Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#468 - anon (01/18/2013) [-]
Think about it like this: if they ban guns, they have to ban knives, because knives can also kill. Then rope too, and bleach. And drugs, because they can all kill.

Why not sex, while their at it? It transmits diseases which can shorten lives.

Just think about it. No sex, no knives, no rope, no drugs. And no sharp corners. They can kill. We'll be living in circles.
User avatar #536 to #468 - mcrut (01/18/2013) [-]
your logic is so out of place
#578 to #536 - trollnot (01/18/2013) [-]
>your logic is out of place.

Not really


Have you ever heard of the slippery slope theory?
>Uk bans guns
>Less gun murders still has gun crime
>tens of thousands are now being stabbed to death.
>UK Bans knives

Ill keep my gun thank you
User avatar #734 to #578 - mcrut (01/18/2013) [-]
then dont say stupid **** to make a point, guns were made to be killing machines, while sex is not, comparing the two makes him a dumb ass in my opinion, why do gun owners get all but clenched when the government wants to take away something that is not needed and highly dangerous
User avatar #740 to #734 - trollnot (01/18/2013) [-]
You are literally too stupid to argue with. What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand.

You say they are super dangerous but cant even comprehend how they even work. This limiting the second amendment ******** would be like the government censoring the internet because "The founding fathers had no idea the internet could exist so it doesn't apply to the 1st amendment"

I would gladly fight for your rights any given day of the week why will you not fight for mine, which technically is also yours.
User avatar #749 to #740 - mcrut (01/18/2013) [-]
All right but was the internet invented as something intended to kill others? We only made guns to be killing machines it would be nice to know someone has even more difficulty to get their hands on a deadly weapon
User avatar #767 to #749 - trollnot (01/18/2013) [-]
Most firearms were not intended to be used for combat the Ar-15 platform which the m16/m4 family comes from was originally invented for pest control before our military found out it was good for taking out targets at long ranges. The 300 Winchester magnum was originally made for competition shooters to use on long range targets then someone decide to snipe people with it.

Most of these psychos friends and family knew they were going to do this **** weeks before it happens but say NOTHING. these current new proposals will do nothing to curb the violence btw. Only 3% of gun crimes are commited with a long rifle. "Assault weapons" being a sub division. Did you know more people are killed by bolt action hunting rifles which are also long rifles then assault weapons.

Colombine and the west Hollywood shootout were during the Clinton AWB as well which is the same one we are trying to pass again as well.

The west hollywood shoot out two men had body armor and SELECTIVE FIRE AK47s
Which body armor was banded in the AWB and the weapons were banned long before the in 1986. Criminals do not follow rules.
User avatar #775 to #767 - mcrut (01/18/2013) [-]
all right then, but why do we need rifles or should i put out guns in general with extended magazines? And honestly i don't care either way but personally i want to see some sort of mental health reform than gun reform, bc gun discussions just make people to angry and personal, i have yet to see some one get angry over a mentally disabled person and them getting treatment
User avatar #776 to #775 - trollnot (01/18/2013) [-]
They have a right to be angry like is said its called the BILL OF RIGHTS FOR A REASON

The 1st and the 2nd

They are rights not given to you by the government, but BY GOD even if you don't believe in flying spaghetti monsters they are something bigger then the government.
User avatar #778 to #776 - mcrut (01/18/2013) [-]
please tell me you went to the whole rights given by god....
User avatar #639 to #578 - sketchE ONLINE (01/18/2013) [-]
the slippery slope is actually a logical fallacy
User avatar #653 to #639 - trollnot (01/18/2013) [-]
Keep believing that.
The UK is proof

>Ban guns
> Ban sharp Objects
> Ban Kitchen knives

That's 3 ******* down lets see how bad it gets from here.
User avatar #737 to #653 - mcrut (01/18/2013) [-]
it is a logical fallicy
User avatar #671 to #653 - sketchE ONLINE (01/18/2013) [-]
first off i dont support gun control. second off the slippery slope is a logical fallacy. for instance if vietnam goes communist so will the rest of asia. that is a common example of the fallacy
User avatar #678 to #671 - trollnot (01/18/2013) [-]
then Im not going to argue with you. We are "On the same side" this is over
#521 to #468 - leveltwowizard (01/18/2013) [-]
Death also seems to be a pretty big killer, we should probably ban that.
User avatar #631 to #521 - schneidend (01/18/2013) [-]
You're on to something!
User avatar #505 to #468 - jasonbomb (01/18/2013) [-]
i say we just ban hands, hands make people kill people. stubbing eachother to death would also be alot more amusing.
User avatar #497 to #468 - InglushMayjur (01/18/2013) [-]
Cars and cigs need to be banned too. Much higher annual death toll than guns.
 Friends (0)