boys and girls. setting girls straight since 1970.. inb4 feminist rage boys and girls setting straight since 1970 inb4 feminist rage
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (381)
[ 381 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
88 comments displayed.
#3 - misterewan
Reply +354
(01/13/2013) [-]
**misterewan rolled a random image posted in comment #90 at So I was playing Metro... ** a sexist's face after seeing this post.
#244 to #3 - vegetatheprince
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
well, ****
#373 to #3 - sammyjankiis
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
Librarian likes your roll,
#144 to #3 - nyawgga
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#49 to #3 - hirollin
Reply +2
(01/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#101 to #3 - fivewordminimum **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#223 to #101 - odapac
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
Last Light? OOOOOOH MAN, let's do this.
#313 to #223 - fivewordminimum **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#103 to #3 - NutHut ONLINE
Reply +7
(01/14/2013) [-]
The Library.

Worst ******* mission in the entire game.
#31 to #3 - notarepostlol
Reply +13
(01/13/2013) [-]
that's the greatest roll ever rolled
#4 to #3 - texasbarbie
Reply +20
(01/13/2013) [-]
such a good roll...such a good roll...
#1 - powerlevel
Reply +154
(01/13/2013) [-]
inb4 feminist rage
#2 - wolfbananabear
Reply +100
(01/13/2013) [-]
Nyohohoho
#307 to #2 - anon
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
*male twins*
#316 to #2 - dapianoman
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#317 to #316 - dapianoman
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
***********, got beat by anon. props.
#10 to #2 - captainfuckitall ONLINE
Reply +9
(01/13/2013) [-]
As funny as that is, you used that meme wrong
#83 - doctorjosh
Reply +75
(01/14/2013) [-]
Boys now
#356 to #83 - vlauer
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
Not this faggot again..
Not this faggot again..
#87 to #83 - flipoutt
Reply +7
(01/14/2013) [-]
That was a guy?
#85 to #83 - Jeff C ONLINE
Reply +10
(01/14/2013) [-]
....well you were awfully quick to use that. Tbh, it kinda creeps me the **** out just looking at
#70 - heartlessrobot
Reply +61
(01/13/2013) [-]
This image has expired
To all the bitches and white knights flipping ****, please note it says "1970s childrens book", not "2013 guide on how to live your life". Nobody gives a damn how analcrusaded you are. Now **** this gay ****, time for a spiderman thread.
#154 to #70 - awesomenessdefined
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
If you dare use that **** show as an example of spiderman, so help me god...
#265 to #70 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
So it is time then, DUMP TIME THAT IS
So it is time then, DUMP TIME THAT IS
#267 to #265 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#269 to #267 - popkornking
Reply +2
(01/14/2013) [-]
Oh yeah, all that dump
#270 to #269 - popkornking
Reply +2
(01/14/2013) [-]
#271 to #270 - popkornking
Reply +2
(01/14/2013) [-]
#272 to #271 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#274 to #272 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#275 to #274 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#276 to #275 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#278 to #276 - popkornking
Reply +2
(01/14/2013) [-]
#280 to #278 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#281 to #280 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#282 to #281 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#283 to #282 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#284 to #283 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#286 to #284 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
A little late but whatever
#287 to #286 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#298 to #287 - whargarbler ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#288 to #287 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#297 to #288 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#300 to #297 - popkornking
+1
(01/14/2013) [-]
Welp, that's all folks
#290 to #288 - popkornking
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#292 to #290 - popkornking
+2
(01/14/2013) [-]
#296 to #290 - popkornking
+1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#295 to #290 - popkornking
+1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#294 to #290 - popkornking
+1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#293 to #290 - popkornking
+1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#291 to #290 - popkornking
+1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#315 to #272 - cjasper
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
#100 to #70 - coolcalx
Reply +4
(01/14/2013) [-]
hell to the yes
hell to the yes
#112 to #70 - neverposting
Reply +5
(01/14/2013) [-]
I concur.
#91 to #70 - dontrixster **User deleted account**
+6
has deleted their comment [-]
#76 to #70 - hydraetis
Reply +12
(01/13/2013) [-]
I shall happily oblige
#80 to #76 - sedativechunk ONLINE
Reply +10
(01/14/2013) [-]
Me too!
#5 - KayRed
Reply -55
(01/13/2013) [-]
Women actually make better pilots than men.
#131 to #5 - xnotcreative
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
If women are considered to be worse than men at driving, what the **** makes you think they're better at something more complicated?
#241 to #131 - miaandvinny
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
That's a sterotype, not exactly the truth.
#243 to #241 - xnotcreative
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
You're equally ****** retarded.

Stereotypes don't just ****** make themselves up, they're conclusions made from inductive reasoning.

In other words, women across history must have done something for us to conclude that they are bad drivers.

Yes, they may be more careful than guys are, but that's only because they can't afford to NOT be careful because of their poor reaction skills.
#246 to #243 - miaandvinny
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
Sterotypes (for the most part) originated from a while ago. They had some truth to them back then (A lot of Jews being bankers a while ago because being a banker was a crappy job, which led to people believing Jewish people can handle money and are greedy), but in todays modern age and time their is little truth to them.
#254 to #246 - xnotcreative
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
Wow... I... I seriously can't tell whether or not you're actually serious...

I'm not sure when the first vehicular car was invented but... I do know when they were mass produced. If my memory serves me correctly, it was around 1901, and during this time and age. Which means it's only been a little more than 100 years since cars have been around.

I'm sure this is recent enough for us to conclude that all of the percentages we gathered up are still relevant.
#257 to #254 - miaandvinny
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
Do you know how much have changed in 100 years?! Wasn't the 19th amendment signed in 1920?
#285 to #257 - xnotcreative
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
All these statistics are static, meaning they haven't changed. Women have always been more careful, but guys have always just had better reactions.

It doesn't even have to be about driving, we're just all around better at activities that require good hand eye co-ordination.

Such as: Driving, sports, video games, and last second decisions.
#299 to #285 - miaandvinny
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
Not always true.

Driving: Once again, I knwo a lot of good female drivers.

Sports: When I was in highschool, I could shoot a basketball better than most of my guy friends on the boy team could. (Not saying I could outplay them, I just had better aim)

Video Games: That may be because they tend to play video games more (girls play farm vill, boys play call of duty)

last second decisions: When?
#308 to #299 - xnotcreative
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
I know a lot of good female drivers too, but I've yet to find one that can actually beat me in a race.

What the ***** the point of playing basketball if you're not going to do cross-overs and lay ups? Speaking of cross-overs, I've yet to find a women that can actually do one successfully.

We have a steeper learning curve when it comes to activities revolving around reaction skills.

Try calling the names of a boy, and a girl, then throw a basketball at each of them, and you'll know what the **** I'm talking about. In general, the male will attempt to catch the ball, as to where the female will turn back around, duck, and screech.
#392 to #308 - miaandvinny
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
I haven't raced anyone yet, boy or girl, because I find no need to, so I know little about it and cannot argue.

Actually, the majority of girls on my team and myself could do a pretty decent crossover and made almost all of our layups.

I have found no research on that study, please provide the source.

That's the fight or flight instinct. In general, girls will flee from danger, while boys will comfort it. It's not reaction time, it's just how they react in general.
#400 to #392 - xnotcreative
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
The last segment of your reply speaks volumes.

There's no way a person that would confront danger would have instincts worse or even on par with that of someone that runs away.

Also, the only women I've actually seen that actually confronts danger are mothers, but that's only when their babies are at risk.
#402 to #400 - miaandvinny
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
So um, can I have a source for the studies about the steeper learning curve? It's not that I don't believe you, it's just that I want to see proof.

Men, in general, are stronger, while women would rely on males for protection (this happens less now) This is not because of reaction time, but because of the fact that males are generally stronger and have a better chance in a fight against an enemy due to the fact that they can punch stronger and get punched more. Instincts are there to keep you alive, and it works for both genders (for the most part)


I've seen many women back away from danger, because they would have gotten hurt if they didn't and there was no need to put themselves on risk (no people they oculd save) That's not weak, that's smart. Why put yourself in danger unless someone you love (or, for very heroic people, anybody at all) is at danger and you want to save the,
#8 to #5 - photonmik
Reply +30
(01/13/2013) [-]
Said no one ever.
#11 to #5 - recoveryone
Reply +42
(01/13/2013) [-]
You know, you could have saved the thumbing down by explaining this by stating two things, 1), a generally small body build allows a female to feel less cramped in a cockpit(haha, recoveryone said cock), which is generally very confined in military aircraft. 2) Women are generally less susceptible to eye disorders(such as colorblindness, vision is very important when piloting aircraft).
#44 to #11 - enkmaster
Reply 0
(01/13/2013) [-]
Yes, but how does that affect the actual piloting of the aircraft? If you were to take a poll between licensed pilots, you would find no difference. Hell, someone with colour blindness isnt even allowed to fly a plane, so that point is irrelevant.
#13 to #11 - KayRed
Reply -36
(01/13/2013) [-]
Correct, but I always enjoy a good **** storm. Especially when some one else validates my point.
#25 to #13 - nosauceforyou
Reply +14
(01/13/2013) [-]
You like **********? Well, in that case, take this red thumb.
You like **********? Well, in that case, take this red thumb.
#19 to #13 - recoveryone
Reply +13
(01/13/2013) [-]
Do you also enjoy the red thumbs that come along with it?
#9 to #5 - xzynth
Reply +61
(01/13/2013) [-]
I enjoyed the part were you explained why.
#32 - freakeyebilly
Reply +51
(01/13/2013) [-]
#328 - EdwardNigma ONLINE
Reply +41
(01/14/2013) [-]
**** it feels good having a dick.
#365 to #328 - swagbot
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
This ******* picture...   
every god-damned time...



This ******* picture...
every god-damned time...
#369 to #365 - EdwardNigma ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
Then you might also enjoy my other version.
#333 to #328 - thebestofmurder
Reply +24
(01/14/2013) [-]
It's glorious....Glorious.
#79 - snakefire
Reply +41
(01/14/2013) [-]
This whole goddamn thread is chocked full of stupid men with a superiority complex and stupid femenists also with a superiority complex.
This whole goddamn thread is chocked full of stupid men with a superiority complex and stupid femenists also with a superiority complex.
#116 to #79 - stallwallwriter
Reply +3
(01/14/2013) [-]
Everybody's out there arguing and meanwhile I'm just sitting here laughing at your gif.
Everybody's out there arguing and meanwhile I'm just sitting here laughing at your gif.
#28 - weirdoo
Reply +41
(01/13/2013) [-]
**weirdoo rolled a random image posted in comment #72 at Close ** How feminazis would react
#29 to #28 - weirdoo
Reply +8
(01/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#51 to #28 - spyrothehedgehog
Reply +15
(01/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture