Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #38 to #18 - lickilicky (02/17/2013) [-]
How is this bad? Herms make the world go around.
User avatar #20 to #18 - thisotherdude (02/17/2013) [-]
If we're talking hermaphrodites here than that ain't bad luck at all.
#23 to #20 - anon (02/17/2013) [-]
Ehh herms are gross, that's just like a freak of nature
But traps. Traps are damn sexy
#44 to #23 - anon (02/17/2013) [-]
Asari's are herms, you think they're freaks of nature?
User avatar #46 to #44 - princeofbrokensoul (02/17/2013) [-]
they are? didnt know that.
#25 to #23 - stonerjesus (02/17/2013) [-]
I'm not sure how to feel about that statement... at all
#74 to #25 - commentorman (02/17/2013) [-]
how I feel
how I feel
User avatar #24 to #23 - thisotherdude (02/17/2013) [-]
Don't you dare call herms gross! Those "freak of nature" are glorious! If they weren't sterile for the most part they'd be the next step in human evolution!
User avatar #45 to #24 - princeofbrokensoul (02/17/2013) [-]
User avatar #51 to #45 - thisotherdude (02/17/2013) [-]
Think about it, they'd have the ability to mate with anyone else regardless of the partners gender where-as single genders can only reproduce with members of the opposite sex, their population would be double that of the single gender in no time, after a while single genders would be bred out of existence with maybe a few here and there due to recessive genes and all that jazz. Unless of course hermaphroditism itself would be a recessive gene, in which case it would be more of a rarity, however since this is completely hypothetical since herms are incapable of actual reproduction there's no way to determine if herms would be a recessive or dominant trait.
 Friends (0)