Upload
Login or register
Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#11 - ninivr
Reply +39
(01/19/2013) [-]
In all the rest of the ******* world "low abiding citizens" go around without carrying guns, and they're ok... even better than US citizens!
#18 to #11 - Maroon ONLINE
Reply -12
(01/19/2013) [-]
I'd prefer dying quickly from being shot to lying in pool of my blood waiting for the shock to kill me after I've been stabbed.
#20 to #18 - sovereignsunkown
Reply +7
(01/19/2013) [-]
common misconception. you will NOT die quickly from being shot, it's the same as being stabbed. you would only die quickly from a shot to the head, neck, center of mass, left ventricle or inner thigh, the same places you'd die from a knife wound (bar the head, it's pretty hard to get stabbed through the skull). most people (criminals) who would shoot you, wouldn't have very good aim and would most likely shoot you in the lower torso, which would allow you 6-18 hours of life, just like a knife wound.
#40 to #20 - bakedbread
Reply +1
(01/19/2013) [-]
bullets mushroom on impact and can cause massive internal damage especially if it fragments, theres alot of area on your body where a bullet wound can kill you in a hurry, besides theres restrictions on the size of a blade you can carry, a 3-4 inch blade is deaadly by all means but not nearly as deady as a firearm, ive nearly decapitated a deer with a .243 which is relatively small, cant do that with a knife
#70 to #40 - dadukesta
Reply -1
(01/19/2013) [-]
123 people were shot in the Aurora Colorado shooting, only 12 died.
#153 to #70 - bakedbread
Reply -1
(01/20/2013) [-]
true, but in most incidents where you would get shot would be from a robbery or something similar where it would be much closer range, and it really isnt hard to somewhat accurately fire a weapon without aiming in close ranges, and any larger caliber weapon can quite easily tear your internal organs to shreds, my buddy shot himself in the leg with a 9mm and just that almost killed him it went right past a major artery
#154 to #153 - dadukesta
Reply 0
(01/20/2013) [-]
Say that to Rick.
Say that to Rick.
#15 to #11 - nightstar
Reply +6
(01/19/2013) [-]
Is that why England has camera's all over the place? To record all the peace and happiness?
#17 to #15 - anon
Reply 0
(01/19/2013) [-]
I'll let you in on a secret basically none of them work, they are just there to screw with criminals heads.
#41 to #17 - anon
Reply 0
(01/19/2013) [-]
Seems legit.
#60 to #41 - fooljamable
Reply 0
(01/19/2013) [-]
Its pretty much true actually. Plus the ones that do work have so low resolution they can't see **** half the time anyway.
#116 to #60 - Faz
Reply 0
(01/19/2013) [-]
Thats actually not true, the majority of security cameras are working and they are not that low of a resolution that criminals are not caught, there are more working security cameras in Britain than there are people. Anyway i don't see why people have such a problem with security cameras, it helps punish criminals and doesn't effect me negatively in any way.
#151 to #116 - nightstar
Reply 0
(01/20/2013) [-]
Mission creep happens.