Do you even science?. . iit N REISHI. Aea; or, THE duim, l' tuti,!, l' iil, In MOTION INT. ETIHER IS ' 50. soooo.... all the porn on the internet weights less than 50 grams? Do you even science? iit N REISHI Aea; or THE duim l' tuti ! iil In MOTION INT ETIHER IS ' 50 soooo all the porn on internet weights less than grams?
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (117)
[ 117 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#33 - oversoul
Reply +77 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
soooo.... all the porn on the internet weights less than 50 grams?
#29 - thisisestonia
Reply +59 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#95 to #29 - funmanigro
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #41 to #29 - muzikmafia
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
what the fucccccck
#43 to #29 - mrcocoabeans
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#47 - anonymoose
Reply +36 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
>Weight
>grams
User avatar #65 to #47 - daddymcswagger
Reply -14 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
People like you make Amerifags look bad...
User avatar #66 to #65 - anonymoose
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
How? I'm Irish.
User avatar #53 to #47 - ancano
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
A thousand times this.
User avatar #56 to #47 - pianoasis
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
its used for both weight and mass
the conversion of grams from weight to mass is exactly 1:1
User avatar #105 to #56 - Crusader
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
mass is weight
User avatar #115 to #105 - shadowknife
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
Incorrect. Weight refers to the force acting upon an object due to gravity. It is measured in Newtons in standard units. Mass refers to the amount of matter that makes up the object which is commonly measured in grams or pounds.
User avatar #117 to #115 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
So what you are saying is that weight is how hard something is being pulled towards the earth due to gravity, and mass is how much matter is being affected by gravity.
So in layman's terms, they are the same thing.
One is simply referring to the force rather than the object.
User avatar #118 to #117 - shadowknife
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
no they arent the same thing. one refers to the force on the object and one refers to the amount of object as you noted but they are not equal for example if someone has a MASS of 10 kilograms then they will have a WEIGHT of 91 newtons. They are not the same thing.
User avatar #122 to #118 - shadowknife
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
sorry approximately 98 newtons
User avatar #120 to #118 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
As I said, in layman's terms.
Do you know what a layman is?
It is the lowest ranking in an organization, the majority of the populace, the average.
To the average person, they are the same thing.
YOU may know they are different, I may know, we may even car, but the laymen of the world don't know, don't care, and don't see the difference.

Also, if they are different, then how come a scale that measures weight measures in pounds, ounces, grammes and kilogrammes?
User avatar #123 to #120 - shadowknife
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
That scale doesn't measure weight it measures mass
User avatar #124 to #123 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
Pretty sure that the scale in my kitchen for measuring food measures how much gravity is pulling the object down on the object, not how much matter is in the object.
Considering that the scale would be affected differently on mercury, mars, jupiter, etc. due to different gravitational pulls, yet it still measures in grammes, kilogrammes, ounces and pounds.
User avatar #125 to #124 - shadowknife
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
thats the interesting thing. those scales actually do measure mass and you are right they wouldn't work properly on other planets for measuring mass. this is because the acceleration due to gravity (approx 9.8m/s^2) changes from planet to planet and wouldn't give true readings on other planets. However if you measure something here in grams or pounds it will have the same value on another planet you would just have to use a different kitchen scale that was calibrated for the planet
User avatar #107 to #105 - pianoasis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
fuuuuuuu
#100 to #56 - anon id: 03a968ed
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Are you ******* stupid or what bro?
User avatar #101 to #100 - pianoasis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
please lurk more
#62 to #56 - punkrockdude
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Weight = force of gravity = mass x acceleration due to gravity

Mass = amount of matter

lrn2science
User avatar #71 to #62 - pianoasis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
http://www.mathsisfun.com/measure/weight-mass.html

please, take your time
#77 to #71 - punkrockdude
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
>Mass is a measure of how much matter something contains
>Weight is a measure of how strongly gravity pulls downwards
>Apparent Weight is a measure of downwards force
>Force is measured in Newtons, not kilograms or pounds
>When scales show "kg" or "lb" it is just an estimate of the mass above them
User avatar #79 to #77 - pianoasis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
im talking about the conversion of weight to mass in grams
#85 to #79 - punkrockdude
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
See if you actually had a high school education, specifically physics or science (or at least could read your own source) you would know that weight is a force. Someone saying that they weigh 150lbs is not accurate - they have a mass of 150lbs. To convert that to weight, you would have to multiply it by 9.81m/s^2. Weight cannot be measured in grams, kg, lbs, etc. it can only be measured in newtons
User avatar #60 to #56 - anonymoose
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
1 gram mass has a weight of approx. 0.00981 Newtons.
User avatar #69 to #60 - pianoasis
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
here's this too

http://www.mathsisfun.com/measure/weight-mass.html
#63 to #60 - pianoasis
-2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #70 to #63 - anonymoose
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Can you read?
Originally defined as "the absolute weight of a volume of pure water equal to the cube of the hundredth part of a metre, and at the temperature of melting ice"[2] (later 4 °C), a gram is now defined as one one-thousandth of the SI base unit, the kilogram, or 1×10−3 kg, which itself is defined as being equal to the mass of a physical prototype preserved by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures.
User avatar #72 to #70 - pianoasis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
that was an accident damnit
http://www.mathsisfun.com/measure/weight-mass.html

this
User avatar #76 to #72 - alhemicar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
And where the **** would that be? On the moon?
An object of a mass of 100 kg would weight 9.81 N on EARTH,
but what else would you expect from a site called Maths (not physics) is fun!
#78 to #76 - pianoasis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
We werent measuring in newtons, we were talking about grams being used for both weight and mass on earth
User avatar #81 to #78 - alhemicar
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
ok, you gotta be ******* kidding me.

A Newton, short N. 1 N = 1 kg * m * s^-2,
A gram, short g. 1 g = 0.001 kg
Those who made the page are idiots, you could aswell say that you use pascals to measure force.
User avatar #84 to #81 - pianoasis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Im not saying its right, im just saying that we use it that way
User avatar #88 to #84 - alhemicar
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
then stop trying to proove that it's right, the post was titled "do you even SCIENCE" so it's obvious you'd anonymoose was talking about the scientific definition.
User avatar #74 to #72 - anonymoose
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Another link proving me right?

Q: Aren't "weight" and "mass" the same?
A: Not really.

But remember .. they do not mean the same thing,
and they can have different measurements.

technically wrong to talk about weight in kilograms
User avatar #75 to #74 - pianoasis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
when did I say they were the same thing...?

"its used for both weight and mass
the conversion of grams from weight to mass is exactly 1:1"

please prove me wrong
User avatar #91 to #75 - anonymoose
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
I thought you were arguing that they were the same thing.

OP was trying to be scientific but used the wrong unit, so I was correcting him. If he can be a overlyscientific douche, so can I when he trips up somewhere.
User avatar #92 to #91 - pianoasis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
nope
User avatar #80 to #75 - alhemicar
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight
W = mg
g=9.81 m/s^2, m = 100 kg therefore W = 981 kgm/s^2 = 981 N
#82 to #80 - pianoasis
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
again, we are not talking about newtons

grams is a measurement used for both weight and mass on the planet earth

it was created so the conversion would be 1:1 under earth gravity
User avatar #86 to #82 - alhemicar
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
omG you're literally too stupid to insult.
A gramm is an unit used to measure mass, a basic physicall dimension. Weight is the force with wich gravity pulls down an object, thus W = m * g
If you measure mass (m) in gramms, there's no possible way you could measure weight (W) in gramms too, because once you muliply gramms and m/s^2 you'd get newtons (N).
Is it clear enough for you to understand?
User avatar #87 to #86 - pianoasis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
for ***** sake im done
User avatar #89 to #87 - alhemicar
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
after your last comment, obviously.
User avatar #90 to #89 - pianoasis
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
yeah
gg
#108 to #90 - comanderspy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
User avatar #68 to #63 - alhemicar
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Originally defined as "the absolute weight of a volume of pure water equal to the cube of the hundredth part of a metre, and at the temperature of melting ice"[2] (later 4 °C), a gram is now defined as one one-thousandth of the SI base unit, the kilogram, or 1×10−3 kg, which itself is defined as being equal to the mass of a physical prototype preserved by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures.

I'm ******* done
User avatar #121 to #47 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
To the layman, the joke makes sense.
#55 to #47 - brettyoke
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
>measuring weight on Earth
>Grams is acceptable for weight as well as mass
#98 to #55 - punkrockdude
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Mass = amount of matter

Weight = force due to gravity = mass x acceleration due to gravity = ykg x zm/s^2 = N (Newtons)
User avatar #57 to #55 - anonymoose
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
No it's not.
User avatar #58 to #57 - brettyoke
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
If you're on planet Earth it is. Hey, look where we are.
User avatar #61 to #58 - anonymoose
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
It's generally taken as an acceptable means of measure weight for general public, but this post is being specifically scientific. In which case it's about as wrong as using pascals to measure force.
User avatar #59 to #58 - alhemicar
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
I hope you're ******* kidding me....
#3 - xebx
Reply +29 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
#6 to #3 - Jowi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
A strawberry doesn't weigh 50 grams though
User avatar #15 to #6 - vexaton
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
It's an American study. They have genemanipulated the **** out of their strawberries to be massively huge. A normal strawberry is about 10-30 grams
#7 to #3 - anon id: c11803b9
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
What kind of ********** strawberries do you HAVE??
50 grams is like 3 strawberries.
#8 to #3 - happybutler
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
I've got a couple of thousand Internets for you here sir.
User avatar #48 to #3 - nnightfire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Nice StrawB
#64 - antitrollingleague
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
and about 99% of that is porn...
#52 - Jesusnipples
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
#67 to #52 - dirgeofasimo
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
VSAUCE
#102 - poptartans
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
I.T Crowd! ♥
I.T Crowd! ♥
#116 to #102 - anon id: b1b3bbcd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
nice glasses
#22 - thenextprodigy
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
clearly you bitches do not watch vsauce. www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaUzu-iksi8
User avatar #25 to #22 - neptuneport
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Vsauce is the only other channel I subscribe to on youtube, besides the roosterteeth channel.
#94 - admiralamory **User deleted account**
+4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#5 - anon id: 4ea8012f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
congratz, you watch vsauce.
#42 to #5 - ratchets **User deleted account**
+4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]