Star Wars. . I WILL DIRECT STAR WARS EPISODE VII.. Deliver on my Samurai Jack movie first you prick. Star Wars I WILL DIRECT STAR WARS EPISODE VII Deliver on my Samurai Jack movie first you prick
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (164)
[ 164 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#9 - dwarfman
Reply +141 123456789123345869
(02/01/2013) [-]
Deliver on my Samurai Jack movie first you prick.
User avatar #1 - huntergriff
Reply +45 123456789123345869
(02/01/2013) [-]
the **** is that on the computer screen? it looks like a predator without dreadlocks
#155 to #1 - fizzor
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#3 to #1 - heraske
Reply +84 123456789123345869
(02/01/2013) [-]
#4 to #3 - huntergriff
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(02/01/2013) [-]
#72 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply +43 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
This image has expired
my opinion: i didnt mind the prequels and i didnt think Jar jar was that annoying
User avatar #80 to #72 - hawaiianhappysauce
Reply -18 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Are you kidding me, have you ever seen THIS video:
/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI

It's 4 hours worth of video reviews of the prequels and explains why the movies suck
User avatar #82 to #80 - Crusader
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Lemme guess
It's biggest gripes are
Too much CGI
Jar Jar
Based to much of fight scenes
#121 to #82 - samael
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
You forgot that stupid pseudo-biological explanation for the force that ruined the mystery around it.
User avatar #123 to #121 - Crusader
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
That was supposed to be in the original trilogy.
Obi-Wan was supposed to be doing biological research to find a way to to somehow get Force Ghosts bodies' back.
But then they figured the hermit route was going to be better, but Lucas knew that they were going to have that from the beginning, he spent years creating lore behind it all.
User avatar #137 to #123 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
I still think it sound better as a religion.
User avatar #85 to #82 - hawaiianhappysauce
Reply -10 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Nope they make a million good points with why the movie makes no sense.
#127 to #85 - anon id: 63d39c88
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
what's this? a work of fiction not making any sense? well ****, my whole life has been a lie then hasn't it?


gtfo
User avatar #98 to #80 - madjackwack
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
dude, i don't think you understand.

people like the movie, or dislike it because it's OPINION. people who make videos like that are ******* retarded, it's like they're not satisfied with the fact that people enjoy the movie, it's like if someone went round town stopping every person to explain why pop music is crap, but no matter how many hours you spend explaining your point, they will just turn round and say "ok, well i still like it." Opinion is not fact. i like the prequels because they were brutal, had epic as **** scenes, loved the character progression and relevance to the original trilogy.
#84 to #80 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #88 to #84 - hawaiianhappysauce
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Seriously watch the video.
User avatar #87 to #80 - thepandaking
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
I honestly thought those videos were really funny in a dark way. but that's just me.
#73 to #72 - anon id: f07c94e2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
k
#78 to #72 - anon id: 354ee4dc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
I like the prequels better (especially revenge of the sith)
#103 to #72 - LOLinternet
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
#104 to #103 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
This image has expired
ok
#89 to #72 - csmithyo
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
let us date if you are male
let us date if you are male
User avatar #91 to #89 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
not sure if serious
User avatar #184 to #91 - csmithyo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
love it jar jar was one of my favs as a little girl
User avatar #186 to #184 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
i have a jar jar binks piggy bank
User avatar #187 to #186 - csmithyo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
YUUUUUUUS
User avatar #188 to #187 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
and a jar jar coffee thermis
#189 to #188 - csmithyo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
soul mates, its like youre talking dirty haha
soul mates, its like youre talking dirty haha
User avatar #190 to #189 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
messa so happy to speaking to you
#191 to #190 - csmithyo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#192 to #191 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
This image has expired
my wallpaper :3
#193 to #192 - csmithyo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#194 to #193 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
This image has expired
im sorta chubby
User avatar #195 to #194 - csmithyo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
now the internet knows your face
User avatar #196 to #195 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
so ?
User avatar #197 to #196 - csmithyo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
valid point, also my pic is me, and im fairly sure i look older than you...hawks
User avatar #198 to #197 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
im 20 turning 21 in june
User avatar #199 to #198 - csmithyo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
well then i was mistaken
User avatar #200 to #199 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/05/2013) [-]
its ok ^^
User avatar #75 to #72 - thepandaking
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
I didn't mind the prequels either... but... MEESA HATE HOW HARD MASTA JAR JAR CHARACTER TRIED TO PULL OFF THE COMIC RELIEFSA!!!

I just wanted to do a jar jar accent in type.
User avatar #81 to #75 - Crusader
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
i read it in his voice
User avatar #86 to #81 - thepandaking
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
as you should have :p
#39 - sammyjankiis
Reply +35 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
#70 to #39 - evenx
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Oh you!
#18 - Keithazoid
Reply +33 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Okay seriously, what was so bad about the new Star Trek... I thought it was ******* awesome
#26 to #18 - zukowashere
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
It was because they were too lazy to get their facts straight, so they stuck the movie in an alternate universe so there'd be no plot-holes.
It was because they were too lazy to get their facts straight, so they stuck the movie in an alternate universe so there'd be no plot-holes.
#43 to #26 - moshpittmatt **User deleted account**
+5 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #33 to #26 - Mr Ronok
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
theyd better not do that to star wars
User avatar #31 to #26 - vanoreo
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
When you think about it, there are the massive Star Trek faggots who would go through and flip **** over the tiniest of flaws if they had it in the "real" universe.

Then again I have never seen any Star Trek
#36 to #18 - anon id: 46900ea7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Anything "non-canon" is heavily frowned upon.
Alternate reality is a pretty cheesy excuse.

It's like spending decades with a show, only to be told none of that existed. 80 or so episodes, a couple of movies, and poof, none of that happened.

It's not a big deal to me, but obviously the die-hard fans **** themselves.
#56 to #36 - UnoSkullmanx
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
So basically, the movie sucks if you're a fanboy? Gotcha.
User avatar #37 to #18 - taintedangel
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Cus fans bitch at any sort of change from an established medium or storyline.

Examples:
>the new Dvil May Cry
>MegaMan Battle Network
>basically any reboot (good or bad)
#113 to #37 - huntergriff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Don't forget any Halo game...seriously you have no idea how many rustled jimmies there were right after halo 4 was announced.

pic unrelated.
User avatar #143 to #113 - steedawwg **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Halo 4 was ******* awesome, 343 did a great job IMO.
User avatar #175 to #143 - huntergriff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
I'm not saying it wasn't...i'm saying there was a massive ********* that occured prior to the release of the game that intensified in the days before the game came out.
User avatar #176 to #175 - steedawwg **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Oh don't get me wrong, I know you're not. I'm just saying that is was awesome :)
User avatar #177 to #176 - huntergriff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Indeed, by the way, have they said when the title update is supposed to occur? And when the file share is supposed to be up?
User avatar #178 to #177 - steedawwg **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
File share is as we speak my friend, so I think that update happened recently :']
User avatar #179 to #178 - huntergriff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Ah, good.
User avatar #20 to #18 - azraelthemage
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Fanboys just can't get over the fact that someone made a decent Star Trek film in years, and will continue to do so with Into Darkness.
#22 to #20 - mitchimusk
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
I'm just excited to see Benedict Cumberbatch play Kahn
#24 to #22 - azraelthemage
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
As far as Benedict Cumberbatch goes, I can't wait to see him as a ******* DRAGON!!!!
#47 to #22 - anon id: 9c399a00
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
He's not playing Kahn, **********.
#172 to #47 - mitchimusk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Since you know so much, I'm surprised you didn't catch my spelling mistake. It's KHAN, **********
User avatar #25 to #22 - azraelthemage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
And wait, he's gonna be Kahn? I thought he was supposed to be one of his followers.
#171 to #25 - mitchimusk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
You're right. I saw on IMDB that he was playing Khan but it said "rumored" and I looked it up and it said that he isn't. My mistake
#107 - feelythefeel
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Am I the only one that thinks that the prequels get a lot more hate than they deserve? I know they're not as good as the originals, but I think they're fine on their own merits.
#108 to #107 - anon id: 60738608
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
ur retarted.
#109 to #108 - feelythefeel
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
I wasn't aware of that. You learn something every day, I guess.
User avatar #128 to #108 - calawesome
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
So is your spelling.
#135 to #128 - anon id: 60738608
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
you're*
User avatar #138 to #135 - calawesome
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
No it's your. You sir, are retarded.
#181 to #138 - anon id: 60738608
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
retarted*
User avatar #183 to #181 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
seriously, no one can be that stupid.
#185 to #183 - anon id: 60738608
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/04/2013) [-]
noone*
User avatar #148 to #107 - Gandalfthewhite
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
personally i actually really enjoy them. the only thing i don't really like about them is the dude who played Anakin was a terrible actor, but then again i can't really imagine anyone else playing him
#119 to #107 - rawesome
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
The problem with starwars episode 1-3 is that they were made for kids wich pissed off a lot of the people who were kids when episode 4-6 came out.

People were expecting George Lucas to make a movie for the classic starwars fans but instead they ended up with this speech impaired ************.

That also explains why disney has been having such a hard time finding a director, because either you make a movie for the kids or you make a commercial flop that the old school fans will enjoy.
#15 - elmoose **User deleted account**
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
User avatar #19 to #15 - azraelthemage
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Oh please god, make Abrams get rid of the lens flare just this once.
User avatar #29 to #19 - fxremastered
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
You've never seen any of his other works have you? That was the only one with lens flares up the ass.
User avatar #30 to #29 - azraelthemage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
His other movies do have lens flares, but they weren't as bad. Still bothers me though.
User avatar #116 to #30 - huntergriff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
i don't remember cloverfield having lens flare...or lost...or alias...
#32 - Soilwork
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
picture of the cast
#62 to #32 - vanishingpoint
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Chewy...I AM your father
#50 to #32 - kevlarx
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
yoda stich is ******* awesome
User avatar #38 - gammajk
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
Hey.
Even if abrams sucks cock with star wars
at least it isn't george lucas
#131 - SlipknotNine
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(02/02/2013) [-]
You will direct Star Wars Episode VII