Flossing to get a pube out of my teeth. inb4 that stupid Gandhi picture with him quoted saying this.. fuck Gandhi
x

Flossing to get a pube out of my teeth

Flossing to get a pube out of my teeth. inb4 that stupid Gandhi picture with him quoted saying this..

inb4 that stupid Gandhi picture with him quoted saying this.

Tags: fuck | Gandhi
  • Recommend tagsx
+932
Views: 45900
Favorited: 53
Submitted: 02/04/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to zakvanloocke Subscribe to graphs-n-charts submit to reddit
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#21 to #19 - anon (02/05/2013) [-]
He said inb4 you nutsack
User avatar #23 to #21 - davidokuro (02/05/2013) [-]
That's why he put it you sacknut
#28 to #19 - keeluall (02/05/2013) [-]
thats my wallpaper, it helps me through every day
#12 - pyra (02/05/2013) [-]
"Flossing to get a pube out of my teeth"

What if you floss with a pube?
#40 to #12 - nyehsquidward (02/05/2013) [-]
Then you have some issues.
#15 to #14 - pyra (02/05/2013) [-]
Good. I thought I was the only one
User avatar #17 to #15 - zakvanloocke (02/05/2013) [-]
No, you and I seem a kindred spirit, lurking the comment sections of FJ. Posting when appropriate, never trying too hard. You have a very good green to red thumb comment ratio. I like that, it's important.
#18 to #17 - pyra (02/05/2013) [-]
Thumbs don't really matter though
User avatar #20 to #18 - zakvanloocke (02/05/2013) [-]
No, they don't, but I do enjoy having a high ratio between positive and negative thumbs. If you're going to do something, you might as well do it well.
#1 - nyawgga (02/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
+7
#10 to #1 - commondorozor **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#42 - pokemonstheshiz (02/05/2013) [-]
I like mine better
User avatar #43 to #42 - jackisawsm (02/05/2013) [-]
THANK YOU FOR FIXING IT!

I love you.
#9 - ningyoaijin (02/05/2013) [-]
The quote, "bitches ain't **** but hoes and tricks" implies that all bitches are hoes and/or tricks, thus the diagram should look more like this.
User avatar #11 to #9 - bagguhsleep (02/05/2013) [-]
You're reading the phrase wrong. You're thinking they meant "bitches are not **** , but rather hoes and tricks", when dre and snoop meant "bitches are nothing but hoes and tricks". It's subtle, but there's a difference.

You should trust me, I have a bachelor's degree in being a writer.
User avatar #13 to #11 - zakvanloocke (02/05/2013) [-]
*bachelor's degree in bitches and hoeology
User avatar #33 to #11 - gcloud ONLINE (02/05/2013) [-]
ur picture is exactly how u sounded to me
User avatar #27 to #11 - ewowo (02/05/2013) [-]
Your statement it correct, but it applies to the original post, not this comment.
#31 to #9 - swarfega (02/05/2013) [-]
On seconds thoughts, perhaps the set of 'bitches' should be encompassed entirely by Tricks [upside-down U] Hoes, in other words, the intersection of Hoes and Tricks. If they are saying there are no bitches which are outside of the intersection of Hoes and Tricks. But the intersection of Hoes and Tricks is not entirely the set of Bitches because it is possible there are other things which are Hoes and Tricks but are not Bitches. In other words, I don't think there are elements in the set of 'Bitches' which are in Tricks *or* Hoes. They have to be both.
#24 to #9 - swarfega (02/05/2013) [-]
You're actually correct, so I don't know why people are thumbing you down.
#34 to #9 - pocoyothegreat (02/05/2013) [-]
I would rather say that bitches is the intersection of tricks and hoes OR it's completely contained in the intersection, since the quote says "AND" not "and/or".
But you are a lot more accurate than the original diagram.
#36 to #34 - grahamernazi (02/05/2013) [-]
I had to search through the comments to see if anyone corrected him. No one REALLY understands little worlds like "and" anymore.
User avatar #37 to #36 - pocoyothegreat (02/05/2013) [-]
Logic is not a such a common skill as one would desire it to be.
#26 to #9 - llpanic (02/05/2013) [-]
MFW people thumb you down when you are correct
User avatar #39 - forgottenmyshorts (02/05/2013) [-]
Silly Bitches, Tricks are for hoes
User avatar #8 - Cookiez ONLINE (02/05/2013) [-]
Shouldn't bitches be between the hoes and tricks?
User avatar #7 - wintercold (02/05/2013) [-]
Bitches aint **** but hoes and tricks
+1
#41 - shinykakuna **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#35 - anon (02/05/2013) [-]
False. If bitches ain't **** BUT hoes and tricks, Bitches should be a subset of Hoes and Tricks.

More rigorously, If you take the intersection of Bitches, Hoes, and Tricks, you should get bitches.
User avatar #29 - bitchplzzz (02/05/2013) [-]
and kush, *****
#49 - ednaeoj (02/05/2013) [-]
**ednaeoj rolled a random image posted in comment #39 at Yandere Hanako **
**ednaeoj rolled a random image posted in comment #39 at Yandere Hanako **
#48 - mrcrowleysr (02/05/2013) [-]
that Venn diagram is not correct, the quote is "bitches ain't 			****		 but hoes and tricks" you are implying that bitches can also be only hoes or only tricks or none, only a small portion is both, it's wrong.
that Venn diagram is not correct, the quote is "bitches ain't **** but hoes and tricks" you are implying that bitches can also be only hoes or only tricks or none, only a small portion is both, it's wrong.
User avatar #32 - vondarkmoor ONLINE (02/05/2013) [-]
i'm guessing you're trying to present the standard ghetto model which although works in practice works does not include ******** the elemental particles of misc stuff otherwise known as **** quite sharp sir
User avatar #30 - deansg (02/05/2013) [-]
that's actually a wrong representation. Hoes and Tricks need to cover all of the bitches part.
User avatar #22 - facedodge (02/05/2013) [-]
What if he ain't got **** but bitches, hoes and tricks?
 Friends (0)