I am not an atheist because.... imgur.com/7ppI6lr.. Meanwhile on Funnyjunk i am Not an atheist because
x
Click to expand

Comments(114):

[ 114 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#35 - Ishkalorr (02/04/2013) [-]
here it comes
#72 to #35 - Kairyuka (02/04/2013) [-]
I win.
#36 to #35 - Ishkalorr (02/04/2013) [-]
think i might settle in for this one
think i might settle in for this one
#87 - Rascal (02/04/2013) [-]
If god doesn't exist, then why is there a Godzilla but not an Atheistzilla.

Christians : 1
Atheists : 0
#131 to #87 - Rascal (01/21/2014) [-]
because stupid americunts took the japanese term gojira romantisized it and made it godzilla ******* flaming faggoty americans
#101 to #87 - trollbearcat (02/04/2013) [-]
heres that picture you quoted from the front page a few days ago...just sayin.
#89 to #87 - Rascal (02/04/2013) [-]
Japanese: -1
User avatar #96 to #87 - kamusioso (02/04/2013) [-]
How come Godzilla attacked japan but Atheistzilla didn't?
#102 to #96 - atheistzilla (02/04/2013) [-]
bcuz i'm 2kewl4school
bcuz i'm 2kewl4school
#76 - bookmark (02/04/2013) [-]
Meanwhile on Funnyjunk
User avatar #94 - Rezxz (02/04/2013) [-]
Did anyone else start reading before looking at the picture and think it was Kermit the Frog out of the corner of your eye?
User avatar #97 to #94 - hirollin (02/04/2013) [-]
yes.
#74 - fuckyosixtyminutes (02/04/2013) [-]
The only people who care why you're atheist are the ones with the same circle jerk attitude that religious people who supposedly annoy you so much (even though you can't stop talking about them) have.
#32 - jeengak (02/04/2013) [-]
before you guys start anything... let me get my umbrella and rain coat
#10 - Rascal (02/03/2013) [-]
"I do not believe religion will bring peace to mankind" the irony is, neither will politics but we accept the political system like the middle ages accepted religion as their leader.

now to my question:
i dont get the concept of debates like these. what it your goal? maybe that nobody believes in a god? so you give people the choice - believe the scientists or believe nothing at all. what is when i create my own story of the world without any evidence, just for fun. are you going to force me not to believe in this?
#81 to #10 - kangster (02/04/2013) [-]
'Believing' in science..
Believing in science is clearly not the same thing as believing in a god.
I 'believe' in evolution because i can look up documented evidence which supports it.
God-claims are not supported by any hard evidence at all.

I will keep my atheist views for myself, as soon as religion stays out of my life.
#11 to #10 - Rascal (02/04/2013) [-]
you say this as if political figures are not religious at all. politicians are not the atheist popes or leaders. the president is a politician and he is a hardcore catholic, every president was i believe. politicians and religion are not separate entities and are in fact mixed with each other inseparably.
#25 to #11 - oedad (02/04/2013) [-]
there has been one catholic president you and the people who thumbed you up are typical atheist sheeple.
User avatar #13 to #11 - cysco ONLINE (02/04/2013) [-]
"I do not speak for my church on public matters; and the church does not speak for me." - Kennedy

and you are talking about the US .. war is a matter of more than one country
#68 - BlahDude ONLINE (02/04/2013) [-]
MFW I believe in God and at the same time also seek truth through the scientific method

MFW the majority of people who believe in God and at the same time also seek truth through the scientific method

Belief in God and a love for science and the search for knowledge aren't mutually exclusive. It's rather naive to think so and shows limited knowledge of the beliefs of the average religious person in todays world
User avatar #84 to #68 - sgtwilliam (02/04/2013) [-]
Then you're a deist?

No hate.
User avatar #130 to #68 - avengeralpha (12/29/2013) [-]
I dont know man Agnosticism is the way for me at the moment.
#73 to #68 - fuckyosixtyminutes (02/04/2013) [-]
Keep thumbing him down for a different point of view and then bitch more about religious people being intolerant, hypocrite faggots.
User avatar #77 to #73 - numbersixtyseven **User deleted account** (02/04/2013) [-]
As an atheist, I thumbed him up, you generalizing faggot.
#78 to #77 - fuckyosixtyminutes (02/04/2013) [-]
Was I directing what I said at all atheists?
User avatar #79 to #78 - numbersixtyseven **User deleted account** (02/04/2013) [-]
General enough to rustle some Jimmies.
#1 - illshowyouletters (02/03/2013) [-]
You sir, are a hero. By you, I mean the person who made the quote, but OP is pretty cool for posting this picture.
#2 - chrislafff (02/03/2013) [-]
MFW this is probably going to start religious debates and acheive nothing of importance
MFW this is probably going to start religious debates and acheive nothing of importance
#75 to #2 - oharo (02/04/2013) [-]
Small present for ya.
Small present for ya.
#6 to #2 - thebritishguy (02/03/2013) [-]
I actually completely lost my religion because of a post on here, I was doubting that he was really there and then I saw this post and I thought it was silly and wrong, this is the post
User avatar #24 to #6 - danster (02/04/2013) [-]
It's not an ideal government because nothing gives them the right to be above us. We're all humans and we are equal.

God is a god. He's above us and therefore he can do anything he wants, much like how humans do anything they want with animals below them.
#119 to #17 - Rascal (02/19/2013) [-]
According to your religion (assuming you're christian) watching that show is a sin. In fact, visiting most of the internet is a sin.
User avatar #21 - asdfghjklasdfghjk (02/04/2013) [-]
So I would consider myself atheist but there is only one person who knows this and that is my now exgirlfriend. I'm not worried about her telling anyone because she probably doesn't remember (bitch). I honestly couldn't tell my friends and family that I am because of the **** storm that would ensue. kinda sucks not being able to be myself.
User avatar #22 to #21 - TheMagicBong (02/04/2013) [-]
Why would you have such a big problem saying you're an atheist? Its not like you're coming out of the closet or anything.
+1
#42 to #22 - eros **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #30 to #22 - pharaohz (02/04/2013) [-]
In some countries it is. In muslim countries if you say you're an atheist you will be shunned, hated and even killed.
User avatar #3 - lazylazarus (02/03/2013) [-]
there be a **** storm a brewin
User avatar #52 - croski (02/04/2013) [-]
Well, you can say the same thing about sience, it also predicts the end of the world...

(And don't think I'm a go bible, down with the science guy, I'm just an observer)
User avatar #53 to #52 - temporalguardian ONLINE (02/04/2013) [-]
well yeah but that doesnt mean we're actually gunna die. not to mention if we were to stay here on earth we would die out before the end of the world.
User avatar #57 to #53 - croski (02/04/2013) [-]
True that. Still, nobody has come up with an effective solution to space travel so we are pretty much earthbound for now.
User avatar #107 to #65 - croski (02/05/2013) [-]
You wouldn't believe that I watched it just 3 days ago.
#108 to #107 - madoc (02/05/2013) [-]
Haha, well then you should be aware that there are at least theoritcal ways to do it. :P
User avatar #109 to #108 - croski (02/06/2013) [-]
I know there is, but I think that before we actually make some of those theories into reality, we're going to be hit by a asteroid or we're going to nuke the **** out of each other or something similar to that. I'm not a pessimist, or so I want to think. I think it's a realistic point of view.
#110 to #109 - madoc (02/06/2013) [-]
I don't think either of those will be what ends us. The changing climate will kill us before that.
User avatar #111 to #110 - croski (02/06/2013) [-]
I disagree. Earth had various climate changes throughout it's history. We are fully capable of adapting to those changes. Not the whole earth but the developed countries are.

My two ides were just an example. There are million ways for the human race to end it's existence, trying to guess what it is is almost impossible.
#112 to #111 - madoc (02/06/2013) [-]
However, we can say which one is most likely. :p Oh, and previous climate changes are nothing like this one.
User avatar #113 to #112 - croski (02/06/2013) [-]
I agree with the first part but disagree with the second.

We actually don't know where are this changes leading us. There are some probable theories but one can never be sure, especially when there are so many factors involved. Sun, seas, winds, sea currents, air masses, earths rotation and earths movement through space, underground activities like tectonic plates, volcanoes, sun heat, light and radiation, moons gravity field, vegetation on earth, human behavior etc. You see, there are lots of factors, and I've come up with these in less than 2 minutes, and am positive that a scientist specialized in this area could name as twice as much (or even more). It's too unpredictable, you can only make theories...
#114 to #113 - madoc (02/06/2013) [-]
15 years ago a lot of scenarios were predicted. The worst case scenario would mean that we'd see an increase in temperature of 2 degrees celsius by 2100, which was pretty much seen as an impossible scenario.

However, if the math has been done correctly, and it has, if humanity doesn't take a turn for the better soon, the worst scenari isn't even close to what'll have happened. By 2060, the temperature will have gone up by not two but four degrees celsius. But that doesn't sound very much now does it? Think again.

The summers in London would reach upwards of 50 degrees celsius. The north pole and the ice on greenland would be mostly gone, possibly resulting in the gulf changing direction and thus making the climate in norhtern europe a LOT colder. So what happens closer to the equator? The temperature only goes up. Deserts spread wider than ever and the number of fires like the ones Australia suffer from every year would increase drastically.

But that's not the worst part. Embedded into the russian tundra lies methane gas. A lot of methane gas. Gas that will leak out if the tundra thaws, resulting in a release of greenhouse gases worth 700 % of the amount of CO2 in the air right now. And then we're pretty much ****** .

But that may also just be me being cynical :D
User avatar #115 to #114 - croski (02/06/2013) [-]
I don't know, seems to me a bit cynical, but I guess it's a possible theory, though, what can we do now? And I have to state again, one factor can be overseen, idk. like seismic activity or earth magnetic pole changing. And it could be linked with the climate change. For instance (this is me making things up): the temperature rises as you said by 4 degrees. It changes the ocean temperature as well and because of that, the pacific ring of fire triples in activity (I don't know of it can happen, just trying to make up a scenario). We get massive earthquakes and the seismic movement shifts our orbit and we catapult out of our orbit around the sun. At that point, assuming we don't hit another planet or we don't get hit by space objects, we get a sudden and drastic shift in climate and so on... and we are soon dead.

I still believe that we can adapt in one way or another to the climate change you've described.

I was thinking on the world war III end of the world and it came to my mind a reason for the war: water. It's also connected to the climate and human pollution and is essential for every living thing on earth.
#116 to #115 - madoc (02/07/2013) [-]
Well I suppose we can at least hope that some of humanity would adapt, but civilization as we know it will probably come to an end at some point. Either that or we suddenly resolve all problems and become a futuristic utopia. ^^
User avatar #117 to #116 - croski (02/07/2013) [-]
My pessimism doesn't allow the second one so, destroyed civilization it is :D
#118 to #117 - madoc (02/07/2013) [-]
It seems more likely, yes. xD
User avatar #19 - myleghurts (02/04/2013) [-]
wow flower you're so deep.
#20 to #19 - Rascal (02/04/2013) [-]
Thats a bean...
#37 to #20 - Ishkalorr (02/04/2013) [-]
this is also a bean
#5 - xmattx (02/03/2013) [-]
Well said.
Well said.
#14 - Denver (02/04/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #26 - bothemastaofall (02/04/2013) [-]
Now combine that with satanism and you have an ideal human
0
#8 - JosefRieper **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#44 to #8 - eros **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
[ 114 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)