Facebook (14). . Wednesday at 7: -we ' dlt 299. Are people actually bothered by girls dressing this way? Have you all grown old fashioned and prude before your time? Or are you angry that these are the girls  Facebook (14) Wednesday at 7: -we ' dlt 299 Are people actually bothered by girls dressing this way? Have you all grown old fashioned and prude before your time? Or are angry that these the
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (127)
[ 127 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #6 - haydn
Reply +130 123456789123345869
(01/27/2013) [-]
Are people actually bothered by girls dressing this way? Have you all grown old fashioned and prude before your time? Or are you angry that these are the girls that reject you? Food for thought.
#24 to #6 - anon id: 74272886
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
...cool story liberal
User avatar #51 to #6 - joemand
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
Why yes actually. You went from classy and strong to "give me attention cuz I'm wearing a whores uniform".

User avatar #68 to #6 - sammyjankiis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
No sluts are a menace to society. You cant deny that,
User avatar #73 to #6 - anonymoose
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
I for one, like it.
#85 to #6 - anon id: 4e071bd5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
"Chivalry is dead, and women killed it" - Dave Chappelle

If girls don't act or present themselves lady-like, they won't be respected as much.
Personally I don't like how women dress, showing as much of their body as they can without getting in trouble.
I'm a kind guy and want to treat others right regardless of their gender, but it's hard to treat a girl as a lady if they don't present themselves in a way that deserves to be treated like a lady.

Think about how strange it actually is, showing off your breasts, wearing skirts barely larger than underwear.... It's weird, but somehow it became acceptable. No matter how good of a body such a girl might have, I truly wouldn't want to be with them.
#97 to #6 - veryinteresting
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
I think it looks awful, and its basically a "my vagina is open" sign.
#98 to #6 - jgk **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#99 to #6 - dtanobo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
Perhaps you haven't really seen these girls in public. They're idiotic, loud, in your face and ill-mannered. But don't think it doesn't count for men too. I've seen my gender slowly betray me as the years progress. In the end, the bimbos will hang with the douchebags, so I don't see what the big problem is. We don't have to be with them
User avatar #100 to #6 - supermegasherman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
i think its more the hippocracy of it. "we're women so we need rights so we can free ourselves from objective men" then proceed to use these freedoms to objectify themselves in the form of slutty clothing
User avatar #29 to #6 - loomiss
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
Exactly, they sit here and judge them because they know these girls are attractive and they wouldn't have a chance with them.
#80 to #6 - EdwardNigma
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
I prefer old fashioned things, ***** classier and nicer looking.

That and, all girls reject me.
User avatar #83 to #6 - steedawwg **User deleted account**
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
I get rejected either way.
#52 to #6 - Gonnafly
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
Its not the way they dress its the way they act
Its not the way they dress its the way they act
User avatar #47 to #6 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
I don't mind girls dressing like that, I just wouldn't date one of them (******* them is a whole nother story) I prefer someone a little more, womanly, I guess you could say.
User avatar #13 to #6 - nlogax
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
Yes.
#10 - thecurlysage
Reply +115 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
>implying every girl wears minimal clothes now   
>implying every girl back then dressed with class   
i'm sorry op but you're comparing apples to oranges
>implying every girl wears minimal clothes now
>implying every girl back then dressed with class
i'm sorry op but you're comparing apples to oranges
#106 to #10 - Seventeen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
User avatar #45 to #10 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
The ratio changed though, significantly.
#14 to #10 - maxoverderp
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
#9 - immortalfear
Reply +59 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
User avatar #16 to #9 - mattmanhemi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
thats like saying the average person looks like this. do you look like this? does the average person on fj look like this? no. 1% of america and Europe looks that like that
User avatar #23 to #16 - stallwallwriter
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
That's precisely the point. Immortalfear is pointing out the same fallacy in the original post.
#18 to #9 - thesoloist
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
<------------ They quit growing these and became pussies.
User avatar #46 to #18 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
I have a beard and I'm proud of it., although mine is Lincoln like, as in no mustache.
User avatar #53 to #46 - thesoloist
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
A very respectable beard good sir.
#107 to #53 - briggsil
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
BEARD WAR! Only joking, I love my beard!
User avatar #132 to #107 - thesoloist
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
Nice beard bro
#55 - tkdftw
Reply +38 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
#78 to #55 - hektoroftroy
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
#2 - finishhimlarry
Reply +32 123456789123345869
(01/27/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Evolution of Culture, maybe?
#4 to #2 - anon id: debae31b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/27/2013) [-]
Devolution*
User avatar #21 to #4 - coolcalx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
evolution means change. it is neither progressive nor regressive.

devolution isn't a thing

unless you mean the political term
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devolution#United_States
#77 to #21 - MrShaggy
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
&gt;devolution isn't a thing   
&gt;mfw   
   
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devolution_(biology)   
   
Get wiki'd (bitch); because I thought the same thing anon did..
>devolution isn't a thing
>mfw

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devolution_(biology)

Get wiki'd (bitch); because I thought the same thing anon did..
User avatar #126 to #77 - coolcalx
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
actually read the article, man.

"Devolution presumes that there is a preferred hierarchy of structure and function, and that evolution must mean "progress" to "more advanced" organisms[...] However, according to the definition of evolution, and particularly of the modern evolutionary synthesis in which natural selection leads to evolutionary adaptation, phenomena represented as instances of devolution are in every sense evolutionary."

devolution still isn't a thing.
#1 - krizz
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(01/27/2013) [-]
This image has expired




it makes them look attractive
User avatar #60 to #1 - mrdrpage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
It makes them look attractive.

There. I said it.
#11 to #1 - ticklemehomoo
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
leggings make women look more attractive than pants
if you say women dressed hotter in the 1920 vs today then you're ************
User avatar #49 to #11 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
I don't think that 1920's women look as attractive as some women now but dressing like a slut makes you look like a, well, slut, which is not attractive in my opinion.
#64 to #49 - ticklemehomoo
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
>implying "sluts" don't exist in both generations
not every women today dresses like a "slut"
and not every women back then dressed formally
this picture is just one of those stupid "HURR THE PAST WAS SO MUCH BETTER I HATE THE NEW GENERATION" posts
User avatar #66 to #64 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
I know that sluts existed back then, and they weren't attractive to me then either. And I know that not every woman dresses like that but alot more women dress like sluts now than they did then because now it's socially acceptable to be a slut apparently.
#69 to #66 - ticklemehomoo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
it's not socaily acceptable to be a slut
women don't want to be considered sluts
ex when a rumor is spread around a school about a girl sleeping with a boy, nobody says "wow cool, that's normal" instead they say hateful things and then the girl regrets the decision
society usually looks down on sluts
but the way people dress now is just our culture
but just saying every generation has changes
you can choose to hate, which isn't wrong because that's your personal preference but you have to remember this a new generation and most generations probably also had their criticisms when they were new
tl;dr be open minded, and being a slut is not socaily acceptable
User avatar #72 to #69 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
I know being a slut is not socially acceptable, but dressing like one is. And I'm agreeing with you, everything changes, and I hate it but oh well, I'll get over it.
#71 to #69 - ticklemehomoo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
*but just saying, every culture
#56 - TheUsername
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
styles change.
styles change.
#120 - inetus
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
I always get my jimmies rustled when somebody compares pictures of people from say 80 years ago and now and asks like an idiot "What happened?". Well maybe it's the fact that you're:
1. Comparing two different types of people. The girls at the right are much younger.
2. Hear me out on this one because it's pretty dick tickling crazy... Could it be? Fashion fads?
3. General societal views have changed. Especially when you compare women.
4. Not every girl back then dressed nicely and professionally. Not every girl today dresses like a slut. You could just as easily find a picture of a prostitute or a flapper from that time period and compare it to a businesswoman (and there are a lot more of them now then in the past so I feel like this picture itself contradicts the reality) from today...

tl;dr
My jimmies are rustled
#135 to #120 - xmeatshieldx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/03/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#59 - pebar
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
Ever heard of a flapper?
This was the slut of the 20s...
times change
#128 to #59 - anon id: e4102776
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
Still looks better.
User avatar #22 - Crusader
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
But that is comparing the best to the worst.
I could take the best democrat, like Clinton, and compare him to the worst republican like Jimbob and say that is what happens when you become a republican.
It would be equal if you compared flappers to those modern girls, or a modern businesswoman/housewife (I can't tell what the left side is) to the old style woman.

TLDR - This is creating a bias, and that is good for no one.
User avatar #50 to #22 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/28/2013) [-]
My whole issue is the "normal" girls now are wearing what the prostitutes and porn stars did in the 90's.