Fake Moon Landing?. Tags, this is Description. ONLY A B/ BORON would think WE? tired ? 12 of these monsters just for shaw. ixom. The moon landings are obviously fake. Every decent "rocket engineer" can see that this design is clearly flawed. IT NEEDS MOAR BOOSTERS description this is tags we read You over
x

Fake Moon Landing?

 
Fake Moon Landing?. Tags, this is Description. ONLY A B/ BORON would think WE? tired ? 12 of these monsters just for shaw. ixom. The moon landings are obviously fake. Every decent "rocket engineer" can see that this design is clearly flawed. IT NEEDS MOAR BOOSTERS

Tags, this is Description

ONLY A B/ BORON
would think WE? tired ? 12 of these monsters just for shaw.
ixom
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1058
Views: 67351
Favorited: 45
Submitted: 02/22/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to iamtheblackgoat Subscribe to space submit to reddit

Comments(256):

[ 256 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#49 - eccleston (02/23/2013) [-]
The moon landings are obviously fake. Every decent "rocket engineer" can see that this design is clearly flawed.

IT NEEDS MOAR BOOSTERS
User avatar #63 to #49 - darkroro (02/23/2013) [-]
what game?
#64 to #63 - unoletmehavename ONLINE (02/23/2013) [-]
Kerbal Space Program
User avatar #67 to #49 - chuckstein (02/23/2013) [-]
HOLY GOD. THOSE BOOSTERS ARE BURNING, BUT YOU DECOUPLED THEM FROM THE MAIN SHIP.
YOU FOOL! YOU'VE DOOMED YOURSELF!
User avatar #69 to #67 - eccleston (02/23/2013) [-]
I'm not the one who created this glorious ship. Sadly, my booster-based designs used to overheat before getting that high.
User avatar #94 to #49 - lobsternewburg (02/23/2013) [-]
Best I managed on that game was low earth orbit.
User avatar #96 to #94 - eccleston (02/23/2013) [-]
I can easily crash land on the Mun.
User avatar #97 to #96 - lobsternewburg (02/23/2013) [-]
Better than me. I don't even know how to leave the gravitational pull, I just run out of fuel.
#130 to #97 - eccleston (02/23/2013) [-]
That might mean that you have too many weight or that you need a little more fuel. I normally make rockets with a big first stage (3 liquid engines at least, each one with at least 3 tanks) which gets me more or less at the higher stage of the atmosphere, then I use the second stage (another liquid engine with 1-2 tanks) to get into orbit. Then, if I have enough fuel, I try to get to the moon and, as the picture shows, land smoothly on it's surface.
#133 to #130 - lobsternewburg (02/23/2013) [-]
I see. My crafts usually consist of the mainsail engine with a ******** of fueltanks alongside 8 solid thrusters. After the mainsail's run out of fuel I decouple and use the poodle to get into position.

My brother made a craft that got to the moon, but as you say. None survived.
#139 to #133 - eccleston (02/23/2013) [-]
As long as Jeb is not scared, everything is working allright. First figure out how to send Kerbins to the Mun, you'll worry about getting them back later.
#140 to #139 - lobsternewburg (02/23/2013) [-]
Jeb is a hero.


What I really wanted was a full space station, but I cannot into orbit.
User avatar #107 to #49 - certifiedidiot (02/23/2013) [-]
Bob looks scared ********
0
#124 to #49 - nigalthornberry has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #149 to #49 - haaaxderp (02/23/2013) [-]
There's no parachute on that...
User avatar #191 to #49 - bookyle (02/23/2013) [-]
no, your just need additional pylons
User avatar #90 - redclover (02/23/2013) [-]
Well of course the moon landing is fake.
Everyone knows the moon doesn't even exist. George Washington shot it down back in 1267 with his machine turrets. What you see in the sky now is a fake moon put in place by the ancient Sumerians to trick the dragons into thinking World War 2 is still on-going.
0
#116 to #90 - nikoxasylumz has deleted their comment [-]
0
#243 to #90 - felinescrotum **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#112 - anon (02/23/2013) [-]
Wow I just read the comments bellow...

Holy **** there are really people this paranoid... everything is a conspiracy huh? ******* nutcases...
+87
#16 - rainbowadash **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#18 to #16 - stgfilitov (02/23/2013) [-]
We we're entirely better than the USSR. Eh hem.
#21 to #16 - HOtaconE (02/23/2013) [-]
The USSR that didn't care about a manned lunar landing, mind you. Korolev never wanted to plan one, since being the first sattelite in space, first animals in space, first man in space, first lunar probe, first unmanned lunar lander was enough for him.
User avatar #87 to #21 - toosexyforyou (02/23/2013) [-]
Do some more research buddy. The 1st satellite in spice literally could only make a beeping sound. The 1st animal in space never made it back, why is it an accomplishment of getting the first animal in space when it doesn't come back? They got the paperweight that could beep into space, so they just made a bigger one and put a dog in it. The 1st man in space was pretty much their greatest accomplishment just because they were actually able to bring him back. Also, why did you forget to mention the 1st space station? Probably because their 1st and 2nd space station were complete disasters. Do you know what was happening to the USSR when the US had brought a man to the moon? They couldn't even get a rocket in space anymore, everything around them was exploding.

These are just the ones I know off the top of my head. You are kind of right about the USSR not caring about manned lunar landing but you're also wrong. The USSR cared about being the 1st to do something and that's it. They pretty much put the minimum amount of work in their rockets to be able to get that "first." They did want to make the 1st manned lunar landing but they couldn't because while the US had already made a manned lunar landing, the USSR's rockets were failing miserably.

Take a look at the USSR's firsts again. The first woman into space? Seriously? The guy they sent into space couldn't control the ship, so why is replacing him with a woman such a great accomplishment?
#93 to #87 - HOtaconE (02/23/2013) [-]
Jeez lawizz, someone is butthurt, I am just recounting history and Korolev's thought process behind not giving a **** about the moon. God, are you ' ************** today or WHAT?
User avatar #271 to #93 - toosexyforyou (02/24/2013) [-]
TL:DR: I wanted to write a paper on how the USSR was the real winner of the Space Race but then after I researched it I found out the USSR didn't stand a chance.

Umm no. I needed to write a paper for class and I remembered a post on funnyjunk listing a few "USSR Firsts" and compared it to the US only putting a man on the moon. So I thought I should write my paper on how the USSR was the real winner of the Space Race. After a lot of research, I found out that the USSR couldn't even hold a candle next to the US even though they had a huge time lead.

#272 to #271 - HOtaconE (02/24/2013) [-]
Nobody won the space race, that's the funny part. It was 2 governments squeezing low quality **** out of their space programs. You went on a massive butthurt streak because I said russki never gave a **** about landing people on the moon.
User avatar #273 to #272 - toosexyforyou (02/24/2013) [-]
You are completely wrong about everything you just said and you refuse to even google the Space Race. I have no further interest in you.
#276 to #273 - HOtaconE (02/24/2013) [-]
And you are a bit too far up in your "'murica" mindset. Calm your titties.
User avatar #257 to #87 - defender (02/23/2013) [-]
you forgot about the suposed lost cosmonauts before Yuri Gagarin
User avatar #269 to #257 - toosexyforyou (02/24/2013) [-]
I wrote as much as I could before I had to leave for work.
User avatar #17 to #16 - silasdg (02/23/2013) [-]
Even then we didn't really as we had to make deals with German scientists to design our rockets.
User avatar #23 to #17 - Ruspanic (02/23/2013) [-]
The US and the Soviet Union both had German rocket engineers.
#25 - withintheruins (02/23/2013) [-]
Explain this **** then .
+12
#11 - nitsnstone **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #148 - ESniper (02/23/2013) [-]
False.. They're poorly made fireworks, only one went off.
User avatar #119 - abjecttestament (02/23/2013) [-]
I'm not going to bother reading the comments on this one I suggest you don't either
#91 - iamtheblackgoat (02/23/2013) [-]
I'm reading these comments, and I'm alarmed that some of you think that this post is in SUPPORT of the moon landing being fake
#138 to #91 - anon (02/23/2013) [-]
hah captain obvious, i get it.
#177 - lookatmyhouseofwax (02/23/2013) [-]
Didn't Mythbusters prove that the moonlanding wasn't fake?
#180 to #177 - anon (02/23/2013) [-]
They proved the footage fake.
User avatar #182 to #180 - lookatmyhouseofwax (02/23/2013) [-]
Actually, i'm pretty shure they proved it to be not fake.
User avatar #188 to #182 - owls (02/23/2013) [-]
No, they proved it was fake. Go watch it on YouTube.
User avatar #197 to #188 - nevrit (02/23/2013) [-]
Yes, because they are clearly saying that they believe it was a hoax. www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhuX-UaQiS4
User avatar #195 to #188 - lookatmyhouseofwax (02/23/2013) [-]
Just watched it, the photos was real.
User avatar #198 to #195 - owls (02/23/2013) [-]
Jesus christ, your grammar. Are you blind? Go watch the video, the whole 50 minute episode. The whole episode's about proving the moon landing fake.
User avatar #201 to #198 - lookatmyhouseofwax (02/23/2013) [-]
I've watched the whole episode multiple times. Nowhere in that episode do they claim that the moonlanding was fake.
They simply claim that all the theory's of a fake moonlanding were wrong.
#70 - arandomanon (02/23/2013) [-]
There was a myth buster episode where they explained the Moon landing wasn't fake.
User avatar #216 to #70 - muchasmarcos (02/23/2013) [-]
Sorry but they only disprooved the most popular theories about the fotage.
User avatar #74 to #70 - plutoo (02/23/2013) [-]
Well ofcourse, The Mythbusters are American aswell, so ofcourse they wouldn't show an episode where the Moon landing is proofed fake.
User avatar #79 to #74 - arandomanon (02/23/2013) [-]
In my opinion, they had strong arguments supporting it. Besides, they proved wrong most of the reasons that people give when they say the landing was fake.
User avatar #187 to #74 - MrShaggy (02/23/2013) [-]
god ******* damnit pluto, this is why you're not a planet anymore.
User avatar #278 to #187 - plutoo (02/24/2013) [-]
Ask your "earthly" scientists!
#171 to #74 - mrmeatman **User deleted account** (02/23/2013) [-]
A lot of people I know think the moon landing was faked and I live in the US, therefore you can go **** yourself.
User avatar #242 to #74 - americanfreedom (02/23/2013) [-]
You are just mad cause the moon get more attention than you.

You are not even a planet.
User avatar #277 to #242 - plutoo (02/24/2013) [-]
I used to be...
#61 - helion ONLINE (02/23/2013) [-]
IF IT WAS FAKE WOULDNT YOU THINK ATLEAST 1 OF THE 200.000 PEOPLE INVOLVED WOULD MAYBE TALK OVER THEMSELVES
IF IT WAS FAKE WOULDNT YOU THINK ATLEAST 1 OF THE 200.000 PEOPLE INVOLVED WOULD MAYBE TALK OVER THEMSELVES
#164 to #61 - anon (02/23/2013) [-]
What's the soruce of that gif? wasn't it a pretty sad youtube video?
#152 to #61 - beerholder (02/23/2013) [-]
there were actually 400 000 people involving a lot of civil and military corporations

Lockheed Martin made the escape tower
Boeing made the command module, stage S-1C and the testing facilities
Grumman made the lunar lander
McDonnell Douglas made the S-4B stage (the monster engines that lift the whole thing)yes, they do lift

and hundreds of other companies, from the boots of the astronauts to the navigation system and computers.
#213 - rockinstrockin (02/23/2013) [-]
There is a retard below me isn't there
User avatar #234 to #213 - guidedhandsbitch (02/23/2013) [-]
What the **** did you just ******* say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the **** out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my ******* words. You think you can get away with saying that **** to me over the Internet? Think again, ****** . As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re ******* dead, kid.
User avatar #217 - Fgner (02/23/2013) [-]
"And if governments are involved in the cover up, they are doing a much better job of it than they seem to do at anything else"
- Stephen Hawking

It was originally about hiding aliens, but I think it applies to hiding a fake moon landing or hiding if they caused 9/11. The only people who believe the government does **** like this, are simply retarded.
#225 to #217 - anon (02/23/2013) [-]
They did do a bad job hiding 9/11
User avatar #228 to #217 - CHARGERZ (02/23/2013) [-]
your foolish if you don't think the government lies to its people. its very corrupt and filled with ******** . don't be a sheep.
#274 to #228 - anon (02/24/2013) [-]
Of course they lie. They lie about what weapons they have to obliterate other countries. They lie about what goes on in Gitmo.

They don't lie about stupid **** like going to the moon.
User avatar #251 to #228 - defender (02/23/2013) [-]
of course the government lies to people there are something the populace shouldn't know
#258 to #217 - yellowcardraiden (02/23/2013) [-]
Here's the picture you got this from
#145 - CottonTail (02/23/2013) [-]
**CottonTail rolled a random image posted in comment #577281 at Friendly ** proof that Lief Ericson landed on the moon before Columbus.
0
#155 to #145 - desacabose has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #39 - doktorevil (02/23/2013) [-]
The Americans left a reflector field on the moon. With it, normal everyday science happy people can determine the distance to the moon, and prove that man has been there. No other part of the moon reflects like the reflector field proving that it isnt just the moons surface.


The reflector field is also mentioned in "The Big Bang Theory", where Pennies boyfriend is worried Lenard will blow up the moon with their lasors.
0
#47 to #39 - puzzler **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#50 to #47 - anon (02/23/2013) [-]
If anything, you'd need good calibrations or something. A laser will virtually go on forever.
#146 to #50 - fukkendragonite (02/23/2013) [-]
DID SOMEONE SAY CALIBRATIONS???????
#179 to #154 - jonnyfunk (02/23/2013) [-]
This image has expired
garrus thread?
#53 to #50 - anon (02/23/2013) [-]
Also, there should be no clouds, dust etc.
#52 to #50 - anon (02/23/2013) [-]
******** , you need enough power. a simple laserpointer won't be enough
#176 - theswede (02/23/2013) [-]
For those who think the lunar landing was fake, then how can you explain this?
#144 - kakkakrabbypatty (02/23/2013) [-]
my sister believes this...
my sister believes this...
#36 - felixjarl ONLINE (02/23/2013) [-]
Pshhh, we all know that it is only computer animated by the aliens, here use this tin foil hat and you will be able to prevent their mind reading.
#40 to #36 - niggerwaffle (02/23/2013) [-]
thats it, asians are aliens
#41 to #40 - felixjarl ONLINE (02/23/2013) [-]
MY GOD! it all makes sense now!
[ 256 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)