FJ has swipe motions and is mobile friendly. Try it out on your mobile device.
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#373 - jewjewbinks (02/13/2013) [-]
number two is the same as saying if two siblings from one family married two siblings of another and had kids, same result. it's really not impressive or any different that theyre twins
#383 to #373 - datgermanguy (02/13/2013) [-]
Sorry, but that's wrong.
Siblings only share the exact same DNA if they are identical You need to login to view this link your case, the offspring of both couples would be totally different.
User avatar #382 to #373 - RandomAnonGuy (02/13/2013) [-]
Uh, no. Brothers and sisters have genetic differences whereas identical twins don't.
#402 to #382 - jewjewbinks (02/14/2013) [-]
identical twins do not have the same DNA, and theyre not completely genetically identical. either way, they wouldn't TECHNICALLY be siblings anyway you thnk about it. cousins simply.
User avatar #405 to #402 - RandomAnonGuy (02/14/2013) [-]
The post didn't say technically or legally, it said genetically. Identical twins both came from the same union of egg and sperm, they are genetically exactly the same except for the odd mutation. You know, one or two bases out of the few billion there. There would be no genetic difference if one man impregnated two identical twins or the man and his identical twin impregnated a woman and her identical twin.
 Friends (0)