Gun Control. An argument between my cousin and some guy on yahoo. worth the read.. the thing about gun control is the government isn't going to take away your guns. They are trying to limit high capacity mags because unless you are at war you
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Gun Control

An argument between my cousin and some guy on yahoo. worth the read

-1
Views: 1170
Favorited: 1
Submitted: 01/20/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to jasonmaki E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#5 - chevycowboy (01/20/2013) [+] (4 replies)
the thing about gun control is the government isn't going to take away your guns. They are trying to limit high capacity mags because unless you are at war you don't need to hold more than 10 rounds in one mag at a time.
#13 - Womens Study Major (03/06/2013) [-]
Also, the guy that shot alot of people at the Batman movie purposely drove to a theater that did not allow guns on the premise, so he wouldn't get shot by his victims. Eat that liberal hippies.
#12 - Womens Study Major (03/06/2013) [-]
What is with all these stupid people saying, "only ten rounds" or "only one bullet at a time" if they were truely honest they want all weapons banned and we would live in a utopia communistic society (which every attempt has failed in history). It doesn't matter how many bullets a fire arm can handle. Thats why the framers of the constitution didn't put that clause it in there, because the knew it was irrelevent.

Besides under the 2nd ammendment CANNONS are legal to own. Until liberals thought that was wrong. At the signing of the constitution one could own a cannon, and who cares about bullets when you could level a building. The magazine capacity issue is irrelevent. Just a red herring to pass full slavery laws on citizens so they can be controled like in the feudal system of the dark ages. Read the "Road to Serfdom"
#2 - Womens Study Major (01/20/2013) [-]
But why do you need weapons that can shoot more than ten rounds? or ones that shoot a lot of rounds very quickly?
crimes stopped by guns are often stopped by the threat of them rather than because the criminal has been wounded or killed.
A bullet shot from a musket or flintlock is as likely to kill or cause as much damage as modern day guns.
Gun Control is good, let the people have what they need to defend themselves, but recognize that some people are too dangerous to use this right safely and no one needs a gun that can shoot over ten rounds or can empty a clip in little over a second.

TL:DR Gun control good, Gun prohibition bad.
#1 - Womens Study Major (01/20/2013) [+] (2 replies)
just try and take my guns!! i will shoot your ******* face off. if you take my guns whats from stopping you from taking my right to speak away? whats to stop criminals from still using these guns only now i have a less chance to survie. all im trying to say is if the teachers were allowed to have a gun locked in there desk then sandy hook would have been diffrent.
 Friends (0)