how someone can hold that much information in their head
I can't even ******* read musical notes
And this guy is thinking of atom bombs.


#28 to #26 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
funny part is he was academically below average for most of his life until college. He also lacked the part of the brain that separates the left half and right half so his brain was not only smaller than average without the divider but intensely efficient too.
User avatar #49 to #28 - toosexyforyou (03/21/2013) [-]
Anyone saying "oh Einstein was just a normal guy at so and so point because of this and this" you are so ******* wrong. Einstein was born a genius. I wish I had some sources to back this up but in his younger years he was arrogant and refused to do the work because he thought it was too simple and demeaning and teachers would refuse to even consider that they're wrong about anything.
User avatar #32 to #28 - desudius (03/21/2013) [-]
What do you mean? The crease in the middle ?
#42 to #26 - yutdollacwwwthree (03/21/2013) [-]
Oh, would you take a gander at this.
User avatar #47 to #42 - darksideofthebeast (03/21/2013) [-]
I can read tabs and ****
but when it comes to this
no
how does you even my brain
User avatar #48 to #42 - dubnineninedubs (03/21/2013) [-]
lots of c sharps, couple of d's and f's, and im a cellist.
User avatar #72 to #48 - yutdollacwwwthree (03/21/2013) [-]
Yes, it's rather simple. The rendition isn't perfect, but it sounds good.
#2 - adriaan (03/20/2013) [-]
i don't get it.
#4 to #2 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
**** changes. a theory can be deemed wrong if it is wrong. Eisenstein ****** up newtons theories, for example.
#5 to #4 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
nah its just about the Theory of relativity
User avatar #7 to #5 - AlbertEinstein (03/20/2013) [-]
It's actually about how I slept with your mother
#30 to #7 - ohgodwaitimatheist (03/21/2013) [-]
Well, you are indeed a genius.
Well, you are indeed a genius.
#17 to #7 - romdadon (03/21/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#20 to #7 - lamarisagoodname (03/21/2013) [-]
round of applause
User avatar #73 to #20 - lolzordz (03/21/2013) [-]
no offense intended but why is what he said funny? cos his account name is albert einstein?
#34 to #20 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
baby make that ass clap!
#53 - tubaplayah (03/21/2013) [-]
**tubaplayah rolls 797,583,446** Here is one of the answers.
**tubaplayah rolls 797,583,446** Here is one of the answers.
#31 - pwoneill (03/21/2013) [-]
(enlarge)
#33 to #31 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
(no)
User avatar #1 - dinopoopsicle (03/20/2013) [-]
I love this so much, omg, good job op, IF you made this
#3 to #1 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
probably not:
title and desc: einstIEn
picture: EinstEIn

two typos? i guess not
User avatar #71 to #3 - Kekuchi (03/21/2013) [-]
Well done sir. Very well spotted.
#43 - doyoulikeapizza ONLINE (03/21/2013) [-]
**doyoulikeapizza rolled a random image posted in comment #71 at Blue Eyes **
0
#25 - kokanuim **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#54 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
and while science is always changing its story the Bible remains unchanging, absolute, and perfect
User avatar #57 to #54 - chituat (03/21/2013) [-]
so revisions and new translations are staying the same?
#61 to #57 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
all within 0.01% all the prophecies and laws are exactly the same
#60 to #54 - blackmanrollipolli (03/21/2013) [-]
don't take this personal but i think of christians as being extremely childish and neive and ignorant for putting so much time, trust, effort, and faith in such a fairy tale like bedtime story that you call the bible. every single "christian" in this world is a hypocrite. I was for five years what i thought was a christian but in my heart i still had the same kind of thoughts and wants and needs. its human. you cant change a human because you tell yourself you arent one.
#63 to #60 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
the Bible's account of ancient history overlaps with secular history. most of the Bible is undeniably true, so theres no reason to doubt the things in the Bible that arent empirically verifiable
#64 to #63 - blackmanrollipolli (03/21/2013) [-]
hahaha. it accounts for ancient history??? it recalls magical spells cast from a virginal superman sent from the sky to reap the wrong doings from the souls of people that his father which is also him, created. It teaches people that everyone that doesnt do what a book written by none other than what it is preaching against they will burn in a dimension after their physical body that can endure such pain parishes. youve got to be kidding me.... this is too easy.
#58 to #54 - shreddddzd (03/21/2013) [-]
*Science is improving, and the bible is ancient. I don't see the bible curing diseases and exploring space.
*Science is improving, and the bible is ancient. I don't see the bible curing diseases and exploring space.
#62 to #58 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
secular science is speculation

its constantly making the story of our creation more and more convoluted, constantly contradicting itself, and making tons of unverifiable assumptions such as uniformitarianism
#55 to #54 - mrdrpage (03/21/2013) [-]
Just ignore it people. Maybe it will go away.
Just ignore it people. Maybe it will go away.
#56 to #55 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
no you cant just ignore the Bible and make it go away
#59 to #56 - blackmanrollipolli (03/21/2013) [-]
sure i can.
#40 - capnwetnipples (03/21/2013) [-]
This image has expired
you a big dummy einstien, get a hair cut
User avatar #38 - bflynnsorocaba (03/21/2013) [-]
Hey guys,
You need to login to view this link
if you feel like taking a second to check out this blog, it's pretty entertaining. Hope you enjoy!
#36 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
that's not how theoretical physics works
#45 to #36 - thevic (03/21/2013) [-]
doesn't take an einstein to know that, but it's still funny nonetheless
#29 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
SCIENCE!
User avatar #19 - asdcfg (03/21/2013) [-]
I legit had a question where these were the 4 answers
) America, UK, and Russia worked on a treaty
) The Allied powers made a treaty
) America, UK, and Germany made a treaty
) Uk, France, and Russia made a treaty

the answer was both A and B, because the question was like "Which one made the treaty of versailles", and the other 2 didn't make any ****** sense, wtf test
User avatar #22 to #19 - slaykingftw (03/21/2013) [-]
no its B, because A is missing france
User avatar #24 to #22 - asdcfg (03/21/2013) [-]
still doesn't make sense because on the test it had a question saying what were the main 3 country's of the allied powers, and it only had russia, UK, and America. It might have said the MAIN country's but still I hate these stupid ******* test so bad. First time in my entire life I got an F on a EOQ exam.
User avatar #50 to #24 - lunascape (03/21/2013) [-]
America wasn't a main country in the allied powers, It was france UK and russia in WW1, america didn't join till like 6 mounths left in the war
User avatar #44 to #24 - slaykingftw (03/21/2013) [-]
well in ww1 russia wasn't part of the allied powers, nor was it one of the main countries for the treaty of versaille. i'm unsure what exactly the question was or the answers were, but i was just going off your comment which is apparently not what the question actually was
User avatar #52 to #44 - asdcfg (03/21/2013) [-]
WW2
User avatar #74 to #52 - slaykingftw (03/21/2013) [-]
treaty of versailles was ww1 so now i know you are literally making **** up
User avatar #75 to #74 - asdcfg (03/22/2013) [-]
Maybe that's why I got an F :P
User avatar #23 to #22 - pseudobob **User deleted account** (03/21/2013) [-]
allied "powers"
#35 to #19 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
Russia was left out of the decision making in the treaty because they pulled out of the war early on, so the answer is B
 Friends (0)