My sides. Saw browsing on tumblr... I know I'm going to far when I get to my own content. why do These Exist
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (122)
[ 122 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
47 comments displayed.
#10 - potential [OP]
Reply +162
(01/26/2013) [-]
I know I'm going to far when I get to my own content.
#122 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
LOL, "my own content."
#20 to #10 - matthewboss
Reply +17
(01/26/2013) [-]
Post content
Go to bed
Check how it's doing the next day
write witty comment about getting to own content
???
Profit
#26 to #20 - partnerintroll
Reply +15
(01/26/2013) [-]
#17 to #10 - necessary **User deleted account**
+48
has deleted their comment [-]
#91 to #17 - joeledo
Reply +17
(01/27/2013) [-]
your comment was necessary
#93 to #91 - necessary **User deleted account**
+20
has deleted their comment [-]
#111 to #93 - uberteddy
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Was that really necessary?
#12 - wardylocks
Reply +103
(01/26/2013) [-]
I have my own boobs, but looking at other peoples is just so so much better.
#62 to #12 - ipunchinfants
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#96 to #12 - brutalfistfuck
Reply +4
(01/27/2013) [-]
#11 - qotsa
Reply +87
(01/26/2013) [-]
i don't mind when guys look at my boobs, because they're ****** neat.    
and i really can't blame them, i look at the boobs of other girls too.
i don't mind when guys look at my boobs, because they're ****** neat.
and i really can't blame them, i look at the boobs of other girls too.
#63 to #11 - ipunchinfants
Reply +8
(01/26/2013) [-]
ok then show me your boobs if you don't mind
i'm sorry it was worth a try
#140 to #63 - qotsa
Reply +3
(01/27/2013) [-]
because you were so polite and i don't want to gtfo
#143 to #140 - ipunchinfants
Reply 0
(01/29/2013) [-]
<3
now without the shirt
jkjk you have nice boobs in the non rude most way possible lol
#144 to #143 - qotsa
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
haha thanks ;)
#42 - Calunn **User deleted account**
+44
has deleted their comment [-]
#76 to #42 - wafflelord
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
#43 to #42 - Calunn **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#45 to #43 - synapse
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
So he is off at 1.2 gigameters past the speed of light
#69 to #42 - papairish
Reply +8
(01/26/2013) [-]
Maybe this is why boobs amaze us, because we, as humans, can't fully comprehend them - since they are traveling so fast in such a confined space.....
Awww, who am I kidding, tits are awesome cause they're tits!!
#1 - nyj
Reply +42
(01/26/2013) [-]
It really does seem like girls have sensors in their boobs that alert them whenever eyes have seen them.
#40 - felixjarl
Reply +38
(01/26/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#2 - nargogh
Reply +10
(01/26/2013) [-]
This is ********, nothing can travel faster than light which speed is about 3x10^8 m/s. 1,5 gigametres per second is 1,5x10^9 m/s.

Son, Einstein is disappointed.
#9 to #2 - riddickgamer
Reply -6
(01/26/2013) [-]
thats funny, because we have proven there are particles that can travel faster then the speed of light.
#13 to #9 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
We actually haven't done that. If you're talking about the experiment at CERN in which the neutrino was measured to travel faster than the speed of light by 60nanoseconds over some distance that I can't remember, that was proven to be an error in the fiberoptic timing system. That is why no paper was published; they sent out the data for peer review and, sure enough, they found the problem.

www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/06/neutrinos-cant-beat-light/

Nothing has ever been shown to travel faster than the speed of light.

U BAD AT PHYSICS.
#3 to #2 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
nothing we know(aka: following the rules we have observed with mechanics we developed under rules we created) of can travel faster than light
#6 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
its travelling in the complex direction, there are no rules in imagination land
#4 to #2 - autoxx
Reply +28
(01/26/2013) [-]
Nothing can ACCELERATE to the speed of light because it's mass would become infinite.
Things already traveling at the speed of light (or beyond) do not apply to your theories.
#5 to #4 - nargogh
Reply +4
(01/26/2013) [-]
Nothing possessing mass CAN achieve speed equal or greater than the speed of light. Boobs have mass. Also, the light itself cannot travel faster than the light speed, it can only be slowed down (for example, by using Bosy-Einstein condensate).
#8 to #5 - autoxx
Reply -4
(01/26/2013) [-]
Everything has mass, including light.
If you try to detect light as a particle; Voila, it's a particle. And as a particle it has mass.
The gravitational pull of a black hole wouldn't have any effect unless it had mass.
#34 to #8 - nargogh
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Also, you need to read sth about Einstein's general relativity theory. Gravitational field causes distortion of space, in which photons move.
#15 to #8 - jakeattack
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
not true, photons are mass less particles. if the higgs field is indeed true, then they fly right through it. but the reason black holes pull in light is because gravity is warping the space around it. its like warping where the light goes. like those car tracks shaped like big funnels in a way. light moves straight, but its road is curved in another dimension
#32 to #8 - nargogh
Reply +2
(01/26/2013) [-]
Photons do not have RESTING mass. You seriously need to review your knowledge of elementary physics.
#25 to #8 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Einstein is rolling in his grave because of your butchering of general relativity
#18 to #8 - fuzdohraa
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
the black ole part is not true since to say that gravity attracts mass is simplyfying it, gravity actually attracts energy and mass is energy so that is why it is attracted, light however is pure energy and therefore has no mass but is still affected by the gravity of a black hole
#75 to #4 - awesomenessdefined
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
No object with mass can travel at the speed of light.
#59 to #4 - kievaughnb
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
What about photons traveling out of an atmosphere and into the vacuum of space? would they remain at just below c or would they accelerate to c and become black holes?

Sorry, I don't know much about physics
#35 to #4 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
its*
#14 to #4 - jakeattack
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
tachyons right? so thats what boobs are. woah
#23 - harleycurnow
Reply +25
(01/26/2013) [-]
B = 5T

B=boobtime
T=time
#37 to #23 - isopodic
Reply +7
(01/26/2013) [-]
He just overcomplicated it by defining &quot;time&quot; in a formula. Still awesome.
He just overcomplicated it by defining "time" in a formula. Still awesome.
#29 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
anyone notice "sqrt" or squirt is in the equation?
#30 to #29 - whycanticaps
Reply +20
(01/26/2013) [-]
square root...not squirt
#33 to #30 - epicsauciness
Reply +11
(01/26/2013) [-]
12 year olds everywhere....
#44 - ButtonFly
Reply +19
(01/26/2013) [-]
Now all the physicists on FunnyJunk have come out to play.
#48 to #44 - savannahijack
Reply -3
(01/26/2013) [-]
There cant really be that many