paradox. . DJYEDI} PM iti ‘lira?! Hun LI Bab? WILL ‘mu TELL ME A Icti'. simple answer sirbonzaiatak
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (199)
[ 199 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
70 comments displayed.
#2 - thefurie ONLINE
Reply +252
(02/11/2013) [-]
simple answer
#49 to #2 - Yesitsme
+20
has deleted their comment [-]
#67 - awesomeunicorn **User deleted account**
+191
has deleted their comment [-]
#96 to #67 - ctrlaltdeleet
Reply -1
(02/12/2013) [-]
thats morbid.. :D
#190 to #96 - killakahn
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#212 to #190 - ctrlaltdeleet
Reply +1
(02/12/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#202 to #190 - anon
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
Any idea what manga that's from? I've got retardedly short manga knowledge.
#203 to #202 - killakahn
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#167 to #67 - kailybailybo
Reply +1
(02/12/2013) [-]
This is better than the original.
#26 - konradkurze
Reply +148
(02/12/2013) [-]
#117 to #26 - awesomanium
Reply +1
(02/12/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#102 to #26 - ohgodmysides
Reply +3
(02/12/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#58 to #26 - recio **User deleted account**
+7
has deleted their comment [-]
#72 to #26 - shinykakuna **User deleted account**
+15
has deleted their comment [-]
#1 - redrex ONLINE
Reply +126
(02/11/2013) [-]
thats not really a paradox
#29 to #1 - cupcakedevourer
Reply +5
(02/12/2013) [-]
But what if it is a paradox
And the fact that it's not a paradox
Makes it a paradox?

lol i don't know where i'm going with this
#79 to #29 - drunkasaurus
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
does that even make sense? I can't decide...
#179 to #79 - saladtongsofdeath
Reply -1
(02/12/2013) [-]
This image has expired
it will if we go deeper
#7 to #1 - mrgusti
Reply +11
(02/12/2013) [-]
not at all
#36 - vexaton
Reply +73
(02/12/2013) [-]
That's not a paradox... A paradox would be... "Is the answer to this question no?"
#52 to #36 - plumotje
Reply -2
(02/12/2013) [-]
Absolutely not.
There's your answer.
#53 to #52 - vexaton
Reply +4
(02/12/2013) [-]
That's a form of no
#37 to #36 - anon
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
non (latin)
#40 to #37 - vexaton
Reply +2
(02/12/2013) [-]
You can't use another language man...
#75 to #40 - fullbodycondom
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
and why the **** not?
#160 to #75 - vexaton
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
Because it's still a no...
#195 to #160 - fullbodycondom
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
It's a no, but not "no".
#213 to #195 - vexaton
Reply 0
(02/13/2013) [-]
Exactly...
#38 to #36 - sanctium
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
maybe
#39 to #38 - vexaton
Reply +2
(02/12/2013) [-]
Well if you say maybe, you're just delaying the paradox. That implies the answer might be yes or no, but it's currently in a state where both are true. If both are true, then the answer is both yes and no, making it even more ****** up.
#41 to #39 - sanctium
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
Is that a challenge? Can I procrastinate until the point that the paradox implodes the universe?
#42 to #41 - vexaton
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
Until the state of the answer is determined, yes you can, but in the end, it's a paradox.
#43 to #42 - sanctium
Reply -1
(02/12/2013) [-]
True that.

Would potato be a valid answer though?
#44 to #43 - vexaton
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
No, because you are not answering it with yes or no (or maybe in your case)
#60 to #36 - zezenzerg
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
the answer to this question is "no"
#91 to #36 - aquae
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
john is kill
#135 to #36 - halomike
Reply +1
(02/12/2013) [-]
Or: "This statement is false."
#59 to #36 - vorack **User deleted account**
Reply +2
(02/12/2013) [-]
Not only is the answer either yes or no, it is also a superposition in which it is both yes and no.
#159 to #59 - vexaton
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
I explained this earlier, and yeah you're right. It cannot be either, so it's both. It's like Schrödingers theory
#83 to #59 - aesgard
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
I guess you are french right?
#65 to #36 - crazyolitis
Reply +2
(02/12/2013) [-]
Ye- no... Maybe... ****.
#45 to #36 - massus **User deleted account**
+3
has deleted their comment [-]
#63 to #36 - organicglory
Reply +6
(02/12/2013) [-]
#69 to #36 - greeneyedgamer
Reply +6
(02/12/2013) [-]
The answer to that question is not "no".
The answer to that question is "The answer to that question is not 'no'.".
#74 to #69 - anon
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
but then there is a no in the answer and then the answer isnt no but then it is.
#90 to #74 - greeneyedgamer
Reply +6
(02/12/2013) [-]
Just because the answer contains "no" doesn't mean that the entire answer is "no".
#157 to #74 - vexaton
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
He's actually right. That is the only way to answer that (that I know of)
#57 to #36 - taintedangel
Reply +21
(02/12/2013) [-]
I'm gonna say yes, definitely yes.
#47 to #36 - lyuun
Reply +43
(02/12/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#48 to #47 - vexaton
Reply +8
(02/12/2013) [-]
"We knows the answer to this one!"
#56 to #48 - lyuun
Reply +5
(02/12/2013) [-]
#54 to #47 - gisuar
Reply +6
(02/12/2013) [-]
i could watch this for hours
#68 - bannanpojk
Reply +58
(02/12/2013) [-]
He fell asleep so hard that he grew a mustache.
#78 - mishaestrin
Reply +37
(02/12/2013) [-]
#3 - aesguitar
Reply +35
(02/12/2013) [-]
My next statement is false.



The previous statement is true.
#144 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
The first one is true and the second one is false.....sooo, where is the paradox ?
#151 to #144 - aesguitar
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
If the second one is true then that means that second one is also true.

1st = next statement is true
2nd = 1st make this statement false
3rd = 2nd makes 1st statement false
4th = 1st statement is now false so 2nd in now true
... repeats infinitely without a single correct answer.
#17 to #3 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply +2
(02/12/2013) [-]
There's a simpler version of that if you wanted it:

This statement is false.
#4 to #3 - sirbonzaiatak [OP]
Reply +10
(02/12/2013) [-]
New Mission: Refuse this Mission

Does a set of all sets contain itself?
#20 to #4 - lordbyronxiv
Reply +2
(02/12/2013) [-]
Of course a set of all sets contains itself.

What you're looking for is "Does the set of all sets that don't contain themselves, contain itself?"

If this set does contain itself, then it shouldn't be in the set, which means it doesn't contain itself, which means its in the set, etc etc.
#5 to #4 - aesguitar
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
An assassin's last mission was to go back in time and kill himself.
#8 to #5 - anon
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
And so an alternate reality is made. That's not a tough one at all.
#6 to #5 - sirbonzaiatak [OP]
Reply 0
(02/12/2013) [-]
A barber (who is a man) shaves all and only those men who do not shave themselves. Does he shave himself?
#16 to #6 - crazyhindu
Reply +2
(02/12/2013) [-]
only if he wishes to not have a majestic beard
#163 - tenmillionbears
Reply +33
(02/12/2013) [-]
EVERYTIME I see this on here I get so mad. For the umpteenth time: IT'S NOT A PARADOX!
#189 to #163 - doctorstein
Reply -2
(02/12/2013) [-]
Neither is Pinocchio saying this nose will grow. It never said that he needed to lie for his nose to grow, just that it would if he lied. If he said his nose would grow, it would.
Neither is Pinocchio saying this nose will grow. It never said that he needed to lie for his nose to grow, just that it would if he lied. If he said his nose would grow, it would.
#204 to #189 - destismad ONLINE
Reply +4
(02/12/2013) [-]
With the Pinocchio paradox, the key word is "will" grow. "My nose will grow."
If it's a lie, his nose will grow, at which point it will no longer be a lie as he told the truth that his nose will grow, so it shouldn't have grown, of course if it doesn't, then he did lie and it should've. So on and so on.
#24 - galaxyguy ONLINE
Reply +33
(02/12/2013) [-]
Mfw that's not a paradox and he's using lay improperly!
#27 to #24 - shiftyscent
Reply +2
(02/12/2013) [-]
Comment Picture