Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#19 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
i am very shy on the internet, because i'm a lil pussy, so i keep anonymous. (I still dont care is you thumb me down, so please shut up about it). but read my post before you act.. or just ignore it.

i am scientist (meteorologist). i studied in the best institution for meteorology and physics in europe. global warming is my main topic. so stop arguing with me. scientifically the global warming is undeniable, but whats going on in media is a political issue and NOT a scientifical.

Neil DeGrasse is in my opinion completely wrong. He missed the important fact, that science should question things and try to prove them wring. this is how science work. if we wouldnt question science, we would still believe aristoteles. To question things imply that you dont believe them. doesnt matter if you are scientist or not. This ignorance he is showing is the same the church uses. "it is true, stop thinking about it, because we proved it". i am sorry for everyone here who doesnt fall for this. Neil DeGrasse evolved to a entertainer and lost his credibility to science.
#319 to #19 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I think what he was trying to say is that science is true BECAUSE it questions things. It's true whether you believe it or not, so long as the evidence is there.
#169 to #19 - jimimij
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
Science has been completely wrong in the past (spontaneous generation, most of the darwinian model of macroevolution). It is simply a model to explain what is observed. If it was wrong in the past, it may very likely be wrong now. It is the height of arrogance to say that it is indisputable now.
#167 to #19 - nofunzone
Reply -5
(01/26/2013) [-]
Except science is always right regardless, it is our attempts to find out what science is that is wrong.
#370 to #167 - wadethegreat
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
science is not right or wrong its the process of seeing if something is one way or another so saying science is indesputably right dosnt make sense its like telling me that science says that a tv show is stupid when in fact science only is saying we dont know we only tested it... ask the scientist!.... you see what i mean? if not dont please message me and we can talk and ill try and explain better
#138 to #19 - robopuppy
Reply -14
(01/26/2013) [-]
"is NOT scientifical"
"scientifical"
...
#143 to #138 - partnerintroll
Reply +27
(01/26/2013) [-]
well, he didnt major in english
well, he didnt major in english
#139 to #138 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
sorry for not beeing native english speaking.
#184 to #139 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
now wait just a minute buster how do we know youre the same guy
#210 to #184 - pwoneill
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
How do we know that you are a different person?
#141 to #139 - robopuppy
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
No hard feelings. It just popped up to me.
#132 to #19 - bulbakip
Reply -6
(01/26/2013) [-]
I knew I didn't like him for a reason.
#64 to #19 - alleksi
Reply +17
(01/26/2013) [-]
there have been so many ******* times where people have misquoted neil degrasse tyson just so they could have a "legitimate authority" behind their religion debates, that I wouldn't be surprised if this is one of those times.

neil degrasse tyson is a smart man and he's not an ignorant man, so I am fairly sure that he either misspoke or this was misquote.

pretty much all Neil DeGrasse Tyson related content on sites like tumblr, funnyjunk and reddit are complete misinterpretation and misquotes of what he has said for them to act like "**** yeah atheism" when, in fact, he is agnostic