Buckingham Palace. Fact. A man brew spending half new eating 1_ wje. m_ rene, J_ ela while. He drank half a heme of wine heme bettr. ' itd! smattering,. Not only once, but twice. On the second tour he even sat down and talked to the queen. Since there was no law for doing so he was let free of charge.
x
Click to expand

Comments(81):

[ 81 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#11 - felixjarl (02/08/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Not only once, but twice. On the second tour he even sat down and talked to the queen. Since there was no law for doing so he was let free of charge.
User avatar #14 to #11 - newsmyrna (02/08/2013) [-]
England doesn't have a law against breaking and entering.
User avatar #16 to #14 - felixjarl (02/08/2013) [-]
England used to not have a law against breaking and entering Buckingham palace*

User avatar #17 to #16 - newsmyrna (02/08/2013) [-]
Wow...that's pretty crazy, but I guess if no one has done a thing before there is no reason to make a law against that thing.
User avatar #18 to #17 - felixjarl (02/08/2013) [-]
The law was created shortly after his second visit, from what i recall it was the only incident of its type in history(except the pipe boy which was charged for theft rater than being there.)
User avatar #19 to #18 - newsmyrna (02/08/2013) [-]
The pipe boy? I looked it up but couldn't find anything.
User avatar #20 to #19 - felixjarl (02/08/2013) [-]
There was this kid(12 or 14 years old i think) who lived 2 years inside the royal family palace. He was only discovered because the staff saw various food missing and sot marks on the places he had been(he was living in a pipe there after all). He was then sentenced to the tower.

I don't exactly remember the age but i think it was somewhere in 15-17 century.
User avatar #21 to #20 - newsmyrna (02/08/2013) [-]
Sucks for him never mess with the Tudors, but if it was around the 17th I guess that would be the Stewarts or that point where Lord Oliver Cromwell took over.
0
#22 to #21 - felixjarl has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #24 to #22 - newsmyrna (02/08/2013) [-]
I think you're thinking of a different person I'm talking about the one who served as Lord Protector of the Commonwealth from 1653-1658. He made the New Model Army and had King Charles I executed.
User avatar #31 to #24 - Furubatsu (02/08/2013) [-]
Kinda weird how you respect Cromwell enough to call him Lord and protecctor but coming from an Irish family he was seen like the Hitler of the age.
User avatar #83 to #31 - newsmyrna (02/09/2013) [-]
I'm not calling him Lord Protector out of a decision on my part that was his title.
User avatar #84 to #83 - Furubatsu (02/09/2013) [-]
Yeah but most people I know (even thorough Engleshmen) just call him Cromwell
User avatar #85 to #84 - newsmyrna (02/09/2013) [-]
Well there's your answer I'm not English I'm an American.
User avatar #87 to #85 - Furubatsu (02/09/2013) [-]
I see
User avatar #25 to #24 - felixjarl (02/08/2013) [-]
Mmm yes, the reason why i did delete my comment. But yes, possibly.
#73 to #16 - jjsh (02/09/2013) [-]
There is a law against trespass, however its a tort law and so would have to be privately petitioned by the property owner, in this case the royal family.
#74 to #73 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I do think the Buckingham palace is stated as the property of the queen and county and thus is classified as public domain.
#77 to #74 - jjsh (02/09/2013) [-]
Oh yes, right you are. Since 2007 according to wikipedia. The dude in question i believe was prosecuted for theft however, for the wine he drank whilst in the palace.
User avatar #78 to #77 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
He was but the queen decided to drop the charges.
#80 to #78 - jjsh (02/09/2013) [-]
Haha turns out he was a bit on the mental side
User avatar #81 to #80 - felixjarl (02/09/2013) [-]
yes, he was just out from a mental hospital(6 months)
User avatar #55 to #14 - giblets (02/08/2013) [-]
There's so many weird 'laws' in England, for instance, in Chester (where I live) it's technically legal to kill a Welshman inside the City walls after midnight with an arrow (although you'd still be breaking common law).

And it is also technically illegal to have gay sex with more than one person at a time, but you would never be convicted because of the European Court Of Human Rights
#57 to #55 - felixjarl (02/08/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Those laws were all abolished after a incident where a Scottish man was killed on a open street and the killer was left free due to a medieval law.
User avatar #58 to #57 - giblets (02/08/2013) [-]
The laws themselves were not repealed, but more they clash with common law, and the Human Rights Act, so you'd still be convicted.

I think don't hurt me if I'm wrong
#61 to #58 - felixjarl (02/08/2013) [-]
This image has expired
A old law stated that you could kill any sottish man wearing a bow in a particular city without punishment.

So a guy was dressed up as braveheart in that town and got gunned down by modern guns by a lunatic who was aware of this law.

They were all abolished after that particular incident.

User avatar #63 to #61 - giblets (02/08/2013) [-]
The one to do with killing a Welshman was a bye-law that was kept in place to drive the Welsh to Wales, and was kept in place by several monarchs.

But it's had no real implications for hundreds of years so I don't think they'd waste parliamentary time repealing it.
User avatar #64 to #63 - felixjarl (02/08/2013) [-]
Guy was killed

Of course they did take time!
User avatar #65 to #64 - giblets (02/08/2013) [-]
Different law though, and that guy wouldn't have gotten off!

You might be right, but most the time Parliament has more pressing concerns.
I'm too tired to be arsed to look it up, so I'll just say you're right.
User avatar #66 to #65 - felixjarl (02/08/2013) [-]
They did abolish lots of old laws including the one you speak of.

It is the law abolishment in history who holds the record of the least opposition.
User avatar #67 to #66 - giblets (02/08/2013) [-]
You're probably right.

I just like the idea of Chester having a weird law, we don't have much :(
#69 to #67 - felixjarl (02/08/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Yea i see your point. Sorry to break your spirits mate.
User avatar #70 to #69 - giblets (02/08/2013) [-]
It's fine. I thumbed you up none the less.
#37 - Exterwinator (02/08/2013) [-]
meanwhile on the other side of Buckingham Palace...
#51 to #37 - anon (02/08/2013) [-]
"Getting real tired of your **** , master Wayne"
User avatar #27 - hkd (02/08/2013) [-]
Wan't there some psycho a while back that went and sat on the Queen's bed whilst she was sleeping? She woke up, talked to the man and then he was taken away...
User avatar #43 to #27 - theshadowed (02/08/2013) [-]
That was in WW2
User avatar #28 to #27 - ImaTumor (02/08/2013) [-]
I think that was the same guy.
User avatar #29 to #27 - midget gang bang (02/08/2013) [-]
I think it was the same man but a different time
User avatar #8 - markowuzhere (02/08/2013) [-]
you forgot to mention that he visited the queen in her 'private chambers'
#9 to #8 - turbodoosh (02/08/2013) [-]
gigitty
#42 - jldragon (02/08/2013) [-]
But did you know that the Titanic hit an iceburg and sank?
User avatar #44 to #42 - departed (02/08/2013) [-]
Wat is tittytanic?
#1 - skardox (02/08/2013) [-]
proof?
User avatar #2 to #1 - kapane (02/08/2013) [-]
It was me
User avatar #4 to #2 - niklamacz (02/08/2013) [-]
proof?
User avatar #72 to #5 - kanpai (02/09/2013) [-]
i'm sorry i've ever doubted you.
#15 to #5 - andrewhannaford (02/08/2013) [-]
Your wrong, it's me.
User avatar #79 to #15 - bjartur (02/09/2013) [-]
You're*

Jesus.
User avatar #82 to #79 - andrewhannaford (02/09/2013) [-]
I try to be funny and everyone bashes on me, cool. -_-
User avatar #86 to #82 - bjartur (02/09/2013) [-]
Just stop, that was awful.
User avatar #23 to #15 - tomainstream (02/08/2013) [-]
im not wrong im tomainstream
#10 - madeyegubbins (02/08/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#35 - emmyizme (02/08/2013) [-]
Doesn't that make the security protocol 			*******		 useless?
Doesn't that make the security protocol ******* useless?
#26 - Kirbyman (02/08/2013) [-]
That's my boy.
That's my boy.
User avatar #68 - daisynomnom (02/08/2013) [-]
Me and my friend had just got home from a night out and we were pretty drunk, it was like 4am, somehow we started talking about the royal family and she said she was going to call the queen, she asked google and found a number on yahoo answers that was apparently the queen(she'ssilly) and she phoned up. A man with the most horrific smokers voice answered, she asked if he was the queen and he said a sentence that will haunt me always "I'll be the queen if you can slip past my crown"

It was so goddamn quick, like didn't even need to think and he said it. He was so ready.
#3 - anon (02/08/2013) [-]
We don't need proof if we want to believe this :D
#48 - pulluspardus (02/08/2013) [-]
Like there is anything important in there.   
Queen's face when.
Like there is anything important in there.
Queen's face when.
User avatar #60 to #48 - thebritishguy (02/08/2013) [-]
how important something is is relative, your things aren't important to me but you would still be pissed off if I had slow sex with them
#62 - anon (02/08/2013) [-]
Another individual broke into the palace with a sponge and a rusty spanner. The Queen saw him and said "I know you and you cannot sing." The intruder responded, "That's nothing, you should hear me play piano."
#50 - namdelliks (02/08/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#53 - mtndewisgreat (02/08/2013) [-]
don't worry, there was a guard chasing him at one point.. wait.. nevermind.
don't worry, there was a guard chasing him at one point.. wait.. nevermind.
#45 to #33 - anon (02/08/2013) [-]
I found it funny.
#52 to #45 - shfreaksixninesix (02/08/2013) [-]
but you don't matter.
#71 - conordalymcr (02/09/2013) [-]
Sherlock, anyone?
Sherlock, anyone?
User avatar #36 - eddymolly (02/08/2013) [-]
Wow, 30 year old news, how relevant.
#40 - anon (02/08/2013) [-]
Disregard the Constables
[ 81 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)