Fake Moon Landing?

Adjust content blocking

iamtheblackgoat

Channel: space

random

Comment

Tags, this is Description

ONLY A B/ BORON
would think WE? tired ? 12 of these monsters just for shaw.
ixom

...

+1057

Views: 67576 Submitted: 02/22/2013

Hide Comments

Add Comment Refresh (256)

First 2 3 4 5 Last Next

[ 256 comments ]

Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest

Live Updates: On

Options

asd

#16 - rainbowadash **User deleted account**

+87 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#18 to #16 - stgfilitov

Reply -9 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

We we're entirely better than the USSR. Eh hem.

#21 to #16 - HOtaconE

Reply -3 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

The USSR that didn't care about a manned lunar landing, mind you. Korolev never wanted to plan one, since being the first sattelite in space, first animals in space, first man in space, first lunar probe, first unmanned lunar lander was enough for him.

#87 to #21 - toosexyforyou

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Do some more research buddy. The 1st satellite in spice literally could only make a beeping sound. The 1st animal in space never made it back, why is it an accomplishment of getting the first animal in space when it doesn't come back? They got the paperweight that could beep into space, so they just made a bigger one and put a dog in it. The 1st man in space was pretty much their greatest accomplishment just because they were actually able to bring him back. Also, why did you forget to mention the 1st space station? Probably because their 1st and 2nd space station were complete disasters. Do you know what was happening to the USSR when the US had brought a man to the moon? They couldn't even get a rocket in space anymore, everything around them was exploding.

These are just the ones I know off the top of my head. You are kind of right about the USSR not caring about manned lunar landing but you're also wrong. The USSR cared about being the 1st to do something and that's it. They pretty much put the minimum amount of work in their rockets to be able to get that "first." They did want to make the 1st manned lunar landing but they couldn't because while the US had already made a manned lunar landing, the USSR's rockets were failing miserably.

Take a look at the USSR's firsts again. The first woman into space? Seriously? The guy they sent into space couldn't control the ship, so why is replacing him with a woman such a great accomplishment?

#257 to #87 - defender

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

you forgot about the suposed lost cosmonauts before **** Gagarin

#269 to #257 - toosexyforyou

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/24/2013) [-]

I wrote as much as I could before I had to leave for work.

#240 to #87 - americanfreedom

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

#93 to #87 - HOtaconE

Reply -7 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Jeez lawizz, someone is butthurt, I am just recounting history and Korolev's thought process behind not giving a **** about the moon. God, are you '************** today or WHAT?

#271 to #93 - toosexyforyou

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/24/2013) [-]

TL:DR: I wanted to write a paper on how the USSR was the real winner of the Space Race but then after I researched it I found out the USSR didn't stand a chance.

Umm no. I needed to write a paper for class and I remembered a post on funnyjunk listing a few "USSR Firsts" and compared it to the US only putting a man on the moon. So I thought I should write my paper on how the USSR was the real winner of the Space Race. After a lot of research, I found out that the USSR couldn't even hold a candle next to the US even though they had a huge time lead.

#272 to #271 - HOtaconE

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/24/2013) [-]

Nobody won the space race, that's the funny part. It was 2 governments squeezing low quality **** out of their space programs. You went on a massive butthurt streak because I said russki never gave a **** about landing people on the moon.

#273 to #272 - toosexyforyou

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/24/2013) [-]

You are completely wrong about everything you just said and you refuse to even google the Space Race. I have no further interest in you.

#276 to #273 - HOtaconE

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/24/2013) [-]

And you are a bit too far up in your "'murica" mindset. Calm your titties.

#17 to #16 - silasdg

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Even then we didn't really as we had to make deals with German scientists to design our rockets.

#23 to #17 - Ruspanic

Reply +8 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

The US and the Soviet Union both had German rocket engineers.

#49 - eccleston

Reply +55 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

The moon landings are obviously fake. Every decent "rocket engineer" can see that this design is clearly flawed.

IT NEEDS MOAR BOOSTERS

#63 to #49 - darkroro

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

what game?

#64 to #63 - unoletmehavename

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Kerbal Space Program

#67 to #49 - chuckstein

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

HOLY GOD. THOSE BOOSTERS ARE BURNING, BUT YOU DECOUPLED THEM FROM THE MAIN SHIP.
YOU FOOL! YOU'VE DOOMED YOURSELF!

#69 to #67 - eccleston

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

I'm not the one who created this glorious ship. Sadly, my booster-based designs used to overheat before getting that high.

#94 to #49 - lobsternewburg

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Best I managed on that game was low earth orbit.

#96 to #94 - eccleston

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

I can easily ~~crash~~ land on the Mun.

#97 to #96 - lobsternewburg

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Better than me. I don't even know how to leave the gravitational pull, I just run out of fuel.

#130 to #97 - eccleston

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

That might mean that you have too many weight or that you need a little more fuel. I normally make rockets with a big first stage (3 liquid engines at least, each one with at least 3 tanks) which gets me more or less at the higher stage of the atmosphere, then I use the second stage (another liquid engine with 1-2 tanks) to get into orbit. Then, if I have enough fuel, I try to get to the moon and, as the picture shows, land smoothly on it's surface.

#133 to #130 - lobsternewburg

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

I see. My crafts usually consist of the mainsail engine with a ******** of fueltanks alongside 8 solid thrusters. After the mainsail's run out of fuel I decouple and use the poodle to get into position.

My brother made a craft that got to the moon, but as you say. None survived.

#139 to #133 - eccleston

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

As long as Jeb is not scared, everything is working allright. First figure out how to send Kerbins to the Mun, you'll worry about getting them back later.

#140 to #139 - lobsternewburg

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Jeb is a hero.

What I really wanted was a full space station, but I cannot into orbit.

#107 to #49 - certifiedidiot

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Bob looks scared ********

#124 to #49 - nigalthornberry

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#149 to #49 - haaaxderp

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

There's no parachute on that...

#191 to #49 - bookyle

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

no, your just need additional pylons

#70 - arandomanon

Reply +25 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

There was a myth buster episode where they explained the Moon landing wasn't fake.

#74 to #70 - plutoo

Reply -26 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Well ofcourse, The Mythbusters are American aswell, so ofcourse they wouldn't show an episode where the Moon landing is proofed fake.

#79 to #74 - arandomanon

Reply +10 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

In my opinion, they had strong arguments supporting it. Besides, they proved wrong most of the reasons that people give when they say the landing was fake.

#187 to #74 - MrShaggy

Reply +8 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

god ******* damnit pluto, this is why you're not a planet anymore.

#278 to #187 - plutoo

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/24/2013) [-]

Ask your "earthly" scientists!

#171 to #74 - mrmeatman **User deleted account**

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

A lot of people I know think the moon landing was faked and I live in the US, therefore you can go **** yourself.

#242 to #74 - americanfreedom

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

You are just mad cause the moon get more attention than you.

You are not even a planet.

#277 to #242 - plutoo

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/24/2013) [-]

I used to be...

#216 to #70 - muchasmarcos

Reply -3 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Sorry but they only disprooved the most popular theories about the fotage.

#61 - helion

Reply +20 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

IF IT WAS FAKE WOULDNT YOU THINK ATLEAST 1 OF THE 200.000 PEOPLE INVOLVED WOULD MAYBE TALK OVER THEMSELVES

#164 to #61 - anon id: eb5f5b66

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

What's the soruce of that gif? wasn't it a pretty sad youtube video?

#196 to #164 - desktoppthabest

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnA4u9CaK7A :)

#152 to #61 - beerholder

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

there were actually 400 000 people involving a lot of civil and military corporations

Lockheed Martin made the escape tower
Boeing made the command module, stage S-1C and the testing facilities
Grumman made the lunar lander
McDonnell Douglas made the S-4B stage (the monster engines that lift the whole thing)yes, they do lift

and hundreds of other companies, from the boots of the astronauts to the navigation system and computers.

#1 - ilikemoney

Reply -40 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Only a moron believes everything the government tells them!
youtube.com/watch?v=VW4_5kAPzb0

#8 to #1 - anon id: 687f59a0

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

you'd think if nasa were willing to fake great accomplishments they would have had another one by now

#10 to #8 - anon id: 02a8b3ad

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

and of course that is not a quote from a comic by Loading Artist, good job you creative fag.

#29 to #1 - owmowmow

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

I dunno man. I did just watch all 40 mins of that YouTube video and, yeah I guess the mood landing does have a few holes in it.... But so does the theory of evolution, and the big bang theory. But like the theory evolution, you can't just dismiss every peace evidence and call it fake because not every single tiny ******* thing dosent match up... that is the lowest form of ignorance.

#3 to #1 - reduxalicious

Reply +12 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

And we never put satellites in Orbit, There is no space station, OF COURSE.

#5 to #3 - ilikemoney

Reply -18 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

I'm not saying that.... I'm saying the first moon landing was a hoax, only the first one! It's been proven... Please watch the video I linked, it's very interesting!

#7 to #5 - reduxalicious

Reply +20 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

DUDE, Watch this video, IT proves GIRAFFES DON'T EXIST!

youtube.com/watch?v=Ofu9xJLLuWU

#13 to #7 - rambochicken

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

You win lol

#33 to #7 - margel

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

HFW

#6 to #5 - ultimtemplar

Reply +11 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Been proven huh? Show me the paper released by all of the science organizations saying it was a hoax... a youtube video is proof of NOTHING.

#19 to #6 - stgfilitov

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

mythbusters btich. That's all you need.

#9 to #5 - ocnamesaregone

Reply +9 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Are you really this retarded?

I mean seriously. Do you REALLLY believe in such a retarded thing?

Don't you believe the USSR would've reacted to a fake moon landing? You REALLY think that the second most powerful nation at the time would've stood still to a fake moon landing?

The ******* conspiracy theories are so dumb I'm baffled that some people still believe them.

#256 to #9 - defender

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

if you have nothing to do look up conspiracy theories on wikipedia i bet you would get a kick out of how many there are.

#22 to #9 - sirbutterballs

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

I instinctively read that in Yahtzee's voice after seeing your image.

#148 - ESniper

Reply +18 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

False.. They're poorly made fireworks, only one went off.

#90 - redclover

Reply +18 123456789123345869

(02/23/2013) [-]

Well of course the moon landing is fake.
Everyone knows the moon doesn't even exist. George Washington shot it down back in 1267 with his machine turrets. What you see in the sky now is a fake moon put in place by the ancient Sumerians to trick the dragons into thinking World War 2 is still on-going.

#116 to #90 - nikoxasylumz

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#243 to #90 - felinescrotum **User deleted account**

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]