Cal and Clara. I never made a connection.. twin , Sc I was rew etching we cw enemas teeny and came across Silence h the Library. The left picture is of CAL, the clara and cal
Upload
Login or register

Cal and Clara

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
 
Cal and Clara. I never made a connection.. twin , Sc I was rew etching we cw enemas teeny and came across Silence h the Library. The left picture is of CAL, the

I never made a connection.

Tags: clara | and | cal
twin ,
Sc I was rew etching we cw enemas teeny and came across
Silence h the Library. The left picture is of CAL, the little girl the
Library was made fer. The right is Clare. or lie-'. win. en
which we like to can her.
New theory is slowly enlarging.
1. CAUS lest weeds were 'Arefu I a '.-lew. rsr ", whereas l: Istill’ s
are always "Flue, yen clay...'. 5. r bay, and remember’, the remember
part implying that he haste recall her. Or maybe it just means "if
something is remembered it can be brought back', but ' t knew.
2. can hack inte extremely complex data bases, perhaps
because sh es CAL? Or maybe the “Mal screaming genius’
meld mean she has all ofthe kn ledge ofthe Libra .
I' randam thee ght
3. Their leeks.
It They teeth Wed in ‘min realities they created fer themselves.
A, 44444444444444444444444444444444444, 4//
...
+239
Views: 22878 Submitted: 03/20/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (40)
[ 40 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #1 - snowshark
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
It's not a bad theory, but it is massively flawed in almost every respect... so yeah it's kind of a bad theory.

For one, Cal was a little girl when she was placed into suspended animation because otherwise she would die. Then you've got the fact that Clara existed in real life in the 1800s and then once again on the Dalek Asylum, both times ending up dying.

The only reason Clara was in the virtual reality was because she could not bear the true reality of being turned into a Dalek.

There are parallels but not enough to draw solid theories, I'm afraid.
#6 to #1 - anon id: 3abfbf37
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
I agree, but if it turns out to be ture, my mind will break...
#13 to #1 - anon id: c62c979c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
Also, she may not have been an accomplished hacker at all - as a dalek, she had access to the dalek 'hive'/network (whatever you want to call it)
User avatar #18 to #1 - Onemanretardpack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
The Doctor said himself that she's impossible, so the fact that she's in so many places is kinda covered by that.
User avatar #22 to #18 - snowshark
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
Actually, that's not true.

She's not impossible, she is only "Highly Improbable." Were she impossible, she wouldn't exist at all (hence the nature of impossibility.) What is more is that Moffat is a very good writer in terms of continuity and logic within the universe. He would not make such a daft leap without significantly more evidence and development, especially as it would be diving head-first into the end of one of his favourite storylines (River Song) and mulching things around a bit.

I'm not going to totally rule this possibility out but what I said still stands. There is simply not enough evidence to qualify her as being CAL.
User avatar #19 to #18 - covered
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
Huh..
User avatar #20 to #19 - Onemanretardpack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
She's appeared in multiple timelines where she shouldn't have been, and the only reason she's a companion now is because she's "Impossible".
#21 to #20 - covered
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
I don't care man. I'm just here to **** bitches and get money
I don't care man. I'm just here to **** bitches and get money
#14 - CaptainKBX
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
Also, it hit me one day... the first episode with River Song was called "Silence in the Library"

I shat bricks when I realized it.
User avatar #15 to #14 - rainbronydasher
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
Care to explain?
#16 to #15 - CaptainKBX
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
The Silence are the main bad guys through series 6 IIRC, and there's like a major plot point with them and River.

I think it's more likely a coincidence than anything else, but a creepy one at that.
User avatar #24 to #16 - retardedboss
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
There were silence all throughout the episode, you just can't remember.
User avatar #25 to #16 - Jodeath
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/21/2013) [-]
it also happened to be the episode river song is silenced.
User avatar #28 to #25 - gentlemanpirate
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/21/2013) [-]
and about time too
User avatar #17 to #16 - rainbronydasher
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
O_O
#12 - capdcrusadr
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
I swear to god if this is how it turns out, I'm gonna be upset beyond belieff
User avatar #23 - rjake
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
If I were to create a show that had a large fandom, I wouldn't even write a complex plot. I'd monitor the fandom creating theories and I'd use those.
User avatar #2 - shaftyface
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
Can I ask, when does DW start again? Isnt it soon?
#3 to #2 - butcrackmoo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
23rd of March, i think, anyway eitherway its an upcoing saterday
User avatar #4 to #3 - shaftyface
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
******* awesome.
#5 to #4 - butcrackmoo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
yeah, it was a big let down on the way the last series ended on the 5th - 6th episode, then left us with anougher 2-3 onths to fend without it.
User avatar #7 to #5 - snowshark
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
Actually, the series didn't end. It was just cut in half. Rather than being forced to wait 12 months w/o doctor who, the new setup allows for tension to be built and people get new dr who every 6 months. Everyone wins.
User avatar #9 to #7 - yetaxaa
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
Except it didn't really work like that in the end.
Series 6 was shown in 2 halves in 2011, yes
But the first half of Series 7 didn't come until the end of of 2012

And there's no knowing when Series 8 will be shown.
#32 to #9 - butcrackmoo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/21/2013) [-]
i'm English and i've seen the adverts on BBC 1
User avatar #33 to #32 - yetaxaa
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/21/2013) [-]
That's for the second half of Series 7
#34 to #33 - butcrackmoo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/21/2013) [-]
yes that, is that what you're talking about?
#8 to #2 - anon id: 60be0ca8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
March 30th for those in the US. =(
User avatar #11 to #2 - yunoavailable
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
10 days
#27 to #2 - anon id: 6e701607
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/21/2013) [-]
March 30th
#40 - anon id: 8d61a311
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/28/2013) [-]
*****Spoilers*****


In "The Name of the Doctor" Clara jumps into the Doctor's timeline and many versions of herself are scattered throughout his history in order to save him. It could be possible that Cal is one of the versions of Clara that was scattered into his timeline.
#39 - jeffjeffetyjeff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/10/2013) [-]
Also in the bells of st jhon preview she said about going to a quite place. a library is a quite place
User avatar #38 - potrsr
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/24/2013) [-]
sorry, nope, this video shuts down the whole theory

www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2IROtC6cAT4
User avatar #26 - HUH
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/21/2013) [-]
I haven't watched this far into Doctor Who yet, so I'm all sad I don't know what they're talking about
User avatar #29 to #26 - Scottizdaman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/21/2013) [-]
#10 - anon id: 71cbf8ab
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/20/2013) [-]
March 30th is when the show starts again.
[ 40 comments ]
Leave a comment