I'm sorry, ma'am. .
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #4 - digits (01/27/2013) [+] (8 replies)
The Beatles suck.
User avatar #5 to #4 - TwistedBamboozler (01/27/2013) [-]
I'm not a fan of the beatles . . . but I think it's a little unfair to say they suck. Musically they aren't the best, but they played people and worked the industry in a way no one had ever seen before.
#1 - Absolute Madman (01/27/2013) [+] (4 replies)
"Make history"

All they did was make a bunch of songs
what the ****
User avatar #2 to #1 - keiishiyama (01/27/2013) [-]
You must be ******* kidding me. I hardly like them, but the Beatles COMPLETELY changed the way people thought about music with Sergeant Pepper.
#21 - juha (01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#26 - cysco (01/27/2013) [+] (2 replies)
This image has expired
my sister is a big "one direction" fan and had this picture as her wallpaper .. i changed it with the picture of the beatles.. she was confused, she didnt know the picture from the beatles, even that we hav the LP from the abbey road in the living room for many decades... i couldnt be more disappointed by my own sister..
User avatar #7 - howunexpected ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
The Beatles are very much like the Monet of music. They did something drastic, something some people liked, and some people didn't. Then, the music world when completely different directions than where it would have gone without them. Some people like the outcome, some people don't.
Bottom line, is that the Beatles were incredibly influential in the flow of music evolution.
#18 - pyra (01/27/2013) [-]
#36 - whenuleastxpect (01/27/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Related. Just Peter Jackson, Howard Shore and a couple of other guys who produced lotr walking across abbey road
#40 - gongthehawkeye (01/27/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Gonna be honest, I don't like the Beatles
Can't stand their music
Feel free to hate me
User avatar #42 to #40 - dementedllama (01/27/2013) [-]
#16 - dexas (01/27/2013) [-]
To go along with this
User avatar #13 - timothybarnes (01/27/2013) [+] (2 replies)
I dated a girl once whose mom claimed to have been in a cafe that the members of the Beatles visited after this photo session. She claimed that after they entered, their security team prevented other people from coming in, but since she was already on the inside she managed to score Lennon's autograph. While I question the authenticity of this story, I still think it's an interesting tale.
#35 - slipperycheese (01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #32 - steviemo (01/27/2013) [-]
God damn, I just can't stand listening to the Beatles...
#22 - sulaco (01/27/2013) [+] (4 replies)
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles “the greatest or most significant or most influential” rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success: the Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worth of being saved.
#44 to #22 - funnjyunk **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #45 - impaledsandwich ONLINE (01/27/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Since this entire page is filled with anti-Beatles stuff, let me offer a differing opinion.

John Lennon and Paul McCartney were/are great writers, both with lyrics and music. Yes, some of their earlier stuff is just simple rock, but so was a lot of music then, and dammit it's fun. They were all really cool guys (most of the time), and John and Paul had/have great voices. Not the best, but still very good. One thing I will say, though, is that Ringo was a really ****** drummer, and his only good song was "Octopus's Garden".
User avatar #50 to #47 - impaledsandwich ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
Only a couple of those are even vaguely believable, and even then I demand citations.
User avatar #25 - tkfourtwoone (01/27/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Why oh why do I only like their early work, like "Love Me Do", "Hard Day's Night", "I Saw Her Standing There" and all the other rock'n'roll stuff?!
Honestly, I've been trying to listen to their post '60s stuff, when the LSD and India trip started to have a major influence... I CAN'T!
I'd much rather listen to Floyd for psychedelic stuff.
#11 - cupotruth (01/27/2013) [-]
I respect other peoples ideals that they do not like The Beatles but even if you don't enjoy the sound you should respect it because it formed modern music. I mean Homo-Erectus wouldn't be stimulating conversation but with out that poop smeared dude we wouldn't be here.
#39 - Absolute Madman (01/27/2013) [-]
mfw my name is Abbey.
#30 - Absolute Madman (01/27/2013) [+] (1 reply)
history? are serious guise? what did they do that changed the world? they were just singing a bunch of ****** songs nothing more than that.
#29 - enderknight (01/27/2013) [-]
My family and I went to England a few years back, and my dad is a huge Beatles fan, so he had to get a picture at Abbey Road. These two old ladies were yelling at us, saying, "What's so great about this road that people try to get pictures here!?"
#12 - buildaburg (01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)