yeah, "asexual" in the literal definition means you reproduce by - #82571136 added by danniegurl at Friendzone

#3 - waffies

Reply +108 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Or they're best friends? You know, not in any zone, just friends? Always a possibility.

#212 to #3 - wagastragas

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

what if you found out your partner have been sending sexual pics to others to check if they're atractive to you

#7 to #3 - daniboyi

Reply +222 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

I actually just want to be friends with this girl without any sexual intentions.

#318 to #7 - waffies

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/02/2013) [-]

Your point is valid but also strange. See, I have said that, i'd be miserable if i ever lost her friendship. That doesn't mean my mind doesn't go to sexual things, but they are far from the priority. I could go my whole life without anything sexual happening between me and her and be happy.

Either way, well played my friend

#281 to #7 - thejokermf

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/02/2013) [-]

Actually is me.

#189 to #7 - frodr

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

... I have plenty of attractive friends who I don't see this way at all.

I guess I'm just not a dweeb. :/

#254 to #189 - Enriss

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

So if you were single and they were too and they offered sex you'd say no?

#363 to #254 - frodr

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/04/2013) [-]

Lol. Yeah, actually.

I have plenty of (hot) chick friends who try to get with me at every other party and I usually ignore them or I might make out with them for a bit but I'll stop before anything else.

It's called college. and I'm an attractive guy.

#364 to #363 - Enriss

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/04/2013) [-]

It being college and you being attractive has nothing to do with it. Simple self control is all it is. Though good for you you're able to turn them down. I know I wouldn't.

#191 to #189 - daniboyi

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Joke.
you don't see it.

#195 to #191 - frodr

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

*AHEM*

I have plenty of attractive friends who I don't have any sexual intentions towards.

#199 to #195 - daniboyi

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

#186 to #7 - hankhillofthe

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Or maybe I don't need sex and I'd rather spend my time doing other more productive things.

#188 to #186 - daniboyi

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

#194 to #188 - hankhillofthe

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

*****, I got a big-ass story of my love life on my profile, if you wanna question my sexual orientation.

#198 to #194 - daniboyi

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

#200 to #198 - hankhillofthe

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

#193 to #188 - hankhillofthe

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#135 to #7 - cshp

Reply +9 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

It makes me sad that so many people agree with you.

#176 to #135 - daniboyi

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

#105 to #7 - milthyfoustache

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

What if they are fat and ugly?

#71 to #7 - roarflmao

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Well.. 99% of the time i would agree with this, but sometimes i play different online games with girls i know in my team.. Some of them arent that hot and i still want to be friends with them because i enjoy playing with them

#61 to #7 - Mortuus

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Actually, I've been friends with a girl I met in Elementary school and I have no sexual intentions whatsoever.

#56 to #7 - coolcalx

Reply +33 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

I actually have quite a few female friends that I have no sexual intentions toward.

#122 to #56 - adayasalion

-9 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#184 to #122 - anon id: 7dd8f2b1

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Must suck to still be 13 and think girls are only for *******.

#132 to #122 - coolcalx

Reply +14 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

no, they aren't. I just like them in a purely platonic way

#37 to #7 - anon id: dfc90a04

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

^Edgy, misogynistic ******** detected

#50 to #37 - xatrainx

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

^lesbian detected

#30 to #7 - anon id: 37346491

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

How horny and angsty are you teenagers? Jesus Christ man, I weep for those of you who cannot be friends with a girl without trying to pursue a sexual relationship with her.

#26 to #7 - andywazowski

Reply +14 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Actually i got a friend who is a girl, and i would rather keep my friendship with her than try to have sex with her and possibly ruin it..

#10 to #7 - sheepysquirrel

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

I am not interested in sex at all asexual and I think this all the time.

I am the 1%

Get it..cause...only 1% of the population is ase-...aahh nvm

#128 to #10 - ICEDgrunge

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

I really think you need to find another term for your sexual preference.

#358 to #128 - sheepysquirrel

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/02/2013) [-]

Why?

#361 to #358 - ICEDgrunge

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/02/2013) [-]

In the biological sense of the word it makes no sense at all

#362 to #361 - sheepysquirrel

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/02/2013) [-]

But in the social sense it does. Many words we use today had a completely different meaning before.
Asexuality may not be entirely new, but it is still lesser known and as time goes on people will understand it better.

When I was younger and people would call someone a "hoe" all I could think of was gardening and assumed they were a gardener. As time progressed I learned the meaning and accepted it.

#235 to #128 - danniegurl

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

actually, never mind. that is the correct term.
that used to be the definition, but as "asexuality" has increased, that term was used for having no sexuality as well.

#232 to #128 - danniegurl

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

yeah, "asexual" in the literal definition means you reproduce by yourself.
idk what the real term would be. i'll have to google it.

#234 to #232 - ICEDgrunge

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Yeah, I understand it's one of those "for lack of a better term" Kind of titles, but when you think about it, it's just wrong. I mean there's terms specifically for people who would indiscriminately have sex with a man, then a rooster, but not for people who feel no desire for sex.

#13 to #10 - Maroon

Reply +13 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Being asexual disqualifies you from conversations about sex automatically

#14 to #13 - sheepysquirrel

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

You would be surprised how often people ask me about sex though. I was once even threatened that they would beat me, tie me up, and pay some girl to **** me so I would stop "being a bitch".

#15 to #14 - Maroon

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Yeah, that sounds like something I would say. I don't even understand how one would function without a sex drive.

#16 to #15 - sheepysquirrel

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

The same as anyone else.
To me, thinking you NEED sex is pathetic.
I am also anti-sexual and am personally disgusted by sex but I understand why people want it.
Also I view it as masturbation with a foreign object.

#220 to #16 - yuniponi

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

"masturbation with a foreign object"
never considered it that way,
I like it. have my thumb!

#360 to #220 - sheepysquirrel

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/02/2013) [-]

Gotta think outside the box.

#124 to #16 - junkiegirl

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

have you ever had sex?

#359 to #124 - sheepysquirrel

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/02/2013) [-]

Nope, and I hope I never do.

"Oh but sheep you don't know until you have it"
Well I don't know if dog tastes good until I taste it but that isn't going to happen anytime soon either.

in case you were wondering that is how the next two comments would go usually that is why I put one in quotations, it would be your response followed by mine

#17 to #16 - Maroon

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

I'm not saying "need"

But, ultimately, the desire to have sex is what fuels a species so to not have desire for it is just odd, not just from a social perspective but from an evolutionary perspective as well.

#18 to #17 - sheepysquirrel

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Not in present day times.
The desire was important back in the day when there were oh so little people. But today we have billions, to feel the need to create more is only necessary for a few million of us to continue to thrive as a species.
That same argument has been used against gay sex as well.
But for each person they only need to pump out 1 child and some pump out 2 or more so it evens out.

#19 to #18 - Maroon

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Oh, I'm not arguing against it. Just wondering how that would get written into genetic code when anyone who has it would not procreate.

#20 to #19 - sheepysquirrel

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Being asexual doesn't mean you WON'T procreate, it just means you don't feel the need to have sex for pleasure. I would probably have sex if I actually felt an attraction to someone and wanted a child. But that is it.

#21 to #20 - Maroon

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

>"I am also anti-sexual and am personally disgusted by sex but I understand why people want it. "

?

#22 to #21 - sheepysquirrel

Reply +10 123456789123345869

(02/01/2013) [-]

Just because you are disgusted by something does not mean you wouldn't do it if you had to.
Some people are disgusted by public restrooms but use them in situations that call for it.