Upload
Login or register
Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
12 comments displayed.
#12 - Milvath
Reply -3
(02/01/2013) [-]
But Stalin defeated the Germans meanwhile the germans were *********** british in France
#29 to #12 - zekest
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Well, the russians COULD lose the war without the allies, but they were supporting them first with leand-lease thing and then, with bombing factories and other ****, but invasion was completly useless, russians were already in Poland + allies had troops in Italy, maybe crossing Alps were too difficult..
#30 to #29 - zekest
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
*was
#13 to #12 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
No.. just no....
#14 to #13 - Milvath
Reply -3
(02/01/2013) [-]
please do show me how wrong I am, the russians were the first to reach into Berlin, when the Americans and British got into Berlin it was mostly cleared by Russians, Stalin won World War II by himself (and vodka)
#20 to #14 - pyrothermal ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
I'm guessing, among other things, you're forgetting the ENTIRE PACIFIC THEATRE.
#21 to #20 - Milvath
Reply -3
(02/01/2013) [-]
United States, Japan, and China? United States was advancing too quickly into Japan
#16 to #14 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
I meant by the "germans *********** british" by then they'd actually started pushing them back.
#17 to #16 - Milvath
Reply -3
(02/01/2013) [-]
nah, they kept forward, even though lots and lots of them died (D-day for example, on the 3 beaches)
#24 to #17 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Please actually go and research this ****. Second hand knowledge from your father is bias and incorrect.
#31 to #24 - Milvath
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
lol implying I'm a drop out like you, pfft, History books, son, my dad never told me **** about World War II
#19 to #17 - craigdavid
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
yeah i mean its not like britain who had spent the last 20 years at peace would havea disadvnatage against a country 3 times the size of us who had been preparing for war for at least a decade