Hobbit's and trolls. .. Rivendell was in the book though. It was a major part of the story. Silly trolls.
x
FJ is now mobile friendly. Try it out on your mobile browser!
Click to expand

Comments(109):

[ 109 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #2 - leglesslegolegolas (02/18/2013) [-]
Rivendell was in the book though. It was a major part of the story. Silly trolls.
#4 - Mebeshe (02/18/2013) [+] (2 replies)
The dwarves are better then the ones I saw in my head when I read the books. I just love how each of them is distinctly different. I can't decide if my favorite is Bofur or Ori. Bofur's got that hat, while Ori uses a slingshot and is covered in hand-knitted awesomeness.
The dwarves are better then the ones I saw in my head when I read the books. I just love how each of them is distinctly different. I can't decide if my favorite is Bofur or Ori. Bofur's got that hat, while Ori uses a slingshot and is covered in hand-knitted awesomeness.
User avatar #1 - pebar (02/18/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Actually, Legolas is the son of the elf king that captures the party in Mirkwood
#20 - sonda **User deleted account** (02/18/2013) [+] (2 replies)
"Bombed"
#54 - netic (02/18/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Comment Picture
#56 - jibjabkid (02/18/2013) [+] (3 replies)
To all the hobbit haters
To all the hobbit haters
User avatar #23 - thijsofbodom (02/18/2013) [+] (2 replies)
I was going to see that tonight but I have a lung infection ):
#24 to #23 - HarvietheDinkle (02/18/2013) [-]
Don't worry; we dwarves are natural sprinters.
#9 - biggathy (02/18/2013) [+] (3 replies)
The depiction of Radagast was bad IMO, but the movie as a whole was brilliant.

Pic related, Radagast in the movie ( with bird **** on his ******* head)
User avatar #76 - dementedllama (02/19/2013) [+] (5 replies)
The Hobbit movie was seriously different from the book, and I would have preferred a more accurate film adaptation.

..but was still a good movie on it's own.
User avatar #77 to #76 - paiwithapple (02/19/2013) [-]
true, it was different from the book, but i read that it contains stuff tolkien wrote down but never put in the hobbit.
+7
#64 - thehatchetjack **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#29 - prettyfire (02/18/2013) [+] (4 replies)
the hobbit was wonderful, but too fluffy. If Jackson wasn't just milking the story for money, the hobbit would've been ONE three-hour movie, not 3 three-hour movies.
User avatar #30 to #29 - wanicochil (02/18/2013) [-]
2 movies maybe

1 movie? No way

3 movies is perfect, I want as much LOTR as I can get, I don't give a **** if he is milking it, I love LOTR and enjoy every moment of it
User avatar #47 - neptuneport (02/18/2013) [-]
I am an avid fan of Tolkien. I have read the Lord of the Rings books at least 5 times, and the Hobbit another 3. I am currently working my way through the Silmarillion (great book if you haven't read it.) I was worried when I heard Peter Jackson was splitting it into three movies. However, the first movie for a fan of the lore was perfect. It renewed my faith in Peter Jackson. I can't wait for the other 2.
tl;dr: Peter Jackson is love. Peter Jackson is life.
#40 - novus (02/18/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Indeed, Jackson did take the movie beyond the realm of Tolkien. However, Rivendell was in the book. That is where the moon runes were read (by Elrond).

Heretics shall be burned
User avatar #50 - graphenz (02/18/2013) [-]
As much as I hate Twilight, Robert Pattinson is a pretty good actor also a pretty cool guy
User avatar #14 - lalakiller (02/18/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Was this dude from a deleted scene or something. Don't remember him
#55 - anonexplains (02/18/2013) [+] (1 reply)
**** you and your **** "oc" **** you
User avatar #10 - Edrosty ONLINE (02/18/2013) [-]
I actually watched The Hobbit today. The movie is amazing...
User avatar #45 - auraguardian (02/18/2013) [-]
rivendell is the last homely house, the bit about gandalf, galadriel and saruman isn't mentioned though because guess who narrates the book? Bilbo does. and guess who wasn't with Gandalf? Bilbo wasn't.
[ 109 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)