Right wing reason #373. Not wanting to make any political statements, just thought the scenario with that assumption was funny. Not trying to start an argument
x
Click to expand

Right wing reason #373

Right wing reason #373. Not wanting to make any political statements, just thought the scenario with that assumption was funny. Not trying to start an argument

Not wanting to make any political statements, just thought the scenario with that assumption was funny. Not trying to start an argument on whether or not that assumption is accurate or correct.

  • Recommend tagsx
+1442
Views: 42481
Favorited: 71
Submitted: 01/28/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to brigettasandra submit to reddit

Comments(155):

[ 155 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #7 - mads (01/28/2013) [-]
I have seen nothing more vicious than a pissed off gay guy. I mean they have the cattyness of a woman and the natural strength of a man, That is not a mix I want to piss off.
User avatar #39 to #7 - recoveryone (01/28/2013) [-]
Lies, the only thing worst then a pissed off gay guy is a pissed off lesbian. On that time of the month.
#8 to #7 - autoxx (01/28/2013) [-]
My buddy is a cop and told me that the most ****** up murders are usually gay on gay.
The ones that he stabbed his boyfriend >500 tims or she ran over her girlfriend until there was nothing but mush.

Something isn't quite right there...
#10 to #8 - anon (01/28/2013) [-]
Maybe homosexuals are more mentally unstable due to being shunned by society.
#11 to #10 - autoxx (01/28/2013) [-]
Distinct possibility but imagine the rage it would take to stab someone for hours and hours, until there was nothing recognizable and you could no longer lift your arms.
User avatar #19 to #11 - Petroleum ONLINE (01/28/2013) [-]
I get that rage from yolofags and swagfags on Facebook. It's not that hard.
#20 to #19 - autoxx (01/28/2013) [-]
I never get that rage, why get upset about something that doesn't affect you?
User avatar #21 to #20 - Petroleum ONLINE (01/28/2013) [-]
Because it's detrimental to society. Y'know, like how fundamentalists see gay people.
#23 to #21 - autoxx (01/28/2013) [-]
I don't see any reason to care if someone is gay or not.
It doesn't effect me, unless two guys are slobbering all over one another.
Don't know why it makes me queasy, two girls doing the same thing doesn't bother me at all...
User avatar #25 to #23 - Petroleum ONLINE (01/28/2013) [-]
Because society has taught you that gay men are wrong. They have told you that it is wrong for two men to be making out or to love each other. And to be honest, it's retarded.
#38 to #25 - comehonorfacetwice (01/28/2013) [-]
Everybody knows the men are attracted to lesbians and women are not attracted to gays. I think of it this way: Lesbians are women doing girly things, gays are men doing girly things. I think it goes somewhat the same for this.

You frequently see girls kiss each other either on the cheek or in porn. However, only gay men watch gay porn (that I know of). So not only is it 2 men doing the opposite of what society dictates (manly things), its something that most of society has little experience dealing with.
#48 to #38 - anon (01/28/2013) [-]
Don't mind me, just trying to share my position on the issue of who watches what porn. I hope everyone has a nice day.
#44 to #38 - anon (01/28/2013) [-]
All the girls I know, including myself, prefer to watch gay porn because it is much more sensual and erotic than straight porn. Straight porn is made for straight men only. I hate straight porn because the women are so fake looking and acting, and seeing a woman beg for the privilege of having a man cum on her face and tits is disgusting to me. gay porn is made for gay men and women. Straight porn is made for straight men. Yaoi is made mostly for women and it is basically just gay porn in manga/anime style.

From the gay Pornography Wikipedia page:
"gay pornography is the representation of sexual intercourse between males. Its primary goal is sexual arousal in its audience. Softcore gay pornography also exists, at one time constituted the genre, and may be produced ambiguously for both heterosexual female and homosexual male consumption."

"In August 2005, adult star Jenna Jameson launched "Club Thrust", an interactive website featuring gay male pornographic videos, which was shown to attract a female audience as well.[21][22] Yaoi comic books and slash fiction are both genres featuring gay men, but primarily written by and for straight women. Some lesbian and bisexual women are also fans of gay male pornography, specifically yaoi, for its feminine-styled men"

en.wikipedia . org/wiki/gay_pornography
#56 to #44 - comehonorfacetwice (01/29/2013) [-]
Anon, I was unclear and I apologize. By gay porn, I meant male on male porn only. And by "However, only gay men watch gay porn" I meant emphasis on gay, not men. I know many straight women watch gay porn by its actual definition, as do many men (meaning girl on girl or male or on male).
#42 to #38 - autoxx (01/28/2013) [-]
Makes sense to me. Petroleum (jelly?) has got the wrong idea about the way I personally think.
Like I said, I don't care if you are gay, straight, or hispanic. All that matters is the way to treat others, I personally don't like being preached to so I don't care for vegans.
Nothing against their beliefs, just keep them to yourself.
User avatar #43 to #42 - Petroleum ONLINE (01/28/2013) [-]
My apologies, it seemed to me you were against gay people in your previous comment.
#45 to #43 - autoxx (01/28/2013) [-]
Not at all, the first gay guy I met was at a friend's place, once I figured out that gay guys don't hit on all men (like straight guys hit on all women ;) then we got along fine.
I still wouldn't pass out around him but I wouldn't pass out around some of my other friends either :P
#71 to #7 - jellyballs (01/29/2013) [-]
I have never been more hurt/insulted then when I got in an argument with a gay guy. I mean a fellow waitress even tried to warn me, but I was foolish and blundered into the painfully orchestrated insults labeling every last one of my physical defects. Before that I had everything a beautiful wife, gorgeous kids, and a happy home. This happened 7 months ago to the day. I still have not recovered from the mentally shattering hell that this one vicious gay man unleashed on me with one limp wristed wave of his hand.
I have never been more hurt/insulted then when I got in an argument with a gay guy. I mean a fellow waitress even tried to warn me, but I was foolish and blundered into the painfully orchestrated insults labeling every last one of my physical defects. Before that I had everything a beautiful wife, gorgeous kids, and a happy home. This happened 7 months ago to the day. I still have not recovered from the mentally shattering hell that this one vicious gay man unleashed on me with one limp wristed wave of his hand.
User avatar #1 - Zarke (01/28/2013) [-]
gay men wouldn't want to shoot men.
So straight men shouldn't want to shoot women.
Women wouldn't want to shoot men.
Most soldiers are men.
So therefore, the entire army should be lesbian.
User avatar #12 to #1 - awesomenessdefined (01/28/2013) [-]
Or men.
User avatar #4 to #1 - whosaidwut (01/28/2013) [-]
no... pms'ing women will shoot men

so clearly our supersoldier programs should be pms'ing lesbians with roid rage
#18 to #4 - albinoman (01/28/2013) [-]
Semi relevant.
#3 - nyj (01/28/2013) [-]
User avatar #31 to #3 - anonymouzx (01/28/2013) [-]
I'm not against abortion.
User avatar #65 to #3 - garvielxloken (01/29/2013) [-]
Ready for the red thumbs here, but I really can't bring myself to believe that a person is born 100% gay as can be. I do believe that a person can be born with a natural inclination to like people of their own sex in a romantic way, but I still believe that the "nurture" part of it is extremely important too.

Regardless of that though, I would fight for a gay baby to be born just like I would a straight baby, because there's no real difference. They're both individuals that should have the right to life, regardless of orientation or genetic make-up.
User avatar #78 to #3 - CapnInterwebz (01/29/2013) [-]
no reason not to, i don't see why sexuality has to do with anything
#139 to #3 - anon (01/29/2013) [-]
Eventually, they will just start blaming the straight people for having gay babies.
User avatar #26 to #3 - itsallinthefunny (01/28/2013) [-]
So I think being gay isn't a choice but you are also not born with it. I think like if if you have gay parents you are more likely to end up gay or if like lets say the the bible said being gay was a good thing and being straight was bad there would be a lot more gay people so I think you sexuality is a mental thing just like if you don't like a certain food. Genes don't define what you find delicious or not.
User avatar #28 to #26 - itsallinthefunny (01/28/2013) [-]
also just so ya know I am not homophobic in anyway I'm friends with two gay people actually and they're both actually pretty cool
User avatar #86 to #3 - trojanmannn (01/29/2013) [-]
just because you don't believe men should marry men and women to marry men doesn't mean you don't want it to live. The current gay rights argument isn't really a discrimination thing, at least I don't think so. Like we don't have different bathrooms for gays. Only radically radical christians believe in that. I think the argument currently is whether you believe marriage should be opened to gays (the military argument is long gone.)
User avatar #88 to #86 - ugottanked (01/29/2013) [-]
i believe gay marriage should be everywhere, i mean why not just let people love who they want?

and yes this is a christian saying this, and no i dont think its wrong. i think that love comes from everywhere, it can drive people to do amazing things. love encircles this world of ours, and im glad it does.
User avatar #89 to #88 - trojanmannn (01/29/2013) [-]
preventing people from getting married won't stop them from loving each other. I think we should have something just like marriage with the same benefits (gays are happy) and not call it marriage (anti-SSM are happy.)
User avatar #91 to #89 - ugottanked (01/29/2013) [-]
i honestly hope there will be something that makes both groups happy
User avatar #92 to #91 - trojanmannn (01/29/2013) [-]
I like making people happy
User avatar #95 to #92 - ugottanked (01/29/2013) [-]
same here :3

its a very gratifying feeling, brightening someones day
#101 to #3 - hillbillypowpow ONLINE (01/29/2013) [-]
that doesn't really mean much considering the kind of person that is adresssing probably also has the 'being gay is a choice' mindset.
User avatar #24 to #3 - allamericandude (01/28/2013) [-]
That kinda lumps all the anti-abortion people with the anti-gay rights people, which is sort of unfair.

I mean, it's perfectly possible to be anti-abortion AND pro-gay rights. Politics isn't black and white. And there are plenty of non-religious reasons to oppose abortion.
+2
#34 to #24 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #27 to #24 - nyj (01/28/2013) [-]
Heh. With a name like allamericandude, I expected an idiotic conservative comment. You surprised me.
User avatar #30 to #27 - allamericandude (01/28/2013) [-]
Oh, wait wait wait... I didn't read that "You surprised me" bit. Sorry.
User avatar #29 to #27 - allamericandude (01/28/2013) [-]
Wait what? Now THAT'S unfair. You don't even know me!
User avatar #32 to #27 - allamericandude (01/28/2013) [-]
But still, you shouldn't lump Americans together like that. Or anyone for that matter. It's hypocritical.
User avatar #129 to #27 - rokkarokkaali (01/29/2013) [-]
Is it customary of you to get top comment and in one reply to someone else get red thumbs? This has happened a few posts back as well.
#46 - MCPO (01/28/2013) [-]
That room clear was just fabulous!
+7
#9 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#13 - drainbramage (01/28/2013) [-]
I saw this on a card about 7 years ago, I didn't realise this was a political point.
#111 - deathrinder (01/29/2013) [-]
By god hes right.
#110 - sirgawain (01/29/2013) [-]
Ignoring the description, this is not how all right-wing people view this issue. It's just a stereotype, just like the one this cartoon claims right-wingers have against gays.   
GIF because Carlton.
Ignoring the description, this is not how all right-wing people view this issue. It's just a stereotype, just like the one this cartoon claims right-wingers have against gays.
GIF because Carlton.
User avatar #130 to #110 - brettd (01/29/2013) [-]
I am a conservative that is all for gay marriage and gay members of the military.
#33 - felixjarl ONLINE (01/28/2013) [-]
This image has expired
The Sacred Band of Thebes was a troop of picked soldiers, consisting of 150 pairs of male lovers which formed the elite force of the Theban army in the 4th century BC.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Band_of_Thebes

Why gays should be allowed in the army, they will fight like wild beasts for those they love.
User avatar #36 to #33 - splitpeasoup (01/28/2013) [-]
their camps would look FABULOUS !
#37 to #36 - felixjarl ONLINE (01/28/2013) [-]
This image has expired
That was not common gays, those were master gays!
#50 to #33 - tehjman (01/29/2013) [-]
But...but I'd fight like a while beast for MY loved ones, and I'm straight. I must an aberration. /sarcasm

I get what you're saying and support gay rights in the military, but it sounds like you're implying homosexual love is stronger than heterosexual love.
#53 to #50 - felixjarl ONLINE (01/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Not implying that at all, all i am implying is that those bonded with love fight harder than those bonded only by comradeship.
User avatar #51 to #50 - tehjman (01/29/2013) [-]
wild*
User avatar #80 - reican (01/29/2013) [-]
In other words, if a super hot girl is an enemy sniper, all countersnipers would be killed as they couldn't shoot her for the same reasons
User avatar #52 - funnyjunktitan (01/29/2013) [-]
Reason gays should be in the military

Captain Jack Harkness
#47 - pepemex (01/28/2013) [-]
How can you trust gays to fight and live and shower with you if they'll try to **** you in the ass as soon as you turn your back on them?
User avatar #49 to #47 - Marker (01/28/2013) [-]
I was about to rant, then the comment pic loaded.
User avatar #62 to #49 - emmyizme (01/29/2013) [-]
Damnit, I had already thumbed it down before I read what you said. Had to go back, saw the picture, retracted my thumb.
#16 - bobodevetjedan (01/28/2013) [-]
Stunning
#54 to #16 - jcjohnson (01/29/2013) [-]
Gems are truly truly truly outrageous.
User avatar #136 - themaaster (01/29/2013) [-]
I'm getting real tired of this Left wing, Right wing ******** . All it does is divide people and cause discourse. Honestly if we didn't do all of this grouping and other ******** we might be able to come up with a ******* result.
#148 to #136 - vonspyder (01/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Word my brother.
#153 to #148 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
YAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAY NO TO STATISM, YES TO WEEEEEED

4/20
#154 to #153 - vonspyder (01/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I just felt this country needed a Big Johnson instead of the usual pricks we get in the white house.
#152 to #136 - wheresthefudge (01/29/2013) [-]
Sooo... discourse is a bad thing now?
#157 to #152 - harleyzone (01/29/2013) [-]
I think he means discord?
User avatar #160 to #157 - themaaster (01/29/2013) [-]
Yeah that one. Thanks for correcting me.
#161 to #160 - harleyzone (01/29/2013) [-]
Nein problem
#102 - Kellanved (01/29/2013) [-]
So much butthurt in the comments....
User avatar #140 to #102 - rokkarokkaali (01/29/2013) [-]
Everyone in the comments must be gay. Geddit?
User avatar #147 - kingmarston (01/29/2013) [-]
I honestly don't see what was wrong with don't ask don't tell. That stuff doesn't need to be mentioned on the battlefield.
#156 to #147 - harleyzone (01/29/2013) [-]
it was because if someone outed you you could get dishonorably discharged for being gay. but I agree, keep your intimate stuff like that under wraps, you really shouldn't have relations or anything with other enlisted people, from what I've been told it's always a bad idea
#142 - pagastan (01/29/2013) [-]
...but you need two wings to fly (pic barely related)
User avatar #158 to #142 - gmarrox (01/29/2013) [-]
Anybody uh



Anybody got this without the bird?
User avatar #113 - badsamaritan ONLINE (01/29/2013) [-]
The only things republicans ever told me about the hole Anti-gay in war stuff is that basically we are fighting cultures that kill people just for being accused gay. They do that **** right on the spot too..
Basically its more of a protection issue. in there eyes
User avatar #114 to #113 - badsamaritan ONLINE (01/29/2013) [-]
their*
User avatar #128 to #113 - demandsgayversion (01/29/2013) [-]
I like this.
User avatar #55 - garvielxloken (01/29/2013) [-]
I'm sorry but I couldn't deal with a flamboyantly gay person in the middle of a fire-fight. Can you imagine someone with a really, really "gay" sounding voice calling things out like "Reloading" or "Cover me!" while bullets are whizzing passed your head? Well I mean I know all of you could, but I just couldn't. I'd probably be on the ground laughing hysterically and getting shot repeatedly by camel jockies and the like. I mean just imagining that is making me giggle like a little girl right now.

I really don't know why, but whenever I think "gay" I just automatically think of Mr. Garrison, or Brian's cousin. That's what makes it so difficult for me to take the thought of gay people in the military seriously.
#57 to #55 - anon (01/29/2013) [-]
They may be gay, but you're a faggot.
User avatar #58 to #57 - garvielxloken (01/29/2013) [-]
Wow, screw you too then dude. I admitted to my own flaw. I didn't even say anything along the lines of "I don't like gay people". You're a prick.
#74 to #58 - anon (01/29/2013) [-]
Another anonfag responding to your easy anger. Dude, if you can't take a simple insult like that, and over the internet too..you should just kill yourself, :)
User avatar #76 to #74 - garvielxloken (01/29/2013) [-]
Yeah, sure! Just post the video of you doing it first

I'll be RIGHT behind you!
#132 to #76 - anon (01/29/2013) [-]
Lol you so badass with that comeback. Try harder next time, and perhaps...don't be twelve. Look at your +1 thumb, another sad kid with no self-esteem wants to kill himself with you, join him. You're the quintessence of all things bad about low self-esteem on the internet, why aren't you dead yet. Why didn't your parents abandon you when they saw you were an emo kid with no friends or happy emotions, or an even better question; why didn't they kill you at birth, God predicted to them you would be a worthless child, and thus fated you to die via suicide or your parents killing you. Either way, keep on not enjoying life. :)
User avatar #82 to #55 - garvielxloken (01/29/2013) [-]
I really don't get why i'm being thumbed down for this. But whatever.
#83 to #82 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
welcome to funnyjunk, douche garofalo will be your guide.
User avatar #97 to #82 - nogphille (01/29/2013) [-]
because it's stereotypical.. most gay men aren't more feminine than straight males..

those that are just stand out a lot more.
User avatar #99 to #97 - garvielxloken (01/29/2013) [-]
I never said they were?
User avatar #105 to #99 - nogphille (01/29/2013) [-]
>I really don't know why, but whenever I think "gay" I just automatically think of Mr. Garrison, or Brian's cousin.

i think that's the cause for all the red thumbs..
User avatar #107 to #105 - garvielxloken (01/29/2013) [-]
Damn. Well it sucks that people can't take a joke. Oh well.
User avatar #59 to #55 - superunclesam (01/29/2013) [-]
I am straight but I have an excellent flamboyant gay voice. If I ever joing the army I'll be sure to use that whenever I get into a firefight.
User avatar #69 to #59 - nogphille (01/29/2013) [-]
'let's outflank them, boys. they're vulnerable in the rear.'
User avatar #70 to #69 - superunclesam (01/29/2013) [-]
"so am I sarge *wink*"
"Shut the **** up Johnson!"
User avatar #72 to #70 - nogphille (01/29/2013) [-]
"oh i'm so done with this war, i'm getting sand EVERYWHERE.
let's hit the showers *wink*"

(last comment i'm going to make as it's beginning to feel too much like cybering)
User avatar #94 to #72 - bokkos (01/29/2013) [-]
These fatigues are FAAAAAAABULOUSSSS
User avatar #61 to #59 - garvielxloken (01/29/2013) [-]
Do it man, that would be ******* hilarious. I can do a pretty good flamboyant voice too, but i'm not in the military or anything so I can't try it out, lmao... If you do it.. Post results xDD
User avatar #63 to #61 - superunclesam (01/29/2013) [-]
I don't know, getting your whole squad laughing they're asses off mid fire fight may have some bad results. I could also taunt the enemy with it though. As if they weren't mad enough already, now they have what they perceive as a gay dude calling them cock eating faggots.
User avatar #66 to #63 - garvielxloken (01/29/2013) [-]
Oh my God, I would love to see the look on some terrorist ******** face when they hear a supposedly gay guy screaming profanity at them. Learn how to insult them in arabic, and you've got the recipe for a fruitless "Allahu Ackbar" charge that will only result in dead hajjis and a happy squad of American soldiers xDD
[ 155 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)