Not Racist. But Specie-ist. Different. fixxed
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#51 - mummyslittlebitch (03/20/2013) [-]
It is strange, but a lot of genetic difference doesn't show up in appearance and a lot of difference in appearance doesn't equate massive genetic differentiation.
#104 to #51 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
Jewish, Hispanic, and many Asians do fall under the Caucasian category though.
#140 to #104 - mummyslittlebitch (03/21/2013) [-]
Yes, most Jews are Caucasian after millennia of intermingling with European populations.

Yes, Hispanics can be Caucasian or partly of Caucasian ancestry, but millions of people considered "Hispanic" are completely or almost completely Native American.

NO. Asians are not considered Caucasian. At all.
#99 to #51 - sirdickhousen **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#1 - twi (03/20/2013) [-]
This image has expired
yay birds
#79 to #1 - Ruspanic (03/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #34 to #1 - famouspork (03/20/2013) [-]
omg this is the single cutest thing my eyes ever saw. Even my kids were not as cute as this .
#53 to #34 - melllvinnn (03/20/2013) [-]
Were? Is kids kill?
#172 to #53 - famouspork (03/21/2013) [-]
I mean when they were babiez LOL
User avatar #35 to #1 - famouspork (03/20/2013) [-]
#77 to #1 - leachan **User deleted account** (03/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#9 - yotrepatotre (03/20/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#18 to #9 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
That thing on the bottom 2spooky4me.
#47 to #9 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
**** you!?
why does everything you see have to be racist?
its not that white people are racist its black people being so ******* butthurt about their ancestors being enslaved by white peoples ancestors that you cant let that **** go EVER!+ ******* get over yourself! it happened long ago and all involved are now dead, so theres no1 to blame anymore but you keep bitching nevertheless.
instead of bitching about the white devil having better jobs, more money and being less likely to commit crimes, how about actually making an effort to better yourselfs instead of expecting the (by now innocent) white man to guilt pay your stupid ass!
#163 to #47 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
did i just hear some rustling?
#122 to #9 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
? clearly that is a troll with a wig
User avatar #19 to #9 - fantomen (03/20/2013) [-]
Is that Brad Pitt in blackface?
#56 to #9 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
he looks half white
#12 to #9 - davidavidson (03/20/2013) [-]
I agree

They both resemble baboons
User avatar #68 - Scarsac (03/20/2013) [-]
anyone think she actually looks Aborigine? I'm pretty sure she is... and Genetically, Indigenous Australians are closer to East Asians and Europeans than they are to Africans
#74 - Scarsac (03/20/2013) [-]
#149 - Jesusnipples (03/21/2013) [-]
To be fair, OP, you've posted a very... I dunno the word to use, bulbous(?) looking person representing africans, and what appears to be a male model to represent europeans. Seems a bit unfair, no?
To be fair, OP, you've posted a very... I dunno the word to use, bulbous(?) looking person representing africans, and what appears to be a male model to represent europeans. Seems a bit unfair, no?
User avatar #152 to #149 - xerardo (03/21/2013) [-]
she isnt even african she is Australian Aborigine
User avatar #156 to #152 - Jesusnipples (03/21/2013) [-]
Well, **** , I feel intelligent
#25 - unbird (03/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#28 to #25 - davidavidson (03/20/2013) [-]
I really was expecting this gif...   
I really was
I really was expecting this gif...

I really was
#123 - helenwheels (03/21/2013) [-]
OP you seem confused.
A sub species is defined by their ability to breed IE a pit bull and a chihuahua might look way different but their ability to produce healthy offspring makes them the same sub species.
and human beings are one of the most diverse creatures on the planet, even within ones own race people look way different.
User avatar #144 to #123 - existacne (03/21/2013) [-]
That pic is simply disgusting.
User avatar #146 to #144 - helenwheels (03/21/2013) [-]
I thought they where pretty nice looking dogs.
User avatar #147 to #146 - existacne (03/21/2013) [-]
Not the right one.
#150 to #147 - aaadddmmmiiinnn (03/21/2013) [-]
the 			****		 you got against pit bulls?!
the **** you got against pit bulls?!
#151 to #150 - existacne (03/21/2013) [-]
Well, they're disgusting.
Well, they're disgusting.
User avatar #153 to #151 - aaadddmmmiiinnn (03/21/2013) [-]
im pretty sure all dogs look gross when they puke.... and why do you have that gif...?
User avatar #154 to #153 - existacne (03/21/2013) [-]
Just googled it.
#158 to #154 - aaadddmmmiiinnn (03/21/2013) [-]
i personally think they're awesome
User avatar #174 to #123 - davidavidson (03/22/2013) [-]
Nigs can breed faster than ****
#126 to #123 - stizz **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#129 to #126 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
I think your just ******* retarted.
#131 to #129 - stizz **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #143 to #129 - xenoquack (03/21/2013) [-]
*You're, retarded.
Oh the irony!
User avatar #148 to #126 - helenwheels (03/21/2013) [-]
The point OP is making is that the different races should be considered different species.
But I think you might be trolling.
User avatar #136 to #123 - ivoryhammer (03/21/2013) [-]
It's a troll, don't try to reason with it
#106 - Lintutu (03/20/2013) [-]
Oh sure, take an unfortunate looking woman and compare her to someone with good looks
#114 to #106 - funnynsfw (03/20/2013) [-]
Sir, you are looking at the best looking aboriginal this side of Sydney.
#159 to #114 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
^THIS ************* GUY

I love you.
User avatar #58 - bramdk (03/20/2013) [-]
ok for all the incompetent ***** around here lemme explain this **** to you
those 2 birds cant **** and have babies but are the same species so they are considered sub species
that woman and man can make babies together if they would have a sexy time
so they arent considered sub species of eachoter
#165 to #58 - waaw ONLINE (03/21/2013) [-]
Actually subspecies can have fertile offspring. Anything in the same species can.
User avatar #169 to #165 - bramdk (03/21/2013) [-]
subspecies can have offspring but that offspring cant reproduce. this is a fact, don't disregard it as untrue because it is in fact true.
User avatar #171 to #169 - waaw ONLINE (03/21/2013) [-]
Nope. Right off the Wikipedia page for subspecies.
"Organisms that belong to different subspecies of the same species are capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring, but they often do not interbreed in nature due to geographic isolation or other factors. "
#87 to #58 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
That's not how sub-specieis are actually characterised, it's just a 'here's an easy laymen way of thinking about it.'. In fact a few quick examples that easily disprove this: Tigers and lions can mate; horses and zebras etc.

Actual characterisiation of sub-species varies depending on the type of animal but the most common ways are by appearance and genetic makeup. Under both of these categories homosapien can be divided into various racial sub-species.

Note: The use of the term 'sub-species' is not in itself derogatory.
User avatar #100 to #87 - generaljosh (03/20/2013) [-]
Actually, it's if the offspring themselves are fertile. Yes, lions can have babies with tigers, zebras with horses, and donkeys with horses, but none of those babies can reproduce.
#59 to #58 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
To bad most people on here don't have an IQ above a Turkey Sandwich.
#4 - nicolbolas (03/20/2013) [-]
I always thought there may be different sub-species in the human race. God forbid someone bring it up because it could be used to justify racism.
#24 to #4 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
yeah but there's not so whoop de doo your idea sucks and racism is still bad
#85 to #4 - wyldek has deleted their comment [-]
#93 to #4 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
Doesn't work with humans because we **** too much. You can find genes spread all over the world, You can track our haplo groups but that's only a basic understanding of where some of your ancestors came from. I'm white as hell but genetically I'm defined as south american Indian or Incan. It's due to my mitochondrial DNA being from Patagonia. I'm white red hair blue eyes, but they are superficial color schemes. the human "races" are nothing more than basic color morphs and inbred traits.
User avatar #98 to #93 - nicolbolas (03/20/2013) [-]
Why are dogs sub-species then? Each breed has specific traits that belong to that breed, but they can intermix to form a "mut" or a breed that does not fit a previous breed/subspecies, this would be similar to people. I'm not trying to be racist but there are noticeable differences and people seem more attracted to people of similar color not including outliers.
#8 to #4 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
#10 - mariogomez (03/20/2013) [-]
It's funny how the title is "Not Racist", when in fact it could just as easily have been "Am Ignorant".

You see, we are all descendant from a single person way back when we were leaving Africa, and this child had a mutation that we all share today, so we are all related.

But why OP is trying to comment on is the fact that one of these two people is express a greater amount of melamine in their skin to protect themselves from harmful UV radiation from the sun, while the other person isn't. This simple self preserving act doesn't make us different sub species, it just means ones person genes are expressed more and ones aren't.

Also OP hand picked fat old black chick vs handsome young white guy, it is an anecdotal example of differences between our races that doesn't mean **** .

tl:dr, OP is a faggot and ignorant of genetics, but most people are anyway.
#21 to #10 - burnswhenipee has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #75 to #10 - fatpartypoo (03/20/2013) [-]
I heard that there are actually two strands of human evolution. One originating from Africa, and one originating from Europe. Not saying its true, just wondering if anyone else heard this and can back it up?
User avatar #82 to #75 - thesovereigngrave (03/20/2013) [-]
All human life traces their ancestry back to Africa. Yeah, early hominids did migrate out of Africa and evolve into different species, but they died off or went the way of the Neanderthals.
#164 to #75 - mariogomez (03/21/2013) [-]
Because if we actually were different sub species, we would be called that by the scientific establishment, but were not, because we aren't.

Genetically we are the same, the only difference is phenotype and culture, and different phenotype isn't enough to make different sub species, if it did then blonde people would be a different sub species form giners or black hair people.
#17 to #10 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
(look at the comment above you. #15)
User avatar #14 to #10 - mrloki ONLINE (03/20/2013) [-]
just so you know, it's very common for birds to be a sub-species just because they have different colors on their tail depending on the area they live, so, for biologists and all, we should have quite a bunch of human sub-species. It's just like saying that a poodle and a rottweiler are the same species just because they are dogs. That's not a comment about discrimination of race, about rights or anything like that, BUT biologically, caucasians are way more different from blacks than a Silky terrier from a yorkshire terrier
#13 to #10 - icheatjews (03/20/2013) [-]
We Human Nao
#86 to #10 - wyldek (03/20/2013) [-]
Well sure, but if two different groups from the some genetic source diverge enough, it's stupid to keep calling them the same species. Hell, go back far far enough and damn near EVERYTHING is descended from a common ancestor.

OP is saying that the divergence between the birds (which was not very much, looks like only minor size/color variation) is enough to merit a different "sub-species" then why isn't humanity judged on the same scale?
User avatar #110 - ODSTRuler (03/20/2013) [-]
Is it weird I know where the black woman is from?
User avatar #115 to #110 - jeudyfeo (03/20/2013) [-]
The jungle?
User avatar #119 to #115 - ODSTRuler (03/21/2013) [-]
Ray Mears walk about, she's an aboriginy, so if you meant a sand jungle, then you are correct.
User avatar #121 to #119 - jeudyfeo (03/21/2013) [-]
Looks like that ape from Tarzan
User avatar #175 to #121 - davidavidson (03/22/2013) [-]
I lol'd
#69 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
Proof FJ is full of a bunch of uneducated 12 year olds.
User avatar #112 - beanmaniac (03/20/2013) [-]
because there is no ugly white people and hot black woman....
#127 to #112 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
I agree that there's such a thing as ugly white people, but I honestly can't picture an attractive black woman.

I don't know if it's just me, but I don't really find it sexy.
#145 to #127 - alexusapi (03/21/2013) [-]
I'm gonna go ahead and disagree with you there :) not even a good example but i think you get the point
#142 to #127 - Jackimole (03/21/2013) [-]
ew, black women, gross!
User avatar #130 to #127 - beanmaniac (03/21/2013) [-]
well i just noticed the new anon name
#89 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
Just remember we look the way we do because humans spent 8/10 of our existence ******* our own family members.
#137 - flnonymousfour **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#23 - xsap (03/20/2013) [-]
and just like any other sub-species of animals in the animal kingdom we too developed differently... and people need to get over it, its not racist if its true.. before Europeans went down to Africa they were still stuck in the stone age with no innovation in science or medicine.
#26 to #23 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
your an idiot
User avatar #27 to #26 - xsap (03/20/2013) [-]
#97 to #23 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
yeah Arabs didnt bring science and philosophy throught the Iberic peninsula. You know, during the Middel-Age, european scientists we discuting from North African author's texts. Besides, Ancient Egypt was kind of the professor of the Greek scientists, which is were modern sciences come from. So it's not that simple, throught time they were a lot of exchange between populations, ideology and pride hide a lot of knowledge learnt from non-occidental civilisation.
Tl;dr : you're an ignorant moron, go read some books before posting.
User avatar #37 to #23 - vedgetable (03/20/2013) [-]
really you define the reason why a lot of races get annoyed by white people.
you brag about how much better your race just because you struck america first. if that happend by any other race it would be diffrent, you cant say japan, china, iran?
if africa was in the conditions to do it as well, they would have done it as well, you are such an ignorent fool
#125 to #37 - anon (03/21/2013) [-]
whites don't think they are great because they found america... its because of their europian discovery and influence on the world... im Muslim and i still think europians (whites) did a lot for this planet than any other race
#30 to #23 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
Mali Empire,
Ethiopian City-states
#32 to #30 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
yfw all influenced by Arab traders and explorers
User avatar #5 - Onemanretardpack (03/20/2013) [-]
I heard somewhere that we are all like 99.7% genetically similar, it's just the expression of those genes that differs between races
User avatar #6 to #5 - unknownmercury ONLINE (03/20/2013) [-]
Yeah, and it's owed mostly to Genghis Khan. I think it's something like 1 in every 1000 people is a genetic descendant of his.
User avatar #7 to #6 - unknownmercury ONLINE (03/20/2013) [-]
Correction to myself: 1 in 200 men can be proven related to him.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)