Sexy. . Progress is born of doubt and inquiry. The Church new doubts, new inquires. To doubt is heresy, to inquire is to admit that you do not Church does neith
x
Click to expand

Comments(110):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - thesoulless ONLINE (02/08/2013) [-]
Never inquires, you say?
#35 to #2 - hemming (02/09/2013) [-]
Hue...
Hue...
#50 to #35 - Marker (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Managed to drag it at just the right moment.
User avatar #84 to #50 - hemming (02/09/2013) [-]
You get thumbs yet i get downvoted :c
User avatar #85 to #84 - Marker (02/09/2013) [-]
I don't make the rules, I just **** with 'em.
#87 to #85 - hemming (02/09/2013) [-]
****		 the rules you say?
**** the rules you say?
#27 - sirformidio (02/09/2013) [-]
I.
HEARD.
HERESY.
#36 to #32 - lodewijkbob (02/09/2013) [-]
Uhh... uhh...
#37 to #36 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
What were you saying?
#38 to #37 - erotictentacle ONLINE (02/09/2013) [-]
YOU!
Spreading heresy again?
#41 to #38 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
You bet your sweet lovely ass i am!
#39 to #37 - lodewijkbob (02/09/2013) [-]
Bring it on.
#42 to #40 - lodewijkbob (02/09/2013) [-]
Must... resist... heresy...

Time for my last resort...

SLOTH MARINE!
#43 to #42 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Oh saints! You got me laughing there!
#44 to #43 - lodewijkbob (02/09/2013) [-]
I surrender, the heresy is too strong. Good show, sir.
#45 to #44 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Welcome to the club mate.
#46 to #45 - lodewijkbob (02/09/2013) [-]
Welcoming party?
#47 to #46 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
All included.
#48 to #47 - lodewijkbob (02/09/2013) [-]
I've run out of funny.
#49 to #48 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
That is sad, for i still got more heresy.
#57 to #49 - lodewijkbob (02/09/2013) [-]
I'll just keep posting stuff for your heresy to feed on then
#59 to #58 - lodewijkbob (02/09/2013) [-]
The reinforcements have arrived! You're done for now felixjarl, you HERETIC!
#61 to #59 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Even if this is my demise the imaterium will spit me out again, no force can stop me!
#64 to #61 - lodewijkbob (02/09/2013) [-]
We outnumber you, HERETIC! Surrender and face Imperial Justice!
#66 to #64 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I might die this day! but even so i will not leave without the victory of having destroyed your boners!
#65 to #61 - atomschlumpf (02/09/2013) [-]
And everytime you return we will purge the **** out of you!!
#67 to #65 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I the chosen of the tit god is not to be banished forever. A day will come!
#60 to #59 - atomschlumpf (02/09/2013) [-]
Bjorn the Fell-Hande inbound to PURGE THE HERESY!!
#63 to #60 - lodewijkbob (02/09/2013) [-]
Quit your cowering felixjarl! We know you're there!
#77 to #63 - dukeofdickbutt (02/09/2013) [-]
WHAT IS THIS??????
#68 to #32 - atomschlumpf (02/09/2013) [-]
that orc....what the **** ....





also we hit the reply maximum
#69 to #68 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Well, i am not a CHAOS cultist for nothing.
#71 to #69 - atomschlumpf (02/09/2013) [-]
The Emperor be blessed, we know exactly how to deal with that ****
#72 to #71 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Just going to put this one here...
#76 to #73 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
And that is leaving call. Thanks for the fun mate.

Nothing is more fun than corrupting the ''loyal'' imperium.
#78 to #76 - atomschlumpf (02/09/2013) [-]
Well then, godbye. It was indeed much fun and have a good day, heretic
#79 to #78 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
We will meet again imperialist, next time i might try techpriest.
User avatar #20 - Vandeekree (02/09/2013) [-]
False on both accounts.
#51 - dwarfman (02/09/2013) [-]
Heresy shall be answered with holy fire.
Heresy shall be answered with holy fire.
#22 - supermanon (02/09/2013) [-]
Its because we know you will do it for us
Its because we know you will do it for us
#56 - blackandwhitegod (02/09/2013) [-]
This quote is wrong.

Dear god there are countless WRITERS in the church THAT QUESTIONED AND REFORMED THE CHURCH.

This is why 95% of atheists are stupid as **** . They are ******* ignorant to the only religions their bash, which tends to be Christianity/Islam. Guess what you ********* , OTHER RELIGIONS EXIST. You're not atheists, you are **** stains on Mother Earths panties, you are more worthless than a cumstain on a hookers upper lip, and frankly I hope you get ass cancer for all of this faggotry you spread.

Tldr; anyone who believes this makes atheists look bad and should promptly join a foxhole somewhere.
#83 to #56 - foulsmell (02/09/2013) [-]
People may have reformed the Church, but that says nothing about the inerrancy of their faith. Their faith is still nonsense. Nor does it change the fact that the Church has been instrumental, and continues to be instrumental, in retarding society by suppressing. Lest we forget the imprisonment of Galileo and the threats of torture made against him?

Still, I have to hand it to the Catholics, at least they acknowledge evolution as conflicting with scripture. I'd say Protestantism and Calvinism are the worst offenders of reason and inquiry, at present.
#62 to #56 - lip ONLINE (02/09/2013) [-]
Atheists are ignorant?

Did you know the quote isn't even from an atheist?

If anyone here is spreading "faggorty" here it's you.
#70 to #62 - blackandwhitegod (02/09/2013) [-]
Yes an anti-religious post WASNT posted by an atheist on FJ.

User avatar #75 to #70 - numbersixtyseven **User deleted account** (02/09/2013) [-]
It was probably posted by an atheist. But lip is saying that the quote was not created by one.
#74 to #56 - dukeofdickbutt (02/09/2013) [-]
If you are christian, then there are nearly 2700 recorded gods that you dont believe in just cause athiests dont believe what you do doesnt mean you can call them stupid or ignorant.
Athiests dont go out of there way to bash homosexuals or pro-choice people if anyone is being ignorant here it is you saying that we are wrong. You have no proof you are right and we have no proof that you are wrong so everyone needs to shut the **** up, get on the floor and walk the dinosaur
#3 - anon (02/09/2013) [-]
if an atheist told me all the things wrong with my religion, i'd say shut the **** up you're atheist why would you waste time researching my religion just to tell me why I'm wrong?
User avatar #24 to #3 - unggoy ONLINE (02/09/2013) [-]
It's the same the other way around if a religious person tells me that i'm going to hell....
User avatar #53 to #24 - teoberry (02/09/2013) [-]
we don't spend our days looking up that stuff. We just say 'you're sinning, you're gonna go to hell'
User avatar #106 to #53 - unggoy ONLINE (02/10/2013) [-]
And that doesn't seem threatening to you?
#82 to #3 - anon (02/09/2013) [-]
Personally, I've looked into a few of the more widely-practiced religions just to get a good feel on what they believe, their traditions, etc for myself, so I do know a decent amount of information on certain religions.

I don't feel like this is an uncommon thing, although there are certainly atheists who say "deity is stupid" without any looking into it, just as there are religious people who say "my deity/deities of choice exist" without any thought as well. Simply put, they've chosen not to be ignorant when making their choice in believing in a deity or not.
User avatar #4 to #3 - Mahazama (02/09/2013) [-]
To show you you're wrong.
#8 to #4 - anon (02/09/2013) [-]
Why do they care? It's obviously not because of something as altruistic as wanting to advance the knowledge of the human race. If it was, they wouldn't be constantly insulting and belittling religious people. That just proves to those people that they're right because the people who disagree with them act like jerks.
#5 to #3 - merrymarvelite (02/09/2013) [-]
Because researching things is how we find out what's wrong and what's right.
#7 to #1 - duudegladiator (02/09/2013) [-]
Some good artwork right there.
#9 - breadnsteak (02/09/2013) [-]
I have written close to 200 published works why do atheist not read them when they want to attack the Catholic Church? I have found many answers the Church does no wrong it the is ignorance of the the people.
0
#10 to #9 - SILENCEnight has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #12 to #10 - breadnsteak (02/09/2013) [-]
I would like to know when the Church denounced science because from my understanding science was backed by the Church in the West during the Medieval Ages which gave rise to the Renaissance age which the Church had back that up too, It is not until the 1940's when the Church started putting its foot down on Science because of some of the products being acquired through it. We can blame that on the philosophies of the time which truly contradicted Church teachings because in the 18th and 19th century all the big philosophers had these "original ideas" and refused to look back to the Greeks and Romans. Again as I said in the original post the Church is pro-science but there are individuals out there who were/are/will be against it.

In my post I was writing as if Thomas Aquinas had seen this and what he would have said. In his opening statements of the Summa Theologica he speaks very highly of science and what it has done for society and still to this day St. Thomas is one of the more influential Catholics and some Protestants read to find answers
#11 to #9 - SILENCEnight (02/09/2013) [-]
**SILENCEnight rolled a random image posted in comment #469594 at Friendly ** NOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION




old comment was deleted cause i dont want to start a religious *********
User avatar #13 to #11 - breadnsteak (02/09/2013) [-]
eh it's ok I don't mean to be an asshole about it but I gets on my nerves to hear people talk about Catholics (the Church) being anti-science
#54 - sometimeswefuck (02/09/2013) [-]
i just hope atheists do not become condescending irrational like how the religious people were to them...
User avatar #25 - xyxoz (02/09/2013) [-]
I think I'm gonna flag all the religious/anti-religious posts for spam now.
#14 - arkfire (02/09/2013) [-]
Personally this is ridiculous the only "science" we Christians go against is evolution.
User avatar #21 to #14 - polifemo ONLINE (02/09/2013) [-]
you see that's the funny things about facts, even if you don't belive in them they still true
#55 to #14 - anon (02/09/2013) [-]
Most Roman Catholics, including the Pope, agree with the theory of evolution.
#89 to #55 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
The Pope and the roman Catholics can be wrong, which in this case they are.
http://www. You need to login to view this link
#91 to #89 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
Watch the whole lecture and you will see that evolution is not a fact but a fairy tale.
User avatar #18 to #14 - ohgodmysides (02/09/2013) [-]
Too bad evolution is a fact -_-
Could you mean abiogenesis?
#90 to #18 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
Evolution is not a fact but a theory.
Theory; a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
User avatar #114 to #90 - ohgodmysides (02/10/2013) [-]
We argued for too long, I can't answer your last post because of all the purples.
"But if there is not evolution that means we were created so that proves he exists so it's not a problem."
That's called "the argument from ignorance" aka "I don't know what else could've done it, so there is no other way."
You have to prove God's existence, no matter whether the theory of evolution is true or not. That's what I meant with "they don't understand the nature of evidence"
Disproving God wouldn't confirm evolution either.
I mean, did you seriously think it goes like this
"We have fossil record of various different stages of animals and observed evolution, that could explain how they lead to one another and the beings today, but we can't possibly proof that, so we are just gonna take one of 1870 mystical entities that has been talked about in the history of humanity and say that did it, even though we can't proof that either."
are you even aware of how silly that sounds?
#115 to #114 - arkfire (02/11/2013) [-]
I decided to look for someone who was not a creationist to tell you the problems with evolution.
http://www. [url deleted] v=KtC1 x69F28U
#116 to #115 - arkfire (02/11/2013) [-]
youtube dot com
User avatar #117 to #116 - ohgodmysides (02/11/2013) [-]
You still seemingly don't understand the difference between evolution (fact) and the theory of evolution.
And the "link" provided leads to Dr. Mike Riddle again.
User avatar #92 to #90 - ohgodmysides (02/10/2013) [-]
Evolution, the change in the gene over the passing of generation is an observed fact.
The theorie of evolution, that explains how species came to be, is a theory, yes.
But it's the single best explanation, that only one that has made predictions that came true and hasn't been proven wrong since.
#93 to #92 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
Actually Micro-evolution is just the change of dominant and recessive traits in the DNA of cells( also known as genetic variance) but it is not macro evolution which is the changing from one species to another .
User avatar #94 to #93 - ohgodmysides (02/10/2013) [-]
Makroevolution is only what microevolution can do over time. There is no difference other than that. Concratulations for falling for that common creationist argument.
Oh and btw, those two are of course part of the theorie of evolution...
#95 to #94 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
Micro evolution only works with the DNA the organism already has! Macro evolution requires new DNA that 1. is beneficial and 2. a modifier.
User avatar #96 to #95 - ohgodmysides (02/10/2013) [-]
Are you cutting out mutations again?
#97 to #96 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
Almost all mutations either have no affect or are harmful to the organism.
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cfl/mutations
User avatar #98 to #97 - ohgodmysides (02/10/2013) [-]
Ah, that site. There goes your credibility.
I won't start refuting the arguments from that site again.
Have a good day sir.
#99 to #98 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
Did you even read it?
User avatar #100 to #99 - ohgodmysides (02/10/2013) [-]
the site "answersingenesis" is very familiar to me.
it's a site that claims to be scientific, but doesn't understand the nature of evidence.
#104 to #100 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
But did you read the article?
User avatar #105 to #104 - ohgodmysides (02/10/2013) [-]
Yes, the first half, and it's exactly the ******** that I expected.
I am not gonna waste my time pointing it out; seriously, if you want to believe that, please do so. I am tired and sick of those people who can't present their cases and that's it.
Why isn't there a single creationism site, that can proof their case without mentioning evolution? It works the other way around, you know -_-...
#107 to #105 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
What about a lecture on why evolution doesn't work?
[url deleted]
#108 to #107 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
http://www. [url deleted]
#109 to #108 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
funny junk is good at stopping my links to youtube.
http://www. youtube . com /watch? v=KtC1 x69F28U
User avatar #110 to #109 - ohgodmysides (02/10/2013) [-]
Watched the first part. Could barely hold back my laughter.
"If evolution is true, there should be observable evidence to support these transitions."
Of course he is bringing up "transitional forms" as problem... because if there aren't fossil records of the evolution of EVERY SINGLE species, evolution sure must be false.
How I love those creationist claims, they always go like this
"Oh, you can only prove 90% of your points? How sweet, I have a magical entity in the sky that can do 100% of what I claim. Clearly my point is better."
Pathetic.
#111 to #110 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
The Cambrian explosion has no transitional fossils and you don't think that's a problem? Continue watching the lecture please, it talks about other problems too.
User avatar #112 to #111 - ohgodmysides (02/10/2013) [-]
No, it's no problem compared to proving an allmighty allpowerful being exists.
This guy seemingly thinks it takes the same amount of "faith" (lol).
Nah, don't wanna waste my time.
Is there anything serious to expect? Or just another 50minutes of the same fallacies?
#113 to #112 - arkfire (02/10/2013) [-]
But if there is not evolution that means we were created so that proves he exists so it's not a problem.
#15 to #14 - irishlawyer (02/09/2013) [-]
the big bang theory?
User avatar #23 to #15 - emrakul (02/09/2013) [-]
Was first proposed by a Catholic monk, and is not held in dispute pretty much anywhere.
User avatar #31 to #15 - ningyoaijin (02/09/2013) [-]
I think a lot of Christians just say God caused the Big Bang. There's nothing wrong with that.
User avatar #52 - corundum (02/09/2013) [-]
Funny how most of the Dark Ages scientists and historians were ******* monks.
User avatar #26 - infinitereaper (02/09/2013) [-]
Lots of religious **** today.
User avatar #6 - kazorkthedork (02/09/2013) [-]
if that were true, we'd all still be Roman Catholic.
 Friends (0)