Only letters, numbers and basic punctuat. . ALL NOTIFACTION LANCE ARMSTRONG BOOKS. INCLUDING 'Lance : Images of e Champion', The £. nnr; e Armstrong Pototo' ttm Lance armstrong
x

Only letters, numbers and basic punctuat

ALL NOTIFACTION LANCE
ARMSTRONG BOOKS.
INCLUDING 'Lance :
Images of e Champion', The £. nnr; e
Armstrong Pototo' ttm'
and lance Armstong: ' y
Greatest Champion' WILL SOON
BE MOVED TO THE
SECTION
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+808
Views: 30722
Favorited: 24
Submitted: 01/21/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to neosflare submit to reddit

Comments(69):

[ 69 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - oborawatabinost (01/21/2013) [-]
"Manly library" brought some interesting images into my head...
#42 - theelderscrolls (01/22/2013) [-]
Well i guess that the 470,000,000$ that he raised for cancer research is also fiction and should be rendered fake.

This man raised a ******* of money. I wouldnt care if he road a Harley through the tour de France, he still had good intentions.
#70 to #42 - umadproblemm (01/22/2013) [-]
AMEN. It's not like he raised the money and blew it all on expensive material items. He still gave back to those in need.
#53 to #42 - neosflare (01/22/2013) [-]
"wouldnt care if he road a Harley through the tour de France". you my dear sir are funny
"wouldnt care if he road a Harley through the tour de France". you my dear sir are funny
User avatar #51 - drtrousersnake (01/22/2013) [-]
I guess lance didn't have the balls to win fairly
User avatar #60 to #51 - holdup (01/22/2013) [-]
well, thats a given, but now, he is not even half the man he used to be.
#37 - mericafuckyeah (01/22/2013) [-]
feel like I'm the only one who really doesn't care about Armstrong doping. The man had cancer in his brain, lungs, and balls. Anyone who can come back from that and win the Tour de France i have respect for, doping or no doping
0
#41 to #37 - Thebullsking has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #43 to #37 - nadastress (01/22/2013) [-]
He ******* lost a nut and won. I'm with you.
#2 - connormccloud (01/21/2013) [-]
Manly libary with sound proof booths for private studying
User avatar #21 - luidias (01/22/2013) [-]
>lance wins a bunch of prizes whilst doping
>raises millions of dollars for cancer research
>gets found out about doping
>becomes evil human being

let me reiterate that.

>millions of dollars for cancer
>some stupid prize
somehow, he's a bad person for cheating on the prize, and ISN'T a good person for the millions of dollars to cancer.
User avatar #33 to #21 - Marker (01/22/2013) [-]
People are treating him worse than Barry Bonds, which is pathetic as all hell.

Armstrong, while proven to have cheated, what a good person.
Bonds, although never actually proven to have cheated, made it quite obvious. And to top it off, he was scum.
User avatar #34 to #33 - Marker (01/22/2013) [-]
was* a good person.
User avatar #36 to #34 - luidias (01/22/2013) [-]
I agree. What Lance did was wrong, but I think he's getting way too much heat for it, especially considering all the good he did on the side.
#52 to #36 - anon (01/22/2013) [-]
Disagree. He sued people who told the truth that he was cheating. How is that right? Him raising money for cancer does not negate the **** he did and the hell he put other people through with lawsuits. He also lied during an investigation. I hope he gets sued and thrown in jail for perjury. **** him, he's a piece of **** .
User avatar #62 to #52 - luidias (01/22/2013) [-]
it doesn't negate anything, but he deserves some credit for it. again, I'd rather have lance as a cheater and cancer receiving the money, than honest lance and no money for cancer.
User avatar #74 to #62 - Marker (01/22/2013) [-]
Agreed completely. There is no reason to treat Lance anywhere near as bad as Bonds.

Of course, Bonds' punishment is one that will sit with him for the rest of his life, knowing he's never getting into the Hall of Fame.
User avatar #40 to #21 - tiddycats (01/22/2013) [-]
He was a dick though, he ruined a lot of reporter's careers for probing into doping, he basically bought off a lot of the people that run the tour de france and all that through "donations" and then would blacklist certain reporters that he didn't like.
I wouldn't have cared otherwise since I'm pretty sure 90% of all cyclists dope.
User avatar #46 to #40 - luidias (01/22/2013) [-]
granted, he's no saint. a lot of the **** he did was wrong, but he did a lot of good as well.
User avatar #23 to #21 - KillYourself (01/22/2013) [-]
how much monetary gain did he make from cheating?
User avatar #25 to #23 - luidias (01/22/2013) [-]
>he gained money
>he raised much more for cancer

if you could give a man some amount of money to raise ten times that amount for cancer, wouldn't you do it? wouldn't you say that's a pretty good deal?

I can see why people are upset about it, but I don't think it matters in the big picture. what does it matter what he gets, if cancer got the money anyways? I'll take the current situation over the one where he never cheats and the millions for cancer are never raised.
#26 to #25 - anon (01/22/2013) [-]
People could still DONATE THEIR MONEY toward cancer research without Lance Armstrong making millions.
User avatar #28 to #26 - luidias (01/22/2013) [-]
but they don't. the only reason those millions were raised was because lance founded Livestrong and started a massive awareness campaign

i.e. if lance hadn't been there, no one would've donated **** all. again, I don't mind that lance cheated, because the alternative meant that none of that money would have gone to cancer.

I mean, I think it's fair that he was stripped of the title. In terms of the competition, cheating was a dick move. However, I think what he did for cancer research deserves some merit, and I just can't call him an overall bad person.
User avatar #32 to #25 - StrayBullet (01/22/2013) [-]
So you would say the ends justify the means? I agree with that sentiment. However, at what point do the means cease to be justifiable and become universally deplorable? As far as the universe is concerned, never, but what do you think?
User avatar #35 to #32 - luidias (01/22/2013) [-]
I think people incorrectly treat that statement, "the end justifies the means" as a black and white statement. Its truthfulness depends entirely on the scale, effects, moral implications and a billion other factors pertaining to the ends and the means.

In other words, sometimes the ends justifies the means and sometimes not, because the world is not black and white, it's made up entirely of grey zones. I think that, in this situation, the ends do justify the means, although saying that is still oversimplifying it.
User avatar #39 to #35 - StrayBullet (01/22/2013) [-]
With that, I agree with you. Everything can be found in shades of grey.
(And a Hell of a lot more than fifty. It doesn't take a telepath to know what you're thinking.)
#55 - iscreamsonday (01/22/2013) [-]
if they were to give the tour de france title to someone who hadn't doped they would have to give it to the guy in 23rd place
#58 to #55 - neosflare (01/22/2013) [-]
only reason that people care is that he the only cyclist that a normal person could name. when john Q biker comes out as having doped only the cyclist fans care but a guy held as a hero, his going to get blown outta proportion
#68 - warrenzthehero (01/22/2013) [-]
MFW "Manly Library"
#5 - stepsword ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
I don't get it. Why are they moving it to fiction?
User avatar #6 to #5 - mikhailovych (01/21/2013) [-]
because he used performance enhancing drugs
#8 to #6 - stepsword ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Thank you
User avatar #47 to #6 - dadukesta (01/22/2013) [-]
Performance enhancing techinques*
Technically blood doping is just putting your blood back in after taking it out at high altitudes.
User avatar #73 to #47 - mikhailovych (01/22/2013) [-]
he admitted to using performance enhancing drugs on Oprah
User avatar #75 to #73 - dadukesta (01/23/2013) [-]
He admitted to blood doping. Which is illegal in most sports.
User avatar #7 to #5 - hugsforfree (01/21/2013) [-]
Lance armstrong cheated to win many cycling competitions. He recently admitted to cheating.
#20 to #7 - ienjoyrofling (01/22/2013) [-]
Boy do I feel like a 			****		 up, I only read Lance and assumed the astronaut, so I jumped to the end and read the 'moving to fiction section' so I thought they were implying the moon landing wasn't real. Thank you, comment section.   
   
>mfw my error
Boy do I feel like a **** up, I only read Lance and assumed the astronaut, so I jumped to the end and read the 'moving to fiction section' so I thought they were implying the moon landing wasn't real. Thank you, comment section.

>mfw my error
User avatar #13 to #7 - Crusader (01/22/2013) [-]
As if dozens of other competitors weren't doing it as well.
He is still below the rest considering he did lose a nut.
#9 to #7 - stepsword ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Thank you
User avatar #29 - darman (01/22/2013) [-]
Its sad really. All the good cyclists dope and its so ingrained into the nature of the sport its not going to stop.
#45 - steavo (01/22/2013) [-]
I really don't ******* care if he was doping. I really don't ******* care. He's a good man, he had good intentions. Him cheating raised tons of money. Sure, he didn't deserve the medals that he won, but he did good with his cheating.
#54 to #45 - anon (01/22/2013) [-]
The ends justify the means in your opinion.
User avatar #56 to #54 - bossmanholms (01/22/2013) [-]
hey man thanks for clarifying that.
#31 - anon (01/22/2013) [-]
manly library.
Library: "GRRR BRO DO YOU EVEN LIFT FAGGOT, HOT DAMN IM OFF TO GO **** SOME BITCHES BECAUSE IM SO DAMN MANLY. OLD SPICE DOESNT HAVE **** ON ME **** YA"
p.s: i like to start my mastrubation off with a floppy dick, because it thoroughly amuses me to have it flap around the way it does.
User avatar #69 - digits (01/22/2013) [-]
"At least he had the ball to admit it."
#71 to #69 - kreekydoorS ONLINE (01/22/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #64 - bagguhsleep (01/22/2013) [-]
What I find hilarious is that people hate him for doping despite the fact that pretty much every other ******* cyclist that participates in the Tour De France dopes as well. The only difference is that he was the best (either at cycling or at doping).
User avatar #10 - mrbuu ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
yeah,but who is getting the first place medal. not 2nd place, not 3rd place, not 4th. Infact they don't know who to give it too.
#22 to #10 - anon (01/22/2013) [-]
why shouldn't second place get it?
#24 to #22 - anon (01/22/2013) [-]
they were ALL doping
+1
#44 - zmbz **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
+2
#48 to #44 - roadkillamanjaro **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#49 to #48 - zmbz **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #50 - ronyx (01/22/2013) [-]
Everyone makes mistakes.
User avatar #11 - thepyras (01/22/2013) [-]
You know what I think about Lance Armstrong admitting to doping? I think he's lying to get the media off his back. They've been on him for years about something they've never been able to prove no matter how many drug tests he took, and more recently they took away a title on what I don't believe to be reasonable grounds. I think he's just saying this now so it'll all pass over faster.
User avatar #14 to #11 - mrmontombo (01/22/2013) [-]
That or hes lying for attention. If your going to lie to get the media off your back, you don't go on Oprah to do so. I think he wants media attention.
User avatar #15 to #14 - thepyras (01/22/2013) [-]
Well, I think going on Oprah would be exactly what you would do. It's the quickest way for everyone to hear about it, so it'll go away more quickly.
User avatar #16 to #15 - mrmontombo (01/22/2013) [-]
I disagree. If attention is what you dont want, going on one of the most viewed and longest running talk shows ever is not the way you do it. He famous. Talking to anybody (a paper, magazine, etc.) would have been a better option.
User avatar #17 to #16 - thepyras (01/22/2013) [-]
The point is, you want everyone's attention straight off the bat, then it doesn't drag on for weeks as more people find out.
User avatar #18 to #17 - mrmontombo (01/22/2013) [-]
My point is if your going on Oprah, your not getting rid of the media. Furthermore, it may cause more media to assail him asking for comment, further explanation. If you are famous there is no way to avoid the media. All he accomplished was destroying his own reputation. All I know is that I would rather have the media annoying me day and night then have my family/friends/everybody think I have been cheating and lying my entire career.
User avatar #19 to #18 - thepyras (01/22/2013) [-]
The idea is not to get rid of the media, it's to make it all go down at once, then dissipate. I'm not so sure. The people he's close to will know the truth. I can't imagine I would care too much what everyone else thought.
User avatar #59 to #19 - mrmontombo (01/22/2013) [-]
Honestly I didn't believe him in the first place. I think he did use performance enhancing drugs because honestly, everybody in that sport does. The only reason hes catching all this flak is because he won. The winners are under the most scrutiny. It just disgusts me that he sued people for saying he cheated, but now hes admitting he did it? If hes that dedicated to preserving the 'truth', that he didn't juice, then why is he lying about it now?
#66 - hanabro (01/22/2013) [-]
>mfw I'm from Manly, Iowa.

This isn't our library though.
#12 - widsquard (01/22/2013) [-]
Manly as in, near Seaforth?
User avatar #38 to #12 - jmanporter (01/22/2013) [-]
as in Sydney Australia
#76 to #38 - widsquard (01/23/2013) [-]
woohoo, i know that place!
[ 69 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)