Not Racist. But Specie-ist. Different. fixxed Not Racist But Specie-ist Different fixxed
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (148)
[ 148 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
49 comments displayed.
#9 - yotrepatotre
Reply +81
(03/20/2013) [-]
This image has expired
fixxed
#18 to #9 - anon
Reply 0
(03/20/2013) [-]
That thing on the bottom left....is 2spooky4me.
#19 to #9 - fantomen
Reply 0
(03/20/2013) [-]
Is that Brad Pitt in blackface?
#47 to #9 - anon
Reply 0
(03/20/2013) [-]
**** you!?
why does everything you see have to be racist?
its not that white people are racist its black people being so ******* butthurt about their ancestors being enslaved by white peoples ancestors that you cant let that **** go EVER!+******* get over yourself! it happened long ago and all involved are now dead, so theres no1 to blame anymore but you keep bitching nevertheless.
instead of bitching about the white devil having better jobs, more money and being less likely to commit crimes, how about actually making an effort to better yourselfs instead of expecting the (by now innocent) white man to guilt pay your stupid ass!
SINCERELY **** YOU!
#54 to #47 - yotrepatotre
Reply +7
(03/20/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#163 to #47 - anon
Reply 0
(03/21/2013) [-]
did i just hear some rustling?
#56 to #9 - anon
Reply 0
(03/20/2013) [-]
he looks half white
#122 to #9 - anon
Reply 0
(03/21/2013) [-]
? clearly that is a troll with a wig
#33 to #9 - famouspork
Reply +2
(03/20/2013) [-]
#12 to #9 - davidavidson [OP]
Reply +3
(03/20/2013) [-]
I agree

They both resemble baboons
#11 to #9 - kuchikirukia
Reply +13
(03/20/2013) [-]
#51 - mummyslittlebitch
Reply +39
(03/20/2013) [-]
It is strange, but a lot of genetic difference doesn't show up in appearance and a lot of difference in appearance doesn't equate massive genetic differentiation.
#104 to #51 - anon
Reply 0
(03/20/2013) [-]
Jewish, Hispanic, and many Asians do fall under the Caucasian category though.
#140 to #104 - mummyslittlebitch
Reply 0
(03/21/2013) [-]
Yes, most Jews are Caucasian after millennia of intermingling with European populations.

Yes, Hispanics can be Caucasian or partly of Caucasian ancestry, but millions of people considered "Hispanic" are completely or almost completely Native American.

NO. Asians are not considered Caucasian. At all.
#99 to #51 - sirdickhousen **User deleted account**
+3
has deleted their comment [-]
#74 - Scarsac
Reply +26
(03/20/2013) [-]
fixed
#110 - ODSTRuler
Reply +2
(03/20/2013) [-]
Is it weird I know where the black woman is from?
#115 to #110 - jeudyfeo
Reply +18
(03/20/2013) [-]
The jungle?
#119 to #115 - ODSTRuler
Reply +3
(03/21/2013) [-]
Ray Mears walk about, she's an aboriginy, so if you meant a sand jungle, then you are correct.
#121 to #119 - jeudyfeo
Reply 0
(03/21/2013) [-]
Looks like that ape from Tarzan
#175 to #121 - davidavidson [OP]
Reply 0
(03/22/2013) [-]
I lol'd
#25 - unbird
Reply +16
(03/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#28 to #25 - davidavidson [OP]
Reply +2
(03/20/2013) [-]
I really was expecting this gif...   
   
I really was
I really was expecting this gif...

I really was
#106 - Lintutu
Reply +5
(03/20/2013) [-]
Oh sure, take an unfortunate looking woman and compare her to someone with good looks
#114 to #106 - funnynsfw ONLINE
Reply +14
(03/20/2013) [-]
Sir, you are looking at the best looking aboriginal this side of Sydney.
#135 to #114 - harrytheheadcrab
Reply +1
(03/21/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#159 to #114 - anon
Reply 0
(03/21/2013) [-]
^THIS ************* GUY

I love you.
#71 - anon
Reply 0
(03/20/2013) [-]
They both look like apes to me.....I don't care about your "race achievements" humans are still dumb apes. You visited a rock in space while half your species are starving to death bravo.
#92 to #71 - IAmManbearpig
Reply +3
(03/20/2013) [-]
you're so edgy I almost got cut
#94 to #71 - sirdickhousen **User deleted account**
+8
has deleted their comment [-]
#102 to #94 - Bobtheblob
Reply +10
(03/20/2013) [-]
Maybe he isn't.
#103 to #102 - sirdickhousen **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#68 - Scarsac
Reply +8
(03/20/2013) [-]
anyone think she actually looks Aborigine? I'm pretty sure she is... and Genetically, Indigenous Australians are closer to East Asians and Europeans than they are to Africans
#58 - bramdk
Reply +8
(03/20/2013) [-]
ok for all the incompetent ***** around here lemme explain this **** to you
those 2 birds cant **** and have babies but are the same species so they are considered sub species
that woman and man can make babies together if they would have a sexy time
so they arent considered sub species of eachoter
#59 to #58 - anon
Reply 0
(03/20/2013) [-]
To bad most people on here don't have an IQ above a Turkey Sandwich.
#87 to #58 - anon
Reply 0
(03/20/2013) [-]
That's not how sub-specieis are actually characterised, it's just a 'here's an easy laymen way of thinking about it.'. In fact a few quick examples that easily disprove this: Tigers and lions can mate; horses and zebras etc.

Actual characterisiation of sub-species varies depending on the type of animal but the most common ways are by appearance and genetic makeup. Under both of these categories homosapien can be divided into various racial sub-species.

Note: The use of the term 'sub-species' is not in itself derogatory.
#100 to #87 - generaljosh
Reply +2
(03/20/2013) [-]
Actually, it's if the offspring themselves are fertile. Yes, lions can have babies with tigers, zebras with horses, and donkeys with horses, but none of those babies can reproduce.
#165 to #58 - waaw ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/21/2013) [-]
Actually subspecies can have fertile offspring. Anything in the same species can.
#169 to #165 - bramdk
Reply 0
(03/21/2013) [-]
subspecies can have offspring but that offspring cant reproduce. this is a fact, don't disregard it as untrue because it is in fact true.
#171 to #169 - waaw ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/21/2013) [-]
Nope. Right off the Wikipedia page for subspecies.
"Organisms that belong to different subspecies of the same species are capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring, but they often do not interbreed in nature due to geographic isolation or other factors. "
#10 - mariogomez
Reply +8
(03/20/2013) [-]
It's funny how the title is "Not Racist", when in fact it could just as easily have been "Am Ignorant".

You see, we are all descendant from a single person way back when we were leaving Africa, and this child had a mutation that we all share today, so we are all related.

But why OP is trying to comment on is the fact that one of these two people is express a greater amount of melamine in their skin to protect themselves from harmful UV radiation from the sun, while the other person isn't. This simple self preserving act doesn't make us different sub species, it just means ones person genes are expressed more and ones aren't.

Also OP hand picked fat old black chick vs handsome young white guy, it is an anecdotal example of differences between our races that doesn't mean ****.

tl:dr, OP is a faggot and ignorant of genetics, but most people are anyway.
#21 to #10 - burnswhenipee
-10
has deleted their comment [-]
#13 to #10 - icheatjews
Reply -6
(03/20/2013) [-]
We Human Nao
#14 to #10 - mrloki ONLINE
Reply -5
(03/20/2013) [-]
just so you know, it's very common for birds to be a sub-species just because they have different colors on their tail depending on the area they live, so, for biologists and all, we should have quite a bunch of human sub-species. It's just like saying that a poodle and a rottweiler are the same species just because they are dogs. That's not a comment about discrimination of race, about rights or anything like that, BUT biologically, caucasians are way more different from blacks than a Silky terrier from a yorkshire terrier
#17 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(03/20/2013) [-]
(look at the comment above you. #15)
#75 to #10 - fatpartypoo
Reply 0
(03/20/2013) [-]
I heard that there are actually two strands of human evolution. One originating from Africa, and one originating from Europe. Not saying its true, just wondering if anyone else heard this and can back it up?
#82 to #75 - thesovereigngrave
Reply +1
(03/20/2013) [-]
All human life traces their ancestry back to Africa. Yeah, early hominids did migrate out of Africa and evolve into different species, but they died off or went the way of the Neanderthals.
#164 to #75 - mariogomez
Reply 0
(03/21/2013) [-]
Because if we actually were different sub species, we would be called that by the scientific establishment, but were not, because we aren't.

Genetically we are the same, the only difference is phenotype and culture, and different phenotype isn't enough to make different sub species, if it did then blonde people would be a different sub species form giners or black hair people.
#86 to #10 - wyldek
Reply +1
(03/20/2013) [-]
Well sure, but if two different groups from the some genetic source diverge enough, it's stupid to keep calling them the same species. Hell, go back far far enough and damn near EVERYTHING is descended from a common ancestor.

OP is saying that the divergence between the birds (which was not very much, looks like only minor size/color variation) is enough to merit a different "sub-species" then why isn't humanity judged on the same scale?