Smart answer. .. Some test asked me how to solve the Israel Palestina conflict. How the hell should I know. asdasdasdas
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - heafi (02/27/2013) [-]
Some test asked me how to solve the Israel Palestina conflict. How the hell should I know.
Some test asked me how to solve the Israel Palestina conflict. How the hell should I know.
User avatar #20 to #2 - TwistedBamboozler (02/27/2013) [-]
I was asked the same thing, however our prof was just getting us to try and think outside the box. He knew it was a silly question and told us that, but just wanted to see our thought process and creativity on paper
#40 to #20 - recio **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#126 to #2 - kokanium **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#23 to #2 - swiftykidd **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#56 to #23 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
in fact, israel does belong there, jews have more of a history than muslims and arabs do, furthermore jews have always lived in the area
User avatar #129 to #56 - bigmanfifty (02/27/2013) [-]
The arabs have been the majority there for about 1,000 years. Does that not qualify?
#86 to #56 - swiftykidd **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#145 to #56 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
The Palestinians are the direct decedents of the Semitic peoples of the area, Ashkenazi Jews who make up the majority are Europeans. It's white imperialism. Zionism and Naziism started in the same elitist circles of German society in the late 19th century. White people do not magically gain dominion over everyone else. If Zionists really wanted to be fair and talk about the rights of "indigenous populations" they would give up their money and lands here in the US to the native Americans and move there butts to Israel. Which will not happen since they are white supremacists. The problem is the delusion that Jews are victims in this instance it's completely false. Zionists are using Jews as a scape goat to force European occupation of the middle east. It's the crusades all over again. Since it's inception during Israel has been a a purposeful stumbling block in peace used by the European elites to force a wedge in the middle east. Look at who runs Israel and tell me there not honkies.
User avatar #77 to #2 - vigilum (02/27/2013) [-]
Make them talk to each other. That worked for several years, and people were pretty happy.
User avatar #32 to #2 - burdenedsoul ONLINE (02/27/2013) [-]
everyone shuts the **** up and pull the stick out there ass
#66 to #2 - pootington (02/27/2013) [-]

User avatar #71 to #66 - davidavidson (02/27/2013) [-]
Don't know why you were being thumbed down. They just need to quit being butt hurt all the time.
#73 to #2 - asmodeu (02/27/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I have an idea or two.
#146 to #2 - aproudpatriot (02/27/2013) [-]
what your answer should have been
#151 to #146 - themarineelite has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #41 to #2 - daentraya (02/27/2013) [-]
"We dont eat pigs, you dont eat pigs, seems its been that way forever. So if you dont eat pigs, and we dont eat pigs, why not not eat pigs together?"
User avatar #3 to #2 - thinkwithportals (02/27/2013) [-]
I would write that we should pick up Israel and put it somewhere in the western hemisphere.
#4 to #2 - methead (02/27/2013) [-]
nuke it.
#30 to #4 - festinas (02/27/2013) [-]
Quick and easy.
User avatar #55 to #4 - kratosalza (02/27/2013) [-]
In my politics class there was a kid who actually said that israel/palestine should be bombed and reduced to rubble then whoever wants it can take it after. Despite how weird the paper was he had pretty solid arguments and he got a 85 on it.
#29 - Loppytaffy (02/27/2013) [-]
Get Colombia some self help books.
User avatar #68 - aquae (02/27/2013) [-]
All they need to do is get rid of the Internet, that stops a lot of people who 'are trained in gorilla warfare'.
User avatar #61 - rel (02/27/2013) [-]
Rustle their jimmies obviously.
#51 - stepsword ONLINE (02/27/2013) [-]
to dastract gorilla u gibe banana
User avatar #10 - osirusrising (02/27/2013) [-]
Teacher: Put away your phone dammit this is a test.

Student: Hold up i'm making a joke for the internet to see.

Teacher: Oh okay then.
#25 to #10 - tomainstream (02/27/2013) [-]
maybe he got back the test after it was graded....
maybe he got back the test after it was graded....
User avatar #13 - bitchpleaseshutup ONLINE (02/27/2013) [-]
I am trained in gorilla warfare.
User avatar #11 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (02/27/2013) [-]
"Put them in zoos"
#34 - pappathethird (02/27/2013) [-]
awsome teacher
#54 - kaboomz (02/27/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#39 - dramallama (02/27/2013) [-]
This is the hero Columbia needs
#44 to #39 - opjoopie has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #76 to #39 - tiberia (02/27/2013) [-]
It's Colombia! D:
#147 to #76 - dramallama (02/27/2013) [-]
yeah you're right, sorry
yeah you're right, sorry
#18 - murdocisgod (02/27/2013) [-]
> "Guerrillas trying to control the country."   
I see nothing wrong with this.
> "Guerrillas trying to control the country."
I see nothing wrong with this.
#80 to #18 - atheistzilla (02/27/2013) [-]

Exept they're called "Gorillaz" and not Geurillas
User avatar #62 to #18 - generaljackass (02/27/2013) [-]
They have managed to harness the power of the sun through the use of bags. We can learn from them.
#60 to #18 - vegardwd (02/27/2013) [-]
#16 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
I hate teachers who ask these questions.
Once I was asked to solve homelessness, and given (literally) two minutes to make a speech on it.
"Give them houses."
User avatar #42 to #16 - daentraya (02/27/2013) [-]
You could do it further. George Carlin came up with the idea of making small houses on all the goddahm golf fields
#69 to #42 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
But that's not reasonable.
You need money and property rights to get the land and supplies for the houses. The golf field owners aren't about to give up their golf fields, and Republicans would throw a fit if any more money were spent to help the needy (not that the US has money to spend in the first place).
User avatar #143 to #69 - daentraya (02/27/2013) [-]
How else is it going to be possible? It will provide the space needed for them, and will as such qualify as a solution. Problem is, as you said, that the rich ***** wont stop playing their silly sport
#149 to #143 - anon (02/28/2013) [-]
That's the point though.
It's not possible (without substantial bills passed which Republicans would never agree to), otherwise we wouldn't have homeless people.
Sure, you can say "give them houses," but this is a capitalist society, all that land and building materials isn't free.
User avatar #150 to #149 - daentraya (03/01/2013) [-]
If only we could take their golf courses. I wonder how many small houses can be build from the budget of one of those pretty big houses. If that could be converted to a houseless house project, i'm pretty sure it'd fit
Thats the problem with monopoly effect. Money is useful and all, but it has an uneven distribution
#79 to #16 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
Module houses, make bedsits.
Free schooling so they can get half decent jobs, increase amount of jobs so they can actually get jobs.
#48 to #43 - yurilove (02/27/2013) [-]
the wait is killing me
the wait is killing me
User avatar #49 to #48 - TastyBurger (02/27/2013) [-]
I ******* love Two Best Friends Play!
#15 - verby (02/27/2013) [-]
The obvious solution is to make laws forbidding guerillas! Or just send in Snafu
#97 - snackman (02/27/2013) [-]
Bombs solve ANYTHING. Biggest the problem... biggest the bomb.
Bombs solve ANYTHING. Biggest the problem... biggest the bomb.
#81 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
At first I though massive apes attacking cities and flipping buses, and **** . I was thinking Rise of the Planet of the Apes **** was happening. But then I realized I was thinking the wrong word.
#35 - amuzen (02/27/2013) [-]
A lot of history/socials teachers like to think their outside perspective possess some magical insight into foreign affairs so they read discussions on different current events and then pass on people's hypothesis's on how to fix the situation as fact and except the students to memorize these hypothesi as possible solutions to future conflicts despite that the biggest repetitive problem in all of history that every nation assumes is that **** will constantly repeat with no regards for the fact that society, technology, and knowledge of the universe in general has remained fairly fluid throughout the ages. We are never going to have another world war 2. just like we are never going to have another world war 1. next time it's going to be world war 3 and knowing how WW2 happened is going to stop it just as much as knowing how WW1 happened stopped WW2.
User avatar #67 to #35 - meganinja (02/27/2013) [-]
However, we can take action to prevent something similar from happening. Why did WWII happen? Germany was ******* pissed because of how WWI ended so they tried it again. Why hasn't WWIII happened? Because we didn't ******** the losing countries so much that they went into massive depressions like what happened after WWI.
#70 to #67 - amuzen (02/27/2013) [-]
One could also say that WW2 happened because we were to lenient to Germany in letting them get back on their feet after WW1, if we had stopped them the moment they overstepped their bounds and prevented them from gaining a standing army they would never have been able to start WW2.
No one thing ever caused either of the wars and it's stupid for us to focus on a bunch of one things and think well as long as we don't do any of those specific things again we're safe. Hell you can't even just say 'avoid war at all costs' because again that's why WW2 happened, Britain and the rest of the world were so piss scared of a second world war 2 they let Hitler gather a substantial foothold in Europe before ever actually fighting them. There really isn't any overall lesson to be learned about how to avoid war in the future by looking at the past. The only thing you can really deduce is it's gonna happen again as long as there are separate nations willing to protect their own interests because when it comes right down to it everything else is just an excuse.
User avatar #144 to #70 - meganinja (02/27/2013) [-]
While it's true there was never only one reason for WWII, we can learn a lot from the past, like how people learn from their pasts. Should we have been extremely forceful in disarming Germany? No group of people likes being told what to do, you can see in history over and over and over again that whenever you impose your will on a certain group they will **** you up sooner or later. If France and England would have been nice, yet not forceful, then there's a good chance we could have avoided WWII, but they didn't, and it happened. Yes, things change, but you can base your strategy on what's worked most recently so that you can go somewhere from there. If you're in a battle and sending your troops on an all out assault wins you a war, you'd do that same thing in the next war. If that didn't work, THEN you can try something else. Conversly, if sending your troops on an all out assault lost you the war completely, you may want to avoid using that in the next war.
#45 - jimborustler **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#78 to #45 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
is Colombia you cunt

We don't say EEnited Strates of 'Murica
#91 to #78 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
No dumbass it's the Federal Kingdom of Burgerclap
User avatar #75 to #45 - occamsrazor (02/27/2013) [-]
that guy had some pretty slick facial hair

he will be missed
#119 - frodofappins (02/27/2013) [-]
See what you did there,

<- Pic unrelated
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)