Upload
Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#39 - chrolt
Reply +69 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
This is all fake, notice how there was no swearing in the post. Clearly we can't trust it.
This is all fake, notice how there was no swearing in the post. Clearly we can't trust it.
#65 to #39 - RosarioVampire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#60 to #39 - wakaflockfloka
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Well you **** there was no swearing in yours either how can we trust you?
#64 to #60 - anon id: c3b2daca
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Well cum munching titty dumpers, you're right. You solved the most ******* proplexing problem in the universe and the president of Earth wants to give you the "************* Genius" Award!
User avatar #62 to #60 - chrolt
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
**** you. Is that better?
#81 to #62 - wakaflockfloka
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Much ******* better.
#53 to #39 - anon id: a1320de6
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
but... if you say that you can't trust it because there is no swearing in it, aren't already trusting in it, considering that that is its message?
And now you just created a loophole in my brain you ******* cocksucker.
User avatar #51 to #39 - manicekman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
**** you ******* cocksucker, the post is ************* legit you cunt.
User avatar #44 to #39 - fitemeirl
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
But if it's fake it doesn't need swearing to be true.
User avatar #50 to #44 - eccleston
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
But if it were true, wouldn't it be meesing swearing?
User avatar #52 to #50 - eccleston
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
*missing.

****, I shouldn't be in front of my computer before drinking my morning coffee.
#45 to #44 - chrolt
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
By the gods, you're right!