Libfags. . Muzzle IT '' SAFE direction. Finger OFF the trigger. Safety ON. Less safe with guns than a six year old kid. Claims tn he an authority an gun safety
FJ should now work well with mobile. Try it out on your mobile/tablet browser!
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - scottmc (01/25/2013) [+] (2 replies)
It costs four-hundred-thousand dollars to fire this weapon.... for twelve seconds.
#54 - taintedangel (01/26/2013) [+] (14 replies)
The gun is not the problem. It never was. The problem is that you can easily get one, even if you are mentally unstable or untrained.

The gun doesn't kill the person, it's only a tool. The killer is the one holding the gun with the malcontent/fear to pull the trigger.
#15 - originalop has deleted their comment [+] (43 replies)
#26 to #15 - reconred (01/26/2013) [-]
Yes, lets ignore the 6 million dead Jews that couldn't defend themselves. Alright, what about Stalin? No? Okay what about this, in Britain there was 59 firearm homicides, compared to the United States of America's aprox 8,000 homicides however 600 of them were justifiable homicides by police officers and self-defense, pretty low number of justified homicides to have the highest gun ownership in the world right? I have an explanation for this: Say you're walking down the street and somebody jumps out of a corner with a knife and says 'Give me your money!' you pull out a firearm, this man now frightened was not expecting resistance and runs away. Therefor, theoretically anyway, the crime goes unreported to the police, does this make sense to you?

Alright now, lets try this out seeing as Britain has a population of about 65 million people versus America's 314 million people, yes, Britain would have a much lower gun homicide rate, but you say '59 versus 7,400' well look at this:

per-100,000 people there is aprox; 2,000 violent crimes in Britain, Seems like a fair number right? Well across the pond, here in America there are aprox 446 violent crimes per-100,000 people. Woah, let's look at this, we have ALOT of gun homicides compared too Britain but a MUCH lower VC rate. Well obviously in a place where it is easy to get a firearm there is going to be more firearm related deaths, but less stabbings and beatings when compared to Britain. Because in Britain criminals know that the most their victim is going to have to defend themselves is a knife, so Criminals are going to take advantage over this, but over here they are going to say (If they're smart) 'This man may have a gun, I don't want to mess with him!' And for this reason Britain is rank one of the most dangerous nations by the EU.

And this is why I say, God Bless the United States of America and long live the Constitution and thee Republic.
#23 - pickledpee (01/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
A complete ban on guns wouldn't be effective, but a psychological and physical examination is needed. You can be completely blind and still own a gun if you can afford it.
A complete ban on guns wouldn't be effective, but a psychological and physical examination is needed. You can be completely blind and still own a gun if you can afford it.
User avatar #27 - satrenkotheone ONLINE (01/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)

Caps cause I am cool like that.
User avatar #105 - impaledsandwich (01/26/2013) [+] (10 replies)
God damn this is stupid. She isn't retardedly unsafe because she's a liberal, she's retardedly unsafe because she's a middle-aged woman who almost certainly has no training with guns. Political beliefs have nothing to do with gun skills or knowledge.
#130 - alphajunk (01/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
MFW reading this post and the stupid 						*********					 comments about banning guns and 						****
MFW reading this post and the stupid ********* comments about banning guns and ****
User avatar #185 - jasonbomb (01/26/2013) [+] (4 replies)
maybe the drum mag is empty?
User avatar #194 to #185 - dratyats (01/26/2013) [-]
its still proper etiquette. if somebody points a gun at you, your first reaction wont be to ask them if the magazine is empty, it will be to get the **** out of the direction of the barrel.
User avatar #158 - reican (01/26/2013) [+] (2 replies)
because if people disagree she could spray them down
User avatar #5 - maidenmk (01/25/2013) [+] (7 replies)
There is no way to argue that 'guns and death' are the something to defend.
#7 to #5 - wormman (01/25/2013) [-]
guns are nothing but tools. its what people decide to do with them that matters. people fear guns more then any of the other weapons that our species has created because they are just easier to use. MFW your comment.
#175 - anonexplains (01/26/2013) [+] (6 replies)
how can u tell the safety is on or off in this picture?
User avatar #195 to #175 - PgFalcon ONLINE (01/26/2013) [-]
red dot means the gun is hot.
User avatar #100 - KayRed (01/26/2013) [+] (3 replies)
How about we bring logic to these arguments, on both sides...please?
User avatar #107 to #100 - neonblackkitty (01/26/2013) [-]
because the anti-gun agenda is not supported by logic. it flies in the face of all logical things.
FACT: crime has been steadily declining (50% decrease) over the past 25 years. (source:
FACT: over 84 MILLION Gun Owners committed no crimes yesterday (source: The Small Arms Survey in 2007 by the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva estimated 270 million firearms in the US. )
FACT: DiFi (as she is know to her constituents) holds her own concealed weapons permit, carries daily and has a detail of 12 ARMED security guards. (source:
#74 - ryanmck has deleted their comment [+] (19 replies)
User avatar #111 to #74 - neonblackkitty (01/26/2013) [-]
the 2nd Amendment has absolutely ZERO to do with hunting
User avatar #135 - Dudedog (01/26/2013) [+] (21 replies)
Seriously I don't understand what the problem is here. Is it really that bad if an assault weapons ban is reinstated? What good use do civilians have with military designed weapons that were designed to kill other people? I understand it's a right that Americans hold dearly, but come on I'm sure you can deal without assault rifles. I'm sure the deer you're hunting only needs one bullet. Besides, we take the 2nd Amendment out of context anyway. That amendment was written at a time when it was necessary for the people to arm themselves for literal dangers like indian raids, looters, and vagabonds. Not to mention 1700s America wasn't very urban or industrialized. Times change and so should how we interpret aged documents.
User avatar #140 to #135 - stripey (01/26/2013) [-]
the thing about the "assault weapons" ban is that it is a joke used to frighten people into losing their freedom. Its all about controlling things that don't need to be controlled. i feel like I should stop spamming this link everywhere, but please read this to get an idea of what I mean-[]

Assault rifles are no more dangerous than any other gun, but the AR-15 happens to be one of the most popular, and to the uneducated looks scary. There are many other things I can bring to the table here, but honestly I don't really like politics on FunnyJunk.
#176 - anonexplains (01/26/2013) [+] (7 replies)
liberals are stupid. they just appeared to be intelligent with many arguments but inside their skulls, they got nothing.
User avatar #200 to #188 - TheFixer (01/26/2013) [-]
he means the far left you pringus. just the same with the far right. where the "smarts" are is in the middle
#171 - gingertank **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #91 - gggman (01/26/2013) [+] (3 replies)
The one on the right COULD also be taken out of context, we can't forget guys.
User avatar #125 to #91 - Zarke (01/26/2013) [-]
What context? She's pointing the firearm in an unsafe direction and her finger is wrapped around the trigger. You have no excuse unless you're shooting.
User avatar #67 - tolazytomakename (01/26/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Don't use the term Libfags in a political argument. It completely eliminates any credibility from your argument and makes you look like you think your opinion is the only opinion. People have different opinions and America was created on compromise.

tl;dr Stop looking like an ignorant redneck and start compromising with other people.
#172 - UnoSkullmanx (01/26/2013) [+] (13 replies)
DEMtards. Democrats are not Liberals. That misconception is why I hate calling myself a Liberal. I keep getting associated with those Democrat retards. Liberals are for individual freedom. That includes guns.
#174 to #172 - UnoSkullmanx (01/26/2013) [-]
And watch as I get a typhoon of red thumbs because people don't actually understand what I'm trying to say.

Any law that decreases individual freedom (besides murder, etc., obviously) isn't a Liberal law.
User avatar #85 - mookiez (01/26/2013) [-]
My dad taught us gun safety since day one. Most 6 year olds are very safe with guns, It just depends on the parents.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)