Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #12 - Milvath (02/01/2013) [-]
But Stalin defeated the Germans meanwhile the germans were *********** british in France
#29 to #12 - zekest (02/01/2013) [-]
Well, the russians COULD lose the war without the allies, but they were supporting them first with leand-lease thing and then, with bombing factories and other **** , but invasion was completly useless, russians were already in Poland + allies had troops in Italy, maybe crossing Alps were too difficult..
#30 to #29 - zekest (02/01/2013) [-]
#13 to #12 - fefe (02/01/2013) [-]
No.. just no....
User avatar #14 to #13 - Milvath (02/01/2013) [-]
please do show me how wrong I am, the russians were the first to reach into Berlin, when the Americans and British got into Berlin it was mostly cleared by Russians, Stalin won World War II by himself (and vodka)
User avatar #20 to #14 - pyrothermal (02/01/2013) [-]
I'm guessing, among other things, you're forgetting the ENTIRE PACIFIC THEATRE.
User avatar #21 to #20 - Milvath (02/01/2013) [-]
United States, Japan, and China? United States was advancing too quickly into Japan
#16 to #14 - fefe (02/01/2013) [-]
I meant by the "germans *********** british" by then they'd actually started pushing them back.
User avatar #17 to #16 - Milvath (02/01/2013) [-]
nah, they kept forward, even though lots and lots of them died (D-day for example, on the 3 beaches)
#24 to #17 - fefe (02/01/2013) [-]
Please actually go and research this **** . Second hand knowledge from your father is bias and incorrect.
User avatar #31 to #24 - Milvath (02/02/2013) [-]
lol implying I'm a drop out like you, pfft, History books, son, my dad never told me **** about World War II
#19 to #17 - craigdavid (02/01/2013) [-]
yeah i mean its not like britain who had spent the last 20 years at peace would havea disadvnatage against a country 3 times the size of us who had been preparing for war for at least a decade
 Friends (0)