Finally found square root. took me ages. Swag
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (101)
[ 101 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
68 comments displayed.
#3 - pyra
Reply +96
(01/31/2013) [-]
#67 to #3 - gavinchase
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
I radicant understand this.
#41 to #3 - theblowtorch
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
I don't think anybody can see them together....But lets just use our imaginations
#43 to #3 - youngduece
Reply +2
(02/01/2013) [-]
i is the answer to all of your problems

i= √ -1
#13 to #3 - awesomenessdefined
Reply +17
(02/01/2013) [-]
Get real.
#30 to #13 - garymotherfinoak
Reply +5
(02/01/2013) [-]
Be rational.
#1 - wethepixeltrade
Reply +72
(01/31/2013) [-]
I 1 up your square root.
#58 to #1 - departed
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
Here's a square log.
#18 to #1 - ritzrules
Reply +9
(02/01/2013) [-]
there is no post more appropriate for this picture. you win the internet.
#12 - shashashanasha
Reply +45
(02/01/2013) [-]
Why did the tree have a square root?
Because it was a Geometree

Haha get it? Geometry? Please don't kill me
#21 to #12 - joeledo
Reply +18
(02/01/2013) [-]
here, take this. Good joke though
here, take this. Good joke though
#48 to #21 - raigen
Reply +13
(02/01/2013) [-]
take this too.
take this too.
#50 to #48 - raigen
Reply +14
(02/01/2013) [-]
And this...
And this...
#52 to #50 - raigen
Reply +14
(02/01/2013) [-]
And annother one.
And annother one.
#53 to #52 - raigen
Reply +16
(02/01/2013) [-]
I think he's broken...
I think he's broken...
#57 to #53 - secondlawprevails
Reply +4
(02/01/2013) [-]
Listening to metal while watching this. Oh lawd......
Listening to metal while watching this. Oh lawd......
#72 to #57 - tenthdivine
Reply +4
(02/01/2013) [-]
because of metal
because of metal
#59 to #57 - raigen
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Sounds fun, this is my kinda metal.
'I like my weapons like I like my music, heavy, and metal...'
#9 - JMF
Reply +31
(01/31/2013) [-]
False. That is a rectangle.
#10 to #9 - weirdvintagegirl
-10
has deleted their comment [-]
#11 to #10 - rhomboidmonk
Reply +37
(02/01/2013) [-]
False. A square is a type of rectangle.
#54 to #11 - andycrbtr
Reply +2
(02/01/2013) [-]
but a rectangle is not a square
#45 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Your false part is incorrect. Your logic is flawed. It is true that a square is a type of rectangle, but based on the specific rectangle in the picture it is not a square.
#19 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
no. He is right. rectangle is a type of square.
#15 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
#14 to #11 - weirdvintagegirl
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#33 to #11 - danniegurl
Reply -2
(02/01/2013) [-]
squares are rectangles, but rectangles are not necessarily squares.
rectangle is any quadrilateral with parallel sides with 90 degree angles.
a square must also have these qualities, while also having sides of equal length.
#99 to #33 - JMF
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Rectangles are never squares, because being defined as a rectangle means that it can not meet the requirements needed to be defined as a square, where as a square can be defined as itself and meet the requirements needed to be defined as a rectangle.
#101 to #99 - danniegurl
Reply -2
(02/01/2013) [-]
exactly what i said. it's kind of like saying all anglo-saxons are white people, but not all white people are anglo-saxons.
squares are a type of rectangle, so they can be defined as both a rectangle and square. in this case, and this case alone, a rectangle is a square.
otherwise, they are just rectangles.
rectangles can be squares, but only when the sides are equal.
#103 to #101 - JMF
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
A rectangle can never be a square. What you are saying is that rectangles can be squares if their sides are equal, but if their sides are equal, then it is defined as a square, not a rectangle. Are you saying that since squares are rectangles, a rectangle can be a square? I'm a bit confused.
#104 to #103 - JMF
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
At least, that was the impression that I was under.
#106 to #103 - danniegurl
Reply -2
(02/02/2013) [-]
no! did you read nothing i wrote? i said a rectangle can be defined as a square only when it qualifies as a square. a square is a type of rectangle. as i said, all other rectangles are just rectangles alone.
a rectangle definitely can be a square. as long as its angles are 90 degrees and the sides are parallel, it is a rectangle. but it is a square and a rectangle if the sides are also equal.
did you not read my comparison at all?
here, i'll make another one.
all oranges are fruits, but not all fruits are oranges.
all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares.
#22 to #11 - doodogger
Reply -3
(02/01/2013) [-]
You dumb asses. Squares and rectangles are different types of quadrilaterals.
#25 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Geometry lesson for today.
Squares = quadrilateral (4 sided figure) with equal sides and angles (90° angles)
Rectangles = quadrilateral with equal angles (has to be 90°, again)
Rhombus = quadrilateral with equal sides.
A square is a rectangle and a rhombus put together, and not vise versa.

tl;dr you're wrong
#98 to #25 - JMF
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Good ****, Anon.
#17 - derpyhuman ONLINE
Reply +22
(02/01/2013) [-]
That's a rectangle.
#46 to #17 - tornwingsofangels
Reply -1
(02/01/2013) [-]
so we're fighting over quadrilaterals now?
#20 to #17 - cannabinoid
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
not exactly, more of a rhombus root
#85 to #17 - viicstaar
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
A square is a type of rectangle.
#34 to #17 - CapnInterwebz
Reply +2
(02/01/2013) [-]
A square is a type of rectangle
#36 to #34 - hecticsilence
Reply +8
(02/01/2013) [-]
But not every rectangle is a square ya ****
#71 to #36 - habigan
Reply -1
(02/01/2013) [-]
Shouldn't it technically be called a rhomboid or rhombus?
#102 to #71 - hecticsilence
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
I wasn't commenting on the shape of the root, I honestly couldn't care less, I was just correcting the other guy.
#105 to #102 - habigan
Reply -1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Sorry, I was just trying to add some mother ******* intelligence to a pointless conversation
#107 to #105 - hecticsilence
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
Oh everyone watch out! Einstein is here to add some "mother ******* intelligence." It's funny junk, you don't need to be the smart guy.
#47 to #36 - crazyoljew
Reply -2
(02/01/2013) [-]
Jumping on the bandwagon is fun
#56 to #47 - hecticsilence
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
It's just continuing the joke, it's not a bandwagon thing.
#24 to #17 - merrymarvelite
Reply +9
(02/01/2013) [-]
If you look closely, it seems not all angles are 90 degrees.   
   
Furthermore, while the top and bottom sides appear parallel, the right side does not appear to be parallel to the left.   
   
Ergo, this is a trapezoid at best.   
   
(Possibly a parallelogram if the right and left sides are indeed parallel.)
If you look closely, it seems not all angles are 90 degrees.

Furthermore, while the top and bottom sides appear parallel, the right side does not appear to be parallel to the left.

Ergo, this is a trapezoid at best.

(Possibly a parallelogram if the right and left sides are indeed parallel.)
#40 to #24 - derpyhuman ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#32 - residentevilfan
Reply +8
(02/01/2013) [-]
now find x
#82 to #32 - spanishninja
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
nerd ********* incoming.
#35 to #32 - flixoe
Reply +18
(02/01/2013) [-]
#37 to #35 - fuperbooper
Reply -11
(02/01/2013) [-]
4^2+3^2=25
x=25
#55 to #37 - ooants
Reply +6
(02/01/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#38 to #37 - flixoe
Reply -2
(02/01/2013) [-]
4^2+3^2=x^2
16+9=x^2
25=x^2
x= {+5, -5}

If you want to be fully technical with me.
#60 to #38 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
The side of a triangle cannot be "-5".

The answer is 5.
#62 to #60 - flixoe
Reply -1
(02/01/2013) [-]
That's why I said technical ******* anon. And yes, negative lengths exist as an idea.
#39 to #38 - fuperbooper
Reply -3
(02/01/2013) [-]
****, I forgot to square the 25.
****.
#70 to #39 - tenthdivine
Reply +6
(02/01/2013) [-]
#69 to #39 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
"****, I forgot to 'square root' the 25"
#42 - thenipplenator
Reply +12
(02/01/2013) [-]
That's a rectangle.
#6 - shamrockbandit
Reply +12
(01/31/2013) [-]
Would that mean that hoverhand is the real-world equivalent of asymptotes?
#79 to #6 - XboxJunky
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
She looks familiar...
#74 - bannak
Reply +7
(02/01/2013) [-]
That's a rectangle!
That's a rectangle!
#2 - dnalien
Reply +5
(01/31/2013) [-]
not a square root... it is not square, but rectangular
#5 to #2 - reyden
Reply +5
(01/31/2013) [-]
a square is a rectangle.
#7 to #5 - EjPzycho
Reply +6
(01/31/2013) [-]
But a rectangle is not a square.