Jeremy Clarkson. .. The Euthanasia coaster, it's designed to keep a certain amount of g-force on you which will stop your blood reaching your brain and essentially starve it of oxy Jeremy Clarkson The Euthanasia coaster it's designed to keep a certain amount of g-force on you which will stop your blood reaching brain and essentially starve it oxy
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (225)
[ 225 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
71 comments displayed.
#24 - semilunarknight
Reply +82
(02/19/2013) [-]
The Euthanasia coaster, it's designed to keep a certain amount of g-force on you which will stop your blood reaching your brain and essentially starve it of oxygen. tl;dr machine that kills using speed
#220 to #24 - semilunarknight
Reply -1
(02/20/2013) [-]
What the hell have I started.
#227 to #24 - anon
Reply 0
(06/12/2013) [-]
>g-force
>kills using speed
You're so retarded, you didn't even notice you contradicted your own statement in the statement itself. G-force is a force derived from acceleration, not a velocity measurement.
It ashames me to belong to the same species as people like you.
#231 to #227 - semilunarknight
Reply 0
(06/13/2013) [-]
***** what the **** are you doing on this ancient post, also acceleration is a change in the velocity so you contradicted yourself, ******* idiot
#98 to #24 - plopodmonkey
Reply +2
(02/19/2013) [-]
That roller coaster has never been made so it still has yet to kill anyone. Jeremy's still right. Jeremy's always right.
#29 to #24 - voidekatwo
Reply +5
(02/19/2013) [-]
actually it's not the speed again that kills you

it's the forces exerted because of the track design. Same speed in a straight line wouldn't kill you.
#28 to #24 - CaptainPugwash
Reply +112
(02/19/2013) [-]
While your contribution is valued, what you're describing kills you with force, not speed.
#69 to #28 - aesguitar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
The force is caused by speed, technically
#99 to #69 - hamzaisawesome
Reply +3
(02/19/2013) [-]
That's acceleration.
#105 to #99 - aesguitar ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
a = (delta(v)^2)/d or (v2^2-v1^2)/d
#107 to #105 - hamzaisawesome
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
Acceleration is delta(v)/delta(t) dude. Also, the change in velocity isn't the velocity, so it's technically not caused by the speed.
#109 to #107 - aesguitar ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
a = (delta(v)^2)/2d

here's the formula I pulled that from

v2^2 = v1^2 + 2ad


#111 to #109 - hamzaisawesome
Reply +2
(02/19/2013) [-]
It would still be the change in velocity, not the velocity itself. Also, it would be delta(d) and the delta(d) is multiplied on 2 in the denominator.
#114 to #111 - aesguitar ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
d is diplacement. I reposted the corrected formula in my last comment. Besides, the pic is dealing with centripital force which is:

Fc = m*Ac
Ac = v^2/r
Fc = m (v^2/r)

Here, v is not delta(v) and is the actual velocity. To get the G-forces, simply divide the centripetal force by weight.
#118 to #114 - hamzaisawesome
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
By mass but yeah I forgot it was centripetal force.
#120 to #118 - aesguitar ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
weight is the gravitational force. w = m*g remember.
#217 to #118 - redorbit
Reply 0
(02/20/2013) [-]
i never learn basic physics this far in funnyjunk.
#79 to #69 - sirlorddarthvader **User deleted account**
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
The force is created for G-forces, which is caused by a change in direction while moving. The speed contributes, but it is not speed itself which kills you.
#106 to #79 - aesguitar ONLINE
Reply +2
(02/19/2013) [-]
In this case, it's centripetal force which is Fc = (m*v^2)/r
#124 to #69 - mrthezho
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
Yes, but it is not the actual speed that kills you, it's something caused by the speed. "Suddenly becoming stationary" is also caused by the speed in a way.
#115 to #69 - panacamanana
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
#117 to #115 - aesguitar ONLINE
Reply -1
(02/19/2013) [-]
Centripetal force equals mass times velocity squared over radius.

Fc = (m*v^2)/r
#49 - suikerpapa
Reply +61
(02/19/2013) [-]
Nah, speed can kill you alright.
#8 - maddboiy
Reply +16
(02/19/2013) [-]
what if you get hit by a car and you're standing still, that's speed hitting you and you are already stationary   
   
tldr speed can kill you
what if you get hit by a car and you're standing still, that's speed hitting you and you are already stationary

tldr speed can kill you
#56 to #8 - norriz
Reply -2
(02/19/2013) [-]
shut up Meg
#9 to #8 - anon
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
but if you were not standing and goin fast like sanic you wouldn't have been hit.
#104 to #8 - anon
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
you're ******* stupid, its not speed what kills you, its the ******* force, which is amplified thanks to speed (also mass).. all hail phagat
#35 to #8 - bausch ONLINE
Reply +2
(02/19/2013) [-]
thats called rapid acceleration.
#30 to #8 - voidekatwo
Reply +33
(02/19/2013) [-]
but if you move out of the way, then you're fine.

speed saves you
#60 to #30 - jimmyprice
Reply +7
(02/19/2013) [-]
speed giveth and taketh away
#43 - tommyprince
Reply +27
(02/19/2013) [-]
#116 - isoscelessandwich
Reply +21
(02/19/2013) [-]
I'm american, and I will accept no other Top Gear before the BBC version.

The american version just isn't funny. They try too hard.
#208 to #116 - renegadehawk
Reply 0
(02/20/2013) [-]
And they do stuff that's already been done. Like last week they did the RV's that was done like 2-3 seasons ago. It's a little interesting to see what they do different, but yea it's not as good.
And they do stuff that's already been done. Like last week they did the RV's that was done like 2-3 seasons ago. It's a little interesting to see what they do different, but yea it's not as good.
#154 to #116 - nightstar
Reply +2
(02/20/2013) [-]
and they have the balls to advertise the American version on the BBC during the new episodes of the real Top Gear!

#88 - Nullifier
Reply +17
(02/19/2013) [-]
Better than suddenly becoming stationery, am I right?

No?

Okay...

I'll see myself out..
#10 - Viggiator
Reply -27
(02/19/2013) [-]
Sorry, but this is complete ********. I love Jeremy Clarkson, but this is really dumb.
Suddenly becoming sationary is only dangerous if you're at high speed.
No one has ever died from becoming stationary at 5 mph. so in conclussion; yes, speed does kill you.
#15 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
He said the exact same thing. Looks like your dumb brain is having a hard time grasping the concept, and had to explain it in a more complicated way.
#17 to #15 - Viggiator
Reply -1
(02/19/2013) [-]
I was commenting on the photo, not what he might have said before or after, as I do not know what that might have been.
#16 to #10 - huchkizz ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
Speed has never killed anyone. No one (at least what I know of) have died from just being at high speed.
The action of suddenly stopping at high speed, however, can kill you.
It´s the speed combined with the sudden stop that kills you.
Speed have never killed anyone on it´s own; Becoming stationary can kill someone depending on the situation (becoming more stationary that just stopping will also kill you, but then we'll get into physics which isn't appropriate on Funnkyjunk)
#19 to #16 - TheHutchie
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
What if you accelerated quickly enough that it killed you? I'm pretty sure the G-forces could do that.

Does that count?
#195 to #19 - bearpirate
Reply 0
(02/20/2013) [-]
Yes, because now you're talking about a force acting upon an object.
#20 to #19 - huchkizz ONLINE
Reply -1
(02/19/2013) [-]
In theory.. so yes that does count.
But you need a very large amount of G-force for someone to die from it, and not the after-effects (fainted -> not able to take any actions)
#33 to #20 - anon
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
But then again, the speed is not killing anyone, is the acceleration. Apples and oranges here, guise.
#222 to #33 - huchkizz ONLINE
Reply -1
(02/20/2013) [-]
Actually... The speed can kill you. If you stay at high enough speed for long enough, you will be exposed to too much G-force, which will eventually kill you. All without accelerating.. But again.. you have to accelerate to get to this high speed.
This is starting to get a bit too philosophical for a science threat.
#229 to #222 - anon
Reply 0
(06/12/2013) [-]
Then again, if you don't understand the difference between velocity and acceleration, why are you even trying to lecture people?
#232 to #229 - huchkizz ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/13/2013) [-]
Please explain why your statement, has any sort of relevance to my comment.
If you're trying to convince me, that I've made a false statement, then you're doing a very poor job..
#18 to #16 - Viggiator
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
Which was close to exactly what I commented.
But thanks.
#21 to #16 - winsauceiswin
Reply -1
(02/19/2013) [-]
-5 g's for extended period of time can kill someone which is caused by speed.

everyone is right both speed an suddenly stopping can kill you.

the joke is still funny
#32 to #21 - anon
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
Speed does not produce any force. Not a G, not 5. Acceleration does. Positive or negative whatever your reference is. You have no idea of mechanics, do you?
#62 to #32 - winsauceiswin
Reply -1
(02/19/2013) [-]
acceleration doesn't cause force either, acceleration is also dependent on mass. i can play the semantics game too, we all know what i meant by "speed" i was speaking non specifically.
#149 to #62 - bearpirate
Reply +1
(02/20/2013) [-]
SMH, acceleration DOES cause force. Acceleration can be measured in G's, or any other force unit. Velocity, which is what speed really is, cannot be measured in G's, it is measured in distance units.
#194 to #149 - winsauceiswin
Reply -1
(02/20/2013) [-]
again, i wasn't speaking of the strict definition of speed i was speaking in laymen's terms; i've had a semester and a half of college physics now....believe me, i understand your point and the point anon was trying to make...
#191 to #149 - winsauceiswin
Reply -1
(02/20/2013) [-]
acceleration is the SOLE cause of force? tell me, what is the force produced by a massless photon?
#228 to #191 - anon
Reply 0
(06/12/2013) [-]
If you have taken a semester of physics and you postulate what you did there, you're a retard, either for not understanding the most basic physics, or for paying for something you could not achieve in the first place.
#230 to #228 - winsauceiswin
Reply 0
(06/13/2013) [-]
haven't we already established that i was using speed generally. i know the difference between speed and acceleration.   
   
mfw "postulate"
haven't we already established that i was using speed generally. i know the difference between speed and acceleration.

mfw "postulate"
#65 to #62 - winsauceiswin
Reply -1
(02/19/2013) [-]
force* is dependent on mass (typo accidentally said acceleration)
#23 to #21 - huchkizz ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
And with that, We'll conclude this comment.
#14 to #10 - haaaxderp
Reply +4
(02/19/2013) [-]
"speed does kill you"
#12 to #10 - Kairyuka
Reply +13
(02/19/2013) [-]
Also you can die from high g-forces.
#13 to #12 - Viggiator
Reply -2
(02/19/2013) [-]
That too.
#39 to #13 - anon
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
Yeah... but that is acceleration, not speed. You guys need to science more.
#130 - triarii
Reply +12
(02/19/2013) [-]
#100 - elitechristovsky **User deleted account**
+12
has deleted their comment [-]
#126 to #100 - anon
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
thats rock bra
#129 to #126 - elitechristovsky **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#133 to #129 - organicglory
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
hes right
i dont think thats speed man
#152 to #100 - anon
Reply 0
(02/20/2013) [-]
But it only ever kills worthless faggots, anyway. Sooo... No harm done!
#209 to #167 - bearpirate
Reply 0
(02/20/2013) [-]
That's works by centripetal force, not just speed.
#226 to #167 - anon
Reply 0
(06/12/2013) [-]
You obviously know nothing about physics.
#204 to #167 - arigsxc
Reply +1
(02/20/2013) [-]