Hobbit's and trolls. .. Rivendell was in the book though. It was a major part of the story. Silly trolls.
x
Click to expand

Comments(109):

[ 109 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #2 - leglesslegolegolas (02/18/2013) [-]
Rivendell was in the book though. It was a major part of the story. Silly trolls.
User avatar #1 - pebar (02/18/2013) [-]
Actually, Legolas is the son of the elf king that captures the party in Mirkwood
User avatar #3 to #1 - Hyoukin (02/18/2013) [-]
That's true, but Legolas doesn't appear in the Hobbit. The cameo is kind of forced, for the simple fact that he was so popular on the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Not complaining though, Legolas is an immortal elf and ages old, perfectly reasonable to assume he'd be with his father at the time.

Though, I'm surprised more people aren't raging about "Tauriel", PJ's "original" character he's adding...I'm not sure I'm 100% on board with that.
#56 - jibjabkid (02/18/2013) [-]
To all the hobbit haters
To all the hobbit haters
#59 to #57 - jibjabkid (02/18/2013) [-]
Mike's my friend... :(
Mike's my friend... :(
#62 to #56 - astickywhale (02/18/2013) [-]
dont worry i liked the movie too, i cant wait for the others.
#4 - Mebeshe (02/18/2013) [-]
The dwarves are better then the ones I saw in my head when I read the books. I just love how each of them is distinctly different. I can't decide if my favorite is Bofur or Ori. Bofur's got that hat, while Ori uses a slingshot and is covered in hand-knitted awesomeness.
The dwarves are better then the ones I saw in my head when I read the books. I just love how each of them is distinctly different. I can't decide if my favorite is Bofur or Ori. Bofur's got that hat, while Ori uses a slingshot and is covered in hand-knitted awesomeness.
User avatar #65 to #4 - vegardwd (02/19/2013) [-]
Nori is best dwarf
User avatar #7 to #4 - supercweepy (02/18/2013) [-]
I have to agree, the movies made me distinguish the Dwarves a lot better, as each had a characteristic look. It was hard reading the book and imagining 13 Gimlis with different coloured beards, lol.
#20 - sonda **User deleted account** (02/18/2013) [-]
"Bombed"
User avatar #99 to #20 - sweetmike (02/19/2013) [-]
Plus, I think, that budget went mostly to the other three movies that were filmed in sequence. They already have the footage, it just needs editing (and more unnecessary CGI). This is just my theory, I really have no clue.
User avatar #21 to #20 - sonda **User deleted account** (02/18/2013) [-]
"It is thus far the fourth highest-grossing film of 2012,[59] and the 17th highest-grossing film of all time."

"Bombed
#9 - biggathy (02/18/2013) [-]
The depiction of Radagast was bad IMO, but the movie as a whole was brilliant.

Pic related, Radagast in the movie ( with bird **** on his ******* head)
#98 to #9 - anon (02/19/2013) [-]
I thought he was badass. He fought off the freaking witch king!
User avatar #39 to #9 - thatonesouthernkid (02/18/2013) [-]
i can not tell you how freaking eye catching that ******** is. they could have left him with out a beard in some scenes and i wouldn't have noticed. everytime i saw him i couldn't stop staring at the bird **** on his head.
User avatar #31 to #9 - wanicochil (02/18/2013) [-]
Bird **** was annoying

His character was good
User avatar #47 - neptuneport (02/18/2013) [-]
I am an avid fan of Tolkien. I have read the Lord of the Rings books at least 5 times, and the Hobbit another 3. I am currently working my way through the Silmarillion (great book if you haven't read it.) I was worried when I heard Peter Jackson was splitting it into three movies. However, the first movie for a fan of the lore was perfect. It renewed my faith in Peter Jackson. I can't wait for the other 2.
tl;dr: Peter Jackson is love. Peter Jackson is life.
#40 - novus (02/18/2013) [-]
Indeed, Jackson did take the movie beyond the realm of Tolkien. However, Rivendell was in the book. That is where the moon runes were read (by Elrond).

Heretics shall be burned
User avatar #14 - lalakiller (02/18/2013) [-]
Was this dude from a deleted scene or something. Don't remember him
User avatar #15 to #14 - mattdoggy (02/18/2013) [-]
Yea, He is generally known as the speaker of Mordor. A servant of the Black Lands who came to discuss the attack on Mordor.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BonYZe-B9M
#19 to #15 - anon (02/18/2013) [-]
Mouth of Sauron, I think
User avatar #68 to #19 - arstya (02/19/2013) [-]
And **** does he go on and on...
User avatar #16 to #15 - lalakiller (02/18/2013) [-]
Oh, ok. Thanks
#28 to #16 - bigredtomato (02/18/2013) [-]
He's in the extended version.
#54 - netic (02/18/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#95 to #54 - roguetrooper (02/19/2013) [-]
This scene is now tainted... what have you done?
This scene is now tainted... what have you done?
#118 to #95 - netic (02/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
+7
#64 - thehatchetjack **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #50 - graphenz (02/18/2013) [-]
As much as I hate Twilight, Robert Pattinson is a pretty good actor also a pretty cool guy
User avatar #109 - azraelthemage (02/19/2013) [-]
That awkward moment when Rivendell actually was in the book.
User avatar #76 - dementedllama (02/19/2013) [-]
The Hobbit movie was seriously different from the book, and I would have preferred a more accurate film adaptation.

..but was still a good movie on it's own.
User avatar #81 to #76 - vexaton ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
It is different but by GOD was it amazing! Probably the best movie I've seen
User avatar #77 to #76 - paiwithapple (02/19/2013) [-]
true, it was different from the book, but i read that it contains stuff tolkien wrote down but never put in the hobbit.
User avatar #80 to #77 - dementedllama (02/19/2013) [-]
Yeah, all the background info about Erebor and the battle wherein Thorin received his title "Oakenshield" are mentioned in the Appendices to the Lord of the Rings, but that's basically just Dwarven historical information.
#83 to #80 - anon (02/19/2013) [-]
Frankly? The hobbit wouldn't have made a good movie. It's that simple. Anyone who watches movies and read the hobbit KNEW it was going to have things changed. I'm just glad that the result was pretty damn good.

On top of that? Jackson was pretty up front about how he was changing stuff, which is rare, and I appreciated.
User avatar #88 to #83 - dementedllama (02/19/2013) [-]
The book is way too damn long and too detailed to make an accurate movie. Tolkien himself never held onto the film rights because he knew neither he, nor anyone else could make LotR movies completely identical to the books. Peter Jackson came damn close, and made an epic trilogy at the same time.
User avatar #13 - spawnconnery ONLINE (02/18/2013) [-]
Haha Jersey Shire
User avatar #10 - Edrosty (02/18/2013) [-]
I actually watched The Hobbit today. The movie is amazing...
User avatar #45 - auraguardian (02/18/2013) [-]
rivendell is the last homely house, the bit about gandalf, galadriel and saruman isn't mentioned though because guess who narrates the book? Bilbo does. and guess who wasn't with Gandalf? Bilbo wasn't.
User avatar #26 - darknesking (02/18/2013) [-]
Dont understand the big dead about the hobbit i loved the movie and the people who didn't are just those types of people that you cannot impress.
[ 109 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)