Peta. Should I?. wouldda ' rt Lefy I_! eeat, t 54‘ he I atrii!‘ LOVERS I git I I. this is why I hate PETA, none of their money goes on actually helping any animals, in fact they put down almost all of the animals they take in! 90% of all thei
x
Click to expand

Comments(487):

[ 487 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#176 - harbingerwolf (02/19/2013) [-]
Cool! Hot lesbian action! Hmm, i suddenly never want to eat bacon again...
User avatar #285 to #176 - pokemonstheshiz (02/19/2013) [-]
Though eating bacon while masturbating is still a very viable option
#426 to #176 - irvea (02/19/2013) [-]
This image has expired






You're supposed to hit enter 6 times first when using this.
#498 to #426 - harbingerwolf (02/19/2013) [-]






Thanks for the advice fellow FJer, noted.
#500 to #498 - irvea (02/19/2013) [-]
This image has expired
you're welcome
#449 to #176 - lolmallroflmao (02/19/2013) [-]
Wow hoy lesbian action well lets watch this and eat bacon.
#47 - bloomberg (02/18/2013) [-]
I'm a vegetarian and I 			*******		 hate PETA, I'm all for animal rights and 			****		 but the way they advertise is just stupid, all they do is make everyone hate them   
   
   
   
   
Pic unrelated
I'm a vegetarian and I ******* hate PETA, I'm all for animal rights and **** but the way they advertise is just stupid, all they do is make everyone hate them




Pic unrelated
User avatar #266 to #47 - koombine (02/19/2013) [-]
Why should animals have rights they are ******* stupid
#501 to #266 - iusedtocare (02/19/2013) [-]
Why should we have rights then?? We may be human but even so, we are way more stupid than quite alot of animal species. Proof: We are ruining our own world.
User avatar #518 to #501 - koombine (02/21/2013) [-]
We are intelligent, they are stupid. They wouldn't even know if they were being mistreated. It's simple.
User avatar #520 to #518 - iusedtocare (02/21/2013) [-]
I respect your opinion, but our intelligence has given us more power than we can handle. We will eventually ruin ourselves.
User avatar #102 to #47 - joaomartins (02/18/2013) [-]
A gif with pandas is always related
User avatar #61 to #47 - wrought (02/18/2013) [-]
A "Meat is murder" vegetarian or a health benefits one?
User avatar #66 to #61 - bloomberg (02/18/2013) [-]
Well I love animals so I don't like eating them, I don't see why everyone has such a problem with that..
User avatar #123 to #66 - wrought (02/18/2013) [-]
It's just sort of weird to have an emotional attachment to a chicken you've never met
User avatar #505 to #123 - bloomberg (02/19/2013) [-]
By that logic would you be okay with eating a human you've never met?
User avatar #513 to #505 - wrought (02/19/2013) [-]
If I was really hungry.
User avatar #476 to #66 - admiralen (02/19/2013) [-]
people dislike vegetarians cause theyre usually judging attentionwhores, they judge you for eating meat you know meat is murder etc. not saying you are either, just saying why i hate most of em
User avatar #504 to #476 - bloomberg (02/19/2013) [-]
I guess but I know quite a few vegetarians and none of them are like that. I'm sure there are some like that but I think it's just a stereotype associated with them and I think PETA is partially responsible for that.
User avatar #506 to #504 - admiralen (02/19/2013) [-]
exactly
#90 - hoffmeisterh (02/18/2013) [-]
>says it is wrong to exploit animals
>happily exploits women aka human beings aka animals to tell people not to exploit animals
PETA logic
User avatar #226 to #90 - plutobr (02/19/2013) [-]
They are not expliting them, they are doing it by free will

And it is hot, so doesn't matter
User avatar #290 to #90 - ningyoaijin (02/19/2013) [-]
I'd agree with you if we bred humans for meat.
User avatar #508 to #290 - DamnNature (02/19/2013) [-]
Because we breed owls and leopards for meat...
User avatar #95 to #90 - Ruspanic (02/18/2013) [-]
technically they volunteered and/or are paid, so it's not exploitation.

I'm just saiyan
User avatar #97 to #95 - hoffmeisterh (02/18/2013) [-]
Blah blah used for their bodies blah, blah prostitution blah, blah devised by and aimed at men blah, blah demeaning blah.
shhhh... if we can get PETA and feminazis to fight over this we could take them both out at once
User avatar #273 to #97 - rokkarokkaali (02/19/2013) [-]
Wait, so if they it publicly, it's not prostitution? Time to get creative...
#246 to #95 - hoffmeisterh (02/19/2013) [-]
technically as exploitation has multiple definitions and this comes under at least one of them it is, in fact, still exploitation. And while cases can be made from a marxist or feminist perspective it is not necessary to do so for the joke to work. Check your facts; prevent anonymous humiliation over the internet.
User avatar #255 to #246 - Ruspanic (02/19/2013) [-]
Not feeling particularly humiliated right now.
"Exploit" might mean merely "to use" in its broadest definition, but it has certain negative connotations, especially in this context, that make it a poor and misleading descriptor of Peta's use of women in its activism.
User avatar #275 to #255 - hoffmeisterh (02/19/2013) [-]
1st of all exploit has specific advertising/marketing definitions, making it perfect for an advertising campaign.
Second there is a substantial amount of academically recognised literature available which would disagree with your point entirely. See Andrea Dworkin. Yes she is a radical (and a horrible human being) and I personally do not agree with anything she says, but the joke works, it is a sound descriptor of PETA's use of women, and it is recognisable as exploitation in that context to the extent that it is a separate and noteworthy branch of socio/politico/economic theory.
Please don't hide behind ignorance as a shield, go out and learn.
User avatar #320 to #275 - Ruspanic (02/19/2013) [-]
Your hostility toward me is unwarranted. I am not ignorant, I simply reject those theories and the alternative definitions they offer.

There are some circles that believe white people cannot experience racism because they define racism as a tool of oppression used by the dominant majority against minorities. Should I account for that definition whenever I use the word "racist"?
No I damn well shouldn't.

Look, in certain contexts "exploit" can have a neutral meaning like "to use". Like "exploiting resources", for instance. Sometimes.
But exploiting people usually has a negative connotation (as in this case), implying that in using these people to advance your goals, you are violating their rights or committing some other wrongdoing against them.
If it's voluntary (i.e. with mutual informed consent) calling that exploitation is misleading at best. Marxists or feminists might argue that capitalism exploits workers or that pornography exploits women, and even they use "exploit" to mean a bad thing.

If these Peta women are paid money to pose naked, is Peta exploiting them for their bodies, or are they exploiting Peta for its money?

You don't need to get so defensive about your joke. It was just a joke, and my comment was just a comment. I was pointing out that the joke made a false comparison, because I felt like being a buzzkill.

tl;dr I know the dictionary definitions, but I was going by the commonly understood meaning.
User avatar #109 to #95 - dashdashdash (02/18/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure my cat would choose to live with me rather than out in the wild.
pets love their owners most of the time, so it's kinda like voluntering.
User avatar #199 to #90 - andalitemadness (02/19/2013) [-]
While I agree that Peta is **** , it is one thing to pay someone to pose in their underwear, and another to force them into captivity for a few years before killing and eating them.
#276 to #90 - anon (02/19/2013) [-]
now just imagine the ********* you'd have created if you went straight from women to animals.
User avatar #5 - platapus (02/18/2013) [-]
this is why I hate PETA, none of their money goes on actually helping any animals, in fact they put down almost all of the animals they take in! 90% of all their money goes on their useless marketing campaigns. they are essentialy one massive corperate attention whore.





but hey, im gonna end up masterbating to this anyway
User avatar #147 to #5 - wiljones (02/18/2013) [-]
why do they put down animals? is there proof of this?
User avatar #149 to #147 - brettyoke (02/18/2013) [-]
The money that would go towards taking care of those animals is used to pay lesbians to have sex on the street. Thus uthinization is the PETA way.
User avatar #148 to #147 - platapus (02/18/2013) [-]
they believe that domesticated breds of animals shouldnt exist, so their responce is to kill as many as possible
User avatar #150 to #148 - wiljones (02/18/2013) [-]
is there proof that they do this cause i want to inform the next peta member i meet. without looking like an idiot
User avatar #159 to #150 - RandomAnonGuy (02/19/2013) [-]
And finally there's this, www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2501797/PETA/
I found all of this by googling "Peta Statistics" by the way.
User avatar #155 to #150 - RandomAnonGuy (02/19/2013) [-]
There's a link at the bottom of the table that should take you to more data if you want it.
User avatar #200 to #5 - thenewnuggubler (02/19/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=inFtOMx8nDU
In case anyone wants to know more about PETA. God I love this show.
User avatar #257 to #200 - hookydoo (02/19/2013) [-]
me and the family just watched this upon your recommendation. that was a good show!
User avatar #263 to #257 - thenewnuggubler (02/19/2013) [-]
I love it, and the uploader has posted ******** of their episodes free. Be careful though, the show is occasionally **** and not censored, even on youtube
#30 to #5 - anon (02/18/2013) [-]
96% of their animals last year were put down
User avatar #74 - galkawhm ONLINE (02/18/2013) [-]
I thought it said "Vegtables make better lovers" and thought "That chick doesn't look disabled"


I'm bad.
#78 to #74 - kanatana (02/18/2013) [-]
It says a lot about me that this was already in my folder.
#13 - abcdxyz (02/18/2013) [-]
I want sex
User avatar #405 to #13 - waterbottlemanboy ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
What is that from? I'm trying to remember the guys name. The comedian, not the kid.
-3
#439 to #405 - neoslash **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#267 to #13 - koombine (02/19/2013) [-]
I would like to sperm her ass
0
#347 to #267 - neoslash **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #183 - darthblam ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
Is this really how PETA promotes itself? That is just plain pathetic.
User avatar #186 to #183 - anonymoose ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
PETA are a lot more pathetic than this.
#188 to #183 - anon (02/19/2013) [-]
They're just getting extra desperate for members.
User avatar #189 to #183 - philippinessucks (02/19/2013) [-]
Thank you!
0
#202 to #183 - articvibe has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #187 to #183 - MrsMcDowell (02/19/2013) [-]
Isn't it? ******* self-righteous pricks.
#45 - Farmerbill (02/18/2013) [-]
*******		 Peta. Stop your 			****		... 			*******		 just stop. "Saving animals" to then just kill them because no-one adopts them.   
   
(I approve the advertising though. Just get rid of the banner first, then we are good to go)
******* Peta. Stop your **** ... ******* just stop. "Saving animals" to then just kill them because no-one adopts them.

(I approve the advertising though. Just get rid of the banner first, then we are good to go)
User avatar #51 to #45 - awesomenessdefined (02/18/2013) [-]
Well, at least they put them down humanely.
User avatar #56 to #51 - Blargosnarf (02/18/2013) [-]
Yes, shoving a needle into them so a poisonous substance destroys their nervous system until the body revolts in death, far more humane.
User avatar #69 to #56 - awesomenessdefined (02/18/2013) [-]
It's totally painless and It's better than starving.
User avatar #168 to #69 - thatguywhohasbacon ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
Or, you know, rather then producing porn they could put that money into bigger shelter so they don't have to put down as many animals even if it is humanely...
User avatar #174 to #168 - awesomenessdefined (02/19/2013) [-]
If they didn't produce porn, they'd have to put down even more animals. Sex sells.
User avatar #184 to #174 - thatguywhohasbacon ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
about 90% of their funding goes to borderline pornographic advertising campaigns, if they cut down that number to like 20-30% they could make much better shelters, but this is all implying that peta actually want's people to adopt animals, in reality the founder hated domesticated animals, she actually went around to shelters killing the cats and dogs whether or not they were adoptable. Also here's something to think about when you look at peta's love for animals: www.petakillsanimals.com/proof/
User avatar #277 to #184 - awesomenessdefined (02/19/2013) [-]
The shelter's aren't the point, they can't possibly keep every animal with no home, or every animal from a cosmetic testing facility or whatever. What they're trying to do is get those animals a home.

The founder actually did like animals, she had and has a lot of pets. The idea that she hated them makes no sense, it's one of those myths that people want to believe, like saying human's only use 10% of their brains.

Yeah, PETA is a really stupid organization, yeah, they get mad over people swatting flies, they do a lot of questionable stuff. But at the end of the day, they're better than nothing.
User avatar #291 to #277 - Farmerbill (02/19/2013) [-]
Trying to get animals a home? Based on the stats via link posted by thatguywhohasbacon it looks like they kind of gave up with that after 2005 (or even as early as 2001 seeing as how the next year it halved adoption rates). If they are all up for getting pets homed why is the adoption rate so piss poor? It's so bad it doesnt even look like (for such a large orginisation) they are even bothering with re-homing.Just my opinion, but from what I've gathered its almost as if they don't trust other people to give animals a better life or even the animals themselves to have a better life outside their protection, so they just kill them as a "kinder" solution
User avatar #286 to #277 - thatguywhohasbacon ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
By that logic hitler was a better solution to overpopulation than nothing, I'd rather those animals have a chance to live as strays rather than be brought to a shelter by peta only to be euthanized.
#68 to #51 - newall (02/18/2013) [-]
over 80% of all animals that enter PETA shelters are put down.

I don't care how humanely they do it. those animals had a better chance on their own.
#8 - mattdoggy ONLINE (02/18/2013) [-]
Disregard women's dignity   
acquire animals
Disregard women's dignity
acquire animals
#130 - improbablyyourdad ONLINE (02/18/2013) [-]
How the 			****		 would you(PETA) know? Did they have someone go out and bang a bunch of vegetarians and meat eaters? That's a ridiculous claim.
How the **** would you(PETA) know? Did they have someone go out and bang a bunch of vegetarians and meat eaters? That's a ridiculous claim.

User avatar #163 to #130 - thatguywhohasbacon ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
>Peta
>Truthful and factual advertising
Pick one
User avatar #131 to #130 - sodapops (02/18/2013) [-]
Well, it's a ridiculous organization.
#413 - swittig (02/19/2013) [-]
>pre-synthetic insulin
>head of PETA has diabeetus
>uses insulin from pigs and cows
>"It's okay because I'm fighting for the animals"
>mfw
#381 - slashtrey ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
User avatar #115 - astraea (02/18/2013) [-]
OMG KILLING ANIMALS FOR SURVIVAL IS WRONG!!
USING WOMEN AS SEX OBJECTS IS TOTALLY OK!!
User avatar #158 to #115 - DeeJayBee (02/19/2013) [-]
doesn't peta kill thousands of healthy animals or something? (think i read that on a post on here some time ago so not sure of credibility)
User avatar #161 to #158 - astraea (02/19/2013) [-]
It does, if they dont seem like dogs people would adopt they kill them
User avatar #125 to #115 - eddi (02/18/2013) [-]
******* THANK YOU
#34 - senorfrog (02/18/2013) [-]
Hey PETA, I eat the animals that destroy your precious plants.
#92 to #34 - pippysfleas (02/18/2013) [-]
oh my god
+20
#473 - deadmeme **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #524 to #473 - jacodpwns (02/24/2013) [-]
this guy wins all the internet
#386 - schneidend (02/19/2013) [-]
At this point, PETA isn't even about animals. It's just this huge overfunded and bloated organization that exists solely to perpetuate its own existence and piss-everybody-off-slash-give-them-boners-slash-make-them-wet-if-they're-lesbian s-I-guess.
At this point, PETA isn't even about animals. It's just this huge overfunded and bloated organization that exists solely to perpetuate its own existence and piss-everybody-off-slash-give-them-boners-slash-make-them-wet-if-they're-lesbian s-I-guess.
#100 - fuperbooper ONLINE (02/18/2013) [-]
But do they eat out?
[ 487 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)