Harry Potter Plot Twist. 100% not OC. I am a time Here; Fetter ted l) Mettle Ttwtt TIMR .mro'. Arid white I tree the eer: .. I thoug' the ending wee it be a let tags are lying

Harry Potter Plot Twist

Tags: tags | are | lying
I am a time Here; Fetter ted
l) Mettle Ttwtt
TIMR .mro'.
Arid white I tree the eer: ..
I thoug' the ending wee it
be a let different.
o' tiea it time ended.
There wee e pert of the prophecy that meld have
either . die tit the hand ofthe other
fer We while the other survives
In the . it rites; -is ‘net. in otie end.
we m them wt I time kill [HIE ether.
needle die. wetted tee at the heed of the entier’?
n." .,1: 1. in the hund eithe other
l% smily the cute wt: -ti dit: tri' 1 the he-: 1 he -t: -titer
achieving death.
IPS, arr
tine frlg?. Hrri' that he Hittite; . , Harri;
e. er: his death.
he Historie merit he ire. :. iall is the
only way he/ ll ever be with his tweed ewes.
But '' icarus his ewe deem end fei' . rer
By killing Voldemort, Harry wetted become .
item,» Fetter weedd. terrier. he The Bee Who Lived.
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 88311
Favorited: 715
Submitted: 02/27/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to fackyazombies submit to reddit


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - vycanismajoris (02/27/2013) [-]
He could be immortal, alright. But...
#382 to #1 - anon (02/28/2013) [-]
not funny. thumbed down.
User avatar #393 to #382 - vycanismajoris (02/28/2013) [-]
You hurt my feelings...
#90 - detsgudaarne (02/28/2013) [-]
My ending - hermione strips and get naked
#227 to #90 - anon (02/28/2013) [-]
And magically appears in my room
User avatar #394 to #90 - cubanwhiteman (02/28/2013) [-]
Whoa, she strips, AND gets naked?
User avatar #395 to #90 - kolpster (02/28/2013) [-]
Well if she stripped, she probably would be naked.
#201 to #90 - anon (02/28/2013) [-]
That was my ending to The Philosopher's Stone
#210 to #201 - wolfblackfire **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #95 to #90 - jokeface ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
Indeed. Strips AND gets naked. In that order.
User avatar #193 to #95 - bookyle (02/28/2013) [-]
and then the entire thing turns into high quality porn with plot
User avatar #321 to #193 - limb (02/28/2013) [-]
Funny guy made me laugh heres a thumb.
#66 - trollins (02/28/2013) [-]
Best ending:

He killed Voldemort.

Then wakes up to the sound of footsteps on the stairs above.
#374 to #66 - anon (02/28/2013) [-]
why in the name of ass would you ever think of something so horrible?
Godamn, that pissed me off more than the post gave me feels
#280 to #66 - lordgonorrhea (02/28/2013) [-]
I can't even imagine how butthurt I'd be if that actually happened...
User avatar #265 to #66 - alleksi (02/28/2013) [-]
that would probably the biggest **** you, ever. the amount of butthurt resulting from that kind of ending would be incredible
User avatar #289 to #265 - bigmanfifty (02/28/2013) [-]
User avatar #2 - guiguito ONLINE (02/27/2013) [-]
wow imortality...
that's plenty of time to find out why kids love cinamon toast crunch
User avatar #365 to #2 - beerterror (02/28/2013) [-]
Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged much?
User avatar #383 to #2 - AlexPaincakes (02/28/2013) [-]
"Never underestimate immortality.."

If anyone from FJ can tell me where this is from I will be in shock.
User avatar #385 to #383 - guiguito ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
i've seen at least 30 movies/series with that phrase
but i guess i comes from a book or something
User avatar #384 to #383 - TommyV (02/28/2013) [-]
It's from some **** Metal band
User avatar #386 to #384 - AlexPaincakes (02/28/2013) [-]
Ahh I knew FJ was full of faggots I was just testing this. Thanks for proving me right. Btw It's Whitechapel, and they make more intricate and intelligent music then you will ever listen to.
User avatar #387 to #386 - TommyV (02/28/2013) [-]
User avatar #390 to #386 - davidavidson (02/28/2013) [-]
You'll grow out of this stage some time.

Oh, you aren't impressing anyone either.
User avatar #391 to #390 - AlexPaincakes (02/28/2013) [-]
What are you even talking about?
User avatar #392 to #391 - davidavidson (02/28/2013) [-]
Nothing important, kiddo.
#184 to #2 - musicaglory (02/28/2013) [-]
This reminded me of a Dr. Who joke. If I may: The Face of Boe has seen many things, but has he seen why kids love cinnamon toast crunch?
User avatar #152 to #2 - nouken (02/28/2013) [-]
You saucy bastard. You're the first to give me a genuine laugh on this site in weeks.
User avatar #241 to #152 - guiguito ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
glad to entretain
User avatar #180 to #2 - diresister (02/28/2013) [-]
you sneaky fat twat badger
#140 - jimboismynameo (02/28/2013) [-]
i was fine up until "forever be the boy who lived"   
then this
i was fine up until "forever be the boy who lived"

then this
#234 - lemleet (02/28/2013) [-]
but then he'd live long enough to see himself become the villain.... that would be a ******* badass sequel storyline
User avatar #381 to #234 - TheBarneyStinson (02/28/2013) [-]
But how could that end if Harry can't die? Unless it goes all Metal Gear and finds Voldemorts body, and uses it as a key or something.
#402 to #381 - lemleet (02/28/2013) [-]
the main protagonist has to find a way to kill him, which is what harry most desires
User avatar #242 to #234 - rheago (02/28/2013) [-]
**** YES
#11 - europeanswallow (02/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #22 - brettd (02/28/2013) [-]
>Harry finds out that he is supposed to die
>uses the ressurection stone to talk to his parents, Sirius, Lupin, Dumbledore, and Snape one last time
>sacrifices himself
>Voldemort goes into Hogwarts
>Malfoy comes forward instead of Neville, kills the snake
>fighting insues
>Neville stops the fight and challenges Voldemort
>find out that the propechy WAS referring to Neville the whole time, and that Voldemort had it wrong
>Neville is able to kill Voldemort because by sacrificing himself, Harry gave him and everyone else the same protection his mother gave him
User avatar #35 to #22 - charagrin (02/28/2013) [-]
technically the prophesy could have been talking about Neville the whole time, only Rowling said otherwise. if she had never said anything Neville could very much have been the unsung chosen one even while Harry got the recognition.
User avatar #43 to #35 - vanillasmoke (02/28/2013) [-]
not necessarily true, or true at all, if i am correct the prophecy was originally open to harry or neville but voldemort chose harry, because he was the greater threat, neville was then excluded from the prophecy, the role of hero and the burden went to harry, though neville was a hero he was not the prophecies hero. this is proven through dumbledore and harrys conversation in book five i believe after harry smashes things and asks why not neville. not sure if thats the right book and scene but it definitely happens.
User avatar #45 to #43 - charagrin (02/28/2013) [-]
That's what I said. Rowling retconned it, but not within the story itself. So it COULD have meant Neville. It is open to interpretation assuming you ignore what Rowlings said after the fact..
User avatar #48 to #45 - vanillasmoke (02/28/2013) [-]
it directly states in the novel that it could be about neville but voldemort chose harry thus solidifying the prophecy. unless of course you're implying that in an alternate HP universe where rowling has no say and this whole world merely existed and was free of a creator then neville could assume that role through his own will. and if that is what you are talking about i would say put the harry potter stuf down for a while and read a new book.
User avatar #51 to #48 - charagrin (02/28/2013) [-]
No, Dumbledore and the other major wizards DECIDED it meant Harry for assorted reasons including Voldemort going for him. But only the prophesy gets to decide what it meant. JK Rowling retconned it IRL by saying it meant Harry, but if she didn't it could have meant Neville all along. But if she hand't it would have been possible for it to have meant Neville all along, but with harry getting credit.
User avatar #53 to #51 - vanillasmoke (02/28/2013) [-]
that isn't true at all, voldemort made the decision to make the prophecy about harry, that's why he went for harry and MARKED HIM AS HIS EQUAL (THE SCAR), it was in voldemorts hands, not the other wizards. and dont say hey now, nevilles life got ****** up too, it is true, but it happened after the infamous night at godrics hollow, and it was done by the lestranges and BC jr. if you don't believe me, re-read the books, i used to beat my meat to that verbal beauty, i know it all too well.
User avatar #54 to #53 - vanillasmoke (02/28/2013) [-]
here's the prophecy if you don't believe me

"The one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord approaches ... born to those who have thrice defied him, born as the seventh month dies ... and the Dark Lord will mark him as his equal, but he will have power the Dark Lord knows not ... and either must die at the hand of the other for neither can live while the other survives ... the one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord will be born as the seventh month dies ..."
User avatar #55 to #53 - charagrin (02/28/2013) [-]
But he also marked Neville when he had his parents harmed. You are deciding what the mark is, but how do you KNOW? That's why I am saying it is open to interpretation. I am not saying you are wrong, I am just saying I am not wrong. It's like the Bible, everyone decides what it means for themselves, hence all the different religions around it.
User avatar #56 to #55 - vanillasmoke (02/28/2013) [-]
no? that isn't true at all, he never chose to have nevilles parents harmed, they were tortured out of frustration by the afore mentioned death eaters, the mark was made and voldemort was gone into his "ghost-like" state. the novel states it, dumbledore states it, call up jk and she'll reiterate it to you. face facts that your theory is not plausible or possible. and never compare HP to religion, it is a beautiful thing, dont bring it down to that level.
User avatar #59 to #56 - charagrin (02/28/2013) [-]
H never chose to have Neville's parents harmed, but by his actions the event happened. You are assuming the mark meant the scar. And that is the beauty of the way the book was written, it can be read many different ways. Again, Dumbledore does not get to decide what the prophesy meant, only the prophesy does. For the record, I am not the only one who thinks this way, there are THOUSANDS of posts by many people who feel the same way i do. hence why, if JK Rowling had not said anything, we would BOTH be right. I choose to ignore her because even an author does not get to decide what her audience takes away from her work. In my minds eye, and many others, Neville was the chosen one, and Harry was the pretender who got the credit.
User avatar #60 to #59 - vanillasmoke (02/28/2013) [-]
you need to go outside man, i can't continue to have this discussion, the book is clear, it isn't meant to be interpreted, it is a book, it is a solid fact, just let it go man, let it go.
User avatar #61 to #60 - charagrin (02/28/2013) [-]
No. Because you are telling me that what I think about an artwork is wrong. Do you also know why Mona Lisa was smiling? I feel sad that you do not rspect other people enough to allow them freedom of interpretation on assorted works. Although I am curious, when will you be preach to all the Christians you decide are wrong about the bible?
User avatar #69 to #61 - vanillasmoke (02/28/2013) [-]
i have no problem with religion, faith is great for people, just not for me, but you are talking about a ******* book chief, a fiction book, if your theory was correct, then the ending wouldve been different. you are ignoring the facts clearly stated in the novel, it isnt a question of what the mark is, the novel makes it clear that harry is chosen, dumbledore even tells you, like **** , he's the chosen one, the facts are all there man, it's pointless to ignore them. and to answer your question, no i do not know why people watched that ****** julia roberts movie. re-read all seven novels and look at all the times it is stated that harry is the chosen one and how it clearly states that it cannot be neville, until that time, please stop commenting with your nonsense.
User avatar #71 to #69 - charagrin (02/28/2013) [-]
It is not nonsense, it is an alternative way of viewing the book. If I say it is a nice day today, and you and a dozen people all decide I am talking about the weather, you can still be wrong because I could have meant something else entirely. it is the same way with the book, all the "facts" are characters deciding what it meant. literally everything about the prophesy describes both characters, hence why JK Rowling HAD TO RETCONN it. otherwise, why would she have had to? Even she acknowledged it could have meant both of them, she just decided it meant Harry. You don't have to agree with me, that is the beauty of art, we can both be right.
User avatar #116 to #71 - CCpieman (02/28/2013) [-]
Here is Dumbledore's quote to Harry towards the end of _The Order of the Phoenix__ about the Prophecy and why Harry ended up being "The Chosen One" when both he and Neville fit the profile Sybill Trelawney set.
"He chose the boy he thought most likely to be a danger to him. He chose, not the Pure-blood (which according to his creed, is the only kind of wizard worth being or knowing), but the half-blood like himself. He saw himself in you before he had ever seen you, and in marking you with that scar, he did not kill you, as he intended, but gave you powers, and a future, which you have fitted to escape him not once, but four times so far-something that neither your parents, nor Neville's parents, ever achieved."
The "other wizards" didn't decide that Potter was the Chosen One-that title wasn't even used until Order of the Phoenix-it was through Voldemort's own desire to remove any potential opposition to his power that he ended up creating the object of his destruction.
I highly recommend that you read or re-read the last several chapters of The Order of the Phoenix. It makes the whole Prophecy thing kind of clear after the battle at the Ministry.

Source: harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Sybill_Trelawney's_first_prophecy
User avatar #125 to #116 - charagrin (02/28/2013) [-]
This is from cracked where the theory got enough notice and following to be worthy of a spot.------Basically, that Harry Potter dude was just a distraction. The "chosen one" was Neville all along.
See, the plot of all seven books revolves around the idea that Harry's life fulfills this prophecy:
"The one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord [Voldemort] approaches ... born to those who have thrice defied him, born as the seventh month dies ... and the Dark Lord will mark him as his equal, but he will have power the Dark Lord knows not ... ".
The thing is, all that stuff applies to Neville, too. His parents had thrice defied Voldemort, and he was born on July 30, one day before Harry. So what power does Neville know that Voldemort doesn't? According to the theory, that could be either "the power of love" (as in Harry's case) or "herbology."
The "Voldemort will mark him as his equal" part was a little trickier, but then again it wasn't clear how it related to Harry, either. Neville had a messed up relationship with his parents, mainly due to the fact that Voldemort had them tortured into insanity. Voldemort had some serious mommy issues, too, so in that sense Voldemort made him his equal.
But the best part of the theory, the part that makes it all come together, is the idea that Dumbledore, the principal of Wizard High, was intentionally allowing Voldemort to think Harry was the chosen one just to protect Neville. While we're not saying they should have just ditched Harry in the last book and turned the other kid into the protagonist, it would have been pretty cool to have Harry find out he wasn't the center of the universe after all, if only because it would have made the character slightly less insufferable.
The later books do flirt with the idea, however briefly. And it would have fit right in with Rowling's habit of pillaging the first three books to turn all the one-off magic items and half-serious gags into game-changing MacGuffins.
User avatar #134 to #125 - CCpieman (02/28/2013) [-]
Ok, so when you say "cracked" I'm assuming you mean this article : You need to login to view this link
I do love that site and think the topics they cover are interesting, but it might have been a lot more helpful for vanillasmoke and I if you mentioned that your argument was stemming from that article in the first place, so we could follow along more easily.
While it would've been typical of Dumbledore to pull a crafty one over on Voldemort (and from the grave to boot!) the fact is that Voldemort directly marked Harry, further angered him by killing innocents on his quest to regain power and kill Harry, and died when he dueled Harry. Though Neville did destroy Nagini, the final Horcrux that needed to be removed, Ron did the same to the Locket and Hermione might have done in Hufflepuff's cup. Though those two don't fit the other criteria of the prophecy, surely they deserve as much credit for Voldemort's destruction as Neville?
User avatar #344 to #134 - vanillasmoke (02/28/2013) [-]
he's incorrigible, in my opinion the theory of his is not at all possible, it's interesting and cool but not possible, I couldn't continue to go through with the discussion any further. thanks for the help though man, always nice to meet another potter lover.
User avatar #135 to #134 - charagrin (02/28/2013) [-]
My argument did NOT come from cracked, cracked responded TO the argument WE made. I see Neville as The Chosen One because through his actions, Voldemort was defeated. Unless you have a forgotten chapter from Harry Potter where an Angel came down from on high and said it was all Harry, we are going to just go around in circles. To my, my argument makes perfect sense, and you yours. It is open to interpretation, that is why I like the series so much.
#408 to #135 - CCpieman (03/01/2013) [-]
You say that you're argument/theory did not come from cracked, yet you continuously quote the article they wrote verbatim. If they were "respond[ing] TO the argument WE made", surely you could have formulated a better explanation of the theory you and your peers support than cracked had. And while you're correct in saying that no angel or divine being announced that it had to be Harry and Harry alone, in the end that's what J.K. Rowling wrote and authors are the closest things to gods in the worlds they create.

Also this image rocks
User avatar #410 to #408 - charagrin (03/01/2013) [-]
That is an awesome pic, Imma steal it. But I do not understand what you are arguing about. Are you trying to tell me what I should take away from art? Will you tell me what music I can listen to as well? What pages I am allowed to look at on Deviant? Feel to to not agree with me, that's fine. But don't tell me I cannot make up my own mind about what I see as a lesson and plot. Have a nice day, I'm outtie.
User avatar #122 to #116 - charagrin (02/28/2013) [-]
I respect your opinion on the matter. But that is Dumbledores opinion. I suggest you reread the books from cover to cover, and just try and see it from my perspective. I see Neville as the true chosen one. No where does the prophesy say 'Harry Potter will kill Voldemort." The prophesy reads "and either must die at the hand of the other for neither can live while the other survives ... the one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord will be born as the seventh month dies ..." But it never says HOW one must die at the hands of the other. Neville did not strike the killing blow, but he DID kill Nagini The Horcrux, and by his actions Voldemort was killed by Harry. You can disagree with me, I am happy with that. But my reading of the book is every bit as valid as yours because you can not decide what I can take from it. As I have said, I am not one person in a sea o millions with my opinion, there are thousands who have idea's along the same lines as me.
User avatar #123 to #22 - CCpieman (02/28/2013) [-]
I'd really hate to ruin this otherwise brilliant concept, but what about the Hallows, especially the Elder Wand? The whole reason Harry was able to kill Voldemort was because he took Draco Malfoy's wand, who had disarmed Dumbledore, who had possessed the Elder Wand up until that time. Voldemort thought he had the Elder Wand, but because Harry overpowered Draco, he became the master of the Elder Wand, and it refused to kill him. The the Avada Kedavra curse bounced back on Voldemort, refusing to kill its master. If Harry really sacrificed himself then Voldemort would've been the Master of the Elder Wand and Neville would've died whether or not he was the real Chosen One or not.
User avatar #403 to #123 - brettd (03/01/2013) [-]
When they are at King's Cross, Dumbledore tells Harry that because he willingly sacrified himself, Voldemort did not defeat harry and thus harry is still the master of the elder wand. Otherwise Voldemort would have become the mast of the wand in the real ending by hitting harry with the avada kedavra curse.
User avatar #409 to #403 - CCpieman (03/01/2013) [-]
Ah, I see now why Harry was still the master even though he was "defeated". Thanks man. The only problem I have is that the Elder wand is still super powerful, and Voldemort is super powerful, so as long as he didn't fight the master (Harry) then the Elder Wand would still let him defeat anyone.
User avatar #411 to #409 - brettd (03/02/2013) [-]
Not true because the "love" enchanment is proven to be stronger than voldemort's power. That's why he failed to kill harry as a baby. And as long as your not its master, the elder wand is just like any other wand.
#170 - myhugeballsack (02/28/2013) [-]
This...Is...I cant...Its so good!
This...Is...I cant...Its so good!
#117 - memad (02/28/2013) [-]
#119 to #117 - memad has deleted their comment [-]
#120 to #117 - memad has deleted their comment [-]
#121 to #117 - memad has deleted their comment [-]
#89 - puredeliciousness (02/28/2013) [-]
I felt so empty after I finished the last book. I just didn't know what to do with myself anymore.
#190 to #89 - anon (02/28/2013) [-]
what you did while wating for the other books...exept there wont be any books to wait for
#238 to #89 - anon (02/28/2013) [-]
I was watching all the movies again a few days ago and when Harry told Dobby never to save his life again, I ******* lost it.
User avatar #179 to #89 - ilennablond (02/28/2013) [-]
read them again?
#181 to #179 - puredeliciousness (02/28/2013) [-]
I've read each book at least 5 times... I think I've read the 6th one 8 or 9 times...
I've read each book at least 5 times... I think I've read the 6th one 8 or 9 times...
User avatar #199 to #181 - christopherdolan (02/28/2013) [-]
Sixth book is best book
#203 to #199 - puredeliciousness (02/28/2013) [-]
While the 6th is amazing, I still personally like the 7th book more.
User avatar #205 to #203 - christopherdolan (02/28/2013) [-]
Well, maybe but the sizth one is freshest in my mind, because i read it in 5th grade or something in under a week. I actually sometimes lost track of reality in that phase in my life because of that marvellous book. Favourite movie?
User avatar #207 to #205 - puredeliciousness (02/28/2013) [-]
Haters gonna hate. My favorite was the first movie. The more they made, the more they started messing up, and the more important stuff they left out, which really irritated me.
User avatar #208 to #207 - christopherdolan (02/28/2013) [-]
Kind of agree, but my favourite movies are the eighth one and the third one. Allthough it had the most cgi, the last one still nailed things like snapes death and follow-up perfectly.
User avatar #10 - shiningfinger (02/27/2013) [-]
Albus Dumbledore: "By attempting to kill you, Voldemort himself singled out the remarkable person who sits here in front of me, and gave him the tools for the job! It is Voldemort's fault that you were able to see into his thoughts, his ambitions, that you even understand the snakelike language in which he gives orders, and yet, Harry, despite your privileged insight into Voldemort's world (which, incidentally, is a gift any Death Eater would kill to have), you have never been seduced by the Dark Arts, never, even for a second, shown the slightest desire to become one of Voldemort’s followers!"
Harry Potter: "Of course I haven't! He killed my mum and dad!"
Albus Dumbledore: "You are protected, in short, by your ability to love! The only protection that can possibly work against the lure of power like Voldemort's! In spite of all the temptation you have endured, all the suffering, you remain pure of heart, just as pure as you were at the age of eleven, when you stared into a mirror that reflected your heart's desire, and it showed you only the way to thwart Lord Voldemort, and not immortality or riches."
#240 - shadowmaul (02/28/2013) [-]
This is how it really ended    
Voldemort was killed by some little kid with armor
This is how it really ended

Voldemort was killed by some little kid with armor
#7 - cranialpleasure (02/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#3 - idontcarewichname (02/27/2013) [-]
Oh my ******* God, that`s Genius.
Love your idea!
#185 to #3 - musicaglory (02/28/2013) [-]
Blew. My. Motha. ******* . Mind.
#41 - liquidz ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#259 - harlequinlove (02/28/2013) [-]
That would be such a badass storyline - although depressing... For Harry.
That would be such a badass storyline - although depressing... For Harry.
#153 - wubwubbingyou (02/28/2013) [-]
From behalf of the million retards that never made this realization before ........ we thank you good sir .
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)