Willy Wonka and the child factory. . Witty Wanna knew these children the in his fasten. After Augustus gets sucked up the shoot, they all hop on heard the Mat t Willy Wonka and the child factory Witty Wanna knew these children in his fasten After Augustus gets sucked up shoot they all hop on heard Mat t
Upload
Login or register

Willy Wonka and the child factory

Witty Wanna knew these children the in his fasten. After Augustus gets
sucked up the shoot, they all hop on heard the Mat through the tunnel at doom,
The heat deosn' t have have extra vacant seats maugh, It was designed with prior
knowledge that they would less two participants treaure that paint. Later they
drive a meant spewing car with only tour seats. did they have another car
waiting in the garage in case the others made it? Of course not. Willy Venera
USES children to make candy,
...
+826
Views: 30351 Submitted: 01/25/2013
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (63)
[ 63 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
38 comments displayed.
#4 - killerrook
Reply +70
(01/25/2013) [-]
Each main character represents a deadly sin and the entire scenario falls back to greek mythology. Willy Wonka is Hades, the boat ride is like the crossing of the river of souls, and he is looking for the one pure person to replace him.
#65 to #4 - killerrook
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Also, the Wonkavator could represent the ascension into heaven.
#6 to #4 - temporalguardian ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/25/2013) [-]
if thats so who was lust?
#8 to #6 - iliekchocolatmilke
Reply +89
(01/25/2013) [-]
Augustus Gloop is Gluttony (always eating or thinking of eating)
Veruca Salt is Greed (Spoiled brat who always wants more)
Violet Beauregarde is pride (always boasting)
Mike Teavee is sloth (always watching TV)
Grandpa is Envy (Wants what Willy has and what Charlie has (the ticket))
Charlie is lust (not sexual but the intense desire)
and Wonka is Wrath (punishes everyone for there flaws)
#39 to #8 - dandyhandy **User deleted account**
Reply +5
(01/26/2013) [-]
So Charlie wasn't pure, he was lust. Then why was he rewarded if he were another of the deadly sins?
#59 to #39 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Because he was willing to overcome his lust in the end. He gave up the Gobstopper.
#29 to #8 - albeit
Reply +1
(01/25/2013) [-]
Holy ****, the amount of ***** in my mind is too numerous to be defined
#64 to #8 - killerrook
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
i would have thought that Mike was wrath because he always watched violent tv shows, and mentioned wanting a gun. Grampa Joe could represent sloth because he was "bed ridden" until charlie found the ticket. Charlie is envious of all the kids, and the world is full of lust for the tickets. That's just my view.
#28 to #8 - sexybarracuda ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/25/2013) [-]
Your information on this movie gave me a newfound appreciation for the story. I use to think it was just 'okay' and a little too old for my taste, but now that makes a lot of sense and I am impressed with the writing. Thanks for that.
#63 to #6 - killerrook
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
That's the tricky thing, lust could have been Charlie because he wanted the ticket, or he could have been envy because the other children had one and he didn't. I see it as the world is full of lust for the tickets, in a non sexual way of course.
#30 - doctorb
Reply +32
(01/25/2013) [-]
#46 to #30 - ultrarobbie
Reply +6
(01/26/2013) [-]
Fergalicious definition make them boys go loco
They want my treasure so they get their pleasures from my photo.
#27 - gavoman
Reply +25
(01/25/2013) [-]
Also, when everyone is led to the new televison candy room, they are given glasses and jackets. You'll notice, once again, that there are just enough for everyone. He knew there would only be 2 kids left.

****** creeper....
#44 - sammyjankiis
Reply +7
(01/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#11 - thereisaguy
Reply +6
(01/25/2013) [-]
Oh wow, wrong in the first six words. He knew they could succumb to greed but not die hence them all living due to special treatments for whatever befell them.
#14 to #11 - thereisaguy
Reply -1
(01/25/2013) [-]
seven
#13 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(01/25/2013) [-]
First 10 words, bro.
#36 to #11 - fedegon
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
You have a good point, but terrible math.
#12 to #11 - itsyourkidsmarty
Reply +4
(01/25/2013) [-]
"Willy Wonka knew those children would"
1 2 3 4 5 6
#10 - trickytrickster
Reply -9
(01/25/2013) [-]
Omg spoiler alert! You can't just go around ruining the movie for people!!!!!!!!!!
#22 to #10 - myrtille ONLINE
Reply -1
(01/25/2013) [-]
Once a movie has been out for decades you are no longer compelled to with hold spoilers.
#35 to #10 - extravix
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#15 to #10 - kanatana
Reply +4
(01/25/2013) [-]
Rosebud is his sled.
#25 to #15 - dameush
Reply +1
(01/25/2013) [-]
enkidu dies
#26 to #25 - mdawgsome **User deleted account**
+6
has deleted their comment [-]
#33 to #26 - thatoneguywithskin
Reply +3
(01/25/2013) [-]
Titanic Sinks.
#37 to #33 - fedegon
Reply +2
(01/26/2013) [-]
Alladin lets the genie be free.
#41 to #37 - scooba ONLINE
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Bruce Willis is dead the whole time.
#61 to #41 - trickytrickster
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
Holy crap guys it was a joke.
#62 to #33 - trickytrickster
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
Okay too far man. The others fine...but the Titanic...
#43 - jacencaedus
Reply +4
(01/26/2013) [-]
they didn't die though. Both in the book and in the remake we see them walking out of the factory at the end
#7 - temporalguardian ONLINE
Reply -1
(01/25/2013) [-]
would make sense why he was so angry when charlie survived in the end.

i guess.
#23 to #7 - myrtille ONLINE
Reply +3
(01/25/2013) [-]
He got angry because Charlie said he wouldn't move into the factory without his family.
#51 to #23 - cleverguy
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
thats the new movie. in the old movie, charlie and his grandfather break the rules and he gets yelled at. if i remember right he only wins because he told the truth about that guy who allegedly wanted to steal the everlasting gobstopper recipe but really worked for wonka
#52 to #51 - myrtille ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Hmm. I'm not sure, but for some reason that rings a bell. I'm too lazy to look it up though.
#32 to #23 - temporalguardian ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/25/2013) [-]
to be honest, i haven't watched that movie in like 5 years, so yeah.
#2 - cactaur ONLINE
Reply +3
(01/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#1 - popkornking
Reply +3
(01/25/2013) [-]
Well ****...