Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#4 - yeahvinyl
Reply -5
(03/02/2013) [-]
Girth to a certain degree. After around 5 inches it starts to get painful for girls, and it can lead to this sort of... abdominal pain similar to cramps, or stomach pains for the constant hitting on our cervix.   
   
Girth however, feels both better for the man and the woman, but only to the point where it's a small stretch, after that it too gets a little painful. The thinner the dick, the more loose the girl feels, and the thicker the more tight it feels.   
   
tl;dr Women prefer 4-5 inch somewhat chubby penises over porn star dicks.
Girth to a certain degree. After around 5 inches it starts to get painful for girls, and it can lead to this sort of... abdominal pain similar to cramps, or stomach pains for the constant hitting on our cervix.

Girth however, feels both better for the man and the woman, but only to the point where it's a small stretch, after that it too gets a little painful. The thinner the dick, the more loose the girl feels, and the thicker the more tight it feels.

tl;dr Women prefer 4-5 inch somewhat chubby penises over porn star dicks.
#54 to #4 - taintedangel
Reply +1
(03/03/2013) [-]
I think you just don't like anything over four inches in your vagina because you were never adventurous to try anything besides missionary.
#55 to #54 - yeahvinyl
Reply -6
(03/03/2013) [-]
I actually hate missionary, and prefer riding or doggystyle.

My sex life and my likes aren't any concern to you though, really.
#56 to #55 - tyraxio
Reply 0
(03/03/2013) [-]
Then why are you sharing it?
#58 to #56 - yeahvinyl
Reply -8
(03/03/2013) [-]
To prove him/her wrong.
#78 to #58 - mrsockz
Reply 0
(03/03/2013) [-]
You didn't prove op wrong you just stated your opinion......
#59 to #58 - tyraxio
Reply +1
(03/03/2013) [-]
Well, you know, if you truly don't think it is any concern to you, then rather keep your pride and let it go, eh?

Now, tits or gtfo.
#60 to #59 - yeahvinyl
Reply -6
(03/03/2013) [-]
I already post **** on a nearly weekly basis, there no point in getting excessive.

What's wrong with not feeling like getting into my preferences and sex life in general? Oh wait, nothing's wrong with it unless it concerns an insult.
#72 to #60 - jazzytheferret
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#61 to #60 - tyraxio
Reply 0
(03/03/2013) [-]
Hmm. Nice. I suppose my argument in invalid then. Too bad for me.

Absolutely nothing wrong with not feeling like sharing your preferences on your intimate life, but you can't tell people about it, and then say it's none of their business. That's just stupidity.
#62 to #61 - yeahvinyl
Reply -7
(03/03/2013) [-]
I didn't tell them about it in it's entirety, that's like saying you can't give out free food samplers in grocery stores and then prohibit people from buying it, because it doesn't work that way.

Yes, it's none of anyone's business what I do in bed, but if they're to ask something who am I to not answer? If they're going to imply something that isn't true, who am I not to inform them? It's no one's business what people do behind closed doors, but it isn't exactly that touchy of a subject to not ask or imply things, am I wrong?
#73 to #62 - jazzytheferret
Reply +1
(03/03/2013) [-]
Since you shared your sexual preferences, can I buy you? Possibly rent for a bit?
#64 to #62 - tyraxio
Reply 0
(03/03/2013) [-]
Certainly not wrong, it just seems odd. "This is none of your business, but blahblahblah". Totally your business what you want to share or not, just saying that that statement didn't work for me, but this is overanalysing on tiny details which I don't remember the words of because it's late where I live, and I think I get your point anyway.

Anyway, it was nice making your acquaintance, and I hope to see you around in the comment section some other time. You don't seem half-retarded like the majority of the FJ community.
#65 to #64 - yeahvinyl
Reply -7
(03/03/2013) [-]
Thanks.
#48 to #4 - skybluetroll
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
Is girth diameter or cirumference?
#49 to #48 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/03/2013) [-]
I use it in diameter; but before you say anything else, PLEASE read the other comments to my explanation.
#39 to #4 - foxxywithpaws
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]
I got a feeling we're just talking right past eachother.
#40 to #39 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
WHY are you still commenting, after it's become painfully obvious you're not willing to listen?
#41 to #40 - foxxywithpaws
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]
Because you still haven't explained the structuring of your comment I just replied to again.
#43 to #41 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
Since you're obviously having trouble finding this for yourself, even though it's 6 comments down:

www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4457666/final+fantasy+7+the+true+battle/12#12
#7 to #4 - vatra
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]
Reread what you wrote please. Then, tell me why people are thumbing you down.
#8 to #7 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
Why should I care?
#9 to #8 - vatra
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]
Just saying, you said girth for both sections. If you had written it how you originally intended I think you would have green not red.
#10 to #9 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
I talked about length first and girth second, little green and red pixels don't really concern me much.
#11 to #10 - vatra
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]
You never actually said length in the first one, you accidentally said girth for the first one. And you do have a point with the thumbs, I feel similar, I just use those as incentive for other people.
#12 to #11 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
"Girth to a certain degree."-Explaining how it's better.

"After around 5 inches..."-There is no 5 inch wide dick I have seen that's real, it's left the the reader to infer, implying these people aren't complete dumbasses who need everything spelled out for them.

"Girth however,...."-Explaining how girth feels better.

Not only that, but I think I specified everything for those few who can't red in my tl;dr at the end of the comment.
#46 to #12 - foxxywithpaws
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
This explains dick-all about what you think is a big/small/thick/thin cock.
But by now I've stopped caring to type. Jesus, this is tiri
#47 to #46 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
ok
#15 to #12 - foxxywithpaws
Reply +2
(03/02/2013) [-]
Girth is measured by circumference. :|
#16 to #15 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
Not where I'm from, we measure by diameter.
#75 to #16 - anon
Reply 0
(03/03/2013) [-]
Girth is ALWAYS measured using circumference.
#17 to #16 - foxxywithpaws
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]
Well then your country is one of the few ones that does that. In science (like in scientific studies) girth is always measured by circumference.
The average circumference lies between 4.67" and 4.97".
#19 to #17 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
That's cool
#21 to #19 - foxxywithpaws
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]
So you see, your "After around 5 inches it starts to get painful for girls" is really REALLY odd, considering you mean a girth of 5 inches in DIAMETER.
That's like trying to put a freaking leg up someone's snatch.
#22 to #21 - yeahvinyl
Reply -9
(03/02/2013) [-]
I think you should read the below comments.
#24 to #22 - foxxywithpaws
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
How so? I don't see what I'm missing here.

In your original comment either definition of girth would fail.
You said: "tl;dr Women prefer 4-5 inch somewhat chubby penises over porn star dicks."

A penis with a diameter of 4 or 5 inches would be retardedly thick.
A penis with a circumference of 4 inches is considered thin.
A penis with a circumference of 5 inches is somewhat above average.

Now if by "After around 5 inches it starts to get painful for girls" you meant 5 inches in length then you're just wrong right there.
#25 to #24 - yeahvinyl
Reply -11
(03/02/2013) [-]
If you would've read the other comments on this, you wouldn't be confused.
#26 to #25 - foxxywithpaws
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]
I wouldn't be confused if you proof-read your original comment.

Comment #18 has it all right. Because you didn't clarify that you were talking about length in the first paragraph it all looks a bit like a jumbled mess.
#27 to #26 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
There's nothing to proof read, considering when I read it and had a female friend read it to see if she felt the same way, there were no questions or misinterpreted information.

Maybe FJ's community needs to learn to read in between the lines.
#76 to #27 - anon
Reply 0
(03/03/2013) [-]
Stop lying. No female friend read your comment.

You're a woman, you don't have a dick, you don't know how to measure a dick properly, your opinions don't matter.
#28 to #27 - foxxywithpaws
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]
"Girth to a certain degree. After around 5 inches it starts to get painful for girls..."
This implies that you're talking about girth all through the first paragraph, though it's unclear what "kind" of girth you're talking about. (diameter or circumference)

"Girth however..."
OH! So you WERE talking about length? Okay.

"After around 5 inches it starts to get painful for girls"
Honey, 5 inches in length isn't really big at all.

"{More} girth however, feels both better for the man and the woman, but only to the point where it's a small stretch, after that it too gets a little painful. The thinner the dick, the more loose the girl feels, and the thicker the more tight it feels."
This part of your comment is pretty much water-tight, and I agree with it 100% percent.

So yeah, there's your comment broken down. I think I understand and I hope you understand that your comment is confusing and (on multiple occasions) wrong.
#29 to #28 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
Jesus Christ, if you would've read the other comments, I've already explained this.

You act like I give a **** whether or not your opinion matches mine. If I wanted someone else to agree with it I would've specified or asked if anyone else thought I was right. This is all based on both my friend and I's opinions, and if you don't like it, that's fine and dandy.
#45 to #29 - vatra
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
True, I might even go as far as to say people in general are.
#42 to #29 - vatra
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
I agree, and by all rights (s)he can express his or her opinion, but to try and convince you that your opinion is wrong is laughable, it is an opinion, there is no right or wrong, it is all preference.
#44 to #42 - yeahvinyl
-10
(03/02/2013) [-]
Let's face it, the FJ community in general is kinda ******.
#37 to #29 - vatra
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
I can understand that. You and I covered that one aspect rather thoroughly, it should be clear to fox.
#38 to #37 - yeahvinyl
-10
(03/02/2013) [-]
I have a feeling (s)he hasn't bothered to read my other comments.

Oh well.
#33 to #29 - vatra
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
Can't we just have a civil conversation? I never claimed to know what you do or don't care about. Nor do I fault your opinion, actually I think your opinion is pretty spot on, the only thing I questioned was your sentence structure, but we already finished that. I was just enjoying the show fox put on by questioning your measurements and your opinion.
#34 to #33 - yeahvinyl
-9
(03/02/2013) [-]
I wasn't trying to be rude towards you, but I think it's pretty excessive when I'm getting asked to explain myself yet again.
#32 to #29 - foxxywithpaws
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]
Where do you get the outrageous idea that this conversation is based on opinions?
I'm not acting at all. The only thing I hope is an act is your stupidity and stubbornness.

Please. Specify. Break down your own original comment.
What is your definition of girth? What do you consider a thick cock? What do you consider a big (in length) cock?
#36 to #32 - yeahvinyl
-10
(03/02/2013) [-]
I already broke it down.

Like I told you, multiple times, GO READ MY OTHER COMMENTS.
#35 to #32 - yeahvinyl
-10
(03/02/2013) [-]
"So yeah, there's your comment broken down. I think I understand and I hope you understand that your comment is confusing and (on multiple occasions) wrong. "

Are you really going to sit here and tell me this isn't based on opinions?
#30 to #29 - vatra
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
Even though I was originally part of this, I can't help but laugh, the internet, the only place you can have an argument over someone's measurement type for girth, yet no one questions the fact that they arguing about penises. I love it.
Even though I was originally part of this, I can't help but laugh, the internet, the only place you can have an argument over someone's measurement type for girth, yet no one questions the fact that they arguing about penises. I love it.
#31 to #30 - yeahvinyl
-10
(03/02/2013) [-]
All of this was started on the basis that I care about how people feel towards my opinion, and like I stated before, I don't.
#13 to #12 - vatra
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
As to the point of the tl;dr, you are correct. But despite your intention being easy to infer in the long version, the way you worded it implied you were purely talking about girth. Also no need to bite my head off, I am not, nor have I ever been attacking you.
#14 to #13 - yeahvinyl
Reply -10
(03/02/2013) [-]
Where am I doing this?
#18 to #14 - vatra
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
The structure of the first paragraph. You start it with a sentence about girth, then you proceed to talk about an implied concept (length) the lack of separation of thought causes the mind to associate the latter sentences in the first paragraph to be in conjunction with the idea expressed in the first sentence despite that being a ridiculous concept (5 inch girth)

As for attacking, because you didn't clarify which of my two points you wanted me to tell you where you are doing that, "There is no 5 inch wide dick I have seen that's real, it's left the the reader to infer, implying these people aren't complete dumbasses who need everything spelled out for them." because I was questioning your wording at the time, the 'dumbass' statement implies that thought is directed towards me.
#20 to #18 - yeahvinyl
Reply -9
(03/02/2013) [-]
"These people" is not the same thing as "you."
#23 to #20 - vatra
Reply 0
(03/02/2013) [-]
Touché. I suppose I could have made the jump to the connection of that statement to myself, because of my questioning of the structure.
#5 to #4 - aluminiumfoil **User deleted account**
Reply +1
(03/02/2013) [-]