Peta. Should I?. wouldda ' rt Lefy I_! eeat, t 54‘ he I atrii!‘ LOVERS I git I I. this is why I hate PETA, none of their money goes on actually helping any animals, in fact they put down almost all of the animals they take in! 90% of all thei Peta Should I? wouldda ' rt Lefy I_! eeat t 54‘ he I atrii!‘ LOVERS git this is why hate PETA none of their money goes on actually helping any animals in fact they put down almost all the take in! 90% thei
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (487)
[ 487 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
74 comments displayed.
#5 - platapus
Reply +247
(02/18/2013) [-]
this is why I hate PETA, none of their money goes on actually helping any animals, in fact they put down almost all of the animals they take in! 90% of all their money goes on their useless marketing campaigns. they are essentialy one massive corperate attention whore.





but hey, im gonna end up masterbating to this anyway
#30 to #5 - anon
Reply 0
(02/18/2013) [-]
96% of their animals last year were put down
#147 to #5 - wiljones
Reply 0
(02/18/2013) [-]
why do they put down animals? is there proof of this?
#149 to #147 - brettyoke
Reply +4
(02/18/2013) [-]
The money that would go towards taking care of those animals is used to pay lesbians to have sex on the street. Thus uthinization is the PETA way.
#148 to #147 - platapus
Reply 0
(02/18/2013) [-]
they believe that domesticated breds of animals shouldnt exist, so their responce is to kill as many as possible
#150 to #148 - wiljones
Reply +1
(02/18/2013) [-]
is there proof that they do this cause i want to inform the next peta member i meet. without looking like an idiot
#220 to #154 - ajaxthegreat
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
...
#159 to #150 - RandomAnonGuy
Reply +2
(02/19/2013) [-]
And finally there's this, www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2501797/PETA/
I found all of this by googling "Peta Statistics" by the way.
#155 to #150 - RandomAnonGuy
Reply +2
(02/19/2013) [-]
There's a link at the bottom of the table that should take you to more data if you want it.
#200 to #5 - thenewnuggubler ONLINE
Reply +2
(02/19/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=inFtOMx8nDU
In case anyone wants to know more about PETA. God I love this show.
#257 to #200 - hookydoo
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
me and the family just watched this upon your recommendation. that was a good show!
#263 to #257 - thenewnuggubler ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
I love it, and the uploader has posted ******** of their episodes free. Be careful though, the show is occasionally **** and not censored, even on youtube
#151 to #5 - nonamemeant
Reply +6
(02/18/2013) [-]
#401 to #5 - cabbagemayhem
Reply +7
(02/19/2013) [-]
#90 - hoffmeisterh
Reply +180
(02/18/2013) [-]
>says it is wrong to exploit animals
>happily exploits women aka human beings aka animals to tell people not to exploit animals
PETA logic
#226 to #90 - plutobr
Reply -1
(02/19/2013) [-]
They are not expliting them, they are doing it by free will

And it is hot, so doesn't matter
#290 to #90 - ningyoaijin
Reply -1
(02/19/2013) [-]
I'd agree with you if we bred humans for meat.
#508 to #290 - DamnNature
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
Because we breed owls and leopards for meat...
#276 to #90 - anon
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
now just imagine the ********* you'd have created if you went straight from women to animals.
#279 to #276 - hoffmeisterh
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
#95 to #90 - Ruspanic
Reply +1
(02/18/2013) [-]
technically they volunteered and/or are paid, so it's not exploitation.

I'm just saiyan
#97 to #95 - hoffmeisterh
Reply +4
(02/18/2013) [-]
Blah blah used for their bodies blah, blah prostitution blah, blah devised by and aimed at men blah, blah demeaning blah.
shhhh... if we can get PETA and feminazis to fight over this we could take them both out at once
#273 to #97 - rokkarokkaali
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
Wait, so if they it publicly, it's not prostitution? Time to get creative...
#246 to #95 - hoffmeisterh
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
technically as exploitation has multiple definitions and this comes under at least one of them it is, in fact, still exploitation. And while cases can be made from a marxist or feminist perspective it is not necessary to do so for the joke to work. Check your facts; prevent anonymous humiliation over the internet.
#255 to #246 - Ruspanic
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
Not feeling particularly humiliated right now.
"Exploit" might mean merely "to use" in its broadest definition, but it has certain negative connotations, especially in this context, that make it a poor and misleading descriptor of Peta's use of women in its activism.
#275 to #255 - hoffmeisterh
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
1st of all exploit has specific advertising/marketing definitions, making it perfect for an advertising campaign.
Second there is a substantial amount of academically recognised literature available which would disagree with your point entirely. See Andrea Dworkin. Yes she is a radical (and a horrible human being) and I personally do not agree with anything she says, but the joke works, it is a sound descriptor of PETA's use of women, and it is recognisable as exploitation in that context to the extent that it is a separate and noteworthy branch of socio/politico/economic theory.
Please don't hide behind ignorance as a shield, go out and learn.
#320 to #275 - Ruspanic
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
Your hostility toward me is unwarranted. I am not ignorant, I simply reject those theories and the alternative definitions they offer.

There are some circles that believe white people cannot experience racism because they define racism as a tool of oppression used by the dominant majority against minorities. Should I account for that definition whenever I use the word "racist"?
No I damn well shouldn't.

Look, in certain contexts "exploit" can have a neutral meaning like "to use". Like "exploiting resources", for instance. Sometimes.
But exploiting people usually has a negative connotation (as in this case), implying that in using these people to advance your goals, you are violating their rights or committing some other wrongdoing against them.
If it's voluntary (i.e. with mutual informed consent) calling that exploitation is misleading at best. Marxists or feminists might argue that capitalism exploits workers or that pornography exploits women, and even they use "exploit" to mean a bad thing.

If these Peta women are paid money to pose naked, is Peta exploiting them for their bodies, or are they exploiting Peta for its money?

You don't need to get so defensive about your joke. It was just a joke, and my comment was just a comment. I was pointing out that the joke made a false comparison, because I felt like being a buzzkill.

tl;dr I know the dictionary definitions, but I was going by the commonly understood meaning.
#109 to #95 - dashdashdash
Reply 0
(02/18/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure my cat would choose to live with me rather than out in the wild.
pets love their owners most of the time, so it's kinda like voluntering.
#199 to #90 - andalitemadness
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
While I agree that Peta is ****, it is one thing to pay someone to pose in their underwear, and another to force them into captivity for a few years before killing and eating them.
#176 - harbingerwolf
Reply +65
(02/19/2013) [-]
Cool! Hot lesbian action! Hmm, i suddenly never want to eat bacon again...
#285 to #176 - pokemonstheshiz ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
Though eating bacon while masturbating is still a very viable option
#426 to #176 - irvea
Reply +3
(02/19/2013) [-]
This image has expired






You're supposed to hit enter 6 times first when using this.
#498 to #426 - harbingerwolf
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]






Thanks for the advice fellow FJer, noted.
#500 to #498 - irvea
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
This image has expired
you're welcome
#449 to #176 - lolmallroflmao
Reply +3
(02/19/2013) [-]
Wow hoy lesbian action well lets watch this and eat bacon.
#47 - bloomberg
Reply +63
(02/18/2013) [-]
I'm a vegetarian and I ******* hate PETA, I'm all for animal rights and **** but the way they advertise is just stupid, all they do is make everyone hate them   
   
   
   
   
Pic unrelated
I'm a vegetarian and I ******* hate PETA, I'm all for animal rights and **** but the way they advertise is just stupid, all they do is make everyone hate them




Pic unrelated
#266 to #47 - koombine
Reply -7
(02/19/2013) [-]
Why should animals have rights they are ******* stupid
#501 to #266 - iusedtocare
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
Why should we have rights then?? We may be human but even so, we are way more stupid than quite alot of animal species. Proof: We are ruining our own world.
#518 to #501 - koombine
Reply 0
(02/21/2013) [-]
We are intelligent, they are stupid. They wouldn't even know if they were being mistreated. It's simple.
#520 to #518 - iusedtocare
Reply 0
(02/21/2013) [-]
I respect your opinion, but our intelligence has given us more power than we can handle. We will eventually ruin ourselves.
#102 to #47 - joaomartins ONLINE
Reply +4
(02/18/2013) [-]
A gif with pandas is always related
#61 to #47 - wrought
Reply +5
(02/18/2013) [-]
A "Meat is murder" vegetarian or a health benefits one?
#66 to #61 - bloomberg
Reply +5
(02/18/2013) [-]
Well I love animals so I don't like eating them, I don't see why everyone has such a problem with that..
#123 to #66 - wrought
Reply +7
(02/18/2013) [-]
It's just sort of weird to have an emotional attachment to a chicken you've never met
#505 to #123 - bloomberg
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
By that logic would you be okay with eating a human you've never met?
#513 to #505 - wrought
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
If I was really hungry.
#476 to #66 - admiralen
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
people dislike vegetarians cause theyre usually judging attentionwhores, they judge you for eating meat you know meat is murder etc. not saying you are either, just saying why i hate most of em
#504 to #476 - bloomberg
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
I guess but I know quite a few vegetarians and none of them are like that. I'm sure there are some like that but I think it's just a stereotype associated with them and I think PETA is partially responsible for that.
#506 to #504 - admiralen
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
exactly
#13 - abcdxyz
Reply +57
(02/18/2013) [-]
I want sex
#405 to #13 - waterbottlemanboy
Reply -1
(02/19/2013) [-]
What is that from? I'm trying to remember the guys name. The comedian, not the kid.
#439 to #405 - neoslash **User deleted account**
-3
has deleted their comment [-]
#267 to #13 - koombine
Reply +2
(02/19/2013) [-]
I would like to sperm her ass
#347 to #267 - neoslash **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#8 - mattdoggy
Reply +54
(02/18/2013) [-]
Disregard women's dignity   
acquire animals
Disregard women's dignity
acquire animals
#74 - galkawhm ONLINE
Reply +47
(02/18/2013) [-]
I thought it said "Vegtables make better lovers" and thought "That chick doesn't look disabled"


I'm bad.
#78 to #74 - kanatana
Reply +11
(02/18/2013) [-]
It says a lot about me that this was already in my folder.
#11 - Kaoz **User deleted account**
+37
has deleted their comment [-]
#429 to #11 - greenthegunstar
Reply +1
(02/19/2013) [-]
Did they? Did they, really?

That's ALMOST the equivalent of saying, "I like the cows that I've never met before, more than the mexicans that bring me the vegetables that I eat."

...No, wait, it's EXACTLY the equivalent of saying that.
#20 to #11 - Crusader
Reply +2
(02/18/2013) [-]
You ever seen rampaging elephants?
Pissed off Lions attacking people?

If you are going to have wild animals present, you need them restrained, **** PETA and their propaganda.
#25 to #20 - happyfox
Reply 0
(02/18/2013) [-]
well no I think their main aim is to not have animals in circuses at all...which is fair enough really.
#26 to #25 - Crusader
Reply +3
(02/18/2013) [-]
They want animals out of captivity and into the wild so they can be hunted and killed by poachers?

hardly ethical if you ask me.
#27 to #26 - happyfox
Reply +3
(02/18/2013) [-]
well no see they hate poachers too. I'd say they have the right idea in lots of their campaigns, but always come off so damn pushy. zoos seem fine to me....as long as they're big enough and they stimulate (like...mentally you dirty minded person) the animals and keep them healthy and happy. Circuses are much less of a natural environment, and all the travelling etc must cause lots of stress. At least in zoos you can mimic their natural environment/behaviours.
#24 to #20 - Kaoz **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#35 to #11 - platapus
Reply +18
(02/18/2013) [-]
I think PETA is right, we should respect animals,
not women
#496 to #35 - theannoyingFJguy
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
this guy ^
#183 - darthblam
Reply +35
(02/19/2013) [-]
Is this really how PETA promotes itself? That is just plain pathetic.
#186 to #183 - anonymoose
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
PETA are a lot more pathetic than this.
#188 to #183 - anon
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
They're just getting extra desperate for members.
#189 to #183 - philippinessucks
Reply 0
(02/19/2013) [-]
Thank you!
#202 to #183 - articvibe
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#187 to #183 - MrsMcDowell
Reply +3
(02/19/2013) [-]
Isn't it? ******* self-righteous pricks.
#177 - thedarkestrogue
Reply +34
(02/19/2013) [-]
Vegetarians don't make better lovers. They don't give blowjobs for fear of putting meat in their mouths.
Vegetarians don't make better lovers. They don't give blowjobs for fear of putting meat in their mouths.